“India needs to cherish and nurture its Muslim population that is integrated and considers itself Indian”, said former US president Barack Hussein Obama. Understandably, the former President knew nothing about the tens of thousands of Indian Muslims who celebrate every time bravehearts of the Indian armed forces are martyred in a terrorist encounter, and mourn when a terrorist is shot dead.
While agents of Islamism masquerading as liberals are working overtime to spread the “Muslims are being victimized in India” narrative, it is crucial for modern western democracies to learn how Islam has been brutalizing India for centuries, and despite the republic structure replacing monarchies and democracy overthrowing feudalism, the South Asian democracy still reels under the Islamic invasion that commenced a thousand years ago.
While the Arabic invaders are known to have invaded Hindu temples with lightning speed, multiple times, leftist historians held that these repeated plunderings were guided by the greed for riches and not from the burning hatred for the Kaffirs. What needs to be pointed out is that the Arab plunderers didn’t just leave with the gold and the rubies. They ravaged the temples and crushed the idols of the deities. And that the leftists conceal, out of deep-rooted hatred for the idol-worshippers, the non-Muslims.
Had it been the greed for wealth alone that motivated the invaders, Bakhtiyar Khilji wouldn’t have burnt down the great three-storey Nalanda library that housed over 9 million books containing precious and diverse knowledge in medicine, astronomy, science, and many other fields benefiting humankind. The fire burned for three months. Imagine the tolerance of Indians that still allow a railway station, Bakhtiyarpur Junction, to be named after this barbarian, just an hour away from the former library site.
The South Indian Tipu Sultan was notorious for the brutal persecution of Hindus and Christians, and for carrying out forced conversions. The Muslim-abetting governments of India celebrate this brutal Sultan’s birth anniversary, despite the fact that he once urged the Islamic rulers of the far-off Arab lands to invade India. Anecdotes of Islamic atrocities are frequent in 1000 years of Indian history; Hindus are tolerant while Muslims defend and take pride in the brutality of their historical ancestors.
Muslims in modern India accuse Hindus of being intolerant, conveniently forgetting how 70 years ago, Islamists dismembered this country to carve out an Islamic nation.
After Muslim leaders such as Muhammad Ali Jinnah and Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy called for the genocide of thousands of unarmed Hindus by calling for Direct Action Day and the Noakhali Riots, a referendum was held for eligible Muslims to vote for or against the creation of Pakistan. The outcome of that vote is general knowledge. Did they all relocate to that newly formed Islamic paradise?
Students in colleges such as Aligarh Muslim University reverently hold portraits of Jinnah on the Indian university campus, making light of the numerous Hindu deaths he caused. Students of Jamia Milia University eulogize terrorists from Pakistani jihad terror outfits who were killed in a fire fight with Indian Army. Hindus tolerate this. Had the Hindus been intolerant, they would have demanded that Hinduism be declared as the state religion of the remaining India. But they bowed down to the “secularism” enforced by the Muslim-favoring government.
Distorted stories of Muslim Victimhood
Sikhs, Jains and Christians are the religious minorities in India. Presenting Muslims (who at 180 million, stand tall as the second-largest religious group) as the perennially victimized minority is a political strategy executed deftly by Muslim-abetting political parties and their allies.
The well-connected media ecosystem that is burning the midnight oil to apprise the world of how one poor Muslim was lynched by the Hindus cleverly hides details such as “this Muslim was a thief caught by locals while on his ‘business’; he was beaten but handed over alive and well to the local police, and died of a heart attack“. Before buying these distorted sob-stories, take a minute to think how would you treat a robber who broke into your house.
Stories of “Muslim lynched for beef” started floating suddenly after the pro-Muslim party lost the general elections in 2014. Indian Christians consume beef, too; have you ever read reports of a Christian being lynched for this in India? Mainstream media outlets that despise the Christians in Western countries equally are employed only to generate sympathies for Muslims, although they do so based on fabrication and the forgery of facts. Most of the “Muslim lynched for beef”, “Muslim lynched for Hindu religious slogan” stories were determined to be fake in the courtroom.
Intolerance of India’s Second Largest Religious Group
A Hindu woman, Jahnobi Gogoi of Assam’s Nazira, was attacked by machete-wielding Muslim neighbours for watching television at her residence last week. Strangled and hit brutally by Samiruddin Ali and Modibul Rahman, Jahnobi was threatened with dire consequences for watching television during Ramadan by the local Muslims.
After Tablighi Jamaat members accelerated the spread of Covid-19 in India, TJ supporter Mohammad Sona shot a Dalit man dead in Uttar Pradesh for criticizing the outfit in April 2020.
Back in January, enraged by a frivolous quarrel among children, Muslim neighbours set Dhanprasad on fire in Madhya Pradesh.
A poor farmer was charred to death by his Muslim neighbours for celebrtaing India’s victory against Pakistan during the Cricket World Cup held last year.
These are just a few of a plethora of instances.
Muslims claim absolute rights over towns and neighbourhoods where they dominate numerically, and attack non-Muslim marriage processions, Hindu religious processions, or Hindu pilgrims walking barefoot through their colonies. After Kashmir, Hindus in Kairana and Meerut were chased out of their homes. Hindu celebrations are deferred in order to accommodate Muslim festivities falling in the same time of the year.
A 200-strong Muslim mob vandalized a hospital and attacked residential doctors after a patient of advanced age succumbed to his medical condition in West Bengal; the state police overlooked the incident in order to protect “secularism”.
While Muslims go about their economic activities flaunting their skull caps and waving their Islamic flag high, they call the police on poor Hindu fruit vendors for positioning religious emblems on their vending cart. The Muslim-favoring cops rush to intimidate these vendors, despite the “Freedom of Religion” being granted by the Indian constitution to all citizens equally.
The constitution grants the Freedom of Expression also, but that doesn’t stop Indian Islamists from pursuing Middle Eastern authorities to apprehend and penalize Indians in those Islamic countries should they express an idea that is remotely hurtful to the fragile Islamist ego.
The quintessential proof of Islamists’ intolerance is the recent anti-CAA riots. Millions of Indian Muslims are upset with a law introduced to rescue Hindus, Christians and Sikhs who are suffering religious persecution in neighbouring Islamic countries, without challenging the status of Muslims in India.
The Hindus have learned to live with all this, without crying victimhood bitterly and incessantly. The media, since its dawn in India, has been conditioned to suppress these incidents and highlight them only when the religious identities of the victims and perpetrators are switched.
terry sullivan says
india should remove all moslems from india asap
Dude says
I was going to write something, but then thought that Radhika has done such fine job, I cannot add to it, especially from the other side of the planet.
I think our common response to their lies should just be laughter. They know they’re stupid, but don’t know how we know. Their foolish arguments seem logical (whatever that means) to them.
No more words, just laughter. And Radhika.
Pavithra says
While all she says is true, what is never mentioned is how Indian Hindus treat Christians in India. The enemy of my enemy is not always my friend.
b.a. freeman says
Pavithra, what U say is true, but if memory serves, most hindu belief systems incorporate non-violence; if my assumption is correct, then attacks by hindus on christians may be compared to attacks by christians on jews: they were religiously-justified attacks by those who did not understand that their own religion prohibited such attacks. are there hindu sects that have scriptural commands to commit violence against unbelievers?
Anjuli Pandavar says
Thank you, Radhika.
OTTER says
Obama was a Muslim admirer and a world class apologist for it.
If anyone has any doubt about the brutal nature of Islam in India, let me quote the ONE MAN, the ONE MAN who laid down his life for the chimerical pursuit of ‘Hindu-Muslim Unity.
Yes, it’s Gandhi. In ‘The Essential Gandhi’, An Anthology of His Writings, His Life, Work and Ideas’ published by ‘Vintage Spiritual Classics’ 1962, on page, 184, he is quoted as:
” The sword is the emblem of Islam. But Islam was born in an environment where the message of sword was and still remains the supreme law.”… “The sword is too much in evidence among Mussalmans. If must be sheathed if Islam is to be what it means— peace.”
Notice that he too was under the illusion that the ‘essence’ of Islam or ‘true Islam’ was ‘peace’ (just like the fool George Bush thought) BUT when it comes to the ACTIONS of Muslims, he told the truth.”
Gandhi also said, ” Muslims are bullies and Hindus cowards,’ See: https://www.rediff.com/news/2000/jul/27column.htm
The sword was never sheathed. In Islam it cannot be sheathed. It is their law. Why don’t we recognise this?
I have seen how their numbers have increased and how every political party now bows and grovels before them as hold the power to decide elections. In 2014 and 2019, I do know know but what miracle Modi won, but can say with confidence that in the next election in 2024, they will get wiped out because of Muslims numbers and Hindu turncoats.
Just like leftists Christians and Jews in the US and the West, who go along and bow and simper before Muslims, India is not far off from being reconquered.
Sadly, Hindus never remember and Muslims never forget.
tiredofstupid says
I would love to see the hindus treat the muslims just like the buddhists in myanmar treat the rohingya muslims
ainu says
That time is coming soon. Because people are waking up.
Claudius says
The Hindus are defending themselves, even using modern tools like WhatsApp and Facebook to great effect. Here is an article (written by a Muslim) about the counter-jihad in India: https://www.wired.com/story/indias-frightening-descent-social-media-terror/
Sammeer says
Why shouldn’t the Hindus defend themselves after being butchered for so long. Today a Hindu child was sacrificed to make a new “prayer hall” more powerful
gravenimage says
The fabricated victimhood and unaddressed intolerance of Muslims in India
………………….
Good article. We see Muslims using this fake victimhood all over the world.
infidel says
GI… these mad animals are now playing the same game of false victimhood and intolerance in the West too..
gravenimage says
Grimly true, Infidel.
Israel says
Are you sure that the invaders were Arabs.
I mean, the description of the Muslim invasion of India and its entailing massacres, atrocities and genocide are accurate, but the invaders were non-Arab Muslims.
Almost all Arabs are Muslims, but less than half of all Muslims are Arabs.
It’s inportant to understand that the behaviors described here are linked to Muslim supremacism, not to the specific Arab ethnicity. It’s the Turkish Muslims who invaded and burnt down Central and Eastern Europe and there were the Central Asian Muslim who did the carnage in India.
gravenimage says
Most of the original invaders were Arab–later, many of the Muslims who spread Islam there were the descendants of Hindu Indians.
Varun says
There were different waves of Moslem invasions. The first ones were certainly Arabs. But the later invaders were Turko-Afghans and Central Asian Turks. And yes, in the South of India, the majority of Moslem rulers were indigenised.
gravenimage says
True, Varun.
Jayell says
“The fabricated victimhood and unaddressed intolerance of Muslims in India”…..
Very nice title, and sums up the whole business of ‘islam perfectly whichever society it’s been allowed to contaminate..
But it must be all too apparent that this whole ‘victimhood’ routine typical of muslims is merely inverted egocentric supremacist bigotry at about the same level as the demanding baby who throws it s toys out of the pram (stroller); or the insufferably infantile spoilt brat who thinks that the whole world revolves around it, owes it everything it wants, and stamps its little feet whilst making a hell of noise just to be the centre of attention. And then maybe starts making up stories in order to get its way if the stamping and screaming doesn’t do the trick, as possibly exemplified in another recent story on this site where two New York Times writers (whose names suspiciously suggest muslim heritage) demonstrate all the intellectual integrity of a third-rate Walt Disney screenplay writer to try to kid us that Hindus are responsible for the the evils in India!!!
In the good old days, ‘charming” little characters like this would be told to shut up then get a clip round the ear if they didn’t. Unfortunately, you’d get arrested for trying that kind of ‘therapy’ these days, and things get even more tricky when nasty, lying little spoilt brats turn into nasty, lying BIG spoilt brats with too much money, too easy access to things that go ‘bang’, and too many opportunistic hangers-on who can’t resist the temptation to make use their insufferable spoilt-brat histrionics for their own political ends.
DP111 says
“India needs to cherish and nurture its Muslim population that is integrated and considers itself Indian”, said former US president Barack Hussein Obama.
Only a committed Muslim would think so.
Rob says
“India needs to cherish and nurture its Muslim population that is integrated and considers itself Indian”
Let’s rewrite as: ‘Pakistan needs to cherish and nurture its Hindu population that is integrated and considers itself Pakistani’.
Hell, they cant’ even nurture their Muslim population given the rape and butchery in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) in the 70s.
True to type Bangladesh is now persecuting Hindus even though 000s of Bengalis trekked across the border into to escape the Pak Army and eventually the Indian Army had to intervene.
ed says
hussein was never president
DDMisra says
Thanks to Radhika Singh for this excellent essay.