“Illegal migrants crossing the English Channel in small boats threaten to drown themselves or their children in order to keep French ships back, according to reports.”
Yet it has been reported that the French navy was actively escorting illegal migrants to Britain with help from UK border force; and trying to cover it up.
It has also emerged that the Boris Johnson government has been flying Muslim migrants into Britain from Greece, adding to the 1,000 illegals who arrived during the coronavirus lockdown.
Contradictory information and hearsay accounts continue to proliferate ever since the truth about the swarm of illegal Muslim migrants into the UK during the coronavirus lockdown was exposed. Only then did British and French authorities begin concerted efforts to control public opinion rather than deal with the serious problem of Muslim migration, which has led to a crisis of crime and chaos for both countries.
To avoid being called “racist” and “Islamophobic” and to appease European globalists, the UK and French governments have forced the public to endure the slow unraveling of the rule of law in their countries. The mindset of these migrants who are using their own children as human shields to guarantee their entry into the UK is telling about what to expect from them.
It seems clear, however, that migrants behaving in this manner would be committing a variety of crimes under international law and the domestic laws of both Britain and France — and yet neither country has given any indication that it is arresting the illegal migrants crossing to Britain for such acts. It also remains unclear why the migrants could not, once picked up by the UK Border Force or received on shore, still be sent back to France, as the international conventions against so-called “push-backs” are not legally binding.
“Report: Channel Migrants ‘Threaten to Throw Their Children Into the Water’ to Keep French Away,” by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, May 29, 2020:
Illegal migrants crossing the English Channel in small boats threaten to drown themselves or their children in order to keep French ships back, according to reports.
Migrants from coronavirus-infected camps on the French coast have been crossing the English Channel in record numbers, with many seemingly being escorted into British territorial waters by French ships rather than intercepted and turned around.
The British government, which has paid the French government millions of pounds to stop migrants from using their country as a launchpad to Britain, has defended this state of affairs — exposed by Brexit leader turned investigative reporter Nigel Farage — on grounds that the French authorities allegedly cannot intercept the migrants request assistance under international law — and that the British authorities, similarly, cannot turn the boats around but must bring them the rest of the way to England to lodge their bogus asylum claims.
Many members of the public are sceptical of these explanations, given the Australians implemented a successful policy of turning back migrant boats years ago — but new reports reveal the French have claimed a new excuse for not intercepting migrants, as the individuals apparently threaten to throw themselves or their children overboard if their ships get too close.
“When rigid-hulled inflatable dinghies are approached by French patrol vessels, the migrants threaten to jump overboard or throw their children into the water to prevent officials from helping them,” reported Richard Ford, home correspondent for The Times, on Thursday.
“The French have little option but to back off and shadow the boats until they are close to a UK Border Force vessel,” he suggested.
It seems clear, however, that migrants behaving in this manner would be committing a variety of crimes under international law and the domestic laws of both Britain and France — and yet neither country has given any indication that it is arresting the illegal migrants crossing to Britain for such acts.
It also remains unclear why the migrants could not, once picked up by the UK Border Force or received on shore, still be sent back to France, as the international conventions against so-called “push-backs” are not legally binding.
Home Secretary Priti Patel is “planning to bring in new laws after Britain leaves the EU to make it easier to return cross-Channel migrants to France”, according to The Telegraph.
The wording of the report, perhaps unintentionally, exposes the illusory nature of Brexit — which technically took place in January — at present, as while Britain remains in the present “transition period” with the EU it remains a member-state in all but name, still subject to the bloc’s laws, judges, trade policy, and migration regime….
terry sullivan says
thats their decision–they have done it before–they can bang more kids out later
we must deal with this invasion now
Ned Kelly says
The last UK govt was flying in 150 Africans direct to UK every night under darkness. I guess this is still happening.
Rufolino says
I understood that the principal motive for Brexit was to detach Britain from the suicidal mass-immigration policies of the EU. Didn’t make much difference, did it ?
James Lincoln says
Rufolino,
Apparently not, that was the UK’s last hope…
toomanyhobbies says
Dose anyone see a better reason to ban them from everywhere?
these people are mentally sick and should be barred from entrance!!!
Dan Roley says
Wow. Nigel Farage is not prone to lie.
Maureen Chaloner says
None of this is ‘heresay’.I live in the UK – Its all true. While we citizens were obeying the law and staying indoors to prevent the spread of the Coronavirus,these illegals were being brought in,some carrying the Virus. Also many came in,and are STILL coming in along our unguarded coastlines and just disappearing to God knows where. Its a SCANDAL of megga proportion, and the Tories are encouraging the Islamisation of our country and giving special status to Muslims. The Tories will NEVER get in power again if this continues,neither will Labour who are quite frankly the Muslim party of GB and far worse! WE WILL elect a Right Wing government next time!
Roger Woodhouse says
Yes indeed.If only we had a true’right wing party to vote for.At the moment we have a conglomerate of small rightwing parties all vieing for your vote but non of them large enough to take on the present establishment parties.Only Nigel Farage could command the kind of support needed to bring this government down.Untill he is ‘forced’ to take up the challenge Britain is doomed to further decline and ultimate Islamisation.Join a rightwing party.Stop voting for the two establishment parties!
CogitoErgoSum says
So if they are willing to kill their own children to achieve their goal of getting to Britain what will they be willing to do to achieve their other goals once they do get to Britain? If they would use their own children this way, how might they use the children of others? This is despicable. In fact, are the children they are bringing really their own?
Phil Copson says
“….So if they are willing to kill their own children to achieve their goal ….”
——————————————————————————————-
They’re not; the point of making a threat is to get your way – not to put it into practice: The migrants, the people-smugglers, the “human-rights” lawyers, the traitors in the UK Border Force, Home Office, and police, the nihilistic NGOs etc, all know that the French are only too glad to see the back of them, and will use any excuse to help them on their way.
It’s just as likely that French or English Lefties told them to make that threat: “Listen Abdul, officially speaking – we’re supposed to stop you from crossing the Channel, but unofficially – if you were to say to me that you’re so desperate that you’d even drown your own children…..I’d just have to let you carry on, wouldn’t I ? See what I mean…..?”
gravenimage says
This is likely true, Phil–but not necessarily.
The “Palestinians” put their children at deliberate risk all the time, and if they are ever killed or even endangered by the Israelis trying to defend themselves, they use it to excoriate the Jews.
In the same way, if any of these children on the boats was so much as injured, these thugs would scream that the UK is “Islamophobic”, has to let them in, and additionally has to pay them millions of pounds for supposed pain and suffering.
James Lincoln says
Human shields, gravenimage.
That’s how they operate…
Crusader 666 says
The principal reason that a majority of Britons voted to “Leave” the EU was to regain control of “who is allowed into the United Kingdom”. The Conservatives keep talking about “Brexit Britain voted to leave the EU”, but make absolutely NO effort to deter, repel , or repatriate the invaders!
I voted to Leave, but I hate to say that Britain has discarded the benefits of EU membership, whilst making ZERO effort to repel the invaders who are flooding across the English Channel, and (why does nobody except me, mention this?) the thousands who are slipping into Essex and Suffolk creeks at dead of night!
Wellington says
Crusader666: As an American I fully sympathize with your frustration. I had a sense back in 2016 when the Brexit vote was successful that the principal reason for this was unchecked immigration and not a bevy of stupid regulations by the EU restricting business, examples being what length a banana must be to sell it or when English fishermen could fish or where, though such regulations were also a major factor. The desire to quash the idiocy of political correctness I sense was also a reason why Brexit succeeded.
The EU is a disgrace and should be ended, just as the UN should be. Globalist endeavors invariably do more harm than good because mankind was never meant to function in a “globalist world” despite naive utopians or control-freaks asserting otherwise. City-states are too small to protect themselves but empires and all kinds of international efforts are equally flawed. The nation state concept, though not perfect (what is in human life?), was and remains the best of any possibility. The EU is determined to destroy this “last best hope” as is the Islamic sphere of mankind, the UN, anarchists, and other malfeasance operators like the CCP of China.
God knows the Labour Party looks permanently “out-to-lunch” as is the present Democratic Party here in America. But the worst of it all is that the Conservative Party of the UK as well as the Republican Party of America have essentially lost their collective balls. Seems more and more the choice is between dangerous and feckless—and not just in America and the UK but other Western nations like Canada.
From across the Pond it looks to this American observer, who esteems traditional Britain even though I have no British blood in me, that the UK is in profound, perhaps even irreversible, trouble. Lefthink and internationalism have a lot to do with this but so do cowardice and massive ignorance. Of course, the pure iniquity which is Islam (and nauseating excuses for it) plays a major role as well When a leader who does come along, like Trump, who tries to correct the insanity in the West in our time, he is demonized to the maximum.
Not looking good and it gives me no pleasure to state this. But nonetheless, I do wish the UK well. One could argue as it goes so goes all of western Europe, perhaps even all of the West.
Roger Woodhouse says
Good post Wellington.The situation in Britain has been building for decades.We are seeing the fruits of leftwing idealism backed and supported by the BBC and its fellow travellers in the rest of the swamp we call the’ media ‘here.So deeply entrenched now are leftwing ‘values’ that to reverse this trend (particularly amongst the young )in almost impossible.They can be considered ‘putty ‘in the hands of the establishment.Boris made all the right noises to get elected but we knew his heart really wasnt in the job of ‘making waves’Hes a tory and tories just want to keep the conservative ship on course heading God knows where!
David says
Im with you on all points, valid and accurate.
James Lincoln says
Wellington says,
“When a leader who does come along, like Trump, who tries to correct the insanity in the West in our time, he is demonized to the maximum.”
Yes, he elicits a visceral hatred among leftists and muslims.
Maybe that’s a good sign…
gravenimage says
Grimly this is largely true, Crusader and Wellington.
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
” threaten to drown themselves … in order to [get their way].”
Are there any historical precedents for this? Has anyone ever successfully drowned himself when thwarted? Drowning a child is easy; drowning yourself is harder, almost as hard as suicide by holding one’s breath.
CogitoErgoSum says
Well, it’s actually pretty easy to drown yourself if you don’t know how to swim – as long as the water goes over your head. It’s not too hard for a drowning man to take a would-be rescuer with him also. Rescuing a drowning man is quite dangerous until he stops struggling and flailing about in the water. Even a drowning child would be tricky to save.
If these migrants from France are taking children with them on overcrowded boats and/or are not providing the children with personal flotation devices, once on dry land the legal authorities should charge the adult migrants with endangerment of a child. Their behavior is disgusting.
Roger Woodhouse says
Difficult also to drown yourself while wearing a ‘life jacket’as all of them do
S Green says
Call their bluff and send them back or we will never stop them coming Australia did that under Abbot and they stopped
tim gallagher says
Yeah, people who are inhuman enough to kill their children to get their way are just the type of people you want to let into your country. They’ll make such wonderful citizens of the country that is stupid enough to accept such vile excuses for human beings as citizens. Their behaviour demonstrates clearly that they are not fit to be allowed into any civilised country and they should be rejected and sent back to the Muslim country they came from.
Roger Woodhouse says
Easier said than done Im afraid.First there has to be ‘the will’to do it which our government hasnt got .Secondly these illegals throw away all documents pertaing to their origins and France would not accept them back anyway.Why should they.They would have the same problem.No.Britain and the British people must be made aware that these people are here to stay and we will support them for the rest of their lives.Only then perhaps they just might refuse to accept them.Who knows? They just might stop voting for these two trougher parties.!
tim gallagher says
Good points you make, Roger. Once these invaders are let into any of our countries, it is very hard to get rid of them. Out here in Australia, the illegals that have lobbed here, and which the Government has rejected as refugees and seek to send back home, seem to tie the Government up forever in appeal courts, etc. I keep thinking that Hungary and the other Visegrad bloc countries have it right. Don’t let Muslims in the first place and you avoid all the problems they bring. But I guess that can only happen when enough of our populations wake up and vote for tougher Governments. As you say, it is all about having the will to do the right thing.
gravenimage says
UK: Muslim migrants crossing English Channel threaten to drown their own children to repel French ships
………………
*Oh my God*–can you imagine any person *actually* looking for a better life for their families threatening to do this? Clearly they know that the British care about their children more than they ever will.
Of course, the UK should deport all of these thugs back to where they came from.
mortimer says
People who would murder their own children to break the law and enter the UK illegally ???
Wow! What ideal immigrants! What crime would they be UNWILLING to commit?
Roger Woodhouse says
Its not uncommon for Muslims to kill their own children.It happens when a case of ‘honour’ is involved.Its all in their qu’ran.
Done this before says
The asylum seekers tried this tactic in Australia many years ago.
David says
Yes, folks should seek out the Utube interview with N Farage & ex Australian PM Abott, he knew, and did a fine job, and it stopped the illegals, until Oz voted in a lefty party and it started again.
Ade Fegan says
and when the left allow them in they may threaten
to kill their children every time they don’t get things their own way
Jake2169 says
We need a strong leader in Britain who cares passionately for their country. Until that happens we are lumbered with a government terrified of the word “Islamophobic”, a word that has been made up to exert pressure on people with no backbone, who cave in at the terrible prospect of being called names!! WTF!!
The Muslims are being shipped in by sea and air, and presumably this is all part of the great multicultural experiment that after decades has still not be abandoned by the politicians because they assume it is doing wonders for our country and is working fine. Just how much more evidence do they need before they realise their mistake? It isn’t working!! It’s been a disaster!
We now have Muslims threatening to drown their own children in order to be allowed into Britain, and we again have a situation where the authorities once again cave in to threats! It is ridiculous, it is apparently acceptable for these people to make threats and for those in authority to give in to the demands. Islam thrives on threatening others and using anyone or anything to enforce their demands. No doubt whatsoever, many Muslims given shelter in Britain will be absorbed into a Muslim community and will then make demands even after they have been afforded a safe place to live for themselves and their children. It’s apparent that the British government is not learning any lessons from past mistakes, those in authority are still cowering at the very thought of being labelled as “Islamophobic” The policies by most Western governments is strange, it’s confusing. Why are they welcoming the greatest danger to mankind in to their countries? Why are they putting the lives of their citizens at risk? Maybe investigations should be carried out in order to discover whether money has changed hands to allow this to happen, or are the politicians really that naive and stupid??
James Lincoln says
Jake2169,
muslims will continue to push for more and more – unless they are pushed back.
Always…
JDow says
Um, photograph them carrying out their threat then try them for murder. “Look what you made me do,” is not any kind of defense for obnoxious behavior.
{^_^}
Laura says
We have lots of bleak, uninhabited islands off the North coast of Scotland, I feel sure that one, or more, of them could be quickly transformed into a welcoming holding camp for would be asylum seekers? Basic shelter and plain cold food, with no internet access, no mobile phone signal and contact only with their respective embassies might encourage them to return home?
When we are in a desperate situation we need an equally desperate solution.
Janice Mermikli says
As long as the island is extremely remote, definitely uninhabited, and with no way of accessing the mainland, I agree. My relatives in Glasgow would concur with this, too,
Sukabumi Joe Joe says
I see no problem here. I’d say: go ahead, make my day, feel free.
No Muzzies Here says
This is a unique religion we’re dealing with here. This religion has the power to override the natural love a parent has for his child. Inspired by this religion, members have gleefully killed their children, their mother, their brothers and sisters. This religion is contrary to human nature.
roberta says
If they would do this to their own children, imagine what they would do to (your) children.
Oh wait a minute, we dont have to imagine, we can just go over to the right of this page and click on 2003 and read upward.
muslims are scum.
Rhiannon says
So much for family values.