Another manifestation of the Leftist-Islamic alliance. “Alhamdulillah” means “Thanks be to Allah” and is not usually said except by observant Muslims. Here again we see that radical Leftists have the same goal jihadis do: not just the removal of statues of Confederates, but much more. The targeting of Confederate statues is part of a larger effort to make Americans ashamed of our history as a whole, as the targeting of statues of Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, and Frederick Douglass shows. The ultimate goal is the destruction of the U.S. as a free republic, and the replacement of that republic with an authoritarian state. The nature of that authoritarian state, however, will be determined by the group that comes out on top after they turn on each other.
Why is this racist, black separatist “militia” shouting the Arabic phrase alhamdulillah?
Who funds them? Who trains them?
Georgia has a growing
problem ?? https://t.co/FjFaQEhVEy https://t.co/3d19juhPAs— Creeping Sharia (@creepingsharia) July 5, 2020
“‘We’re in your house… let’s go!’ Hundreds of heavily armed militia protest Confederate carving in Georgia,” by Shawn Langlois, Market Watch, July 5, 2020:
‘I don’t see no white militia, the boogie boys, the three percenters and all the rest of these scared-ass rednecks. We here, where the **** you at? We’re in your house… let’s go!’
That taunt came from one of an estimated 200 armed protesters who marched through Georgia’s Stone Mountain Park on Saturday and called for the removal of a sculpture depicting Gen. Robert E. Lee, Confederate President Jefferson Davis and Gen. Thomas J. “Stonewall” Jackson….
Reuters reported that the vast majority of the protesters, dressed in black and wearing face scarves, appeared to be African Americans, though various races were represented….
spartan says
heard thier leader in an interview declare they done with talking and that they want to create a black ethnostate within America, said they will take Texas. Makes sense now in light of the comments, they want to forcefully create a caliphate in the US.
gravenimage says
Thanks for that information, spartan.
brenrod says
these are the black muslims and black panthers, also muslims. The war on statues is a jihad from muslims. They destroy all statues, thats how you know this is a muslim funded and organized rioting and destruction.
Vladimir says
That’s what I’m thinking Benrod, because far too many Statues of people almost all African-Americans universally revere, like Lincoln and Fredrick Douglas and various abolitionists, and even of black civil war units, have been vandalized or pulled down. This is all beginning to look like an attempt at organized and coordinated Islamic insurgency right here in the United States.
Sun says
Would be great to find out more about this interview.
I found this press release. I see it as a call to infiltrate the BLM movement:
https://www.cair.com/press_releases/nihad-awad-in-solidarity-with-our-african-american-brothers-and-sisters/
oldbat says
actually, they want the whole southeast. to start.
MoBetter2 says
Why not let them have California? It is a festering $hithole already, so not much of a loss. Plus, it would be no problem to build a border wall around it to keep them in it….
mortimer says
As per the admission of the devoutly Marxist founders of BLM, the organization promotes communism. They are apparently promoting a communist revolution in America. One of the first things the Bolsheviks did in 1917 was to topple monuments and statues to Russian heroes, saints and tsars. This is the what BLM is copying. Americans have to speak out and organize to support the police who have to deal with these maniacs.
The Red-Green Axis will eventually founder because godless communists and fanatical Mohammedans cannot co-exist in the same organization. It has to become one or the other.
Frank Anderson says
Mortimer, you have your themes which have a good foundation. I hope my similar theme is from Post WWI Germany where there was a temporary alliance of the Nazis and Communists in the Reichstag. The Communists voted with the Nazis until they became “inconvenient”. And then there are several examples I believe in Iraq and Iran where the Communists lasted only long enough to put their allies in power and then suffer along with the other “misfits”. Communists have shown a number of times in history that they do not choose their allies well.
gravenimage says
Very true, Mortimer and Frank.
Stan Lore says
True. Thanks for reminding us. Made your point effectively and succinctly. Not easy.
mortimer says
Response to JL: There were several temporary alliances between Nazis, fascists and communists. The US Left is currently blurring the lines between fascism and Leftism. They are acting like fascists by cooperating with international industrialists. Leftists are currently Globalist-Fascists. All they need now is a charismatic leader. I shudder what will happen if they do.
However, the American Left is also repeating the early, ‘friendly’ pattern of conduct between the Soviets and the Asian Muslims … a temporary alliance. The American Left will continue to give the Muslims special privileges until they don’t need them, then they will be dumped.
Vladimir says
Reminds me of the Red Army during the Russian Civil War back in the 1920’s, I read that something like half their troops fighting the White Counter-Revolutionaries in Siberia were Muslims.
Sabri S. says
And it will be ISLAM…AlHamdulillah!!!….American muslims tend to be more docile and patient. The
rest of us here will wait it out. Nothing wrong with Socialism, as long as things are egalitarian and
eliminates the current white supremacy system.
Vladimir says
I used to be a Socialist too, until after I got back from my first visit to the former Soviet Union and saw the ruins and heard the stories of the people who lived through it. It simply doesn’t work.
gravenimage says
Vladimir, Sabri S. wants to impose the horrors of Shari’ah law on us. He sees Socialism at most as a stop gap to destroy the West.
gravenimage says
Why is Sabri S. pretending to be egalitarian?
He has repeatedly refused to say *anything* against Muslims enslaving their victims, who are mostly Black.
As for there being “nothing wrong with Socialism”, Muslims hate Socialism and Communism almost as much as they do Democracy, because it represents systems that are rival to its own. But no doubt Muslim surpremacists like Sabri S. assume that if these thugs are successful in destroying Freedom and Democracy that Muslims will be able to destroy anything that follows it.
Vladimir says
And they’re probably right. The secular Left always needs the Right when action needs to be taken against Muslim radicals.
Eric Smith. says
Beware of the coming together of the Left and Islam, NO GOOD CAN COME OF IT. AT ALL.
Melvin Ruebinawitz says
Intersectionality, makes strange allies.
Hank Mansfield says
There were 2 black guys in my basic training platoon, out of 40.
Also, blacks in the US military tend to get into MOS (jobs) that translate into higher earnings in the civilian world after discharge, not combat-related ones. Outside of law enforcement, that training doesn’t do a guy much good, and the knowledge that someone is lethal freaks out a lot of potential co-workers.
Judging by the way these ‘militia’ members were handling their weapons they were more a threat to themselves than any disciplined resistance. They even had police escorts in and out of the area.
In the video, they stopped at the guy’s window after they noticed him laughing at them.
FYI says
So it seems they targeted a guy because he was WHITE and judged him on the color of his skin.
Isn’t that…..Racism?
“Where’s our reparations?”they ask menacingly.
WHAT?What reparations?
What have any folk living today got to do with folk who lived in earlier times?
Nothing.
Phil Copson says
“…WHAT?What reparations?
What have any folk living today got to do with folk who lived in earlier times?”
——————————————————————————
Bigger point – the economies of much of the African, Arab, South American etc world were run on slave labour for thousands of years.
It is therefore far more likely that anyone from a non-White background has slave-traders and slave owners in their background, than any White person has.
Where’s my “reparation” for the million-plus Europeans captured by Arab slave-traders ?
Or even my “reparation” for the Great-Uncle I never met and the cousins I never had, thanks to the Kaiser ? Nowhere, that’s where – and that’s where they should be, because normal people don’t think like that.
Melvin Ruebinawitz says
Yes, the S-4 shop’s NCO mafia!
Vladimir says
I’m hoping for their sakes that nobody calls their bluff someday.
jewdog says
Meanwhile, 53 countries at the UN have taken China’s side in her Hong Kong democracy repression, about half of them Muslim countries. So much for Islamic concern for human rights and democracy.
Despite the Douglas statue, most of the statues targeted are of white males, seeming to confirm that the Left wants a race war, having failed to provoke a class war. This is convenient for Islam since Muslims are considered non-white and Jews considered white, despite the obvious gross inaccuracy and irrelevance of those categories. The Left is big on identity politics, kind of like the Nazis were.
gravenimage says
Disgusting but unsurprising, jewdog.
curious george says
“We’ll just get rid of all the whites in the USA.” says Dr. Carol J. Baker
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyXuPwsLGWI
gravenimage says
Has Dr. Baker noticed that she herself is white? Probably not–she is “woke” enough to be any ethnicity she wants.
And yesterday I saw some thug on line saying that all white people needed to commit suicide. Ugly, ugly stuff.
James Lincoln says
The comments were made by Carol J Baker, M.D. at a May 2016 event in Atlanta, Georgia.
She is an Pediatrics-Infectious Disease Professor at the Baylor College of Medicine in Houston,
Texas, and told a National Meningitis Association panel discussion that a “solution” to the large numbers of white people who refuse to let their children be given vaccines is to “get rid” of white people.
OK… Let’s follow the “logic”…
So if blacks refused to undergo a certain treatment or medical procedure, would she also recommend to “get rid” of black people?
connect.xfinity.com/appsuite/#!!&app=io.ox/mail&folder=default0/INBOX
gravenimage says
Good question. Of course, *no one* would say such a thing, and would be (rightly) condemned if they did. But saying this about white people is now considered acceptable. *Ugh*.
gravenimage says
Georgia: Members of heavily armed black militia shout “Alhamdulillah”
……………….
Deeply disturbing. And “Alhamdulillah” is not a well-known Arabic phrase like “Allahu Akbar”–this is serious Islamic supremacism.
Sun says
+1
Whenever something good happens the phrase is used to thank Allah.
The march of the armed militia, which reminded me of the Taliban or Boko Haram, seemed to be a good reason to praise Allah.
gravenimage says
Yes.
Michael Casmer says
But if so-called white groups arm themselves per the 2nd amendment they are labeled ” vigilantes”. I don’t understand
Frank Anderson says
M.C. consider the difference between protecting your own (and your neighbor’s) property and going away to engage in offensive action. While deadly force is not allowed generally in the US solely to protect property, it is allowed to protect human life health and safety. The basic right recognized in all civilization until recently allowed self-defense. Now, many countries other than the US prohibit any act of self defense because that “deprives governmental due process” to the attackers. I disagree with the non-US view for this reason. Like the rule of “exigent circumstances” which excuse the requirement of a search warrant, there is also a similar rule of exigent circumstances allowing deadly force for defense of self and third persons.
I am still dreaming of someone who knows this case and will share the cite for it. I studied Criminal Law in the first semester of law school in 1977. One of the cases we covered concerned an archer defending a wooden fortification called a “keep” by shooting dead a man who had a jar with a flaming rag stuck in it. The only reasonable inference was the jar contained flammable liquid that would set fire to the wooden structure either burning the occupants or exposing them to the deadly force of those attacking. The archer was acquitted of any criminal charge because if he had waited until the jar was thrown, the right of self defense would have been pointless. The rule of the case is followed widely in the US, with good reason.
There is a difference between acting in lawful self defense and defense of third persons and violating the law by becoming a lawless aggressor.
Marttheman says
I can only hope, now that this has become a racial issue, that white Americans are teaming up to hold their own if need be. It is best not to be a sitting duck if push comes to shove. Be like the Jews who say: If someone threatens they want to kill you, you better take them seriously.” They have learnt this lesson the hard way. The threats on whites doesn’t seem to relent and that is not only the case in the US. In Zimbabwe (former Rhodesia) and South Africa similar things happened and are still happening to the detriment of the whites. Let those events be a wise lesson. The Boers in SA are heavily targeted at the moment and are emigrating to Canada and Australia to escape from discrimination and violence. The msm doesn’t cover their plight at all. Some people even say the Boers had it coming and Africa is for the blacks. By the same token, wouldn’t Europe then be for the whites? So taking the problem back to the US, where would white Americans escape to? Or will they stand their ground. Time will tell.
OLD GUY says
A good question is why are our politicians who run our country still allowing the migration invasion of muslims into our country. It doesn’t take much common sense to see that these migrants are not becoming Americans. They are trying to change America to an islamic country with sharia laws giving them power to enslave and kill anyone they deem not worthy to live in their criminal state. If we keep letting them in we are in for the fight of our lives.
dambuster4642 says
Please stop calling these gang or mobs a “MILITIA”….it is NOT correct in terms of the meaning of the purpose and intent of the word “Militia” in the U.S. Constitution. Using the term broadly and really incorrectly confuses people and leads to a bad connotation that “Militias” are even, when in fact a “Constitutionally” based Militia is Patriotic and provided for in the our Constitution for the protection of our liberties.
Each State in the U.S. has a patriotic and “Constitutionally” based “Militia”….Please do not let the meaning of the word be misused….
gravenimage says
True.
Maria says
The minute people read this comment they will say:” conspiracy theorist”!
However, we knew this was coming by the seeds put in the ground by the Obama administration. Take a good look back at all he did and with whom he associated with.
Farakhaun, the Muslim Brotherhood, cair, not to mention the linency with which he handled the. Sex crimes against children at the hands of Muslim men and teenagers. All which was all covered by media because they were afraid to be labeled racist…
Look at Minneapolis, take a hard look at their efforts to defund the police… They want to implement the sharia police and antifa as civil policing organizations. Americans don’t be naive to think that this is about race. It’s not it’s about toppling American in a tribal warefare situation.
Look at iran, Turkey and even at Saudi Arabia… They are all quiet and pretend to be friends of the U.S. and Israel… But we will pay for it with our freedom if we don’t say something and stand up to this.
Politicians think that somehow their status will exclude them, they are dead wrong. They too are the enemy of blm , antifa and Islamic extremists…dont be fooled they want to ruin everything you and I hold dear that is our freedoms given by god and the western civilization we created one that we are brought up in judeo christian ethics of morality.
Wake up!!!
Ross Poldark says
This excellent information regarding how Islam really views black people. They are just useful tools and slaves for Islam.
” Nasir al-Din Tusi, the famous Muslim scholar said of blacks: “The ape is more capable of being trained than the Negro.”
Ibn Khaldun, an early Muslim thinker, writes that blacks are “only humans who are closer to dumb animals than to rational beings.” He also insisted that “the only people who accept slavery are the Negroes, owing to their low degree of humanity and proximity to the animal stage.” (In truth, over 500,000 Africans in Basra overthrew their Arab-Islamic masters in the largest slave uprising in history in what is known as the Zanj Rebellion).
Classical Islamic law allows a light-skinned Muslim man to marry a black woman, but a black Muslim man is restricted from marrying a light-skinned woman. As the literature of the time put it, “only a whore prefers blacks; the good woman will welcome death rather than being touched by a black man.”
Another hadith quotes Muhammad: “Do not bring black into your pedigree.”
In Abu Dawud (2247-2255) Muhammad described a hypothetical black baby Hadith as a “dusky child with curly hair, fat limbs, fat shins and fat buttock.”
Muhammad once told his people “Whoever wants to see Satan let him take a look at Nahtal b. al-Harith” He was a sturdy black man WIth long flowing hair, Inflamed eyes, and dark ruddy cheeks.(Ibn Ishaq 357)
The famous Muslim historian, al-Mas’udi describes the African slaves as, “Kinky hair, thin eyebrows, broad noses, thick lips, sharp teeth, malodorous skin, dark pupils, clefty hands and feet, elongated penises and excessive merriment.” He goes on to add that the “the dark complexion person (al-aswad) is overwhelmed by merriment due to the imperfection (fasad) of his brain; therefore, his intellect is weak.” (Akbar Muhammad, Slaves and Slavery in Muslim Africa, vol. I, p 68)
https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/articles/black-africa.aspx
George Hale says
now that every one has had their say about what they are, next question what are we going to do about it punch keys on a board are repel the invasion your why of life depends on your actions I don’t want to leave this for my grandchildren to deal with
Jay says
I’d say they better make sure that one of their guns doesn’t accidentally go off. It might bring a response they don’t really want.
Kevin Fulton says
Alhamdulillah means “Praise be to Allah”, not “Thanks be to Allah”.
DDrake says
The only LAWFUL “Militia” in America is a CONSTITUTIONAL Militia. Any other is Criminal, Unlawful and Un-Constitutional. That includes DHS, FEMA, Federalized/Militarized Police and any other UN-Constitutional Militarized Force that USURPS the 2nd Amendment and it’s WAR POWERS given to the PEOPLE alone, as a Militia for Homeland Security and Defense. It can not Lawfully be Subordinated unto ANY Act or Decree of Congress or Executive Order of the president. The 2nd Amendment is for WAR. “Arms” are weapons for War, combined with “Militia” determines the intent/context of the 2nd Amendment to be FOR WAR as well as Self Defense of the People.
DDrake says
ONLY Militias that defend and uphold the Constitution are Lawful. For the purpose of ENFORCING the Constitution. This means that the Constitution can never be Lawfully “Suspended”. The 2nd Amendment can NEVER be Lawfully “Suspended”, neither can ANY “Continuity of Govt.” Lawfully exist that has not the purpose of upholding and defending the Constitution. Govt. can not stand above or outside the Constitution at ANY TIME under ANY GUISE, other than Criminally and in TREASON. “Continuity of the Constitution” holds power over ANY so-called “Continuity of Govt.”, which does not exist in any manner in the Constitution. No “Continuity of Govt. can ever Lawfully be Contrived, under any guise, or fabricated/non-fabricated emergency, by ANY Act of Congress or Executive Order of the President, which puts itself above the Constitution for any purpose whatsoever.
glock 1911 says
Well said.