Shamima Begum, who is a high-level threat to Britons, an enemy of the state, will be allowed to “return to the UK to fight the Home Office’s decision to revoke her British citizenship for joining the murderous Islamic State regime.” The Daily Mail asks the right question: “Who’s next? Judges are accused of ‘opening floodgates’ to MORE ISIS brides and up to 150 terrorists after Home Office LOSES bombshell High Court case to keep Shamima Begum out of UK.”
This ruling is yet another example of the normalization of jihad and Sharia. Shamima Begum said she had “no regrets” as she “faithfully” served the Islamic State. She left Britain in order to join an entity that had declared war against Britain. Tory MP Andrew Bridgen said: “Most Brits will rightly think that when you swear allegiance to another country that declares war on Britain, that you have given up all the rights and protections and privileges of your British citizenship. After today’s ruling it appears you have not.”
Jihad Watch has followed the story of Shamima Begum since the beginning, including why she was stripped of her British citizenship while her lawyer relentlessly fought for her; the dangerous nature of Islamic State brides, who are no less brutal and threatening than their male counterparts; and the children of these women, who are known as “cubs of the caliphate” and were conditioned and groomed to wage jihad against infidel individuals and nations.
She should never have been allowed back. We permit more and more of what should be intolerable, and over time the freedom of our societies is chipped away by patient Islamic supremacists and their battalion of useful idiots.
“Who’s next? Judges are accused of ‘opening floodgates’ to MORE ISIS brides and up to 150 terrorists after Home Office LOSES bombshell High Court case to keep Shamima Begum out of UK,” by Martin Robinson and Paul Thompson, MailOnline. July 16, 2020:
Up to 150 British jihadis and their brides will be celebrating today after senior judges ruled that Shamima Begum must be allowed to return to the UK to fight the Home Office’s decision to revoke her British citizenship for joining the murderous Islamic State regime.
Begum – one of three east London schoolgirls who travelled to Syria to join ISIS when she was 15 – was stripped of her UK passport after she was found, nine months pregnant, in a Syrian refugee camp in February last year.
Tory MP Andrew Bridgen was left furious by today’s ruling saying it risked a flood of jihadis returning. He told MailOnline: ‘It opens the door for all her fellow jihadi brides to return to Britain – and potentially their terrorist partners too.
‘Most Brits will rightly think that when you swear allegiance to another country that declares war on Britain, that you have given up all the rights and protections and privileges of your British citizenship. After today’s ruling it appears you have not’.
These include Tooba Gondal, a former AK-47-wielding ISIS bride who groomed others online and bragged online about her ‘real freedom’ in Syria before the caliphate collapsed.
She is also in the Al Hol camp with Begum and has begged to come back to the UK because of ‘dire conditions’ there.
British jihadi fighters believed to be alive including former bouncy castle salesman turned alleged executioner Siddhartha Dhar, 36, ‘Jihadi Jack’ Letts, ISIS grave digger Shahan Choudhury, fast food addict ‘Hungry’ Hamza Parvez and Cardiff ice cream salesman Aseel Muthana may also try to seize on Begum’s legal victory.
UK civil rights groups including Liberty helped launch Begum’s legal battle in Britain and today the Court of Appeal found she could not have an ‘effective’ appeal against the decision by the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) in February while she is out of the country – and said letting her back into the UK ‘outweighed national security concerns’.
The three judges, led by Lord Justice Flaux, said: ‘The Court concludes that Ms Begum’s appeal to the Court of Appeal should be allowed, so that she can have leave to enter the UK in order for there to be a fair and effective appeal before SIAC’. …
Mike says
this is nut’s if they allow her to return
she should not be allowed to have her cake and eat it too
Aniruddha says
Yes, your politicians are the same as ours in India. Selling the country down the tube, for the sake of some pretentious virtue-signalling, not to mention jihadi-supporting-muslim votes.
Rahoul says
Yes. You are right.
Mr K.Wade says
More excrement on the tide of Muslim sewage. Demonstrates how asinine the law is and how morally challenged these judges are. What community in its right mind would allow such murderous animals to not only live in but also return to it? Liberty – falsely named, merely digs the grave and Islam provides the corpses.
Rowena Haldane says
Morally challenged? I would suggest “morally bankrupt” might be a more fitting description.
Peter Buckley says
10 years ago, it was unimagineable that someone like Trump could win win a US election. 10 years ago, it was unimagineable that someone like Marine Le Pen could be more popular than a mainstream French PM:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6351897/Marine-Le-Pens-far-right-party-popular-Macrons.html
10 years ago it was unimagineable that many central European countries would be run by “anti-muslim” parties. Why has this happened? Largely because of decisions like this. I must admit these kind of decisions used to anger me, but now I just laugh, as it proves once more how disconnected these decision-makers are from ordinary people. We saw it here in the UK with Corbyn getting thrased at the last election. The silent majority keep quiet, as they know they will be labelled “Islamophobes”, but it doesn’t matter really, as the silent majority vote against these people WHEN IT MATTERS i.e at election time.
It is 10 years now since the left-wing Guardian carried out a survey, and came up with results it didn’t like:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/aug/02/poll-islam-negative-britain
That figure will be much higher now, though few would dare to say so publicly, and raised a notch with this decision.
As I say, these decisions used to make me angry, but now I just take the long-term view that it is merely another step in Islam’s self-destruction and ultimate collapse back to Medina, as predicted by Muhammad himself:
It is narrated on the authority of Ibn ‘Umar (‘Abdullah b. ‘Umar) that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) observed: Verily Islam started as something strange and it would again revert (to its old position) of being strange just as it started, and it would recede between the two mosques just as the serpent crawls back into its hole.
http://hadithcollection.com/sahihmuslim/Sahih%20Muslim%20Book%2001.%20Faith/sahih-muslim-book-001-hadith-number-0271.html
R Russell says
She can be imprisoned and just like the male Muslims in prison, insist her fellow prisoners convert to Islam or suffer the consequences.
John Allan says
That would be interesting! I wonder how long her fellow prisoners would put up with that before shutting her down!
European pagan says
In Bangladesh she would be hanged. Send her there!
John Allan says
Well, the home secretary was elected by the British electorate! The judge is an appointee! The British electorate outranks the judge, so the home secretary needs to tell the judge, in no uncertain terms, to f__k off!
KEEP THE NON-BRITISH BEGUM OUT!!
eleee says
Imprison and isolate forever.
Jayell says
No. That means that people like me are going to have to pay to keep her in a manner rather better than she seems to be enjoying at the moment. and costing about the same as the fees of a top-level Public School (like Eton or Harrow). And as R Russell says, she’ll be proselytizing along with the rest of her kind in jail and creating yet more trouble. She’s not even British anymore (not that she really was before) so she’s not our business anyway, thank God. Let her rot where she is, along with the other 150 of her friends (not ours). By the way, anyone who’s seen the latest video of her in her camp might notice that she now appears in Western clothes – apart from the obligatory rag around her head (which they no doubt will try to claim is archetypal ‘British’ dress these days). They’re probably trying to con us into believing that she’s a real ‘British’ girl – except any female can be ‘a real british girl’ these days because ‘British’ means absolutely nothing at all anymore.
Kepha says
That is the complaint a lot of Americans have with the way “justice” supposedly works over here, too!
andrew mckendrick says
The law is an ass , but a vindictive ass ,think of the way it treated Tommy Robinson for reporting muslim rape gangs.
Chistopher Watson says
Treason used to have the death penalty. It ought to again.
mortimer says
I believe a death sentence for terrorists is valid, especially for those who make the claim ‘we love death’. Let us give them the opportunity to prove their claim by introducing them to the public hangman.
Seth says
Move her in next door to one of these excremental ‘judges’. They’re as evil as she is. Maybe Lord Justice Fluxhead can have her over for a nice cuppa and a bacon buttie.
mortimer says
The judges understand the UK cannot make a person stateless. Look up ‘statelessness’.
Rob R (Brit stuck in Britainistan) says
Look up “headlessness”.
Mischief Maker in the Land says
“senior judges ruled that Shamima Begum must be allowed to return to the UK to fight the Home Office’s decision”
TRANSLATION
Senior judges ruled that Shamima Begum must be allowed to return to the UK so that fellow lawyers can draw large fees at taxpayers’ expense for fighting the Home office’s decision.
mortimer says
A slave owner and genocide-supporter returns to Britanistan.
mortimer says
UK is a signatory of protocols that protect persons from becoming stateless. They do not break the protocol if a person has a previous citizenship or a dual citizenship. They can let the ‘OTHER’ country deal with the person. I don’t see a problem with revoking the passport of a dual citizen.
I think it is a valid point to say ALL ISIS volunteers BURNED their passports and renounced their prior citizenship. They then proceeded to fight against their original countries. Thus, if they return, they should be immediately tried for treason and terrorism.
mortimer says
The UK should reinstate the death penalty for convicted terrorists. In that way, most terrorists will not voluntarily return to UK.
James Lincoln says
+1
RichardL says
she will lose her appeal and stay in the UK for ‘humanitarian’ reasons. She will live a nice Muslim life without ever working and sharia-conforming Brits will have to smile or be imprisoned. The UK has been lost 15 years ago. It was the first European country to submit to islam. 100% majority in Parliament
Rob R (Brit stuck in Britainistan) says
Notice how it was important for the weirdo, Islam-loving ghouls/”powers that be” to actually bring her physically back into the country. It was important to do that, to insult the few remaining sane people in the UK.
There is no reason why they couldn’t have done the “trial” via video link.
Due to Coronavirus I’m sure there are very many cases in the UK where people are currently giving evidence from their homes etc., through a video feed, and they are being told not to come into the court. But of course, Jemima or whatever is special because she gives ghoulish, terrorist-fancying Civil Service/judges a wet patch in the groin area.
Also – how does a displaced terrorist have enough money to afford a plane ticket? Who is supporting her?
“The normlization of Jihad” is a depressing accurate description of this.
James Lincoln says
Rob R,
If you could immigrate to the United States, we’d love to have you!
Rob R (Brit stuck in Britainistan) says
If I stood in a UK street saying what I think of Islam to passers-by, I would get worse treatment than this insane bitch has got. And none of these twisted ass-backward “human rights” people would offer me any help or try to get me out of a cell.
I’m so tired of my insane country. Brits too busy snoozing off in front of the football, or “down the pub”, to notice or care. Illiterate, ignorant apes, every single one of them.
Chrissie01 says
I have the same impression about Germans…somehow all of them suicidal
tim gallagher says
Idiotic decision from some left wing type of judge, which, I guess, will open the flood gates for more of these barbaric scum to get back into the UK. Such a stupid decision by one of these supposedly learned fuckwits.
Michael Copeland says
See “The Lamentable Shortcomings of Some English Judges and Senior Lawyers”
https://gatesofvienna.net/2019/06/the-lamentable-shortcomings-of-some-english-judges-and-senior-lawyers/
tim gallagher says
Thanks for that, Michael. Congratulations on the excellent article you’ve written. We get plenty of these judges and magistrates out here in Australia, who regularly display their stunning ignorance when it comes to Islam. I’m not sure if they are just too lazy and pompous to bother to do a bit of study on the subject before making their idiotic decisions or whether some of them are actually on the side of Islam and want the vile ideology to prosper and they make decisions which will help bring about this result. One thing is for sure, their idiotic decisions put us in danger. Imagine letting this ISIS barbarian back into the UK.
gravenimage says
Jihadis celebrate as judges rule that Islamic State bride Shamima Begum must be allowed to return to UK
……………..
More suicidal insanity.
And *of course* Jihadists celebrate–they know this Jihadist is a threat to us. If she was really a poor deluded schoolgirl this would not be the case.
David Curtis says
A petition is needed in UK, simple question, Yes or no to letting her back to appeal decision.
Jake2169 says
So, the conditions in the camp are not up to standard? I wonder whether these women enjoyed it more when living in an ISIS stronghold? A place where they were able to see the heads of people placed in bins on the street, the so called enemies of the caliphate who had been beheaded in town squares. Once more we witness the victim hood of Muslims, those oppressed people, members of the “Religion Of Peace” desperately pleading to “come home”! Now that the party is over for them, they apparently feel the need to be looked after by the people of the country they so willingly left looking for adventure and the prospect of becoming the wife of an ISIS fighter. We in Britain are in the majority, and we say, we don’t want Begum or any others back here! Our judiciary are treacherous, brown envelope grabbing enablers of Islam, the very real enemy of the people,who are probably terrified of repercussions also, them being well known to those representing these obnoxious things who crave to return to our shores. The government hasn’t quite worked out the threat of Islam just yet, it will take time as they are so much slower on the uptake. Some in government are taking bribes from Arab countries, others are quite simply, fools and even more are just useful idiots who don’t give a damn as long as their monthly salary is being paid by taxpayers. Then there are those who take cash from lobbyists and of course the many that are too terrified of being targeted by Islamic groups. Basically, we have a bunch of corrupt, fearful bastards within parliament, all bowing to Islam!
Normally, we are reminded at least once a month that Islam is a “Religion Of Peace”, but the politicians don’t appear to have noticed that this statement is not going down well with the public, many disagree!! One day the politicians may finally get the message. But at this time, the message to politicians and lawmakers is quite simple, we don’t want Shamima Begum or any others to be allowed to return to Britain. Set up a video conference facility in another country, there is no need for any to come back here!!
Joe S. says
A stupid decision by the British court.: putting Begum’s individual rights above the security of our country! .
David Foot says
TSharmeena Begum is where she is now, among our enemies by her own efforts and volition and constitutes less of a danger to our Sate and to our people where she is now.
To use one’s strength and powers to force an enemy of the English Crown in to England itself putting all the people of England in harm’s way should be construed as gratuitous treason.
This is a “check mate” from the Marxist enemies of the English Crown in the Judiciary working with our other enemies in Islam, both in unison against the Crown and its obligation to fulfil its first duty which is to survive and second must come the right to life of our people. Nothing must come before those two things! There can be no law which allows what the treasonous judges have just done. Once these Marxists have secured the entry of the mortal enemy of our State, then, using the flimsiest of excuses they will make sure that the Islamist will not leave, under any circumstances, and in this way they would have constructed an eternal problem for the Crown of England!
This is not an “alleged” enemy of England, this is a subject of an enemy alien State by her own volition, and that state now no longer exists, and this person is not a problem for the UK but for the UN by her own volition, this Islamic enemy of England voluntarily gave up her citizenship of our nation in order to fight alongside the enemies of England. The enemies of England in the Judiciary here have found a way to attack our English Crown successfully and they have not let such an opportunity pass them by!
The big political problem of the UK is that the people can vote for a British Government but unelected Marxists, enemies of England have colonized the Civil Service, the Judiciary and the Education System and we really need a vast decolonization process, a purge or the undemocratic left which holds the head of the UK under the water forcing our nation to fail as much as they can, using all the undemocratic power they can muster they attack our State and our people whenever and however they can.
The enemies of England as in this case, use their not elected positions of privilege, they twist our laws, they corrupt our freedoms and they use our tax contributions against us. They know what they are doing, they are undermining the Crown’s execution of its first duty and also threatening the right to life of our people by bringing in our mortal enemy, they are doing their utmost for the Crown to fail!
This is not the first time that our enemies wield such terrible power against the Crown satisfying its first duty. The Judiciary is also conscientiously undermining the work of the security services and of our soldiers, some of whom may have paid the highest price to make their people secure, protecting their people’s very right to life. This is what we can expect effectively from the alliance of our enemies the Marxists and the Muslims working in unison at the highest level.
For our laws to be properly interpreted by British judges, we need to purge the Judiciary of the Marxist internationalist enemies of the Crown by definition. Here the Judiciary on its own has rendered useless the work of our security services, armed forces and with impunity has more power than possibly one of our carriers and they relentlessly use that power to attack the Crown. This has to be stopped.
The Judiciary is not the press and it is not there to attack the State and its people, nor to be the Devil’s advocate! The Judiciary is there to make a success of the State and its people and must have that as its purpose when interpreting the law.
The purpose of the Judiciary: In the Theory of Control of Systems the Judiciary is without doubt the feed-back loop or at the very least part of the feedback loop, and in that feedback loop which controls how our system is going to operate, we can’t afford to have treacherous rubbish or even worse, our open enemies, as in this case. We must make sure to put only the best British components in that position or we will be contributing even to the destruction of our State and the death of our people. Without proper control we will go nowhere. Our system can’t afford to be an open loop system either, without taking in to consideration the results which it obtains for to control it, if the concept of our Crown and our people having a sacred right to live is not a purpose for those in the Judiciary and other services, then they are not in harmony with the first duty of the Crown or even with the right to life of the English, if we allow this, then we prepare our own destruction or as a great Englishman once said, “we are busily piling on the wood for our own funeral pyre”.
David Foot says
This attack by the Judiciary on England is without precedent
Sharmeena Begum is where she is now, among our enemies by her own efforts and volition and constitutes less of a danger to our Sate and to our people where she is now.
To use one’s strength and powers to force an enemy of the English Crown in to England itself putting all the people of England in harm’s way should be construed as gratuitous treason. This judgement brings back not only Sharmeema but it also brings back all the terrorist criminals who are with her, the marxist traitors have opened the doors to all the Islamic ones! And they will make it impossible to deport afterwards any of the criminals which they bring in!
This has to be an attack by the Judiciary on England and such an attack by marxists and islmaists has no precedent
Giacomo Latta says
”return to the UK to fight the Home Office’s decision to revoke her British citizenship for joining the murderous Islamic State regime”
Her trial or hearing should be held with her making her case, if she cares to testify, external to the UK. If not, then what happens if she loses?
unbeliever1 says
Once she gets in, she is in for good. The government can’t even deport none citizens who commit horrendous crimes in Britain.She has won the battle.
OLD GUY says
Somebody in the UK needs to grow some balls and stop this crazy idea that a traitor has the right to return home. The British may have a stiff upper lip but they seen to now have a weak back bone, how sad. When she gets back on UK soil they should try her as a traitor and execute her.