• Why Jihad Watch?
  • About Robert Spencer and Staff Writers
  • FAQ
  • Books
  • Muhammad
  • Islam 101
  • Privacy

Jihad Watch

Exposing the role that Islamic jihad theology and ideology play in the modern global conflicts

More Countries Ban the Muslim Brotherhood, But Still Not the US

Jul 24, 2020 4:00 pm By Robert Spencer

This is because the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated into numerous American governmental agencies, skillfully and comprehensively, while successfully branding anyone who pointed out what was going on as “racist” and “Islamophobic.”

“More Countries Ban Muslim Brotherhood,” by Hany Ghoraba, IPT News, July 21, 2020:

For 92 years, the global Muslim Brotherhood has managed to create franchises across the world. Despite a rise in power in several countries after the Arab Spring revolutions, the group is witnessing steady recessions in the Middle East where it once flourished.

Jordan’s Court of Cassation issued a final verdict last Thursday dissolving its Muslim Brotherhood chapter and banning its activities. The court dissolved the group for failing to adapt to a 2014 law that restricts political activity by religious groups. “We requested a special-status rule for the group to be approved by the government but the decision makers rejected the request,” said Jordanian MB spokesman Moaz al-Khalidi.

The Muslim Brotherhood is a model of moderation and an important element in strengthening national unity, so dissolving it is not in the national interest,” said Sheikh Hamza Mansur, who runs the Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood’s ruling council.

While the court action didn’t designate the group as a terrorist entity, it may pave the way for such an action in the future.

The Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood is the oldest and most popular Islamist group in the country. Established in 1945 as a franchise to the mother group in Egypt, it became the driving force for Islamists in the country and was behind the foundation of the country’s chief Islamist party, The Islamic Action Front (IAF). Despite Jordan’s 1999 ban against the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas, the Islamic Action Front maintained strong ties to the terrorist Palestinian group through Jordanian MB deputy leader Zaki Bani Arshid. Arshid coordinated political stances with Hamas.

The IAF strongly endorses ending the 1994 Jordanian-Israeli peace treaty. “We urge the government to meet the demands of people who have repeatedly called for freezing and eventually cancelling the peace treaty,” an IAF statement said.

Egypt designated its Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist entity following a series of terrorist attacks inside the country. The attacks followed the June 2013 revolution which ousted the Islamist Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi in power.

Saudi Arabia followed suit a few months later with its own designation. Saudi Arabia has multiple motivations – including regional political dynamics – for opposing the Brotherhood after years of support. “We were wrong when we opened the doors of our schools and universities to foreigners who allowed such ideas to reach our youth,” said Mohamed Zulfa, a member of the Saudi Shura Council [consultative assembly]. “We, unfortunately, realized that too late.”

The 2014 Saudi ban shocked Muslim Brotherhood members in Egypt, who had banked on the Saudi Kingdom’s support since the 1960s to counter the Egyptian ban during President Gamal Nasser’s rule. In response, Muslim Brotherhood media went as far as describing the Royal Saudi House of Al Saud, and particularly Crown Prince Mohamed Bin Salman, as “Zionists” because in the Brotherhood’s view, opposing the Brotherhood benefits Israel. The Saudi ban was followed by the arrest and incarceration of a number of Islamist clerics considered supportive of the Brotherhood. Moreover, Saudi Arabia has enacted a series of reforms opposed by the Brotherhood following the ban, including giving women the right to drive, go out in public without wearing a hijab, and earlier this year, banning flogging as a means of judicial punishments.

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) issued a more extensive ban on the Muslim Brotherhood in 2014 as part of a broader Emirati fight with MB elements who allegedly plotted to overthrow the government. The Emirati government also listed dozens of Western based Muslim Brotherhood fronts, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), Muslim American Society, Islamic Relief, Muslim Association of Britain and Cordoba Foundation in Britain as terrorists. Other predominantly Muslim countries which listed the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist stretch from Bahrain, Syria, and the Libyan parliament of Tobruk, to Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.

Even in Tunisia, where the MB-affiliated Ennahda Party has been a force to be reckoned with since 2011, there is a new move to blacklist it. A motion filed by former Tunisian presidential candidate Abir Moussi to ban the Muslim Brotherhood group was rejected earlier this month by the parliament bureau.

Ironically, the United States, which suffered the most horrific terrorist attack on its soil in September 2001, has not banned the mother group behind the ideology adopted by the 9/11 al-Qaida terrorists. Al-Qaida leaders were heavily influenced by the ideology of Brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna and the group’s chief ideologue Sayyid Qutb. The 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial exposed the Brotherhood’s modus operandi on American soil.

HLF was the largest American Muslim charity. While it solicited aid for widows, orphans and other needy people, prosecutors proved it had a secret role: “HLF became the chief fundraising arm for the Palestine Committee in the U.S. created by the Muslim Brotherhood to support Hamas.”

The Brotherhood created the Palestine Committee specifically to support Hamas politically and financially. “With the increase of the Intifada and the advance of the Islamic action inside and outside Palestine,” an internal Palestine Committee memo said, “the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas), provided through its activities in resisting the Zionist occupation a lot of sacrifices from martyrs, detainees, wounded, injured, fugitives and deportees and it was able to prove that it is an original and an effective movement in leading the Palestinian people. This Movement – which was bred in the bosom of the mother movement, ‘The Muslim Brotherhood’ – restored hope and life to the Muslim nation and the notion that the flare of Jihad has not died out and that the banner of Islamic Jihad is still raised.”

The Holy Land Foundation and five former officials were convicted in 2008 of illegally funneling more than $12 million to Hamas.

Still, consecutive U.S. administrations have failed to ban the Muslim Brotherhood despite its role creating and directing the Palestine Committee’s support for Hamas….

Share this:

  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)

Follow me on Facebook

Filed Under: Muslim Brotherhood Tagged With: Court of Cassation


Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Comments

  1. Wellington says

    Jul 24, 2020 at 4:40 pm

    Every Muslim in the US government is an enemy within just as every Marxist or Neo-Nazi would be.

    The best that can be said of any Muslim in the US government (or state or local government) is that they don’t know how vile their religion is. And as I have stated before about Muslims in America (or in any Western country), either they know what their religion really says or they don’t know what their religion really says. Whichever, it’s a problem. In different ways of course, but still a problem.

    As for the Muslim Brotherhood, only a fool (gee, I hope this doesn’t offend you, curious), assuming sincerity here, would think the MB in any Western nation is no big deal.

    • curious says

      Jul 24, 2020 at 6:47 pm

      Wow, some avatar of me is apparently living rent free inside your head, since you’re trolling me in threads where I haven’t even commented. Whatever. I agree the Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization.

      Regarding your comments about Muslims in the US government, your second paragraph is better than your first. Some don’t known how vile their religion is, and thus fail to realize they should renounce it, but mere fools are not necessarily enemies.

      Since we both like Mark Twain, I’ll close with a quotation from him:

      “Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.
      – Mark Twain, a Biography”

      • Wellington says

        Jul 24, 2020 at 9:01 pm

        curious: To my knowledge, I have not initiated a comment to you on a thread where you have not yet commented, except for this one. You did to me the other day when I responded to another commenter (James Lincoln) about Woodstock and you “popped up” taking me on. And thus I responded to you.

        I have brought you up on no threads that I know of before you were on a thread with the sole exception of this one. If you could provide evidence I would like to see it.

        As for my second paragraph being better than my first, you can’t endorse the second without seeing the accuracy of the first. And I did not call a Muslim who does not really know what their religion says a fool. I called someone who ingenuously treats with the MB a fool, whether Muslim or non-Muslim. So, you missed yet something again—distorted matters—which is your wont.

        As for Mark Twain, yes, that is one of my favorite comments of his and I have used it many times, but I don’t see how it is applicable here.

        • curious says

          Jul 24, 2020 at 9:16 pm

          @Wellington, I should have written “a thread” instead of “threads”. I apologize for that, and would correct it if the site allowed editing comments.

          There is however an obvious difference between your first and second paragraphs. Islam is indeed a problem either way, but it is a worse problem among serious enemies who believe what it says, as opposed to people who ‘identify’ as Muslim because their (grand)parents were. I did not accuse you of calling the latter group fools. I call the fools, because they claim to believe something without knowing what it says.

          You and I have similarities and differences. Neither of us suffers fools gladly, but you take hypocrisy to a rare level, whining about incivility while calling millions fools because they consider Woodstock a positive. I do not worry about being called a fool, but I do reject your belief in segregation, which you style in the separate but equal argument you made while mocking same-sex couples who avail themselves of their right to the equal protection of the laws governing marriage. These issues have been litigated to a final conclusion, decided by SCOTUS, and settled years ago. Your illogic would re-imagine Donald Trump as a leftist, because he accepts the SCOTUS decision recognizing marriage equality and praised Bostock v. Clayton County as a strong decision, and because he vilifies his opponents (e.g. on Twitter). You distort matters, and demand hypocritically different rules for yourself and everyone else, as is your wont.

        • Wellington says

          Jul 24, 2020 at 9:54 pm

          Yes, curious, you should have written “thread” in the singular. Glad you corrected that.

          As for a “worse problem” if the Muslim really knows that their religion says, I did cover that in my last sentence of my second paragraph, i.e., “In different ways of course, but still a problem.” And to expand upon this, I think it arguable that the Muslim who does not actually know what his or her religion is really all about may be more of a menace than one who does know, unwittingly giving better cover to Mo’s creed and all that. Reasonable minds can differ about this. Close call here I think.

          And I don’t whine about incivility, I “merely” decry incivility, but when I come across fools, I have to describe them as such. Civility, you know, does not require not describing fools as fools.

          And I also haven’t mocked same-sex couples. Again you distort what I have said. What I have mocked is gay marriage, which I think ridiculous. I don’t care if people are gay or lesbian, but I am possessed of the conviction that marriage should only be between one man and one woman. No polygamous marriages. No polyandrous marriages. No same-sex marriages—same-sex marriage for me is an oxymoron because marriage is ultimately a contract between a man and a woman chiefly existent for the procreation of the species. Ancient Greece, you know, tolerated, even promoted, same-sex relations but understood quite well that marriage was an institution that required one man and one woman. I’m with the ancient Greeks here. With the Catholic Church too. With numerous Protestant sects. And so on. Or have we all been bigots?

          I don’t castigate you for endorsing same-sex marriage. It is your right to endorse such. But I think you are only mistaken, not some kind of ogre which you are trying to make me out to be. Really, is there any way that one can be against gay marriage without you asserting that they are a bigot? And deep within my inner soul where ultimately my life resides, who I really am, I have the profoundly held conviction that marriage, as was the case for millennia in the vast majority of societies, is an institution that REQUIRES a difference of gender. Must be wonderful to be so enlightened as you are compared to all of us bigoted rogues over innumerable centuries.

          Finally, while I certainly respect the law and think it is usually in accord with what is right, in the final analysis what one considers ethical must supersede what is legal if the two differ. Think the Dred Scott (1857) and Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) Supreme Court decisions respecting examples where what was declared legal was not ethical. Or in the realm of common sense occasionally diverging from the law, there is the Engel v. Vitale 1962 SCOTUS decision which asserted that a non-denominational, voluntary school prayer in the public schools was unconstitutional, which I think a ridiculous decision even though I am an agnostic and which I look upon as the genesis of the rot we are now faced with in our era because once you divorce morality from education (and the vast majority of people “get” their morality by way of religion and not philosophy, which is fine by me), anything is possible—and I don’t mean this in a good way. Just look at education in the American school system today as first-rate evidence of the validity of this hypothesis of mine.

        • James Lincoln says

          Jul 25, 2020 at 9:21 am

          Wellington says,

          “…in the final analysis what one considers ethical must supersede what is legal if the two differ.”

          I have always thought this to be true, although I have never actually seen it written down.

          When I first started public school, every morning we recited the Pledge of Allegiance and the Lord’s prayer. Not one single child or parent complaint about this.

          Fast forward 2020 and even the Pledge of Allegiance is in jeopardy.

          As an aside, my comment was not meant to interfere with your discussion with curious…

    • mortimer says

      Jul 24, 2020 at 10:12 pm

      Wellington says that ‘Every Muslim in the US government is an enemy within’. I would just add the term ‘potential enemy’. For some Muslims, it would not take much to cross over to betraying their oath, but many would honorably defend the US. Many Muslims fought the caliphate of Constantinople. Muslims who are in favor of democracy and equality, probably haven’t a full understanding of their primary source texts, and if they have a good understanding of them, they are ignoring them or rationalizing them as not valid for today. In so doing, they are clearly saying that the Koran and hadiths are not eternally valid, complete or perfect … they need tweaking to be valid today. This rationalistic argument for modernizing Islam actually destroys it.

      However, I believe most Muslims in the West doing that sort of rationalizing, rather than live in a horrific cognitive dissonance that would eventually force them to abandon belief in the Koran.

      Muslims leave Islam when they observe the Koran is of human origin.

      • David says

        Jul 25, 2020 at 11:34 am

        Ilhan Omar swore her Oath of Allegiance on the Koran. And it was acceptable. Have you ever heard such nonsense?
        The Koran to muslims is a bit like marriage. You may not like every single thing about your partner, but you may have to tolerate some unpleasant things.

      • Eli says

        Aug 9, 2020 at 6:17 pm

        Many Muslims follow Islamic belief and traditions out of fear of death or fear of isolation from loved ones. A realistic study of Mohammad, 600 years later, then Christ, can only verify a human origin. The Bible is documentation of ancient history, while the Koran is distorted accounts or varied sayings with threats against any, who do not believe in Allah. So, their belief in their hearts would be animosity or contempt toward anyone outside Islam. Their goal is to dominate, and they’re making every attempt to claim political positions, when possible.

    • abad says

      Jul 26, 2020 at 11:49 am

      And if Biden wins in November (he probably won’t) he will hire even more Moslems in government.

      Let’s take a look at the list of Moslem Brotherhood members in USA politics:

      Keith Ellison
      Barack Obama
      Ilhan Omar
      Huma Abedin
      Linda Sarsour
      Rashida Tlaib

      A rather dangerous group.

  2. jca reid says

    Jul 24, 2020 at 4:58 pm

    Ban Islam is by far simpler. Imagine a “Religion” that openly endorses Banditry, misogyny, lying (Taqiyya), Common Assault, ( on wives & non-members alike), &every Human perverted behaviour. Again to be practiced on non-members. As stated, get rid of the entire lot

    • David says

      Jul 25, 2020 at 11:37 am

      All muslims should be made to live in islamic countries. That is the rational solution to all this misery. look at the example of Hungary. No muslims;no terror attacks.Long Live Viktor!

      • James Lincoln says

        Jul 25, 2020 at 2:46 pm

        David says,

        “No muslims;no terror attacks.”

        Yes, David – it’s that simple.

        Poland has figured that out as well…

  3. Merri-joy says

    Jul 24, 2020 at 5:22 pm

    When King Solomon reigned he had a wise practice of only letting his citizens hold Governmental Positions – no foreigner was given a position of Government or influence!
    Japan does not give citizenship to Muslims!!! America and all Western countries should do the same!
    The Dalai Lama said Britain for the British, Europe for Europeans – wise perspective!

    • Wellington says

      Jul 24, 2020 at 5:56 pm

      Merri-joy: What about a non-Muslim American citizen who decides to convert to Islam? What about a baby born an American citizen here in America and whose parents are Muslim and who is raised Muslim?

      There is also the “problem” of the First Amendment of the American Constitution insuring freedom of religion. Nowhere in said Amendment does it state that a religion must be good and/or wise (and by whose standards?). This is why Satanism and Scientology are protected religions under the First Amendment. Islam too.

      In brief, it is not as easy as your post indicates. And invoking King Solomon, who lived three thousand years ago, is really not very helpful, for sundry reasons. As for the Dali Lama, sorry, but I consider him most of the time a lame-brain. Besides, if one really believes in reincarnation, for which no proof whatsoever exists, I am dubious about extending credence and regard to one who does believe in this fantasy.

      The “problem” is more complicated than you have posited and, because it is, a more complicated solution is necessary. Oh yeah, complexities aplenty and King Solomon is really no guide here.

      Islam is a parasite and will use freedom to destroy freedom. Free societies must be sapient, and within the parameters of the law as much as they can be, when dealing with the worst religion ever created by man, i.e., Islam.

      A Herculean effort before the West is due because of the rotten religion which is Islam. I would “begin” with the realization that nowhere is it written that a religion must be good, wise or non-fraudulent. Proceed from this standpoint, grant Islam in America protected status, just as Nazism and Marxism have, but NEVER conclude that Islam is something good. Protecting rotten systems of belief is OK AS LONG AS you accurately describe them as such.

      Free societies can withstand iniquitous ideologies in their midst. But where free societies are sorely in jeopardy is when they characterize an iniquitous ideology as something good or innocuous.

      • curious says

        Jul 24, 2020 at 6:59 pm

        @Wellington, Islam is a totalitarian doctrine that commands the violent overthrow of our government. That sets it apart from other religions, and puts it in the category of Marxism and Nazism. The USA has long restricted immigration or even entry by advocates of a totalitarian doctrine that includes the violent overthrow of our government. I agree that Islam is a parasite, and it is not merely a religion.

        Besides, non-resident aliens outside the USA do not have American Constitutional rights, so banning Muslims from entering or immigrating would be Constitutional. Entry can likewise be conditioned on limited stay, limited purpose (e.g. delivering a UN speech, which can then be exposed and mocked), etc.

        Very few non-Muslim citizens convert to Islam, so that is a rare problem, although it may increase if Muslims continue to become more numerous and are allowed to dominate certain areas.

        • Wellington says

          Jul 24, 2020 at 9:18 pm

          curious: I agree that Islam is a totalitarian ideology (also a religion) and is, in effect, in the same category with Nazism and Marxism, though these last two are “secular religions.”

          But my response to Merri-joy had to do with this person’s comparison to Japan. It was a very broad statement, i.e., “Japan does not give citizenship to Muslims.” But I posited possibilities like an American citizen converting to Islam, or a person born on American soil to Muslims (even assuming the parents are not American citizens, this being wrapped up with the 14th Amendment). There is also the First Amendment about freedom of religion which I brought up and which, to my knowledge, Japan does not have an equivalent.

          I just thought that a blanket statement such as “Japan does not give citizenship to Muslims” needed to be expanded upon where America is concerned, especially for constitutional reasons. And until Islam is looked upon as nefarious, though still a religion, America remains quite vulnerable to Muslim immigration, which is a damn shame because more Muslim immigrants to any Western nation is a giant negative, but, of course, the Islamic world will use the freedoms that exist in Western nations but not in the Islamic world to take advantage of freedom with the ultimate design of ending freedom. Oh yeah, it’s a huge and complicated problem.

      • Chistopher Watson says

        Jul 24, 2020 at 7:29 pm

        I don’t really see what the problem is. If he tells the truth then he cannot swear to uphold the constitution. If he swears to uphold the constitution then he is lying according to the Koran. If he is practising takiya then he is lying which is treason according to the constitution. Whichever path he chooses he is logically lying if he is a moslem. A moslem cannot swear citizenship of any non-moslem country.

      • peter says

        Jul 25, 2020 at 11:07 am

        There si some evidence for reincarnation .There are a few studies which endorse reincarnation as the only rational explanation for very accurate recall of certain incidents and events in certain families removed by vast distances and time by very young children who otherwise could not have learned about those incidents and events as even their own parents were ignorant of such information .Again , this is not criticize your opinion about Dalai Lama as you are entitled to !

      • David says

        Jul 25, 2020 at 11:44 am

        How about not accepting Islam as a religion, but as a political ideology, bent on the destruction of the West. Treat it the same way as Communism. That gets round the First Amendment.

    • rubiconcrest says

      Jul 24, 2020 at 8:42 pm

      Well … we have a lot of non-Muslim citizens serving in government that are doing a pretty good job subverting the constitution to their agenda. Compared to Islam though they’re amateurs. Citizenship is no guarantee. MB types are pretty easy to spot. The problem is that no one seems to be paying them any attention.

    • gravenimage says

      Jul 24, 2020 at 9:29 pm

      Japan gives citizenship to very few foreigners, but does not have a formal ban against Muslims.

      • David says

        Jul 25, 2020 at 11:49 am

        gravenimage: So, that is the answer for America! Be a lot more choosy. Just because someone wants to come to America, does not mean automatic acceptance. A bit like not buying from a door-to-door salesman. You don’t have to give a reason.

    • peter says

      Jul 25, 2020 at 11:00 am

      This cannot obviously happen in America or Europe where muslims are the biggest vote banks for left wing politicians who are ready to sell their country to get elected by hook or crook !

      • David says

        Jul 25, 2020 at 11:53 am

        Peter: by hook or by CROOK! We have the same problem in the UK. Postal vote rigging in Londonistan, resulted in a muslim Mayor! Many other cities with large muslim populations have the same result. Councils are riddled with muslims.

  4. Brian Hoff says

    Jul 24, 2020 at 5:32 pm

    Bannig very rarely worked. In 1923 the Nazie party was ban they still carry out the actice without wearing they ronw shirt.

    • Wellington says

      Jul 24, 2020 at 6:03 pm

      Proving that banning is not the answer, Brian Hoff, but rather accurate description is.

      As two examples: 1) Nazism sucks and should have been seen as such; 2) Islam sucks and should be seen as such.

      Islam does not need to be banned. It “merely” needs to be properly characterized and exposed for the totalitarian ideology, like Nazism and Marxism, which it is.

      Just love it when you and I can agree on something. Makes me all warm and fuzzy inside. Ah, time for a beer and a ham and cheese sandwich.

      • David says

        Jul 25, 2020 at 11:57 am

        Wellington, you sound like a Brit! Our only line of attack against islam, is to expose its true nature and teachings of hate.
        Islam sucks, and many people swallow it!

    • gravenimage says

      Jul 24, 2020 at 9:36 pm

      “Brian Hoff” is fine comparing his foul creed with the Nazi Party.

      This should not surprise–he has lauded the vicious Fascists many times before.

    • RichardL says

      Jul 25, 2020 at 8:49 am

      Hitler was thrown into prison and wrote two books. The he came out of prison and the party was reconstituted and the rest is history.

  5. Raja says

    Jul 24, 2020 at 7:25 pm

    The word religion invokes some sense of reverence whether good or evil. I guess most in the world used to think that a religion “cannot” be bad per se. This is a flawed thought as everything under the sun seems to fit the tag religion. The glaring contradictions or huge gulf between them shows that some are evil indeed, of which Islam is one.

    Kings during Jesus’ time used to offer child sacrifices. Jesus, though appalled chose not to confront it, consistent with his statement that “my Kingdom is not of this world”. Perhaps it is best that the “standards” of people judge the religions as to how good it is or how bad it is.

    Here again standards or benchmarks are so varying. Ishmael was not just a ” donkey of man” as some versions would have it in Genesis 16:12, it is rather a wicked man always warring against the rest of the world. God foresaw that and warned mankind against that and yet the Left idiots are too stupid to understand that and want to have more of gloom by hobnobbing with the Ishmael’s descendants.

    The crafty devil chose this tribe to present the “great” Mohamed to the world.

  6. gravenimage says

    Jul 24, 2020 at 9:24 pm

    More Countries Ban the Muslim Brotherhood, But Still Not the US
    ………….

    So foolish.

  7. rubiconcrest says

    Jul 24, 2020 at 10:13 pm

    I know Islam is the favored term here but Islamism is useful so we can lump it together with the ‘isms’ of the 20th century to give it it’s due. Like the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse listed in Ezekiel, Islamism would be the sword, Communism … famine, Fascism … wild beasts and Nazism … plague. Islam plays the word game and we should do it right back. The MB is always playing word games. Never mention Islam without the other 3. A mnemonic device is: IslamCoFaN. In all future letters, wherever they are posted, lump the 4 together. Let’s start a movement.

  8. mortimer says

    Jul 24, 2020 at 10:15 pm

    A scholar of Al Azhar University (Islam’s most authoritative source of information) recently said that the Hagia Sophia conversion is the work of the Muslim Brotherhood. It is possible that they know something through the Egyptian spy agency about the work of the MB in Turkey.

    The US should follow the other countries that have banned the MB as a terrorist organization.

  9. RichardL says

    Jul 25, 2020 at 8:50 am

    Keith Ellison is the most highly placed enemy in America’s power structure. If Trum were to ban the MB, he would declare NATO member Turkey (and Qatar) to be official terrorist sponsors as they finance and host the MB

  10. James Lincoln says

    Jul 25, 2020 at 9:28 am

    Apparently the Trump administration did not get John Guandolo’s memo.

    Ban the muslim brotherhood in the United States – and brand it as a terrorist entity…

    • RichardL says

      Jul 25, 2020 at 10:55 am

      like antifa you mean? With an AG officially supporting it without consequences?

  11. OLD GUY says

    Jul 25, 2020 at 11:00 am

    The Muslim Brotherhood should be listed as a terrorist organization with all foreign members being deported. US citizens that support this group should be charged as appropriate for their actions to support a terrorist organization.

    • Craig Michael Vandertie says

      Aug 17, 2020 at 10:56 pm

      And stripped of their citizenship and ejected from our nation as well.

  12. Gourdhead says

    Jul 25, 2020 at 3:23 pm

    The corrupt in our government may give these heathens a pass but when the SHTF, the people will take care of this problem.

    • Craig Michael Vandertie says

      Aug 17, 2020 at 10:55 pm

      Because of a paltry/piddly Class D felony I committed 41 years ago I no longer have my 2nd Amendment rights so I certainly hope that those who do can eradicate the deadly viral spores for me.

  13. Craig Michael Vandertie says

    Aug 17, 2020 at 10:52 pm

    Islamphobia is a Misnomer, phobia: An irrational fear of something, their is nothing irrational about despising those who adhere to and embrace the principles of which islam is based, and you know that it was the islamic brotherhood that originated in Iran that first coined the term, a perfect example of distracting people from the truth of how evil all who practice islam are.

  14. Craig Michael Vandertie says

    Aug 17, 2020 at 11:00 pm

    Pardonne moi in my 1st post I referred to the muslim brotherhood as the islamic brotherhood, but I am correct in that they were founded in Iran.

FacebookYoutubeTwitterLog in

Subscribe to the Jihad Watch Daily Digest

You will receive a daily mailing containing links to the stories posted at Jihad Watch in the last 24 hours.
Enter your email address to subscribe.

Please wait...

Thank you for signing up!
If you are forwarding to a friend, please remove the unsubscribe buttons first, as they my accidentally click it.

Subscribe to all Jihad Watch posts

You will receive immediate notification.
Enter your email address to subscribe.
Note: This may be up to 15 emails a day.

Donate to JihadWatch
FrontPage Mag

Search Site

Translate

The Team

Robert Spencer in FrontPageMag
Robert Spencer in PJ Media

Articles at Jihad Watch by
Robert Spencer
Hugh Fitzgerald
Christine Douglass-Williams
Andrew Harrod
Jamie Glazov
Daniel Greenfield

Contact Us

Terror Attacks Since 9/11

Archives

  • 2020
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2019
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2018
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2017
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2016
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2015
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2014
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2013
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2012
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2011
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2010
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2009
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2008
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2007
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2006
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2005
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2004
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • September
    • August
    • July
    • June
    • May
    • April
    • March
    • February
    • January
  • 2003
    • December
    • November
    • October
    • March

All Categories

You Might Like

Learn more about RevenueStripe...

Recent Comments

  • Walter Sieruk on Iranian top dogs approve bill to end UN nuclear inspections, increase enrichment
  • Dude on Muslim cleric: ‘We welcomed the takeover of ISIS because they wanted to implement the Sharia’
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Infidel on Uighur leader: ‘We’re actually quite worried’ about what Biden might let China get away with
  • Mojdeh on Audio: Robert Spencer on Muslim Brotherhood influence in a Biden/Harris administration

Popular Categories

dhimmitude Sharia Jihad in the U.S ISIS / Islamic State / ISIL Iran Free Speech

Robert Spencer FaceBook Page

Robert Spencer Twitter

Robert Spencer twitter

Robert Spencer YouTube Channel

Books by Robert Spencer

Jihad Watch® is a registered trademark of Robert Spencer in the United States and/or other countries - Site Developed and Managed by Free Speech Defense

Content copyright Jihad Watch, Jihad Watch claims no credit for any images posted on this site unless otherwise noted. Images on this blog are copyright to their respective owners. If there is an image appearing on this blog that belongs to you and you do not wish for it appear on this site, please E-mail with a link to said image and it will be promptly removed.

Our mailing address is: David Horowitz Freedom Center, P.O. Box 55089, Sherman Oaks, CA 91499-1964

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.