“Those who make a direct mistake on Mohammad Saheb, O dog will die.”
The “mistake” here is a film that portrays Muhammad favorably. But even that is not acceptable. Islamic apologists insist that Muslims do not worship Muhammad, and to be sure, he is not considered a deity in Islamic theology, but the rage over any portrayal of this one human being betrays that the fact that in Islam, Muhammad has a de facto status that is considerably more than human.
“Muslims demand ban on Majid Majidi’s 2015 film ‘Muhammad: The Messenger of God,'” DNA, July 6, 2020 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
Twitter has a new trend – #BoycottFilmOnProphet. The hashtag is around Majid Majidi’s 2015 release called ‘Muhammad: The Messenger Of God’. Muslims on the mico-blogging [sic] site have been demanding ban on the movie for various reasons.
One reason that a ban is demanded on ‘Muhammad: The Messenger Of God’, is because, according to a user, filmography is prohibitted [sic] in Shia culture. Many others have asked the government to take strict action against the film too….
#BoycottMovieOfProphet This is not acceptable. No compromise with our Religion. This Movie should be banned. #Government should take serious action against this.#mohammadkhan_21 pic.twitter.com/dqVJpFW0z2
— (@mohammadkhan_21) July 6, 2020…
I appeal to all muslims brother and sister to participate in this trend largely . It’s against Islam . It should not be released in this way#BoycottNetflix #BoycottMovieOfProphet #BoycottMovieOfProphet pic.twitter.com/XmFMjho1O4
— Zubair (@Zubair41202871) July 5, 2020
We strongly opposed this movie..
It should be ban, We can’t tolerate this one even
If we’ve to lost our life
If you agree RT#BoycottMovieOfProphet #BoycottMovieOfProphetं pic.twitter.com/JEvDiOfHru
— Muhameed Hussain (@MuhameedHussai1) July 5, 2020
…
mortimer says
So … a whitewashed story about Mohammed leaving out all the nasty bits is not halal! They must have chosen an actor whose skin pigmentation was too DARK, because Mohammed was known as ‘The White Man’.
– Sharia law says whoever says the Prophet was black is killed
John Gibson says
It is because if you get 10 Muslims in a room from a so called liberal one to one that want shari’a in forced on everyone and everywhere the 1p of them would not be able to agree what is Islam is 2020 and what should be unforced in Pakistan he won’t even Outlaw forced conversions and the age of sex in marriage its in Islamic Pakistan just like Saudi Arabia religion and country are not divided unlike the UK and other Western countries what I don’t get is if they want to live under the conditions why do so many come to the west myself I want no more or integration from Islamic countries only religion that lives separate to the rest of the communities especially in the UK I can see Christians and Jews Sikhs etc no problem living side by side I don’t care about the majority will be told peaceful accessory case it’s a minority I care about grooming gangs terrorist attacks not on soldiers but children civilians innocent targets they hate as that much what they went 2 murder children at Manchester it’s now become apart of everyday life life our London mayor thinks this comes with every big city but when I was growing up we never heard of mass Islamic attacks why now political Islam has a firm hold over the religion to call it a religion of peace is laughable at this time well we have convert wake British women thinks the hijab is a lovely thing tell that women of Saudi Arabia Afghanistan Pakistan almost every Muslim country the LGBT and Islamic way of life please don’t tell me me these two communities with your own well together look at what happens to homosexuals and gay people in Muslim countries
FYI says
At least it didn’t depict muhammed’s magical winged flying donkey with a woman’s face called buraq, the one he flew on when he visited that mosque in Jerusalem that didn’t exist in muhammed’s time{koran 17:1}
This information comes from islamic sources.
What mode of transport did muhammed use in journeying from mecca to Jerusalem?
A flying winged donkey with a woman’s face.
What was muhammed visiting in Jerusalem?
A mosque that didn’t exist in mo’s time.
So muhamed flew on a fabricated fantasy beast which couldn’t possibly have existed to visit a mosque that couldn’t possibly have existed in mo’s time.
TRUTH is stranger than fiction;especially islamic ‘truth’.
mortimer says
Yes, a large number of absurd hadiths show Mohammed in many strange poses and few Mohammedans are aware of all the absurdities that they are required to believe. The mullahs are occupied full time, either hiding or explaining away these hundreds of absurdities.
A person can remain a Muslim only be lacking curiosity about Islam huge factual errors and offensively bone-headed nonsense.
Keith O says
The simple fact is, Mudslimes don’t want the lies of their perfect man being made public.
Showing anything to do with the prophet will bring up inconsistencies in his story and of course you can’t let the truth get in the way of a good yarn!
US infidel says
When I do my bathroom jihad have a facsimile of the prophet muhamed glaring at me before I press the lever.
gravenimage says
Muslims enraged, demand ban of film glorifying Muhammad, threaten to murder filmmaker, filmmaking is un-Islamic
……………..
More proof that nothing can *ever* be Islamic enough.
And this insanity has happened before–here’s “The Message”, also known as “Mohammad, Messenger of God”, from 1976. This movie is hagiographical to the vile “Prophet”, and is careful not to depict him directly at all. Was this enough for the most pious Muslims? Of course not…
Here was its reception:
In July 1976, five days before the film opened in London’s West End, threatening phone calls to a cinema prompted Akkad to change the title from Mohammed, Messenger of God to The Message, at a cost of £50,000.
In 1977, as the film was scheduled to premiere in the United States, a splinter group of the black nationalist Nation of Islam calling itself the Hanafi Movement staged a siege of the Washington, D.C. chapter of the B’nai B’rith. Under the mistaken belief that Anthony Quinn played Muhammad in the film, the group threatened to blow up the building and its inhabitants unless the film’s opening was cancelled. The standoff was resolved after the deaths of a journalist and a policeman, but “the film’s American box office prospects never recovered from the unfortunate controversy.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Message_(1976_film)#Reception
Think that the “Prophet” is somehow being “disrespected”? Issue death threats, kidnap Jews, threaten to blow them up, and murder journalists and policemen…
James Lincoln says
gravenimage,
The entire movie is available on YouTube. I have provided a link.
46,000 likes, 2,700 dislikes. WOW!
islam totally whitewashed – as expected.
The comments section showed that the “slick production” fooled a lot of people – and gained some converts to islam.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=or2BjnTI5cU&t=9581s
mortimer says
Mohammed is never seen or heard in ‘The Message’. The makers of that film also received death threats.
gravenimage says
Thank you for that link, James. I should probably sit down and watch this thing now…ugh…
Beneath the Veil of Consciousness says
Dammed if you do and dammed if you don’t.
This death cult has more do’s and don’ts than
Carter has liver pills
gravenimage says
Note that that picture above is right out of Christianity. Depicting the “Prophet” is Haram.
And it doesn’t sound from Islam’s own texts that he ever experienced any love as a child–not from his mother, who sent him away, not from his foster mother, who died when he was an infant, and not from his uncle, who reluctantly made sure he was fed.
Of course, others have had sad and loveless childhoods, and this does not make them sadistic monsters.
Daniel Triplett says
True, not all who suffer sad and loveless childhoods become sadistic monsters.
However, the one thing all sadistic monsters have in common is an abusive or absent biological father. Muhammad, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and many more fit this profile.
David Wood produced a couple of excellent videos exploring this psychology as it relates to Muhammad and the rise of Islam:
The Psychology of Islam, Part 1: The Defective Father Hypothesis
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wikEctQIRSs&list=WL&index=3&t=0s
The Psychology of Islam, Part 2: Muhammad’s Rebellion
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F90Edm1tPAw&list=WL&index=3
p.s.
I also highly recommend David’s recent outstanding video sharing his perspective about police:
Why Some People Hate Cops (An Ex-Con Explains)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnD5lS-rHJY&t=2s
gravenimage says
Yes–this is *very* common, Daniel. And I have seen David Wood’s videos on how a missing father and abusive uncle may have effected Muhammed.
I haven’t seen his piece on hating police before–I’ll check it out. Thanks for the link.
Westman says
2015 release? And now there is rage? Saw this years ago and it made Muhammad into a combination of Moses v2.0 and your loving grampa.
Any Muslim protesting this film must not have seen it. Only Islam destroys its best recommendations.
Let’s hope Muslims keep digging until China owns Islam.
Manuele Lui says
The appeasers are trying to kiss closer to you know where the Sun don’t shine, THEY’RE STILL INFIDELS. THEY SHOULD GIVE UP ALREADY. “YOU ARE STILL INFIDELS” LIKE THE REST
Jake2169 says
Muslims tend to be enraged at all times poor souls. Nothing is working out for them is it? No real power, they tend to rely on threats against those that oppose their twisted thinking. Islam is not a religion it is a curse on humanity that has to be stamped out!!
wpm says
Islam + government appeasement + MSM appeasement =More appeasement and violence against unbelievers.
Unbelievers lose more rights as appeasement goes up !
You cannot every appease your way into peace with extreme supremacist cult followers and that is what main stream Islam is.
Giacomo Latta says
If this new direction means that true muslims should not be on the internet nor filming their hatefests then I’m all behind it.
wpm says
You cannot ban and should not ban Islamic “hatefests” on the Internet it shows the true hate they have of us unbelievers.The western appeasement progressive crowd would love to and have try to whitewash Islam every chance they get.The western appeasement crowd is forever doing damage control when jihad strikes,letting the leaders of Islam and experts on Islam post,film and shout their hate only confirms that Islam is at war with all of western society.It is like Hitler,s speeches in the early 1930s the leaders in America and Europe said he does not really mean what he is saying.He is not really that bad ,he is good for Germany and not a threat to the rest of the world.
Daniel Triplett says
Yes, it’s easy for an average American to believe that what he sees when he looks up and down his own Mulberry Street in Anytown, USA, is a realistic representation of how the rest of the world must look too. The quiet Muslima dressed in her hijab with her kids in tow at the local grocery store and the friendly vendor at the kebab shop must be a good representation of the true peacefulness of Muslims worldwide.
This perception, along with a complete ignorance of Islamic doctrine, compounded by the Bush 43 doctrine worldwide Great Lie that Islam is “The Religion of Peace, hijacked by a Tiny Minority of Extremists (TMOE),” prevents the West from recognizing the Global War and Islamic Manifest Destiny in progress before our very eyes.
Shielding the West from the truth by censoring what they see and hear on TV and the Internet only helps our enemies and guarantees our continued defeat.
The more graphic video the West sees, and the more they read, the more likely they are to pay attention, respect the gravity of the threat, and organize to fight back with policy and strategy to win and end this 1400 year global war.
wpm says
+1
Gourdhead says
So, what’s their beef? Is Mohammad Saheb protrayed as a faggot? We know he was a pedophile and overall pervert.
OLD GUY says
If you look closely at the radical islamic, they want their followers to live like they are still in the 11th century. Their ideal situation is that everyone is totally dependent on their “religious” dictatorship to survive. And survive is truly all you will be doing, because the modern world will be destroyed, just look at the modern muslim world today with its tribal wars and destruction of society and spread that world wide. NO THANKS!
The so called infidels of this world need to step up and stop the muslim/islamic invasion of our countries.