Boris Johnson has been rather quiet as Muslim migrants, many with coronavirus, continue to invade his country illegally, some with help from the French navy. The migrants are from Iraq, Syria, Kuwait, and Iran. Amid the coronavirus lockdown and Antifa/Black Lives Matters anarchy, the hijrah continues, largely under the radar.
“‘The Invasion Continues’: 90 More Boat Migrants Brought Ashore at Dover,” by Kurt Zindulka, Breitbart, July 16, 2020:
Home Secretary Priti Patel has sought to cast the blame for the illegal boat migrant crisis in the English Channel on her French counterparts for refusing to turn back boats just yards off the coast of France, as nearly 100 migrants successfully reached British shores.
In the early hours of Wednesday morning, an estimated 90 illegal boat migrants were taken from the English Channel and brought ashore at the Port of Dover by the Royal National Lifeboat Institution (RNLI) and the British Border Force after attempting the perilous journey from France.
Since the beginning of the year, over 2,658 illegal migrants have officially been brought ashore, a figure that will increase after Wednesday’s landings, according to the Daily Mail.
This is compared to 1,890 arrivals for the whole of 2019.
Brexit Party Leader Nigel Farage lamented that the “the invasion continues”, claiming that “90 taken into Dover already. A boat has landed on the beach at Hastings, and 30 or more illegal migrants are on the run.”
In a virtual meeting of the Home Affairs Committee, Home Secretary Priti Patel admitted that there is a “major, major problem with these small boats”. Ms Patel said that she has had “difficult discussions with my French counterpart, even looking at interceptions at sea, because currently, the French authorities are not intercepting boats at sea”.
The Home Secretary said that the British government aims to “break this route” for illegal boat migration, saying that the only feasible solution is to intercept and return migrant boats to France.
“We want to break this route, we want to make this route unviable, and in my view the only way we can do this is by intercepting and returning the boats back to France,” Patel said….
Phil Copson says
By failing to ensure that the law is upheld, Patel has emboldened the people smugglers and empowered the “traitors within” – the “Open Borders” contingent within the UK civil service.
She is plainly not in charge of her department – whose side is she on, exactly ? Maybe like Theresa May, her strategy is to say one thing whilst doing the exact opposite.
Roland says
Let’s hope not. Maybe her hands are tied until the UK has finally left the EU and Johnson-Cummings have disciplined the civil service. But, the Conservatives can still be wobbly on immigration.
toomanyhobbies says
give them enough gas for their motor and tell them the UK is south west of here….
mortimer says
Migration without assimilation is invasion.
Red Pill says
Islam isn’t compatible with any system that is not Islam, therefore they can’t assimilate if they don’t leave Islam.
curious says
+1
gravenimage says
Spot on, Mortimer.
Aleksander says
For shure. It`s a fact.
mortimer says
They should be put on airplanes immediately to be sent to their countries of origin.
Giacomo Latta says
I doubt if anything less than the Queen Mary II would suit them.
AntiIslamicman says
Just send them back it’s that simple
Red Pill says
There more they accept, the more will come.
James Lincoln says
According to the feature article, UK Home Secretary Priti Patel said:
…the British government aims to “break this route” for illegal boat migration, saying that the only feasible solution is to intercept and return migrant boats to France.”
“Aims” to break this route?
Break it by force – now!!!
NotAgain says
Soon to be United Caliphate of England known as Britanistan.
ISAAC MEYER says
Since they have not been approved, they should be dealt with as terrorists.
curious says
+1.
curious says
Do unto others as they would do unto you. Read the history of the Barbary Wars, and what made them necessary. As per Islam, the Barbary States sponsored Islamic piracy, capturing and enslaving or killing anyone who sailed the Mediterranean, except only for those flags that paid jizya. Since these foreign Muslims are not paying jizya to Britain, the British Navy should sink the boats and either enslave or kill the Muslims, as the Muslims would do to them.
Robert Spencer renounces violence, and I will accept deletion of this comment, but it is my own opinion that countries have navies for a reason: to defend the shores. In fact, if the first responsibilities of government are to defend the shores and to deliver the mail, then the British government are failing at their #1 task.
The question becomes, why? Have they simply lost their nerve? I think rather that Petrodollar hypnosis and corruption have created a Muslim exception to immigration rules and even SARS-CoV2 quarantines. The British government would prefer to import Muslims with SARS-CoV2 rather than offend KSA and risk the lucrative military contracts and the wrath of Petrodollar-driven media. Also, from the perspective of British elites (including a growing % of Muslims), these migrants look like modern slaves: cheap labor. Of course, the most likely “labor” will consist of navigating the British dole, which pays extra to polygamous Muslims (while Britain prosecutes polygamous non-Muslims). They will set about their “work” of breeding more jihadis. The Saudis get what they want, and the corrupt elites get paid for selling out the country, and everyone smiles until it’s too late.
James Lincoln says
curious says,
“…the British Navy should sink the boats and either enslave or kill the Muslims, as the Muslims would do to them.”
Disagree.
The British Navy should defend their shores by forcing the boats to return to their place of origin. No exceptions.
curious says
OK, fair enough, but the Channel can be rough and “forcing” overloaded boats “to return” may effectively result in them sinking at sea.
James Lincoln says
Curious,
The UK should not allow any boats to even reach territorial waters – 12 nautical miles from land.
The illegal migrants made the decision to come and the UK is not is responsible for the seaworthiness of their boats.
curious says
@James Lincoln, I respect your view, but “The duty to rescue persons in distress at sea is a fundamental rule of international law… It applies both during peacetime and during wartime, albeit with the necessary adjustments to take into account the different circumstances.” (https://international-review.icrc.org/sites/default/files/irc98_7.pdf)
The British could opt to break the law, ignore the duty to rescue, and pay a penalty. If they block a migrant boat and it is then in distress, the British could let nature take its course, but that would be legally (and in their view morally) similar to deliberately sinking the boats.
The predicate of my comment above was to acknowledge that Islam is at war against non-Muslims, and I think the “necessary adjustment” to apply is the same rule that Muslims would apply to you. In the past, their practice was to kill or enslave as per the Koran, which has not changed. Only the Barbary Wars forced Muslims to stop their preferred Islamic practice. At present, the current practice is to throw Christians overboard to drown at sea:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-32337725
Whether you sink the boats, or push away the boats until the boats sink on their own, works out the same in the end.
James Lincoln says
Curious,
This is, understandably, a complex problem – and I am certainly not an expert in international maritime law.
I did find it appears to be a reputable website that addresses when “ships” (likely overloaded rafts) are run by nongovernmental organizations – and the people in distress are illegal migrants.
Suffice it to say, it leaves some discretion to the captain of the rescuing ship as far as evaluating when another “ship” is distress.
As far as bringing the illegal migrants to a “safe place”, that definition is open to interpretation.
Perhaps a Jihad Watch reader who knows the ins and outs of maritime law could weigh in.
I appreciate the discussion…
https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/21314/sea-rescue-what-the-law-says
gravenimage says
Britain has the right to deport anyone they rescue at sea. They are *not* obliged to taken them in.
curious says
P.S. Just to be clear, here is an example of what they would do to you:
“Italian police say they have arrested 15 Muslim migrants after they allegedly threw 12 Christians overboard following a row on a boat heading to Italy.
The Christian migrants, said to be from Ghana and Nigeria, are all feared dead.”
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-32337725
LB says
Eye for an eye is an appropriate response, no matter the circumstances. Unfortunately, the UK government is heavily infested with muslims and their “well-oiled” appeasers, whose common goal is the eradication of native (read: white) Brits. Therefore, the chance that the UK would do something, anything, to the detriment of the muslims and their growth in the country is zero.
The fact that they (native Brits sitting in the UK government) are willing to offer their people’s children for the muslims to do as they please with them should erase all doubts about whether the above is true or not.
curious says
+1 I concur, and I love the usage of “well-oiled” in this context.
For those who didn’t get the reference to offering up the people’s children, I think you are referring to the Islamic rape gangs who were allowed to get away with systematically gang raping thousands of underage British girls (they raped mostly girls, but also sometimes boys, hence the usage of “children”) in Rotherham, Rochdale, and other cities across Britain. The BBC obfuscated these grotesque crimes by calling them “grooming” perpetrated by “Asian men”, as if the girls had merely got their hair and nails styled in a Korean salon.
The well-oiled appeasers at the BBC showed no shame at all in their role of obfuscating the indecency.
Morphy says
England is already lost, gone, and I hope you Americans are watching with some trepidation – it’s already starting for you lot and will only continue until you are the same as the UK.
Second class citizens in your own country, underdogs to the Muslim invasion.
And don’t tell me “we have guns” – what you gonna do, go up against nat guard and army?
You’ll just be propagandised as another “Wako” gun nut…
Take a stand now before it’s too late. It’s long past “too late” for the UK… 2000+ towns and cities with Muslim mayors, Muslim filth in all the behind-the-scenes high offices of civil service.
(You’d think that after the TwinTowers went down you lot would be wary… but no, you now have plenty of vermin in your political offices… how? Why?)
curious says
@Morphy wrote, “(You’d think that after the TwinTowers went down you lot would be wary… but no, you now have plenty of vermin in your political offices… how? Why?)”
It’s the same Petrodollar hypnosis throughout NATO going all the way back to Nixon’s Petrodollar deals with KSA, which enabled KSA to corrupt NATO media and politicians. KSA became the world’s #1 importer of weapons, and thus building relationships with the merchants of war in Britain and the USA, the two largest exporters. In France, Dassault sold fighter jets to KSA and promoted Islam within France. As one merchant of war said in a surprisingly candid interview, politicians are basically midlevel salespeople for the arms industry. KSA hijacks NATO from the inside by paying baksheesh to the right people.
infidel says
Great .. A boatload of docs and engineers and technocrats that will surely enrich the UK in the long run.. VOW!!! Keep it coming…
Chistopher Watson says
You forgot the brain-surgeons! God, how we need those. There was a BBC report today on a chap from Somalia who landed in Britain (illegally) and now has a house and a ‘good life’. How many English homeless are still waiting?
Lenny Leaps In says
For the past 7 years or so every boat coming to Australia with illegal migrants on board has been turned back to Indonesia. No exceptions. Most on board are either Muslims or Tamils. We just, by force, send them all back – no exceptions. We don’ t care what the loony left say. We just don’t care how loud they protest.
British navy – what are you doing? Intercept them. Tie a metal rope to the front of their vessels and tow them all right back to France. Just copy Australia!! It works really well. True!
By letting the people smugglers win – you have in effect seconded your immigration controls over to people smugglers. Don’t the UK taxpayer public already pay for the Immigration Department and Defense Department to police or to control your borders? Why should they bother to pay their taxes?
Jake2169 says
The British government has been well and truly infiltrated, inside parliament and many government offices. The British people have been betrayed and currently are second class citizens and being used as cannon fodder in order to appease a violent threatening ideology that many in authority fear!! It doesn’t take a genious to see what is happening across the world. Britain for instance sells arms and aircraft, bombs etc to Saudi Arabia. They have been fighting with terror groups in the Yemen. As a result, many Yemenis have been killed and displaced. Nothing to do with the UK? Well, we sold the Saudis the weapons, so now we have “Celebrities” on the TV asking the British people to contribute to charities sending aid to the Yemenis affected by the fighting. So not only do taxpayers pay for the arms that are sold, but we also end up paying for things caused by those weapons to be put right!! What a crazy mixed up world we live in, and what a mess governments cause and inflict on their own people!! And the bastards in control are now allowing an invasion of Islam and taking away our freedom of expression to favour the invader!!
Mr K.Wade says
I’m not surprised the French don’t want these so called immigrants, would you? Since the UK is a hole let them keep coming since they don’t have the moral fibre to leave them in the water. Who invites diseased rats unto their home?
gravenimage says
The fact that they are passing all of these free countries shows that these Muslims are targeting Britain–they are not refugees.
Crusader 666 says
All the focus is on the invaders arriving at Dover, because Dover has many vantage points from which Press photographers can take photos of newly-arrived invaders being attached to the British taxpayers teat. But not one reporter has run a story about the Invaders who are being brought ashore, night after night, in the numerous creeks in Essex, then put in unmarked trucks to be spirited through the night to the anonymity of British cities. I despair of Britain!
OLD GUY says
Looks like an invasion force landing on British shores.