This entire Muslim migrant enterprise was sold to Europeans with the claim that the migrants would replace Europe’s aging workforce. Instead, this. Non-Muslims paying for the upkeep of Muslims is a Qur’anic dictate:
“Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued” (Qur’an 9:29).
The caliph Umar said the jizya payments from the dhimmis were the source of the Muslims’ livelihood:
“Narrated Juwairiya bin Qudama at-Tamimi: We said to `Umar bin Al-Khattab, ‘O Chief of the believers! Advise us.’ He said, ‘I advise you to fulfill Allah’s Convention (made with the Dhimmis) as it is the convention of your Prophet and the source of the livelihood of your dependents (i.e. the taxes from the Dhimmis.)’” (Bukhari 4.53.388)
Anjem Choudary said in February 2013:
“We are on Jihad Seekers Allowance, We take the Jizya (protection money paid to Muslims by non-Muslims) which is ours anyway. The normal situation is to take money from the Kafir (non-Muslim), isn’t it? So this is normal situation. They give us the money. You work, give us the money. Allah Akbar, we take the money. Hopefully there is no one from the DSS (Department of Social Security) listening. Ah, but you see people will say you are not working. But the normal situation is for you to take money from the Kuffar (non-Muslim) So we take Jihad Seeker’s Allowance.”
“Asylum seekers are less integrated into the labor market than expected,” translated from “Asylbewerber schlechter als erwartet in den Arbeitsmarkt integriert,” Tichys Einblick, August 8, 2020 (thanks to Medforth):
Berlin. The asylum seekers who have immigrated since 2015 are much more poorly integrated into the labor market than the foreigners who have lived here before. According to current figures from the Federal Employment Agency (BA), 53 percent of all employable asylum seekers receive unemployment benefit II (Hartz IV). That is currently around 629,000 people, reports the monthly magazine Tichys Einblick on the basis of current BA figures. Most recipients of unemployment benefits, namely 58 percent, are Syrians, with around 367,000 people. The Hartz IV quota among Syrians is 70 percent and by far exceeds all other immigrant groups with asylum status. According to official BA figures, of the current 790,000 Syrians in Germany, only 128,000 are employed subject to social insurance. In relation to the group of employable Syrians between 15 and 65 years of age, this corresponds to an employment rate of 24 percent, according to the BA. That is the worst rate of all migrant groups. Experts suspect that this could have something to do with the special position of the Syrians, who are the only ones who have a secure residence status in Germany.
According to the BA, the unemployment rate is also very high among Iraqis at 50 percent, followed by Eritreans (45%), Afghans (44%) and Iranians (30%). “That is well below the rate of 80 to 85 percent for foreigners who have already lived here before,” states economist Bernd Raffelhüschen. “The situation will get even worse because many migrants work in unstable employment relationships – for example in the restaurant trade or in the taxi trade,” said the economist in Tichy’s insight. Refugees have found shelter where low-skilled employees are needed. “But these are precisely the sectors that are laying off massive numbers of employees in the corona recession. That is why the statements made by the government at this time sound like a mockery to me that we are going to integrate this uncontrolled immigration.” Politicians were completely wrong. “Because of the facts, all these fine speakers from back then have to remain shamefully silent today. You were just wrong. A labor market participation of 50 percent is simply no integration.”
Red Pill says
Germans pay, they enjoy it anyway.
Bad Penguin says
Germany would have been better off if Kohl had his way in the early 90s importing about 10 million from India for high tech jobs.
LB says
Importing a huge number of foreigners of different race/ethnicity (no matter their occupation) is a recipe for national suicide. A country is defined by its people; can you still call a country by the same name once all of its native people are gone (read: replaced)? Would Germany still be called Germany if it was made up of 100% Middle Eastern muslims?
Also, a reminder: after WWII, Germany imported millions of Turks as “guest workers”, who were not to bring their families and just help rebuild the country and go back. Well, none of them ever went back and the Turkish population in Germany is now bigger than in any other country in the world (except Turkey, of course). Worst of all, not a single descendant of those first Turks would ever identify themselves as Germans but as Turks even after several generations. Nice integration there!
Anke Klinkenberg says
The first turks came in 1964, after Germany was rebuild in the late fourties and fifties mostly by Trümmerfrauen, the widows of the fallen German soldiers.
I have never heard of one turkish person living in the destroyed cities of Germany, f. e, Hamburg, Hanover or Frankfurt, were Germans were dying of hunger and cold in 1946 and 1947.
LB says
I know. But that is the official German reason for mass importation of Turks: to “rebuild” the country. This might have had other implications though such as filling the gap left by a large chunk of native German men who were either killed or captured in WWII. Point is that the Turks remained in Germany, never identified as German, barely did any actual work, and are at least 10 times more numerous today than the original number. Think of it what you will.
gravenimage says
This is not so much about race as about creed–the fact that Muslims adhere to a vicious, supremacist creed is the main problem.
LB says
Debatable.
Let’s do a fictional experiment using Germany as an example:
1) You import into Germany millions of black Africans and Middle Easterners (Arabs, Yezidis, Kurds, Turks, etc. all EXCEPT Jews!) of various creeds and religions, not just muslims. For argument’s sake, lets assume that all those religions are split evenly between Orthodox Christians, Catholic Christians, Sunni muslims, Shia muslims, Zoroastrians, other Pagans, Atheists, etc. After a century or two, for whatever reason, native Germans no longer inhabit Germany while the imported people are stronger in number than ever.
2) You import into Germany millions of Anglos, Nordics, Slavs, Hispanics, Romanics and other Caucasian sub-groups that inhabit Europe. For argument’s sake, lets assume that all those religions are split evenly between Orthodox Christians, Catholic Christians, Sunni muslims (mainly Bosnians and Albanians), Slavic Pagans, Germanic Pagans, Atheists, etc. After a century or two, for whatever reason, native Germans no longer inhabit Germany while the imported people are stronger in number than ever.
Which of those two experiments would succeed in keeping the German legacy (language, culture, work ethic, etc.) alive so that the replacement of the native German people could not be felt economically nor socially? The first, the second, both or none?
My answer is the second. Why? Because they are the same race as Germans and share the same mentality and work ethic and would therefore assimilate much quicker (within a single generation) into German society. It’s got nothing to do with religion (although Christianity did play a huge part in shaping the laws and morals of Europe, but that’s beside the point). Could you say the same for the first group (again, leave the religion aside)?
Hell, let’s change the first group to be comprised of exclusively black Catholic Christian Africans. I still say they would fail to assimilate even after multiple generations. Why? Simple. The two cultures (German and African) are too far apart in everything: concept of family, education, work ethic, traditions, general societal behavior, and even language. All the traits which define a group of people are near polar opposite of one another (German compared to African). And I’m not even mentioning the racial distribution of IQ which is an important factor because Germans are known to be Europe’s most industrious and in general the smartest people (technologically speaking only). Those are big shoes to fill and I don’t think any black Africans and/or Middle Easterners of any faith and creed could do it even if they tried.
Like it or not, race plays a big factor in assimilation.
gravenimage says
LB, we have Lebanese Christian neighbors who are wonderful, hardworking American citizens. And Robert Spencer’s background is Anatolian (“Turkish”) Christian. He is a rather patriotic Westerner, in case you had not noticed.
The idea that white Muslims are benignant–and that non-European Christians are malignant–really is not borne out.
German Muslim converts are apt to turn to Jihad–non-Muslims do not do this, despite what you seem to believe.-
And a race is not culture–the first is intrinsic, the second adoptable.
LB says
Stop moving the goalposts, you haven’t answered my question. I’m not interested in individual anecdotal stories. It goes beyond saying that you can find the kindest and most hardworking people among Africans, Middle Easterners, muslims etc. just how you can find the some of the most evil black-hearted people among native Europeans. But those are fringes on the extreme ends of the Bell’s curve. I’m talking about the middle, or the large majority of the people if you will.
I know you we’re raised to be “colorblind”, but you cannot ignore basic racial/cultural facts. Let me make this even simpler for you (as if my original question wasn’t simple enough). You live in the USA — the world’s #1 economic force. Who were the ones that built the USA from the ground up? The first or the second group of people? And would it have been the same result if the other group were to first discover and colonize the American continent?
I’m awaiting you answer with baited breath.
mortimer says
Kick out the supremacist freeloaders. Kick out the traitor Merkel as well.
Mike Stevens says
What is interesting about Syrians is that many have no claim to asylum whatsoever – at the height of the insanity, after Merkel’s open invitation to the Third World, the Syrian president (brutal dictator as he is) warned Europe that it was being gullible and taken advantage of by ‘refugees’ leaving his country. He claimed that the really desperate people who needed support were unable to leave, and were trapped in towns and cities by the fighting. Nor could they afford thousands of dollars to pay people smugglers.
In fact, he said that many of the ‘refugees’ were from safe, government controlled areas, IN NO DANGER WHATSOEVER, attracted by the invitation of an easy life at Europe’s expense, and many were better off, even rich Syrians.
Today, in Britain, another 20 Syrians made it into the country, illegally, to add to the 4000 mostly Muslims who have made the crossing this year. And almost certainly will not be returned to Syria, even if they were from a safe area.
Mike Stevens says
PS According to the website of one the many migrant support charities, the cost of a place on a boat to cross the Channel is 3000 – 4000 euros. THESE ARE NOT THE WORLD’S POOR.
curious says
+1
Many Muslim “refugees” vacation routinely in the countries they claim to be fleeing.
Mike Stevens says
How right you are, curious. Here in Britain, for example, Somalis are caught at the airport leaving for Somalia (the county they claimed was so dangerous they couldn’t be sent back, so were given asylum by foolish governments) to have FGM performed on their daughters by professional ‘cutters’. Savages who have no place in the civilised world.
GreekEmpress says
Mr. Stevens,
Is it true that in Britain Muslims are allowed to practice polygamy if the marriages were conducted in a Muslim country? I have been trying to find more information on this subject. Thanks.
gravenimage says
GreekEmpress, insanely, while polygamous marriages illegally performed in the UK are not valid, most polygamous marriages performed outside the UK are recognized–most of these, of course, were performed in Islamic crap holes:
file:///C:/Users/grave/Downloads/SN05051.pdf
Just disgusting.
Also, a lot of these second, third, and fourth wives and their children are considered single mothers and get full welfare benefits–even when the social workers know the real story.
GreekEmpress says
Thanks, GI!!
Mike Stevens says
Greek Empress, I think gravenimage gave you the answer to the polygamy question. he always speaks sense!
gravenimage says
Thank you, Mike.
gravenimage says
Grimly true, Mike and curious.
Mike says
can you all say Greece
Germany will fall as well
and the EU want Merkel in charge
Jayell says
So what percentage of all muslims in Germany are employable and and how many are unemployable? If the number of ’employable’ ones currently receiving benefits adds up to 629,000, the total for both categories receiving benefits must be well in excess of a million, and then housing, medical, education and childcare costs would no doubt be on top of that. So one wonders exactly how much these muslims are costing Germany. Add to that the additional costs necessitated by the crimes these people have been committing, and the grand total to Germany for the time these people have been in the country must add up to billions of euros. I wonder if the figures have been published? Maybe the authorities don’t dare.
curious says
@Jayell, authorities care only about concealing those numbers. If voters were ever told how much they are paying for Islam, they would vote differently. Adding in the cost of crimes & incarceration, the cost is huge.
Christopher Watson says
OK, lets get this straight: most ‘refugees’ are moslems, Arabs, uneducated, cannot speak a European language, do not intend to integrate, are likely to abuse or murder their daughters or wives, commit FGM on their baby daughter’s bodies and rape under-age white girls. The only reason they are allowed anywhere near a European country is the criminality of European politicians. Certain ME countries are paying European politicians, mainly those in Brussels, to make all sort of excuses to let in millions of ‘refugees’ for envelopes containing millions of dollars. Of course these ME countries would not let in a single Arab ‘refugee’. These ME rulers must wake up every morning and think “it’s just another wonderful day. How can we ruin Europe and America TODAY? Let’s send them another 5,000 Ethiopians! They are so stupid, their left-wingers will think it’s Christmas.”
The question is why are we soooo stupid? Why are we allowing in so many refugees who are not, and will not, contribute to our countries in any way? And even more important is why are our criminal-class, our politicians allowing in millions of moslem ‘refugees’ without so much as a wimper.
elee says
The magic of Islam: it creates failed societies, which create “refugees” who in turn (strive to) create more failed societies. See The Management of Savagery for further insights.
Eva says
You answered your own question.
The reason they’re all flooding our countries is because of our cowardly, corrupt, bought and paid for politicians.
They are not going to give up their chance to make millions for trivial reasons such as the health, safety & rights of their citizens.
They’re only concern is that it doesn’t touch them.
Steven Burgoyne says
They are following the Kalergi Plan to dilute and destroy the European cultures and have a mixed mongrel race of low iQ who do t know their roots .
Ferd III says
In the UK similar numbers. 70% of adult Moslems in London do not work. This is why we have record crimes (along with Blacks, 15% of the pop, commit 50% of all crime, but that is only because I am a racist). FGM every 2-4 hrs in the UK (No Moslem convictions). Sex Jihad (600.000 White girls raped), but targeting white girls is neither racist nor a crime (it is the girl’s fault). Knife attacks, gun shots in London every 3 hrs, raves, gangs, petty crime out of control, with of course a Moslem mayor. 1/3 of London is now Moslem – easy to get elected as a Leftard Muzzie isn’t it with such a voting bloc.
So when will Berlin elect their first Moslem mayor? 5 yrs?
Red Pill says
5 years seem too much, I would bet in 1 or 2 years.
elee says
Working saving and investing are foreign to Muslim culture; plundering those who do is a core value.
Dave from San Antonio says
Just normal behavior…for a parasitic organism.
Red Pill says
Once the host dies the parasite jumps to the next animal. Sounds familiar?
elee says
Kudos to Dave and Red Pill, I was going to mention that parasite business. A smart parasite is symbiotic. Islam is not a smart parasite, it’s more like malaria, it kills its host, but first it puts him into huge fevers that in turn draw more mosquitoes to carry it to the next host…..so it thrives until it runs out of hosts.
Pray Hard says
The people bringing them in are the problem, not that moslems aren’t.
Dave from San Antonio says
I thought Germany had a policy on immigration that stipulated that a migrant had to be able to show they would ‘not’ be on public support.
I’ve been to Germany numerous times, in the past, and loved it. Very rich in history, beautiful countryside, and citizens that were proud of their country. All this, though, was back in the late 60s through the mid 80s and no…I wasn’t a ‘military tourist’, at the time. Unfortunately, all that was in the past and things, at least the important ones, have changed for the worse. Could it be that islam is to blame for a large portion of this? YES.
Pray Hard says
Germany has a policy alright.
gravenimage says
Germany: 53% of employable Muslim migrants get unemployment benefits, including 70% of Syrian migrants
……………….
Who can be surprised by this? Besides everything else, Muslims are costing us a fortune.
European pagan says
?♂️ – “Why should I work? I am a guest here, invited by Mutti Merkel”
Red Pill says
+1 Pay the Jizyah Kuffar!
gravenimage says
Yes–a Muslim invader actually said this.
Henricus says
I believe that he said “give me my money”.
gravenimage says
Here is the story:
“German asylum seekers refuse to work: ‘We are Merkel’s guests’”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2016/08/german-asylum-seekers-refuse-to-work-we-are-merkels-guests
Pray Hard says
Corporate welfare. This isn’t just about moslem parasites. It’s about corporations having big pools of taxpayer-supported “cheap labor” and we’re too stupid to see it. They don’t care how much it costs us. Same thing is happening here in America and has been for decades.
James Lincoln says
Has anyone ever figured out the “present value” lifetime cost of just one typical muslim migrant – who is projected to live to age 80?
OLD GUY says
First off they don’t consider employment when non muslims will support them.
Thats taught in the Quran that they are superior beings and that us lesser beings are only here to provide for them.
On top of that raping young girls and boys is approved as long as you are not gay? Then again you can marry a 9yr. old and beat her to death or behead her for disobedience or hurting your feelings.
On top of all that if you are muslim its approved in your religion to kill your neighbor if he or she is not following islamic law.
After all muslim men are judge and jury and executioners according to Muhammad.
They make great neighbors its absolutely wonderful that the wealthy and leaders of our countries move these islamic/muslim people into our neighborhoods and NOT there’s. Funny how that works.
The only way this stops is to close the borders to islamic/muslim people. Not a bad idea when you consider their plan for us.
Red Pill says
+1