Social media companies are becoming more authoritarian by the day. Social media platforms including Twitter, Facebook and YouTube have banned the accounts of many prominent individuals who oppose Sharia oppression and the worldwide jihad. People such as Tommy Robinson and numerous others have been deplatformed by these social media giants for speaking the truth and peacefully exposing Islam and its barbarianism. Meanwhile, jihadi preachers are allowed to incite violence and propagate the tenets of the inhumane, uncivilised and destructive Sharia law.
A popular Islamic preacher named Mufti Menk has over six million followers on Twitter. In one sermon, which you can find on YouTube, he openly propagates the idea that if someone commits adultery, “the Sharia says such a person should be stoned to death, no doubts and ifs or buts.” He also preaches violence and calls for the establishment of an Islamic caliphate. Why are Twitter, Facebook and YouTube allowing a jihadi to do these things on their platforms? When someone such as Tommy Robinson exposes these barbaric practices and incitement, these social media companies have banned him because of “Islamophobia.” What the owners of these social media platforms are really saying is that a Muslim can incite violence against unbelievers and propagate inhumane practices such as stoning, but if anyone opposes these things, he or she will be banned. We are living in very strange times; the capitulation to Islam from these companies is breathtaking.
Zakir Naik is another popular Islamic preacher who openly advocates what Mohammed stated, that the adulterer should be stoned to death. Why are these social media companies allowing real hate preachers who want to violate human rights to have a platform? Naik, like Mufti Menk, has a massive following; he has over two million followers on YouTube. Muslims and new converts are becoming radicalised by the concepts these preachers propagate, and are willing to implement them — and then turn around and deceive non-Muslims that Islam is peaceful.
What is also outrageous is how supposedly moderate Muslims are sympathising with jihadis and praising them on social media. In the image on the left, you can see a supposedly moderate Muslim supporting the Muslim who shot an Ahmadi Muslim in Pakistan by using his photo as a profile picture, praising him as a hero and adding roses to his photo. His image received 41 likes from other Muslim. The Muslim in the picture on the right is named Ahmed Naqshbandi; he is showing his support for a jihadi named Khadim Hussain Rizvi, a man who put a death fatwa on the head of the Christian woman Asia Bibi in Pakistan for blasphemy, and another death fatwa on Geert Wilders for drawing Mohammed. This allegedly moderate Muslim openly shows his support for this jihadi. It no wonder that we don’t see the peaceful Muslims protesting against these jihadis, when other Muslims are openly endorsing them and the social media companies don’t take any action.
Kay says
It’s a grave concern that social media silences those opposed to sharia and jihad.
I thought Congress was just recently reviewing the concerns about social media censorship. Was nothing done?
Westman says
Congress is s-l-o-w as a sloth and primarily obsessed with raising money and avoiding controversey to remain, indefinitely, in office.
Some in congress are just beginning to realize the media giants are threatening their primary obsession and that it mostly affects just one political party. So, only half of congress is really concerned – and that usually results in gridlock.
Big Tech Brother has arrived and he doesn’t work for the government – he controls the government.
Lynn Moser says
slow is an understatement. I know I contacted at least dozen or more Congress people in ’12 when CSP came out with their 10 Part Course on the MB in America video series. Wow. then watched Coughlin’s Red Pill Briefings video series. WOW…
Talked to national Church offices about their using CAIR material to teach about islam and got crickets or handed off to another person. No answers.
The concept voiced by HRC at her UN/OIC meeting where she talked about “peer pressure and shaming” to change Americans ways and thoughts can be seen today. Not totally quoted because I paraphrased.
Look how far that advise has been taken…Karen’s shaming the unmasked during the rona scamdemic. All the loudspeaker behavior modification assaults in stores…
we’ll be dhimmis before we know it if Congress h as anything to do with it.
Idol and Icon says
Seems to me these anti social media platforms are run and controlled by Muslims and their non Muslim sycophants.
Robn Searle says
Yes, so obviously controlled by followers of Allah or their ignorant servants. They need to clean themselves up or it will fall to governments to equalise the field!
Sunny Imarhiagbe says
Why do the West always capitulate under the Muslim world? Maybe because of their money!
Roland says
I can attest that the censorship has become widespread. My comments critical of Islam have been ruthlessly scrubbed by the on-line censors on blogs for the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Newark (New Jersey) Star Ledger, Slate, and other publications. Often, I just quote the Koran to support my remarks or characterize the Palestinian cause as a “jihad”, not a national liberation movement. My comments have never been racist or scatological. As a liberal, I am dismayed by the closing of the liberal mind. I am no genius, but I understand that Islam is an ideology, not a race.
gravenimage says
Grimly, many others have had your same experience, Roland–including myself.
J Morgan says
According to Mufti Menk, Adulteress, Ilhan Omar ..”should be stoned to death, no ifs ands or buts.” Zakir Naik agrees with him. Moderates agree with the extremists online and that needs to be exposed, but why they don’t hold Omar up to their own standards? So they will appear to be moderate and tolerant? They are a big group of liars.
SKA says
And her infidel spouse must be killed for having had carnal knowledge of a Muslim woman.
gravenimage says
Right now, Ilhan Omar is useful for Muslim supremacists. If they ever come to full power, she would have lost her usefulness and would indeed be stoned.
Carl -stealth Infidel- says
Flagrant violations of Human Rights, and therefore should prosecuted and disbanded completely. The Holy Spirit needs to be freed from muslim hate!
Rob R (Brit stuck in Britainistan) says
Nerds sitting in Silicon Valley have the hots for cavemen.
And they are deluded and demented enough to think that they can enable the rise of this hideous religion worldwide, and yet they themselves will somehow be exempt from the bloody and horrible consequences.
Zuckerberg, Dorsey, and the CEO of YouTube have shown themselves to be accomplices to barbarianism, to terrorism etc. They should be arrested and put in Guantanamo Bay.
gravenimage says
Social Media Companies Allow Muslims to Preach Violence, Censor Those Who Oppose Jihad and Sharia Oppression
…………………
More suicidal madness.
Miguel Ángel says
I need to gain more information on this topic guys, at present the SNP government in Scotland, proposed by humza Yousef – a hate bill which signals the end of all things free to Scots and that is a ‘toaty’ amount as it is. His aims are clear, I can see it so can the truth seekers in UK. I dont do SM but these platforms are allowing this yet if one makes a remark about islam in any way, the repeccusions are jail! Thought police. Marxists Islamic alliance dangerous parasites, every last one