Maybe the leaders of Lunel should come out against mass Muslim migration into France? Oh, that would be “racist”? All right. Are they monitoring what is taught in Lunel mosques? No? That would be “Islamophobic”? Well, Lunel’s effort to shed its “jihadist hub” label is going to be wildly successful.
“French town of Lunel tries to lose its ‘jihadist hub’ label,” by Catherine Clifford and Claire Rush, France 24, October 7, 2020 (thanks to Henry):
The small town of Lunel, in southern France, made headlines six years ago for all the wrong reasons. Back in 2014, around 20 people left the French town in order to join the Islamic State group in Syria and Iraq. With Lunel flagged as a breeding ground for radicalisation, the local authorities have since made several changes in a bid to keep a close eye on the town’s youth….
Eur says
that city is lost, as is much of France. Either we accept submission to Islam or that division that exists socially we turn it into geographic. Or civil war or territorial division, there are no more options, Muslims are not diluted in French society since Islam is a hegemonic culture. The reaction of Muslims is always the same … jihad. Many other religious communities, ethnic groups or cultural ones may have the same arguments to cry and exercise victimhood but only Muslims react with the holy war and wanting to impose their theocracy. The origin of the problem is Islam itself. Poverty, exclusion, racism, unemployment … are not reasons for holy war, many people suffer the same. The vast majority of the generous social benefits in the Paris district are addressed to people with Muslim names, why? Because those in charge of allocating social floors and rents are also Muslim. They are the first racists who see society as a constant confrontation between Muslims and non-Muslims and help each other (with the money of all the French). They are infiltrated everywhere and their objective is always the same … to advance Islam in France. They care more about a recently arrived Algerian or Moroccan immigrant than a Frenchman of any origin. Muslim piety and charity is not universal, it is only for Muslims but they do accept Christian charity until they are settled and then destroy everything Christian. Islam is fascism.
gravenimage says
Stop letting Muslims flood into the West–then start deportations, starting with the worst Jihadists.
gravenimage says
France: Town from which 20 Muslims joined the Islamic State tries to lose its ‘jihadist hub’ label
……………
Just trying to lose its label, huh? No problem that it actually *is* a Jihadist hub apparently…
b.a. freeman says
“…the local authorities have since made several changes in a bid to keep a close eye on the town’s youth…”
—
yeah, i’m sure they have, probably by trying to get youth of the ummah to read the koran and the sunnah so they learn how pieceful (not sp!) islam is. and if said youth do somehow manage to get radicalized (!), they get put into the national de-radicalization program, which has had … hmm-m-m, let me see … ZERO “graduates” successfully become peaceful.
Walter Sieruk says
This shows that the ISIS terror/murder entity will still recruit devote Muslim to be jihadists, in spite of the loss of land ISIS suffered because of President Trump,
For the zeal of the jihadists ISIS ,in their deluded Islamic quest. is not based in the amount of land obtained by the Islamic “state” but on the strong and firm but blind ,irrational and unquestioning faith in the Qu ‘ran as totally without error ,therefore Divine.
To explain this in a more detailed way For there are some people who might stop and think and wonder then asked the question a very good question .Which is “Since ISIS had lost so much territory ,why haven’t the jihadist who make up ISIS just given up in their mad Islamic quest against the West and for the advancement of Islam ?
The answer to that question was provided in a speech by the ISIS spokesman, Abu Muhammad al Adnani, now dead, in this speech he had declared “True defeat is a loss of willpower and desire to fight…” he further explained “We would be defeated and you victorious only if you are able to remove the Qu ‘ran from Muslim hearts.” All this leads to a very important question: “Is the Qu ‘ran the Word of God or is it a fabrication of a man. Thus, is the Quran the truth or a fiction and a hoax ?” The jihadists, as those of ISIS use many verses from the Qu ‘ran as the main source of justification for their violence, mayhem and murders.
As found in For example, 2:191.. 4:47 5:33. 9:5,111,123. 47:4 The answer is clearly given on pages 145 through 157 in THE ISLAMIC INVASION by Robert Morey in which he wrote a section on the Qu ‘ran with its self-contradictions. Just two of the many he cited are the following “The Quran differs on whether a day is a thousand years or fifty thousand years in God’s sight’ and “Who was first to believe? Abraham or Moses [Sura 6:14 versus 7:143]? The above is inconsistent and illogical. Further, Morey wrote about “The fact that Judaism and Christianity broke up into different sects was used in the Qu‘ran to prove that they are not of God [Suras 30:20-32. 42:13, 14]. Yet Islam has broken up into many warring sects and therefore cannot be true if the Qu ‘ran is right.” Moreover, Morey in his book shows many more contradictions and absurdities in the Quran, there are and how Muhammad incorporated extra Biblical and Jewish folklore along with pre-Islamic Arabian myth and parts of Zoroastrian and Hindu stories into the Qu ‘ran.
Furthermore, the Muslims claim that “the Qu ‘ran is the direct, literal word of God unmodified in any way by the Prophet who uttered them at the bidding of God.” Nevertheless, in the book UNVEILING ISLAM by Ergun Mehmet and Eethi Caner has shown that the Qu’ran was modified in the following account on pages 45. “Muhammad felt the need to improve on the words of Allah, since he changed Allah’s wisdom for his own on several occasions. A hadith tells of the nonchalant emendations of Muhammad:’ On a number of occasions he [a scribe] had, with the Prophet’s consent changed the closing words of verses. For example, when the prophet had said ‘God is mighty and wise ‘ Adbollah b. Abi Sarh suggested writing down ‘Knowing and wise’ and the Prophet answered that there was no objection. Having observed a succession of changes of this type, Adbollah renounced Islam on the grounds that revelations, if from God could not be changed at the prompting of a scribe such as himself. After his apostasy he went to Mecca and joined the Qorayshites.’ Other writers reveal that later Muhammad and his people did go war with the Qorayshites and he personally killed Abdollah. Obviously Abdollah knew too much and Muhammad wanted Abdollah’s knowledge to die with him.”
In conclusion, the Qu ‘ran, which is the foundation for ISIS, is not only a fiction, it’s also a hoax.
It also should be added that since the Qu,ran has been proven to be a hoax ,as seen above ,this exposes the entire foundation of and for ISIS ,which is the Qu’ ran , then this means that the jihadists of ISIS have taken up a stand for a bad cause. To be more clear and specific a very bad cause.
The Bible instructs “Do not stand up for a bad cause.” Ecclesiastes 8:3. [N.I.V.]