YouTube took down two of David Wood’s videos recently because he said that the Quran contains hateful verses. As far as YouTube is concerned, that is “hate speech.”
So here is a new video from David, which he kindly gave me to post at the Jihad Watch channel, explaining the controversy and its implications.
Watch it soon; it might not be up long.
somehistory says
For several hours yesterday, everything I tried to watch or listen to on youtube (should be renamed ourtube) was replaced with an error message, to try again later.
gravenimage says
Scary, Somehistory.
Sam says
For the vast majority of decent and moral people, your kind of creatures, and the so-called jihadists are one coin with two different faces, both of your kinds of creatures are composed of hate, list for blood amongst other many ugly and animalistic traits and desires.
Your representatives i.e the military have killed millions upon millions of Arab/Muslims and are still killing, while the other side of the filthy coin is trying it’s best to revenge, and both of you, falsely and lyingly (sp?), or with total stupidity produced due to brains filled with hate, both of you attribute your blood lust to the holy books of both good and peaceful faiths, Christianity and Islam.
Jihadists = right wingers of the WESTERN world = mass killers of the western = serial killers = criminals in general.
All are hateful fanatics.
gravenimage says
“Sam” wrote:
For the vast majority of decent and moral people, your kind of creatures, and the so-called jihadists are one coin with two different faces, both of your kinds of creatures are composed of hate, list for blood amongst other many ugly and animalistic traits and desires.
……………………….
Ah…yes–Jihadists and those who oppose Jihad are just the same–much as those running the Holoicaust were just the same as those liberating the death camps…sarc/off
More:
Your representatives i.e the military have killed millions upon millions of Arab/Muslims and are still killing, while the other side of the filthy coin is trying it’s best to revenge, and both of you, falsely and lyingly (sp?), or with total stupidity produced due to brains filled with hate, both of you attribute your blood lust to the holy books of both good and peaceful faiths, Christianity and Islam.
……………………….
No, defending against Jihad is not the same as waging Jihad, as “Sam” here pretends. And the idea that the West has killed “millions upon millions” of Muslims is grotesque calumny. Citations?
More:
Jihadists = right wingers of the WESTERN world = mass killers of the western = serial killers = criminals in general.
All are hateful fanatics.
……………………….
Jihadists are not part of the West, although many have invaded our lands at this point.
And no–pointing out that Jihadists are fanatical killers does not make one a fanatical killer. This is is known as projection.
Note that “Sam” here has no problem with ther crushing of freedom of speech for Anti-Jihadists, while enabling that of Jihadists–but then, why would he?
somehistory says
Ah, Sam, where do you find this “vast majority of decent and moral creatures”?
Are you putting yourself in with that ‘vast majority of decent and moral creatures,” or are you set up as the Judge of all creatures so that you can rule on who is “decent and moral:?
Moral people don’t make up stuff in order to deceive others, to cause hurt or shame; lies are made to mislead..
Hint: moslims lie, they are taught to lie, and commanded to lie in order to spread their filthy islam. They are encouraged to “shed blood” lustily and often.
Christians and Jews have no “blood lust.” But you know that already. so writing it…claiming it….just what does that make you?
Do you smell something burning? Wool/cotton blend or polyester?
gravenimage says
Yes–the idea that the “vast majority of decent and moral people” don’t oppose Jihad terror is pretty sick.
Kesselman says
Arguments ad nausea. Arguments of this type are seen as early as in the 1930s about the Nat’l Socialist threat to civilization. A famous author at that time said: “We cannot condemn Nazi tyranny, brutality, and paganism … because our own society is also infected with tyranny, brutality, and paganism.” (Paul Hollander: From Benito Mussolini To Hugo Chavez – Intellectuals And A Century Of Political Hero Worship).
somehistory says
It was very frustrating, to say the least. It wouldn’t even allow me to listen to music…of any variety…watch an old movie, etc. I’m to have the extra eye work week after this coming one, and until then, I’m limited as to what I can see to do, so listening helps me pass the time without going too crazy.
When I couldn’t get anything on youtube, I tried dailymotion and watched…mostly listened to…a silly, stupid movie.
I have no clue why the tube thing was down for me. If it is taking down the Truth, that’s one more avenue that might end up closed to getting the information about islam out to the public.
gravenimage says
Good luck with your medical procedures, Somehistory!
Frank Anderson says
+1
Brando says
The LEFT is in ALLIANCE with the MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD (which in the West operates under many different names )
but as French scholar ALEXANDRE DEL VALLE has said: when the Muslim Brotherhood ( which has as its objective the establishment of a CALIPHATE ) gets to power ( if it happens)
it will LITERALLY start KILLING its Leftists allies.
THE CASE OF KHOMEINI
He got to power in 1979 with the help of IRAN’s leftists,socialists,communists.They thought they could manipulate him.
In 1970 Khomeini wrote his MOST famous book:” Islamic Governement / Velayat e Faqih” where he said EXACTLY what type of government he intended to install in Iran,a THEOCRATIC one.
It is often stated that Iran’s leftists Never Read the Book,I don’t know if it is true.Anyway,Khomeini turned on them and killed (along with the MONARCHISTS) 20,000 of them.
MICHEL FOUCAULT(leftist)
Even the brilliant French philosopher Foucault wrote a series of articles SUPPORTING Khomeini’s Islamic revolutionary actions.
A POET ALSO
Khomeini was also a poet and wrote many poems,which have been read by ROBERT SPENCER,and who says they are well-written.
They have been published as THE WINE OF LOVE,and are MYSTICAL and LYRICAL.
Eleanor says
Your first sentence says it all – “The LEFT is in ALLIANCE with the MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD (which in the West operates under many different names)” – that’s your answer right there! You only have to look at the T w i t t e r C E O to understand that this is perfectly true. And you are also correct in saying once ‘they’ get power, the Lefties who are presently ‘protecting’ them, are the first ones they will dispense with.
Brando says
Part of the problem is LEFTISTS think the Muslim Brotherhood is PRETENDING to care about RELIGION,they Think they Can BUY or BRIBE the Muslim Brotherhood.
Leftists are INCAPABLE of Understanding that True Believers are true believers.
Clifford Fodor says
And great pretenders. The Koran tells them to pretend to be friends with the non-Muslims. If they truly are friends of the non-Muslims, then they are no longer Muslims.
Aussie Infidel says
Brando, You wrote, “Leftists are INCAPABLE of Understanding that True Believers are true believers”.
From long personal experience, I can attest that you are right. I came from the Left over 50 years ago, and I know that most Leftists are atheists and have not read the Quran; so they are unaware of the hatred and violence it contains. Also they do not understand the power of religious indoctrination. Because they do not believe in a god, they cannot understand how anyone else can become so deeply committed. Leftists have allied with Muslims hoping that together they will defeat their common enemy – democratic Western societies and their freedoms,
newsupplements says
I agree, It is a very real fixed state of mind which along with other mental deceptions that have not been studied to be understood very well in science. We do not understand how a person can be so thoroughly duped especially when it is clear that the entire edifice of religious mental states only exists in the mind yet they proclaim it all real without evidence. For many, if a something cannot be proven such as the existence of chocolate sundaes orbiting the moon only on Sundays we say – you have a delusion that you are entrapped by. Some such people could watch a real live video of the moon exhibiting no chocolate sundaes on a Sunday but still they would insist that the moon had them, imagine if the same people then made it legal not to mock the chocolate sundae religion and declared themselves a protected group.
newsupplements says
Well it’s clearly not the left is it? This government is putting in the hate laws and is protecting Islamic Muslims. as usual they don’t have a clue. When you protect one group you should protect all groups such as Atheists, Christians, Buddhists, Hindhus, Chinese religions, There are many people born Muslim who are not Muslims in the strict sense of the word or anywhere close, they are not even believers in the great invisible woo” they just don’t want to upset the older generation, they are playing along with the game, also they don’t want to be murdered by their relatives. Atheists and Christians don’t want to be murdered either as punishment to save Islamic shame supposed to have been given to an offended “invisible woo” but the government is steadily strengthening the rights of Islamic Muslims and smoothing the way to an Islamic UK. This is not being done under the left but by the right conservatives so I can only assume that governemnt as in left and right is colluding with Islam
gravenimage says
What happened in Ohio. Barb?
gravenimage says
Do you have more details? Or is it something you don’t want to talk about?
revereridesagain says
Religious fanaticism can and will overcome even the most basic forms of human decency such as parents’ love for their children. That’s 15+ years of cult investigation talking, witnessing such abominations as Berg’s “Children of God” cult that sent their daughters “flirty-fishing” for converts.
But Islam outdoes every one of them I ever saw. Their vile and probably imaginary “prophet” taught them to worship abominations for which he set the standard. So very little those people do surprises me. No wonder they find such common ground with the Marxist Left.
gravenimage says
David Wood Video: YouTube Sides With Jihadis In Free Speech Controversy
………..
Yep–now pointing out others’ threats to murder you is “hate speech”–utter madness.
Boycott Turkey says
This is outrageous and absurd this makes my blood boil this vile protected trash group threatened David Wood life’s and family and I seen this protected group celebrate the beheading of the teacher I also seen them advocate genocide on Armenians I seen so many sickening things so basically YouTube allows this protected Group to advocate terrorism hate and racism murder and if non Muslims respond we are banned it’s more like a protection racket then a protected group this is a really bad time for us I think David Wood should have his own site like jihad watch does. This is the only site I comment on I don’t have Facebook Twitter or YouTube account I deleted them a long time ago because I knew what was coming the trust and safety for jihad team don’t feel very safe to me seems they are only safe for jihadist
Mauricio says
It’s stunning that YouTube is doing all of this. I used to think highly of them, specially because they allowed people like David Wood to post all his truthful videos. I mean, I’m aware Facebook and Twitter have been desecrated already but as for YouTube… I still held some hope
Frank Anderson says
My Opinion, of which I do not like and am not proud. Youtube is taking advantage that it is a private entity which has not yet been included as a “public accommodation” under Civil Rights laws, such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Search and read the case of Katzenbach v. McClung, (Ollie’s BarBQ) to see an example where the Constitution is extended to private businesses when they fall into the public accommodation classification. How and why Youtube and Facebook escape that designation is a mystery to me.
I ran into this with a nationally known “charitable” fraternity of which I WAS a member when defending another member from false charges. When they laughingly proclaimed that the promises of the foundational fraternity and the Constitution do not apply in their building, I knew I had better places and people to know.
mortimer says
We look to our lawyers to find a way to force Facebook and twitter to observe the freedom of expression. Lawyers are our only hope in defeating the censorship of Big Tech.
Frank Anderson says
mortimer, I earned my first license a little over 40 years ago, and my second about 9 months later. 2 bar exams in 2 states each passed on the first try. I have been researching and litigating related issues since 1982 when I was ordered to join a conspiracy to present false information to the US government. The cases I cite here frequently have some of the best guidance I can find to undermine the claim that islam is immune from prosecution because it is a religion.
Please, if you have not already done so, take a few minutes to search and read the Southern District of Alabama case United States v. Gary Greenough. It is available for free online. That contains one of the most concise explanations of the law of conspiracy I have found and cited in my litigation. In my opinion, the law exists if non-lawyers will make a decision that the law be enforced. I have suggestions if you ask. Whatever disagreements we have over issues I consider minor, I always wish you well.
I am retired. Please consult a currently licensed lawyer practicing in your jurisdiction for any legal advice.
Daniel Triplett says
Frank
How do you envision the “criminal conspiracy” strategy unfolding, showing all Muslims to be co-conspirators? I have a lay understanding. I’ve read the US Code on it, but I don’t have the experience or legal talent to correlate and assemble case law precedent and put together a case.
Would you start with civil lawsuits? Or would you pressure/lobby state and US Attorneys General to pursue criminal prosecutions? Would you do both?
In a nutshell, of course, I’m sure you’re capable of writing several hundred pages of technical detail on this.
Frank Anderson says
D.T. the judges in 2 cases wrote brilliant and concise explanations of successful prosecutions for conspiracy and related charges. These cases are available in full for free simply by searching their names.
United States v. Gary Greenough, 609 F.Supp 1090 (S.D. Ala. 1985), 782 F.2d 1556 (5th Cir. 1986)
United States v. Dan Alexander, et al, 850 F.2d 1500 (11th Cir. 1988).
There is no time limit or upper limit of participants on a criminal conspiracy. As long as it is an agreement of two or more for an illegal purpose or to use illegal means for an otherwise legal purpose it is a crime. Any of the members can be legal entities along with human members. Many cases can be found with the most basic of legal research. I have been writing and litigating on this subject since 1982 and have never found or had cited a single case to the contrary.
Daniel Triplett says
Thanks Frank. Appreciated. I’ll hang onto those cases.
Sounds like this will need political will to initiate: A state or US Attorney General will need to authorize/direct the application of the law to Islam in a first case, one that can withstand all the scrutiny and appeals all the way through the SCOTUS. And the AG won’t do that unless he has the backing and support or the Governor/POTUS.
Further, the initial judge, and all appellate judges up to and including the SCOTUS justices must all be on board with this too.
So, to get this going, it’s going to take a massive demand from the People upon the Governor/POTUS to make him feel a moral, but more practically a political consequence, for not yielding to the will of the People.
If that’s the case, we’re a long long ways off, and it’s going to take a lot of public persuasion and consensus building before we see this happen in America. We all therefore have a lot of work to do. We best all get busy.
Is this how you see it Frank?
Frank Anderson says
D.T. It really is more complicated than we wish. Please remember the story about the medic who was told by a doctor that he could be taught how to remove an appendix in about 15 minutes; but about 10 years of additional training is needed to know what to do when something goes wrong.
What if someone sues you for hate speech, or tries to send you to jail or fine you? Then THEY have submitted to the court and are stuck as you present your defenses and counterclaims. As far as trial and appeals court judges, they must not be “on board” but instead shown the facts in the regular presentation of a completely righteous case. If they are biased, the result will not stand. The most dangerous and treasured person on earth is an honest judge.
There are times to let someone try to do wrong in order to force them to do right. Plaintiffs can become defendants very quickly..
Daniel Triplett says
Good points.
Generally speaking, I think most people trust judges still. I don’t trust prosecutors, but I think most judges are straight. Seems like their personal biases often affect their decisions though. For example, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals, who heavily resisted the travel ban and were so protective of Muslims that Trump had to tip-toe through the semantics avoiding any mention of Muslim or Islam at all. The decisions and opinions they render are usually favorable to the liberal perspective.
Likewise, 5-4 decisions in the SCOTUS aren’t uncommon. So, 9 honorable, intelligent justices hear the exact same set of facts, yet half of them judge the outcome opposite to the other half, again, often along liberal/conservative ideological lines. Obviously, this is why the POTUS picks SCOTUS justices who share his ideological values system.
So, if this Islamic “criminal conspiracy” case were to land on the bench of the 9th Circuit right now, the Ummah would likely prevail, which would set a dangerous precedent for any succeeding attempt to make the case.
America is probably many decades away from the DoJ attempting to do this. But perhaps the Western Europeans are much closer to trying this, as they descend deeper into chaos and are much further along into the conquest than we are here. They’re going to need a huge strategy real soon if they’re going to win this war. The woke virtue-signaling strategy is a spectacular failure.
Frank Anderson says
D.T. we agree. The best opportunity for litigation will come when a muslim sues a kafir. Then there will be plenty of ways and places to present the case. Until then, we kuffar have the problem of showing we have sufficient interest in prosecution of our case (standing) and that we have selected and served the correct opponents.in the right court.
Daniel Triplett says
Thanks Frank. Noted. Makes sense. I’ll stay tuned looking for a solid future legal action.
Maybe something like the Scottsdale Community College Professor earlier this year, a case in which the defendant prevailed early in the process.
Perhaps something like that, but where the defendant continues to get railroaded and screwed by the court.
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2020/05/scottsdale-community-college-loses-its-war-on-academic-freedom
Frank Anderson says
D.T., if the defendant is getting treated poorly, of course a good record can be made for an appeal. But the main, important first step is to get the right opponent into court. If the judge is fair, make the best of the chance to present the truth. Every chance to tell the truth is a treasure. Every chance to show it and create a record for all to see is even better. Support the defendant when needed, but take advantage anytime the truth can be published.
Daniel Triplett says
Thanks Frank
Andrew says
Somebody somewhere somehow has fallen down a Rabbit Hole.
Jayell says
I believe that the Great Prophet was personally mocked in Mecca. Then look what happened later. And it’s happening again!!!
Jerry says
Except that Mo was never a true prophet, only a plunderer for profit and a self proclaimed but false prophet.
If time travel was reality and Mo was positioned to face Balaam’s She Ass in the narrow mountain pass, Balaam’s Ass would still be able to address him in human voice and words, and Mo would probably only be able to beat his falsehoods back.
In any event, it would be easy to distinguish which one was the true messenger of God.
Jerry says
Read bray for beat
Uma says
Thank you sir
Regards
Henry Schalk says
David is absolutely right, and we see this immunity from hypocrisy granted to Muslims and Islam not only at YouTube, but at Twitter, Facebook, and in the Media at large. Muslims and Islam are indeed a privileged group here in the West. This perpetuates ignorance and leads tragically to death, misery, and destruction. It is a violation of our freedom, and it dangerously handicaps truth tellers from getting the message about the true nature of Islam known to the wider public. YouTube et al are committing a great crime against our civilization.
mortimer says
Statistical Analysis of words Fear, Love and Hate in the Koran:
There are over 400 references in the Koran to hate, over 300 references in the Koran to Allah and FEAR, but there are only 49 references to love. Of these love references, 39 are negative such as the 14 negative references to love of money, power, other gods and status.
Three verses command humanity to love Allah and only 2 verses are about how Allah loves a believer. There are 25 verses about how Allah does NOT love kafirs (disbelievers).
This leaves 5 verses about love. Of these 5 verses, 3 are about loving kin or a Muslim brother. One verse commands a Muslim to give money for the love of Allah. This leaves only one quasi-universal verse about love: give what you love to zakat-charity and even this is contaminated by dualism since Muslim zakat-charity only goes to other Muslims. There are OVER 400 teachings of HATE directed against all disbelievers: Jews, Christians, Idolaters and Kafirs.
So much for love. HATE and FEAR are what Allah demands in the Koran.
James Lincoln says
mortimer says,
“There are over 400 references in the Koran to hate”
Is that all?
Geez, I was a little worried there for a while…(sarc/off)
mortimer says
ISLAM HAS A DOCTRINE OF HATE: ‘AL BARAA’ = Islamic Apartheid, Shunning
‘AL BARAA’ is translatable into English as Islamic Apartheid, Shunning, Avoidance, Hatred, Cleansing from a Disease, etc. Allah ordered Muslims to have Baraa (to be cleansed) from the dirty kufaar and from kufr and shirk (wrong worship). ‘AL BARAA’ (segregation) is the reverse of ‘COMRADESHIP WITH MUSLIMS’ (AL WALAA).
AL BARAA is NORMATIVE ISLAM, rather than an aberration.
‘Baraa’ is HATRED directed towards Kafirs ‘for the sake of Allah’…Al Bughoud or Al Mu’adaat (hatred) is the opposite of Al Muwalaat (love towards Muslims). Baraa is:
– To Hate
– To keep distance from
– To be enemy to
– To desert
– To decline to help
– To disrespect
– To put down
– Not to ally with
– Not to support
Allah ordered Muslims to have Baraa (to be cleansed) from the dirty kufaar and from kufr and shirk.
-Imam Abdul-Latif ibn Abdur-Rahman Rahimullah said, “It is not possible for someone to realize Tawheed (Islamic faith) and act upon it, and yet not be HOSTILE against the mushrikeen (i.e. wrong worshippers). So anyone who isn’t HOSTILE against the mushrikeen, then it cannot be said that he acts upon Tawheed nor that he realizes it.” [ad-Durar as-Saniyyah 8/167]
OLD GUY says
You Tube should take down all things islam as it is based on hate and violence.
Muhammad was all about profit and power.
Antiislamicman says
Not surprised really. I have been banned by YouTube they terminated my account. Bloody commies.
Patriotliz says
Islam has protected status because it is anti-West. If criticizing Islam incites violence by Muslims then that is HATE SPEECH because it incites violence. Youtube appeases anyone that is full of hatred and violence against the West.
hammar says
mohammad was no prophet!
somehistory says
No, he wasn’t. But he was a slimy lowlife, mass-murdering, raper of children. lying son of satan the devil. And that’s what moslims like about him. They wish to copy his every action.
Didn’t he write something about his end coming where he began? Kuje a sbaje? If he did, it’s the only Truth he ever uttered.
somehistory says
Error, error. Hands in wrong position. Like a snake is represented by “Kuje a shaje.” (That soft sound you hear is me laughing at myself.)
Dry Academy says
Glad to see David’s videos are up on BitChute. He may end up having to completely switch over there, YouTube is getting more and more censorious to the point of being unusable.
Art says
YouTube is a supporter of Islamic Jihad and its hatful attacks against non-Muslims around the world.
Here’s a thought, print the hate filled portions under the Qur’an and see if it gets removed. Be sure to explain up front that these are quotes to educate people about Islam and Islamic Law.