By these words, Robert Le Gall is signaling that violent intimidation works, and thereby condemning future generations of Catholics to precarious lives of cowering before their Sharia-enforcing overlords. Oh, that will never happen and could never happen in France, right? Maybe not, but by enabling and encouraging threats meant to enforce Sharia blasphemy laws, Robert Le Gall is doing all he can to bring it about.
“Prophet Muhammad cartoons ‘an insult to Muslims and Christians alike’, French archbishop says,” Rahnuma Daily, November 1, 2020:
(RAHNUMA) A French archbishop has warned of the dangers of publishing offensive cartoons, noting there are limits to freedom of expression amid renewed tensions between France and the Muslim world.
The Archbishop of Toulouse Robert Le Gall said he opposed the publishing of caricatures insulting Islam’s Prophet Muhammad, saying “there are limits to freedom of speech”.
“These are considered an insult to Muslims and Christians alike and they should not be spread further. We all see their results,” he said in comments to France Bleu radio station, according to an Arabi21 report.
“There are limits to freedom of expression and we should realise that we do not have the right to insult religions,” he added….
nicu says
Is he still a christian ??? Muslims are insulted by EVERYTHING
mortimer says
The Koran insults Christians on practically every page.
“FIGHT (to the death = q-t-l) those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who DO NOT ADOPT the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – [fight to the death] until they give the jizyah (extortion tax) willingly while they are humiliated.” – Koran 9.29
Dry Academy says
He wants restrictions on insulting Islam? He better be careful what he wishes for. Islam finds the doctrine of the Trinity insulting and blasphemous.
Peter35 says
Well, he really meant: “We do not have the right to insult islam”.
Gutless traitors are to be found everywhere.
gravenimage says
Yes–Muslims insult the religions of others all the time.
Dave from San Antonio says
I see that the Archbishop is heading back to the days when the inquisition was a standard of the RCC.
mortimer says
Robert le Gall is confusing good manners and polite deference with HUMAN RIGHTS.
Muslims do not have a human right to impose censorship in France.
PRCS says
In their minds they do, and are willing to kill those who refuse to accept that.
The Political Oracle says
Then, religion has its limits. We don’t have a right to usurp other’s rights to life, liberty and happiness. Agree?
Jees says
You are right bro. That is the way it should be, if things must be put in its rightful place.
mortimer says
Robert Le Gall is a legal idiot. The purpose of modern human rights codes is to allow us to insult ideologies, religions and idiotic clergy who don’t understand the purpose of the law.
Basically, our human rights codes give us the right to CRITICIZE RELIGIOUS AUTHORITY and to BLASPHEME.
The right to blaspheme is MEANINGLESS as a concept, unless we actually use it.
MUSLIMS HAVE NO RIGHT TO IMPOSE A BLASPHEMY LAW ON FRANCE.
That would be ILLEGAL and against the constitution.
The Political Oracle says
What! France has a Constitution! Could have fooled me! Muslims own France now because France’s elected leaders allowed muslim clerics to usurp the constitution to subvert it, pervert it and subjugate it. Macron has a serious dilemma on his hands.
PRCS says
Well said!
Manuele Lui says
ABSOLUTELY!! The problem is thE French Politicians allow the Murderers to do as they please.
mortimer says
Insulting Mohammed is not an ‘insult’ to Christians, as the archbishop falsely claims. Most Christians if asked would consider Mohammed to be an anti-Christ, if not THE ANTI-CHRIST.
Islam is extremely anti-Christian.
Donovan Nuera says
Archibishop de Gall still believes Notre-Dame Cathedral’s destruction was due to a “work accident” too!
spiro says
Maybe he should preach that in a mosque in sure they would follow his lead
Rev G says
Speech that offends nobody has no need of having its existence protected. Free speech is about the ability to say offensive things.
mortimer says
Exactly, almost everything that a person might say is offensive or rejected by an other.
What is considered ‘blasphemous’ by members of one faith may be quite normal to members of another faith. That is why freedom of expression must be protected.
If Muslims don’t like freedom of expression, then they should live in a homogenous, Muslim-only country and build tall walls around it.
The Political Oracle says
Although I am in agreement with the statements above, one should do his due diligence in preserving the dignity of others. That’s not to say that we should capitulate to the demands of any religious organization. We should couch our statements of defense as serious concerns rather than despicable cowardice of a growing threat to modern-day society. A rational and diplomatic approach is the best policy to address the islamist problem in France. Otherwise, chaos is inevitable in France.
mgoldberg says
The dignity of others means that we don’t praise those who cut heads off, or shoot them because someone of our faith or nationality felt insult to G-d by others. That is the dignity we deliver.
curious george says
The Political Oracle,
I do agree that we should take emotion out of the equation and think and act rationally. However, acting rationally and intelligently with those who wish to rule the world is viewed as weakness, and therefore, nothing is resolved, other than those seeking our destruction continue to grow stronger and more assertive.
The issue with the left and Islam, is never the issue, it’s the narrative that matters. It’s a war of attrition, last man standing. These people are highly educated, extremely motivated, very well organized and very well-funded. They have a plan and they are following that plan to perfection, using out laws against us.
The road ahead is going to be a very difficult one, are we, the USA up to the task? It appears that we are in the calm before the storm.
“For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.”
– 1 Thessalonians 5:3
“We have staked the whole future of American civilization not upon the power of government, far from it. We have staked the future of all our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government, upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments.”
– James Madison (1751-1836)
wpm says
There are elderly women being killed and beheaded at mass in Catholic churches in France and he is worry about insulting cartoons??There are Christian non Christian children being forced into sexual slavery with the blessing of the Moslem community and the leaders of that community covering it up all over the world and he is worry about cartoons. The Christian communities in Africa, the middle east and many parts of Asia are facing extermination by jihad and sharia law ,but is worry about cartoons! The good Archbishop of Toulouse should be warned that if in France the government substitutes sharia law for secular law he could as a leader of the worst of people (according to sharia law) have his head with its mighty tall hat removed from his body if he does not comply to every sharia law written. No more repairs of churches, no more building churches .No more ringing of church bells. No outward display of church celebrations, churches paying heavy taxes directly to Moslems, no civil service jobs going to non-Moslem. The list goes on ,the first step is no talking ,or discussion on how Islam is an evil, supremist, perverted, slave holding, thieving faith ,and by god no cartoons making fun of it. It is the victims fault they get their heads cut off pointing out the truth or questioning this evil cults motives and goals. I am sure the good archbishop get his marching orders from the pope who is more worry with hurting Moslem,s feeling then the spilling of Christian blood in all corners of the world .
spiro says
Very good points but I doubt
The archbishop is informed enough to know what he’s talking about
gravenimage says
Yes–notice that this Archbishop doesn’t say anything critical about Muslims murdering innocent people.
Hoi Polloi says
Sad how that particular omission is the pattern, huh?
mortimer says
What planet does Robert le Gall live on? He says, it is not a right to insult religions. Huh?
France has a LONG TRADITION of ANTI-CLERICALISM and insulting the RCC is a sport in France.
Didn’t Robert le Gall hear of France’s ANTI-CLERICALISM yet?
… puh!
Brando says
Very disappointing,I think he has been BOUGHT, only logical conclusion. He should has instead said that the NT says:
the JEWS are still the CHOSEN PEOPLE of GOD.
It is Hard to Believe,but the TEXT says so:
PAUL(himself a Jew) wrote in ROMANS,his most Theological and Longest Letter,written to a group in Rome he had Never Met,says:
ROMANS 11:1-2
“I ask then: Did God REJECT his PEOPLE?
By NO MEANS!
I am an ISRAELITE MYSLEF, a descendant of Abraham, from the tribe of Benjamin.
God did NOT REJECT his PEOPLE, who he foreknew.”
HE RECOFIRMS THEIR STATUS
ROMANS 11:28-29
“As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies for your sake;
but AS AFAR far as ELECTION is concerned, they are LOVED on account of the patriarchs,
for God’s gifts and his call are IRREVOCABLE.”
WHILE IN THE KORAN
In chapter 5:64 Allah CURSES the JEWS “till the DAY of RESURRECTION”
Michael Copeland says
The Archbishop is not a lawyer. He is not trained in law.
The Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, foolishly opined that muslims ought to have their Sharia law. He, also, is not a lawyer, nor was trained in law.
Let the Church keep to Church matters.
As for offensive speech, would the Archbishop frown on calling people “Hypocrites, whited sepulchres”, or saying, about the Temple, “You have made it a den of thieves”?
ajj says
All right then – if the West stops drawing cartoons, could we please have an honest discussion about the truth concerning islam? And its Catholic-conspired origins? A noteworthy YOUTUBE video by Walther Veith is “The Islamic Connection”
Wellington says
Catholic-conspired origins? Please explain in your own words.
gravenimage says
Oh, this ludicrous conspiracy theory again. ajj, you *do* realise that if Catholics hadn’t defended against Islam for centuries that we would not be free now?
Vieth has also claimed that the Jews were behind the Holocaust in order to take Palestine.
Mauricio says
“Archbishop says ‘There are limits to freedom of expression, we do not have the right to insult religions’
I agree, BUT Islam is not a religion, and even if we call it a religion, religions that insult and threatens others so fervently do not deserve any respect or protection.
Here is a more accurate rendition from an orthodox Archbishop:
https://orthodoxtimes.com/archbishop-of-athens-on-lyon-attack-this-horror-defies-human-logic/
gravenimage says
Islam is a religion by all definitions–it is just an *evil* religion.
James Lincoln says
gravenimage,
An evil religion – yes.
Combined with a totalitarian political ideology – demanding sharia law for all.
But you knew that already…
gravenimage says
Yes.
Jayell says
But the ‘religious’ element is so obviously a bogus pseudo-theocratic facade originally fabricated to ‘sell’ Mohammed to the masses and validate his political ambitions and criminal activities. It doesn’t conform to the normal Western definition of a ‘religion’ because exceeds the limits of a purely personal philosophy and demands overt anti-democratic political control – which puts it squarely in the category of a ‘political ideology’.
Fred van de Bunt says
There is limits to free speech in the Netherlands in the penalty code, called offence and slander. It will be the same in other countries. You have to go to the police for that. The thing is, it is difficult to get things done, when I think of it.
If somebody is offended if his house is ridiculed, with a funny cartoon of his house…ban the cartoon.
The same counts for (nonphysical) ideas. Somebody ridicules liberalism and I am a liberal…ban ridiculing liberalism.
The same counts for books: somebody wrote liberalism is a laughing stock, and I am a liberal…ban the book.
The same counts for religious books, like the Quran, where Allah through Mohammed told that Allah never had a son and that Christians are liars and I am a Christian… ban the Quran.
But I have no legal training, so best is to go to the police, a lawyer and/or judge.
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
Archbishop says ‘There are limits to freedom of expression, we do not have the right to insult religions’
The apologists and appeasers for islam are always talking about the “limits of free speech,” but never have anything to say about the murderous abuse of free speech in islam. I’m sick of this double standard.
Harmless satire and cartoons are nothing compared to the terroristic threats in islam against “unbelievers,” and we must remember to put that threatening speech in the context of a world of suffering and terror for islam. To me this archbishop is a fraud, he doesn’t truly care about humanity or the feelings of those who muslims abuse and kill for religious bigotry–he cares about RELIGION. What a gross misapplication of authority, that this archbishop should so willfully ignore the terror in islam while focusing blame on our cartoons. And he does this at a time of great persecution of Christians, his own people that he has been entrusted to love like his own family. I have no respect for cowards who offer a childish solution (appeasement) to a spectacularly large evil with no apparent concern about the consequences of doing it. There is nothing wise or holy or spiritually good about appeasing a supremacist religion that teaches murderous bigotry as godly truth. This archbishop is not worthy to be called a “man of god,” not when he turns a blind eye to evil at the expense of our peace and freedoms and human rights in general. It’s the same mentality that helped Nazi fugitives escape to South America after the war, cowardly rats on the ratline who are now helping islam today with lies and appeasement.
The Catholic Church has exhibited little wisdom or pragmatic counsel regarding islam, just self-serving platitudes, biased judgments, and religious niceties that fail to display the impartial and universal love you expect from world class religious leaders. People who truly love humanity don’t lie or ignore evils they know will be the source of much suffering and death, instead they defend the morals and truths that speak against it; nor do they gloss over great evils with shallow religious banalities that only hurt the innocent while tacitly encouraging the evil. This archbishop doesn’t seem to care much about those who suffer for islam, he’s far more concerned about those who “insult religion.” And we can understand why he would feel this way, as his own religion is itself vulnerable to embarrassing insults of the hard, cold truth.
gravenimage says
Good post, Agostino.
Wellington says
A devout and informed Christian should have a very negative view of Islam, Mohammed and the Koran. And such a person should also in still free countries state this publicly.
PRCS says
“A French archbishop has warned of the dangers of publishing offensive cartoons, noting there are limits to freedom of expression amid renewed tensions between France and the Muslim world.””
1. That is why religion has no place in law making.
2. As tensions between France and the Muslim world will never end…..
SJ says
How did the French become so spineless?
Hoi Polloi says
“These are considered an insult to Muslims and Christians alike.” Speak for yourself. Actual Christians are insulted by your silence and that of the pope and his minions in the face of the ongoing slaughter by Muslims of Christians all over this world. The abductions and rapes of Christian girls. We are insulted by your apoplexy over paper and ink that never bothered you once when it went the other way. By the reading in a Christian church of Islamic texts denying the deity of Christ. We are insulted by your weakness and hypocrisy. Come out of the closet as a Muslim, why don’t you?
Agostino Armo Pellegrini says
There’s millions of Christians around the world that would agree with you, I’m sure. Catholics like this pretend to be sensitive about insulting others, but they have hearts of stone when it comes to the murder and terror of islam. People like this hurt the cause of peace and freedom, they actually encourage terror with their obsequious concern for the feelings of the muslims doing it. They are part of the problem, not the solution.
Hoi Polloi says
+1
gravenimage says
Yes–saying that Islam is violent and defending the freedom to say so does not insult Christians.
Hoi Polloi says
It is amazing that these appeasers presume so fully for the rest of us, isn’t it?
gravenimage says
So true, Hoi Polloi.
don vito says
Honestly Archbishop, insulting religious belief comes with the territory of liberty. We can choose not to be insulted, but for some that is impossible. I don’t mean to say that the insulted should not show disgust, but decapitaion? Or cancelling? WESTERN values accepts insults without murder and violence, this is antithetical to marxists, race hustlers, and moslems, oh yeah, and dhimmicrats.
gravenimage says
Yes–Christians and other Infidels don’t behead those who say anything critical about their faith.
somehistory says
What utter, evil nonsense.
This fool needs to read what Elijah said to the “prophets of ba’al.” He questioned them about their “god,” asking if perhaps he had gone to sleep or wan in the “privy.”
Ask a moslim that and see what explodes.
This fool needs to think about just Who gives men “rights.” People do not get their “rights” from other men. Men may think so, but rights are given by our Creator. He alone gives rights and He alone can take them away.
Nowhere in God’s Word the Bible does it say we don’t have the “right” to say something about religion that another considers an insult.
Jesus spoke to the Scribes and Pharisees about their practice of religion and said things they would have taken as “insults.” Such things as calling them “serpents and offspring of vipers,’ “whitewashed graves,” and that they were bound for Gehenna if they didn’t change their ways.Jesus said to them, “You are from your father, the devil and you wish to do the desires of your father.”
He spoke about the fact that the devil is a “liar” which also made those men liars.
Jesus spoke to the Samaritan woman at the well and said, “You worship what you do not know.” How would moslims take such a statement?
The Apostle Paul said to men gathered to speak and hear others, “You worship an unknown god.” All of the apostles said things about how other people practiced their religions and it’s quite likely that many were “insulted.”
Go forth, mister, and read your Bible before you make other foolish assertions.
gravenimage says
Spot on, Somehistory.
Kepha says
Robert Le Gall should know a lot better. He should understand that Christ’s claim “Before Abraham was, I am” (Jn. 8:58), his proof of divine power in forgiving and healing the paralytic (Mk. 2), and his control of wind and waves (Mt. 8:27; cf. Ps. 107:29, Ps. 148) unequivocally show Jesus’ claim to being God incarnate, which to Islam is blasphemy. If he knows anything about comparative religion, he should now that when Muhammad in the Qur’an represents the Christian Trinity as God, Jesus, and Mary, Muhammad is misrepresenting Christian belief in the Father, Word/Son, and Holy Spirit.
We Christians have the God-given right to criticize Islam on that score, regardless of what a few short-sighted secular judges believe. I would imagine as well that when the Qur’an presents the Jews as honoring Ezra/Uzair as Son of God the way Christian honor Jesus as such, the Jews also have the right to complain. How can any of us accept the limiting of criticism of “religion” to a materialist critique of Christianity? The Bible itself is a highly critical book towards various idolatries, even being applicable to those erected by the supposedly “atheistic”.
Speaking as a Christian, how can I fail to insult Islam by simply maintaining my beliefs? I cannot in good conscience confess anyone to be a prophet after ca. 90+ A.D. (the genrally accepted date of the Revelation to John), for John warns about adding or subtracting to the words of prophecy in his book. Since he alludes or quotes the Old Testament and alludes to other New Testament teaching throughout the book, it is clear he knows he is writing the capstone to the Biblical canon. My refusal to acknowledge Muhammad as a prophet could very easily be construed by Muslims as an “insult” or slander against their so-called “prophet”. Hence, I’m apparently anathema in the eyes of both Cardinal Le Gall and our x-pres the O.
tim gallagher says
I believe that some religions, some concepts of what God is like, are good (and I consider the Christian concept of God, loving and peaceful, is basically good – Christians may not always live up to the high ideals, but Christianity does have high ideals to aspire to) and others religions have an evil, I would say Satanically evil, blood thirsty, endlessly violent concept of what God is like, and Islam is the main such evil religion in the modern world, (I wish Islam would go the way of the old Aztec religion) so this Archbishop is a fool. He should be attacking evil islam. He must either know absolutely nothing about Islam’s evil nature or he is simply too gutless to tell the truth about islam’s evil nature. This archbishop seems to make the unbelievably stupid mistake of thinking that anything which is a religion (even a disgustingly evil religion like Islam) deserves to be protected. Evil religions, evil concepts of what God is like, should not be protected but rather they should be destroyed. The world would be so much better if Islam was not in it. As far as I can see, for 1400 years it has brought nothing but misery and evil to the human race.
Aussie Infidel says
Tim, I agree with your comment that evil religions like Islam, “should not be protected but rather they should be destroyed”. Archbishop Le Gall is either a coward or a fool; or like so many other Christians, simply willing to “turn the other cheek”, instead of confronting this evil head on.
One of the biggest problems facing the West is the protection afforded to religions in our Constitutions. No doubt this protection was included with good intentions – and I’m a secularist from way back – but the people who drafted those clauses surely didn’t understand the nuances of Islamic ideology, like their doctrines of Jihad, Hijra, Taqiyya, Muruna and Tawriya, which are not religious tenets, but strategies of war.
As I have written on this blog before – and been criticized for it – allowing the same protection for Islam is one of our greatest mistakes. That only works when it involves people of good will. Militant Muslims regard such protection as a weakness, and will use it as a weapon against us. They will lie and cheat and murder, and do anything else they can to ‘advance the cause of Allah’. Arguing that such protection is a fundamental freedom and right is very short sighted, and negates reality.
People who make such arguments obviously do not understand how difficult it is to change a person’s belief and behavior. They have to realize that there are some things they cannot change – in the short term at least – and granting Muslims the same constitutional protection as other faiths is the equivalent of signing a suicide pact with our enemy. For Muslims, it’s either them or us – there is no middle ground or compromise possible. Muslims do not believe in pluralist societies – where people of different beliefs can co-exist peacefully. Muslims detest all other faiths and beliefs, and work continually to destroy them.
“It is He who sent His Messenger with guidance and the religion of truth to manifest it over all religion, although those who associate others with Allah (Christians) dislike it.” (Q 61:9).
As Hassan al-Banna (the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood) remarked, “Islam should dominate, not be dominated” – and Muslims will not rest until it does.
tim gallagher says
I agree with everything you’ve written there, Aussie Infidel. To my mind, Christianity is the polar opposite of evil islam and it is insane for Christian ministers of religion to support Islam in any way whatsoever, because islam wants to destroy Christianity and all other religions except islam. To me, when it comes to islam, it is them or us. It is a 1400 year long war and, if Islam wins, we are all going to living an appalling life. My own attitude is, and this is despite occasionally coming across a Muslim who seems OK, all non-Muslim countries should keep Muslims out. We should stop inviting this enemy into our countries. By the way, I used to write to the Australian government way back in the early 2000’s saying we should put an end to Muslim migration and I recall receiving a reply saying that Australia did not discriminate of grounds of race, religion, etc. This is the sort of foolishness and weakness that puts the non-Muslims in danger. Islam is our enemy and should not be treated well, as though it is some harmless religion. What you say about the Christians who think they should always”turn the other cheek”, people that I say seem to think that being a Christian merely means being a doormat, is true. There seem to be many people like that. I’m a Christian who does not believe in being a doormat and isn’t interested in turning the other cheek when it comes to evils such as islam. I believe in opposing obvious evils such as Islam very strongly.
James Lincoln says
tim gallagher,
To your point, a good article appearing on the “Desiring God” website addressing why Christians do not have to be pacifists in regards to confronting true evil.
Seems balanced and well thought out, at least from my perspective.
“Did Jesus Teach Pacifism?”
https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/did-jesus-teach-pacifism
tim gallagher says
Thanks for the comments, James, Hoi Polloi and Mauricio. James, I will read that article later on today. I’m sure it is worthwhile if you recommend it. To me, islam is as evil as Nazism. Nobody would be criticised for fighting against evil Nazism. No one would say that Christians should not oppose an obvious evil like Nazism or that they should have been pacifists and not fought hard and defeated Hitler in WWII. So, to me, Islam deserves the same treatment. I suppose these Christians who seem to suck up to islam must see things differently. I was impressed by the tough, clear sighted Popes mentioned in Robert Spencer’s “History of Jihad” who called Islam evil. That type of Christian impresses me. The doormat types don’t impress me when it comes to obvious evil. Ministers of religion should speak up when they see evil and not be pathetic wimps. Maybe some of these religious types genuinely find something good in Islam. I’m buggered if I can. To my mind, Islam is unmitigated barbaric evil and a danger to all of us.
Hoi Polloi says
I agree as well and I think you rightly note the “turn the other cheek” misapplication. That teaching is used to do great harm to Christians both by their own and others. Like every teaching in the Bible its proper application must be understood and this issue is not it. These shepherds need to be held to the stern passages about caring for their flocks.
Mauricio says
You guys all wrote very good posts here, thanks. I too, have my own comments about this issue which I will probably post in a different news item later.
nicholas tesdorf says
Robert Le Gall naively believes that Islam is a v’religion’ and not a dangerous political movement with military pretensions.
gravenimage says
France: Archbishop says ‘There are limits to freedom of expression, we do not have the right to insult religions’
……………………
What a fool. Doesn’t Archbishop Le Gall realize that his not having converted to Islam is an “insut” to Muslims?
Andrew says
I bet this silly wee Archbishop fella would never think of asking muslims to stop insulting, and attacking, Christians, ask them, politely of course, to please stop attacking his Priest buddies while they give Mass or please stop calling the Jewish people as dogs and other names, perhaps he just loves this current Pope and they can suck each other off and smile…
lickyalips says
Some people seem to think that free speech is subject to their approval and on their terms only.
I wouldn’t look to a moslem for lectures against causing offence.
Mauricio says
Freedom of speech is not absolute.
gravenimage says
Unles it is inciting violence or slander, it should be.
Goofy says
This archbishop appears to be very difficult to insult. He gets no bad feelings when God’s sheep, which he has been entrusted, including fellow workers in the vineyard are brutally slaughtered in one of his churches. Is this because he accepts that this slaughter was indeed a devout expression of faith by a dear brother in another Abrahamic religion?
If this is the case please let us know so we may be assured of the position of the Roman Catholic church.
Does this archbishop realise that according to the twisted understanding expressed in the Koran our triune God is understood to be the gods in a family consisting of the Father, his son Issa (?) and Issa’s mother Mary? Does the archbishop realise that this twisted understanding means that all Christians according to Islam are committing Shirk and for that reason alone need to die?
Does the archbishop realise that if Islamic insults and threats to Christians and Jews are removed there will be no Koran left?
Does the archbishop feel insulted or at least uncomfortable with the fact that Muslim men every day of the week kidnap Christian underage girls to forcefully convert them to Islam and “marry” them against their will to subsequently rape then to their hearts’ desire?
The Roman Catholic church clajms to be the one and only church which had Peter as it’s first pope, the reinstated apostle who was told by his Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ to tend his sheep. What kind of shepherds are you and your pope when it has become more important to placate the religion which more than any other mocks Christianity and persecutes the children of God. You should be ashamed of yourself!