“Traitor-in-Chief” John Brennan, former head of the CIA, who once defended Hizballah as having “a social and political nature to it as well” and endorsed its influence in Lebanese politics, is now blasting the killing of the Iranian nuclear scientist Mohsen Fakhrizadeh as “a criminal act” and “highly reckless.” Music to Iran’s ears.
Ted Cruz tweeted that it was “bizarre to see a former head of the CIA consistently side with Iranian zealots who chant ‘Death to America.’ And reflexively condemn Israel.”
Brennan is afraid of Iran’s retaliation, or so he says. Brennan of course supported the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (the Iran nuclear Deal) which enabled Iran to grow its regional and global influence. Others have reported another factor that may bear weight in Brennan’s bizarre views: he is said to be a convert to Islam. According to Michael J. Del Rosso, a Senior Fellow for Homeland and National Security for the Center for Security Policy, there are allegations that Brennan converted to Islam and they “are based upon firsthand reports of those who served with him in Saudi Arabia”:
- Those allegations include that Brennan was the target of a Saudi intelligence influence operation, one outcome of which was Brennan’s conversion to Islam.
- At that time, Brennan was chief of station, a billet that is designed for an operationally trained officer with experience in the CIA’s Directorate of Operations, which Brennan was not. Brennan’s background is that of an analyst, which may explain why he lacked the sophistication and experience to understand that he was being played by the Saudis in an influence operation.
- Anyone so inept as to be oblivious to basic hostile intelligence tactics such as this influence operation is unqualified to be DCI.
- Furthermore, Brennan’s definition of jihad, “meaning to purify oneself or one’s community,” is incorrect as a matter of fact, since all four schools of Sunni jurisprudence say that the primary and paramount definition of jihad is kinetic war against non-Muslims to forcibly establish submission to Islamic law globally.
- If Brennan truly believes his fictitious definition of jihad, he is unqualified to be DCI, since he obviously is unaware of or indifferent to the fact that he is directly contradicting all published Sunni jurisprudence. Al-Qaeda’s bin Laden, ISIS’s al-Baghdadi (who has a doctorate in Islamic law), Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, and all the other numerous violent jihadi terrorist groups all say that they are at war with us because Islamic law makes such war — jihad — obligatory for all Muslims. They also point out that Islamic law makes the funding of jihad obligatory, as well as lying to further jihad. That 15 years after 9/11, Brennan has yet to drop $40 on Amazon.com to purchase a certified English translation of an authoritative textbook on Islamic law, such as Reliance of the Traveller, is professional malpractice of the highest order for someone who has held the senior counter-terrorism and intelligence positions he has.
- Furthermore, the fiction that Brennan is espousing is not just any fiction, it is a deliberate propaganda lie by America’s enemies in our 15+-year war. It is designed to disorient us from understanding our enemy’s Threat Doctrine. If he is truly unaware of this, he is a useful idiot in espousing enemy propaganda in time of war, and is unqualified to be DCI.
- If Brennan does know the factual Islamic legal definition of jihad, then he is deliberately espousing enemy propaganda in a time of war, in which case Brennan is a traitor — and unqualified to be DCI.
“Former CIA chief John Brennan blasts killing of Iranian nuclear scientist,” by Eileen AJ Connelly, New York Post, November 28, 2020:
Former CIA head John Brennan blasted the killing of Iran’s top nuclear scientist, calling the assassination “highly reckless,” then ended up in a Twitter war with Texas Sen. Ted Cruz over his comments.
Mohsen Fakhrizadeh was slain Friday when a gunman ambushed him in his car near Tehran. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei vowed revenge on Saturday, and pledged to continue the work of the man some called Iran’s Oppenheimer.
“This was a criminal act & highly reckless,” tweeted Brennan, who ran the CIA under President Obama from 2013-2017. “It risks lethal retaliation & a new round of regional conflict. Iranian leaders would be wise to wait for the return of responsible American leadership on the global stage & to resist the urge to respond against perceived culprits.”
Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani blamed Israel for the attack.
Brennan said he didn’t know whether a foreign government authorized or carried out the slaying, but said, “Such an act of state-sponsored terrorism would be a flagrant violation of international law & encourage more governments to carry out lethal attacks against foreign officials.”
He said that assassinations are “far different than strikes against terrorist leaders & operatives of groups like al-Qaida & Islamic State, which are not sovereign states. As illegitimate combatants under international law, they can be targeted in order to stop deadly terrorist attacks.”
Cruz criticized Brennan for commenting, tweeting that it was “bizarre to see a former head of the CIA consistently side with Iranian zealots who chant “Death to America.” And reflexively condemn Israel.” He also tried to tie Brennan’s comments to President-elect Biden.
“It is typical for you to mischaracterize my comment,” Brennan responded, saying Cruz has a “lawless attitude & simple-minded approach to serious national security matters.”…
AK says
I thought Brennan was a Sunni Muslim, he should be happy a Shia nuclear bomb maker is likely in hellfire or Janna?
ElderlyZionist says
Listening to America’s enemies, foreign and domestic, howl with outrage assures me that assassinating Dr. Fakhrizadeh was an excellent move. Squeal, Mr. Brennan, squeal.
wth009 says
This is why America can never have a Muslim in any form of government. They cannot decide who the terrorists are!
Lion heart says
wth009: I couldn’t agree more ?
and I am a Canadian Christian guy originally from Iraq and our Christian ancestors said it hundreds of years ago “ If a Muslim is a piece of gold, don’t put it into your pocket otherwise it rip through” meaning when Muslims have the chance and the ability to harm nonMuslims especially Christians and Jews , they would do it without any kind of hesitation at all and we saw it in Iraq after the fall of Saddam’s bloody regime where many Muslims ( except some nice ones among them who are far from Islam ) and they betrayed the Christians by collaborating with ISIS and al-Qaeda and they joined those terrorist groups and they helped them kill Christians, kidnap& rape Christian girls for not wearing the hijab and die wearing western style clothes , they also helped those terrorists kick Christians out of their homes and loot their property and they even ordered the Muslim grocery stores not to sell anything to Christians especially in Mosul and some parts of Baghdad , and even the long-time Muslim neighbours to Christians have stabbed Christians in the back by doing what I have just mentioned earlier and not only that but also , many Iraqi Arab Muslims who have worked as interpreters with the US army , they too have betrayed the Americans by snitching on them to their fellow Islamic terrorists of Al-Qaeda and ISIS through texting by showing them the whereabouts of the American military convoys so that those terrorists would ambush the American troops and kill them while sparing the lives of their fellow Muslims! . Muslims also including the Shiites like the notorious terrorist militia of Al-Mahdi army have destroyed ALL the liquor stirs of the Christians especially in Baghdad and Basra not to mention in Mosul by the Sunnis there because alcohol in all its kinds is forbidden ( haram ) in Islam . Muslims also have giving the Christians three choice according to the Quran 9:29 : convert to Islam, or pay the Jizya or die ! and then did kill many Christians who refused to convert to Islam nor to pay the Jizya and some of the Christian teens where beheaded by ISIS in an area out side Baghdad after refusing to convert to Islam , and they threw some Christians who also refuse to convert to Islam into wells abdvthey room many Christians as sex slaves and they did many other horrible things to Christians of Iraq after they had taken Islam seriously and put its evil teaching into practice and after all this , Muslims come along and shamelessly say that ISIS are the product of the USA and the West ?? and yet when Muslims come to the West , they play victims and accuse any one who raise awareness about the evil of jihad in Islam of islamophobia ?.
wpm says
This shows(Brennan headed the CIA under Obama) how the under Obama the interest of America was being undermined by Islamic appeasers and they(Obamas heads of CIA,FBI and homeland security) were protectors of know terrorist and terrorist states like Iran.
SKA says
Brennen is a crypto-Muslim. Of course he detests it when a “brother” is killed!
mortimer says
Reply to SKA: Saudi Arabia would surely approve of any action that inhibits the Iranian bomb program. If Brennan works for KSA, then he would favor this action.
Roland says
He is a ditzy CIA hiring mistake “gone native”. His appointment to CIA Director well served the interests of Barack Obama.
underbed cat says
It may be a case of like minds or one hand washes the other…..against exposure per the laws of sharia common agreement amongst muslims, it is a duty so the fibs of harmlessness are not known. Iran nuclear deal no problem, right?
Westman says
Would it appear any different if, Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, like Robert Oppenheimer, had a change of conscience, and encouraged the younger scientists to stop working toward nuclear bombs?
In the US, the government only assassinated Openhiemer’s character while Iran would have assassinated Mohsen Fakhrizadeh and then blamed it on Israel for a cover. False flag operation?
gravenimage says
Westman, what indication do you have that Fakhrizadeh tried to turn his back on the Irani nuke program?
Besides, when have the Mullahs ever been coy about imprisoning and murdering their own people?
And while Oppenenheimer did lose his security clearance in 1954 due to his links with the Communist Party, he had a successful academnic and writing career thereafter.
mortimer says
Is Brennan actually a Muslim? Is he a communist? A globalist? What is he? Who does he really work for? He is talking like a traitor.
curious george says
Mortimer,
Good questions.
More information on John Brennan at “Discover the Networks.”
https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individuals/john-brennan/
underbed cat says
Has anyone every checked to see if it Brennan has a middle name similiar to Dr. Moncef Slavoui ? Biden wants America’s children to learn about Quranic doctrine….which is stunning and shows he never picked up a Quran or informed himself on the doctrine that Brennan would likely deny means anything. Who picked the experts on Covid19 to inform President Trump? There is something similiar to most of these experts which concerns me, but would not concern Biden. Biden had the votes from the mosques, or he hoped1 million approx, it would not concern Biden but it should concern an Attn. General. Would the Iranian foreign minister Javad Zarif approve.
Dr. Moncef Mohamet Slaoui announced new life saving vaccine but seem to certainly criticize President Trump.declaring Trump did not help warp speed…it seemed it was all media approved. I watched the garden presentation it was uncomfortable I think President Trump suddenly realized what the heck is going on and then later issued a statement to correct that comment.
Just saying. 100 % no interference? It is just one of those tactics that works for sharia law after U.S. educates and disregards concerns, that can be whisked away as the terms we” are harmless, there is no way to discern.
I think President Trump knew that the Iran nuclear deal was insanely dangerous, but could it come from all areas of science or a peculiar cultural areas I fear, hope it is well tested and handled properly in transit.
Wellington says
Brennan in microcosm is what the Democratic Party of the USA has become, i.e., an enemy of the American Republic.
Brennan is despicable and all you have to do is look at the man. He confirms what George Orwell observed and that is that by fifty everyone has the face they deserve. Yeah, just look at Brennan’s face to validate Orwell.
Rarely says
Yup. You got to go wit dah science.
somehistory says
It’s the ugly face of pure demonic evil. What’s in the heart of a man, comes out of the mouth and shows in the eyes.
Rarely says
Ah yes. A branch of the Lombroso school of criminality.
Could save courts a lot of time by just checking the face of the accused.
underbed cat says
What is Lombroso, misspelled wine or a criminal gang. That ah yes. must ask.
Wellington says
Rarely: There is a difference, you know, between a court of law and a court of common sense. One should only be convicted LEGALLY in a court of law, but in the court of common sense, culpability can still be concluded UNLESS one has lost most if not at all of their common sense.
Remember, everything legal is not necessarily ethical or rooted in reason (and common sense is a major portion of reason as George Orwell understood so well). As an example, slavery was legal at one time—but it was never right. Step outside the box and thereafter think outside the box.
Rarely says
Wellington.
If we conclude that because of a person’s ugly face or expression that they possess “pure demonic evil”. One might as well count the bumps on his head.
To say the least I am not one of his fans but it’s idiotic to suggest that from his thick, low eyebrows and determined expression we can conclude that he possesses “pure demonic evil”.
In this case the Cracker Jack is outside the box.
somehistory says
I was applying things Jesus Christ said.
Jesus said, “But the things that come out of the mouth come from the heart, and these make a man `unclean. ‘ For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander. These are what make a man `unclean’; but eating with unwashed hands does not make him `unclean,…” and He said, “The eye is the lamp of the body. If your eyes are healthy, your whole body will be full of light. But if your eye is evil, your whole body will be full of darkness.”
So, this “cracker” stands by the statements made I’m not ashamed of being from the South and White..
brennan is full of evil and evil is from the demons.
At least, I ‘m not here to throw insults at people to try to make them feel stupid. Just calling things as I see them.
If you don’t like my opinions, you aren’t being forced to read them.
somehistory says
And, Wellington,
Thank you for your “common sense” reply.
curious george says
Cesare Lombroso
“Lombroso tried to discern a possible relationship between criminal psychopathology and physical or constitutional defects. His chief contention was the existence of a hereditary, or atavistic, class of criminals who are in effect biological throwbacks to a more primitive stage of human evolution. Lombroso contended that such criminals exhibit a higher percentage of physical and mental anomalies than do noncriminals.”
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Cesare-Lombroso
With that out of the way, Brennan’s eyes are troubling, same with Biden, they seem to indicate someone who is mean, vicious and vindictive.
Wellington says
So, Rarely, do you want to conclude NOTHING from a person’s countenance? Not a factor at all in the realm of common sense and street instincts? ONLY what courts of law determine for the mind to conclude what is the case?
If you actually think this way, I suggest the idiocy lies with you.
Rarely says
Wellington.
Don’t be ridiculous. Of course you can get a feel of someone from their expressions — at least where they are at a particular moment in time but it is absurd to believe that through one’s countenance you can conclude they possess “pure demonic evil”. Of course it helps to come to such a conclusion if you already believe the person to be that way. Otherwise it would be reasonable to judge all others who have the same appearance to have pure demonic evil as well. One might suggest that this “prejudging” on the basis of appearance is simply that — prejudice.
IF you were able to faultlessly draw such conclusions it would be very helpful to the Courts.
gravenimage says
I don’t think anyone here is actually championing phrenology.
Rarely says
Phrenology is about as accurate.
I’m not suggesting that a person’s facial expressions don’t give away part of their personality only that it’s an unreasonable quantum leap to concluding that they possess “pure demonic evil” because of it.
Wellington says
Rarely: I did not use the term “pure demonic evil.”
somehistory says
Mr. Rarely…have to ask if your last name is “right”?
I wrote nothing…zip, nada… about his “thick low eyebrows.” I wasn’t even thinking of or looking to his “eyebrows” to tell me the guy is evil. It’s his eyes. Eyes. not brows.
And, you seem to forget that it has a lot to do with the “words out of his mouth.” Not just regarding this iranian guy’s demise, but the entire time he was **working** in the government.
If you don’t like to think that someone can discern…maybe you don’t know discernment, but some people are able to discern things…what another person is like based on certain factors, that is your problem. But even little children and dogs can discern when a person is no good.
If the “Courts” would listen, I would gladly tell them things to look for and observe when trying to determine guilt or innocence. Correction…guilty or not guilty…Courts don’t say innocent.
But, Courts, or the people who run them, are like some regular people….they can’t be told…they have to come to the conclusions themselves. Sadly, Many never do.
And, now, I’m done with this discussion.
Rarely says
lol. Eyes only differ by colour. It’s the surrounding facial features such as eye sockets, the distance between the eyes and even the eyebrows that distinguish.
I doubt that one could distinguish between Hitler and Sister Teresa by looking at their eyeballs.
somehistory says
Obviously, I have to correct myself and say I’m not done.
Your so very stupid, ignorant, arrogant comment has to be answered. Such bogus ideas have to be exposed for the stupidity they are.
Each persons eyeball is different. I’ve been to too many eye specialists and been told how “unique” my eyes are to swallow your ignorant remark.
Eye specialists focus mainly on the eyeball, not the brows, not the skin around the eyes, not the hairline. But the eyeball.
Even if I had never been to any eye doctors, I would know better than what you so arrogantly stated.
There is enough evidence that the irises are different to cause those in authority to install cameras that can read the iris of a person’s eye.
And many has been the time that a rapist covered his face except for his eyes and his victim identified his eyes.
All eyes are different. And some people with 20/20 vision still are “too blind to see.”
somehistory says
One other important point about the eyes: they show whether a person is healthy…as Jesus said…or ill.
Good doctors…GP’s or otherwise…always look in the eyes of patients for signs of illness. Cancer has been detected by looking in the pupils of patients who had no other symptoms.
Gold flecks in the eye mean something to good doctors, even if they appear as an attractive aspect to the person who knows little or nothing.
Rarely says
I get it now. When you’ve determined that a person possesses “pure demonic evil” he/she carries that in his/her facial expression and eyeballs and any reasonable person would see that. Almost makes sense.
Rarely says
OK so eyeballs differ in ways other than just colour. And you, being unusually observant and experienced, can determine personality from them. Excellent. Back to my original comment — youse gotta go wit dah science.
Sparky says
Like they say…he has a face only a mother could love!
underbed cat says
No you cannot just look but listen, does it match behavior, concern arises thru infomation of doctrine, tricky stuff to protect unless it is examined.
Bob says
Brennan converted to Islam years ago. This is not of a surprise.
somehistory says
Just finished reading “Dark Agenda, the War to Destroy Christian America, by Mr. Horowitz.
It’s an excellent book and explains what we are seeing…and have been seeing for most of our lives…since the 1960’s, perhaps all of some lives here…and brennan, his ‘boss’, etc. is a large part of that.
People threaten to kill Mr. Macron of France, threaten Mr.Trump’s life…multiple times and make jokes about his murder on t.v., but if someone actually puts out the light of an evil terrorist, then their evil henchmen jump in with how wrong it is, having said nothing about the threats against non terrorists.
moslims of a feather, complain together. Bomb, stab, rape, threaten, …together and expect everyone else to respect and bow to them and their fake ‘prophet.’
gravenimage says
John Brennan blasts killing of Iranian nuclear scientist as ‘criminal’ and ‘reckless’
………….
As noted, Brennan has lauded Jihad terrorists before.
*Is* Brennan Muslim? This is unclear. But he did spend considerable time in the Muslim Middle East, speaks fluent Arabic, and has spoken “about the goodness and beauty of Islam”. Nasty stuff in any case.
OLD GUY says
Brennen who’s side are you on? Taking out Irans ability to build nuclear weapons seems like a good idea. On top of taking out the head of their nuclear program we should destroy their nuclear facilities. Problem solved.