However, in the interests of political correctness:
The police bulletin announcing their convictions did not disclose any details about their nationality or migration backgrounds.
The bulletin only stated that their names were Muhammed Saeed, Mohamed Ismail and Mohammed Tahir, and that they were convicted of terrorism. Followup statements by police brass also included talk about radicalization, but there was no mention of what kind of terrorism they were involved in, what ideology was involved, or what they were radicalized about. So now police can say that they didn’t target any particular ethnicity or religion.
Some argue that nationality and background are not usually reported in notices about crimes, so why should they be revealed when Muslims are involved in terror activity? One reason is that jihad terror and related offenses are sanctioned by Islamic texts and are not merely crimes. They are acts of warfare against infidels, and against Western culture and traditions. Also, it is imprudent to continue open-door immigration policies given the available statistics about Muslim migrant crime and jihad threats. So hiding such information hinders efforts to stymie threats to national security.
The three men hailed from locations across England — namely Manchester, north London, and Peterborough.
Who they kept company with and who led them to turn to jihad — these questions should be investigated. And while one of them is described as “dangerous” according to an unexplained police standard, they are, in fact, all dangerous, since they are motivated by jihad ideology.
Naively, Commander Richard Smith of the Metropolitan Police Force’s Counter-Terrorism Command stated that the “Met is also working hard to prevent young people from being drawn towards activity in the first place,” adding:
“I urge anyone who is concerned that someone they know is potentially at risk of radicalisation to tell someone and help them take a different path.”
Jihad terror is rooted in the Islamic faith. Helping jihadis “take a different path” has been tried via deradicalization programs, which have always failed in the UK and elsewhere.
London Bridge jihadist Usman Khan, Parson’s Green Tube bomber Ahmed Hassan, and Manchester Arena bomber Salman Abedi all participated in deradicalization programs.
Jihadists don’t stop their missions in jail, either. Sudesh Amman who was shot dead by police after wounding people in a London stabbing spree, “became more religious inside prison,” according to his own mother. And Muslim gangs have been beating infidel prisoners who won’t convert to Islam.
“UK: Three Men Convicted of Terror Offences After Joint Investigation,” by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, November 29, 2020:
Three men have been convicted of terror offences after a joint investigation by counter-terrorism officers from London’s Metropolitan Police and the seven-force Eastern Region Special Operations Unit (ERSOU).
21-year-old Muhammed Saeed (25/03/1998) was convicted of five counts of “possessing an article in circumstances which give rise to a reasonable suspicion that the possession is for a purpose connected with the commission, preparation or instigation of an act of terrorism, contrary to section 57(1) of the Terrorism Act (TACT) 2000.”
Meanwhile, 23-year-old Mohamed Ismail (11/06/1996) was convicted of “two counts of disseminating a terrorist publication, contrary to section 2 of the Terrorism Act (TACT) 2006,” and 19-year-old Mohammed Tahir (17/06/2000) — described as “a dangerous individual” by the head of the Counter-Terrorism Policing unit of the ERSO), Detective Superintendent Andy Waldie — was convicted of “one count of disseminating a terrorist publication, contrary to section 2 of the Terrorism Act (TACT) 2006.”
The three men hailed from locations across England — namely Manchester, north London, and Peterborough, respectively — but the police bulletin announcing their convictions did not disclose any details about their nationality or migration backgrounds.
Their convictions were secured via guilty pleas, and all have been remanded in custody ahead of sentencing in “early 2021”.
“I am very pleased with today’s result. Three young men have now been convicted of terrorism offences thanks to the vigilance of counter terrorism officers,” commented Commander Richard Smith for the Metropolitan Police Force’s Counter-Terrorism Command.
“However, the Met is also working hard to prevent young people from being drawn towards activity in the first place,” he added.
“I urge anyone who is concerned that someone they know is potentially at risk of radicalisation to tell someone and help them take a different path.”
The British authorities run deradicalisation programmes for suspected and convicted extremists, but multiple terror convicts have carried out attacks after being released on prison early on licence, with Prime Minister Boris Johnson conceding that “really very few” can be rehabilitated after one such attack….
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
” 23-year-old Mohamed Ismail (11/06/1996) was convicted of “two counts of disseminating a terrorist publication, …and 19-year-old Mohammed Tahir (17/06/2000) … was convicted of “one count of disseminating a terrorist publication”. I wonder what this terrorist publication was. Was it the Holy Quran?
Mount Zion says
It’s very possible since the unholy quran advocates the killing of infidels.
Mount Zion says
All three of them have the same name “with slight variations” as their false prophet whom they seem wanting to emulate with their terrorism , it’s not difficult at all to figure out their motivation , I’m not surprised that in the police statement there is no mention of the kind of terrorism and the motivating ideology . Wouldn’t be rhe first time these informations are left out when it comes to muslim misdeeds .
Alarmed Pig Farmer says
They ask what’s in a name. Well, when it comes to the Holy Prophet, a lot is. I’ll enter the bidding with a Mohamet
Yogi says
3 wonderful people, poster for perfect integration!!, bring them more beacuse Europe have not enough this parasites..
Sylvia Drummond says
What was their name again??
Mount Zion says
???
mortimer says
DOUBLE STANDARDS! The ethnicity of three white supremacists would certainly have been reported by the police and would end up in new reports around the world.
It’s time to stop the double standards in reporting Muslim crime.
They won’t be able to fix the problem in their community if they don’t hear there is a problem.
Infidel says
How many spellings are there of islam’s founder? Let me count:
Muhammad
Mohammad
Mohammed
Muhammed
Muhamad
Mohamad
Mohamed
Muhamed
Mehmet
Mahmud
Mahmoud
Momad
That list is enough to fill up a soccer or cricket side
Eleanor says
You forgot the best one “MO-HAMMERHEAD”.
Dennis says
The game is tense. Mohammed has the ball and passes to Muhammed who passes to Momad who has a clear shot at the goal but the ball is blocked by Muhamed; the rebound is picked up by Muhammed who scores putting them one goal a head.
gravenimage says
🙂
William Tyson says
Mohammad is the most common name in UK, so makes sense
virtues of Multiculti
gravenimage says
It is the most common name for newborn boys.
Jayell says
‘It is the most common name for newborn boys’……yeah, right, but don’t tell the UK press that. They seem to be convinced it’s ‘James’ or ‘Harry’ or something like that.
Or are THEY trying to convince US that it’s ‘James’ or ‘Harry’ or something like that’ for some strange reason?
European pagan says
Mo Ham ?? Mad ?
Eleanor says
When reading or listening to UK MSM it is very easy to pick exactly who they are talking about when they don’t mention nationality, ethnicity or race. If it is a white European, that will always be mentioned in the news. They think they are being clever and woke, but by doing this, they are really highlighting the facts.
gravenimage says
UK: Muhammed, Mohamed, and Mohammed convicted of ‘terror offences,’ cops withhold info about migration backgrounds
………………..
I just *wish* this were a skit…
Remember that bit in Team America: World Police where the Muslim woman calls “Muhammed!” and scores of Mohammedans pop up? Very apt…
Jayell says
It’s really getting so predictable now that it’s corny. If someone’s arrested for some atrocity and it’s embarrassing for the ‘official agenda’. the authorities don’t give the name and pixilate the face in the press photos. Or if someone asks a question that’s embarrassing question for the same reason, they don’t even bother giving a lame excuse for not answering anymore because they’ve run out of lame excuses
E T says
I was on a long drive, on my way home, listening to music on the radio, there was sudden breaking news about a man shooting people on the streets in Toronto. Days later he was still a “no namer” — and it turned out he was — I can’t say it or I would be called Islamomatic.
21 year old beat a 75 year old woman so badly she died 14 months later, she never regained consciousness. There was never a picture of him or any personal information, just his name Habibullah Ahmadi.
This is Justine Trudeau’s Great Reset Canada.
OLD GUY says
With the first name of Muhammad it is not hard to tie them to islam and one of the muslim countries that promote violence and terrorism. Islam is the enemy of all non-islamic people period. Diversity will never take place with the islamic people, they are driven by Muhammad following leaders that want to control the world through violence and intimidation. Islamic people will not become apart of your country or society. There goal is to disrupt and destroy your society.
Dennis says
Which one goes “Woob Woob Woob Woob?”