Throughout the massive coverup that saw up to a million girls victimized by Muslim rape gangs over decades, the media has been calling the perpetrators “Asian.” Journalists apparently had no problem with attributing the rape of infidels (which is sanctioned in Islam, see suras 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30) to “Asians,” bending over backwards not to offend Muslims.
In 2018, then-Home Secretary Sajid Javid ordered an investigation into the ethnic origin of sexual grooming gangs. Javid, “whose own family roots are in Pakistan, said understanding more about gang networks would ‘support a more targeted response by the police and other agencies.’”
In February 2020, the investigation had still not been made public, and the current Home Secretary, Priti Patel, was reported to have been “given the run around by officials” over the release of the report. Two months later, the UK government rejected a petition of 120,000 signatures that demanded release of the report. British citizens were rightly outraged. The petition stated:
The Government is refusing to release official research on the characteristics of grooming gangs, claiming it is not in the “public interest”.
We, the British public, demand the release of the official research on grooming gangs undertaken by the Government in full.It has been revealed earlier this year that an almost 19,000 suspected child sexual exploitation victims were identified by local authorities in just one year.
Sajid Javid promised the review as Home Secretary in July 2018, pledging that there would be “no no-go areas of inquiry”.
“I will not let cultural or political sensitivities get in the way of understanding the problem and doing something about it,” he said at the time.
Finally, in May a public outcry forced the government to reverse itself and promise to publish the report. But that promise was made merely to turn public attention away from the issue. Seven months later, the report has still not appeared.
The Network of Sikh Organisations, however, is forcing acknowledgement of the identity of these perpetrators. Following the organization’s campaign against the “blanket ‘Asian’ description” of the perpetrators, the Editors’ Code of Practice Committee is recommending “against using the word ‘Asian’ when referring to the phenomenon of predominantly Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs in news reports.”
The Network of Sikh Organizations is “a registered charity representing 130 gurdwaras (temples) and other Sikh organizations in the UK, hailed the revelation that the 2020 Editors’ Code of Practice review — which will come into effect on January 1st, 2021 — cautioned against using the blanket term when discussing child rape gangs.”
Sikh girls have also fallen prey to Muslim rape gangs. A report by the Sikh Mediation and Rehabilitation Team charity revealed that police “recklessly ignored” cases of Pakistani men raping “grooming” Sikh girls for the past five decades, “due to political correctness.”
“Victory For Sikh Campaigners Against Blanket ‘Asian’ Description of Child Rape Gangs,” by Kurt Zindulka, Breitbart, December 9, 2020:
The Network of Sikh Organisations (NSO) hailed the move by the Editors’ Code of Practice Committee to recommend against using the word ‘Asian’ when referring to the phenomenon of predominantly Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs in news reports.
The NSO, a registered charity representing 130 gurdwaras (temples) and other Sikh organizations in the UK, hailed the revelation that the 2020 Editors’ Code of Practice review — which will come into effect on January 1st, 2021 — cautioned against using the blanket term when discussing child rape gangs.
“We’ve long complained about the vague term ‘Asian’ to describe those convicted in sexual grooming gang cases,” the Network of Sikh Organisations wrote on social media.
In its review, the Editors’ Code of Practice Committee remained bullish and insisted the blanket term was accurate, but nevertheless could give offence. They said: “Editors may be well advised to approach crimes committed by people identified as members of religious or racial communities with caution – and to be aware that their reporting may, in turn, prompt concern in other communities.”
“British Sikh and Hindu groups have objected to the use of the word ‘Asian’ to describe those convicted in sexual grooming gang cases. While accurate, it is better to avoid such general descriptions but this may not always be possible,” the review added.
The NSO has said for years that the British press should abandon the “vague and expansive” term, arguing that Sikhs would be lumped in with mostly Pakistani Muslims in the minds of the public when thinking about the grooming gang epidemic, which has ravaged British cities such as Rochdale, Rotherham, Oxford, and Telford for decades.
Not only have Sikhs not been found to be the perpetrators of grooming gang crimes, but Sikhs have also in fact been victims of the grooming gang scourge. A 2018 report from the Sikh Mediation and Rehabilitation Team found that young Sikh women were targeted by Muslim grooming gangs for decades. The report alleged that police ignored the plight of the young Sikh women because of “political correctness”.
In 2018, the NSO filed a complaint against the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) for an article in the left-wing British tabloid the Mirror that used the term ‘Asian’ six times when describing what the paper termed “Britain’s ‘worst ever’ child grooming scandal”, in which approximately 1,000 girls were sexually groomed.
“To put it frankly, the word ‘Asian’ gives the false impression gangs of Indian, Thai, Japanese, or Korean men are rampaging across Britain sexually abusing underage white girls on an industrial scale. Is that fair?” the NSO wrote.
“The common denominator in such cases is the deliberate targeting of non-Muslim girls, which we believe should be categorized by the police as a hate crime,” the Sikh group added.
Indeed, the 2014 Jay Report found that over 1,400 mostly white, working-class underage girls were groomed and sexually exploited by mostly Muslim, Pakistani-heritage men just between the years 1997 and 2013….
Joe Scott says
And about time … Well done ?
Ade Fegan says
Quite
M Keyzer says
The sikhs are right. You should refer to the groups these rapists belongs too. No bias.
Jules says
It boils my blood that they have been using the label “Asian” to lump so many people into these Pakistani pedophile grooming gangs. What does this have to do with Pakistan being on Asian land? Call them who they are and call them out!!
Infidel says
Not just that, over the last 2 decades, Pakistan and Afghanistan have become a part of the extended Middle East, after going full shariah, as Mark Steyn put it. I no longer think of those countries as Asian.
Traditionally, Asian used to be used in the US to describe people of a Mongoloid or Han race, although curiously, Japanese weren’t included in that description. Indians weren’t either, although no part of India is outside the continent. If one goes by culture rather than geography, then ‘MENA’ – Mid East & North Africa – should start at Pakistan and end in Mauritania/Mali or even Gambia. Asian would be everything India on east, w/ only Bangladesh, Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei being Muslim members
Joel Hinojosa says
So then Israel is part your “cultural Middle East”? That’s why ethnographers and geographers use terms like Arab, Persian/Aryan, South Asian, Central Asian, East Asian and SE Asian… Pakistanis are neither of the first two and Pakistan of course was part of India and includes some of the mountainous zone that is the result of the separate Indian subcontinent slamming into Asia… So they’re South or Central Asian mostly Sunnis… Fun
Infidel says
Israel is a part of the Middle East, but not a ‘cultural’ part of it, unless you are one of those that think Jews and Muslims are the same people. All the terms you used are fine, but ignore the Islamic influence on culture.
Pakistan is actually a mix of Turkic, Pashtun/Pathan and Indo-Muslim races if you wanna ethnically dice the continent. However, they consider the Arab invasion of Sind and the Ghaznavid invasions of India as their foundation, and their history is the entire Muslim history of India, starting from the Mamluq sultanate and going right up to the Mughal empire. Culturally, they have little in common w/ India
You could bunch them more w/ Central Asians, just like the Afghans and their -stan neighbors to the north. Historically, that would be accurate, since Pakistan was a part of Ghaznavid, Qhwarezmid, Timuride and Mughal empires. But in today’s global cultural climate, it’s a gross mischaracterization of them to call them South Asian.
Similarly, East Asian is the term one would use for Buddhist countries East of India – starting w/ Burma and going right up to Vietnam, and maybe tossing in Bhutan, Sri Lanka and if it ever becomes independent, Tibet. One could toss in India as well since Buddhism is respected in that country, even if followed by a miniscule minority
Kepha says
In the USA, “Asian” tends to mean Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Thai, Viet, Filipino, etc.; in Britain, it tends to mean Indian, Pakistani, or other South Asian. This reflects traditional sources of immigration.
Michael Copeland says
Maybe they will start calling them “brown” men, or, like “Boston man” in USA, they will simply say “Rochdale man, or Rotherham man`’. The media are not known for courage.
Treereen says
They already do that. If the “man” has a British passport he’ll be called a “British man” with no other information given. If the “man” hasn’t got a British passport he’ll be referred to by the area he’s been living in, for instance “Newham man”, again, with no other information given but referring to the area lets the cay out of the bag anyway. This has happened so many times that by now the complete absence of information about the perpetrator coupled with even fragmentary information about the crime(s) leaves us in no doubt.
Bad Penguin says
Small ray of hope for Britain
peter says
It is not courage ,the media is disgustingly corrupt to the core . The rape gang was white ,they would not have hesitated a second in calling as white gangs rape .
Infidel says
Thank you, Sikh organizations. Now please keep doing good work like this, and stop bothering about farmers in India (who are affected in all states, not just Punjab) and stop pushing Khalistan
Ade Fegan says
We are starting to see the term “local man” used now ….
I’ve not seen muslim pedo rape gang members referred to as Englishmen yet
.. but give it time
Cornelius says
The good news is that Sikhs and Hindus will no longer be associated with such a pathologies (sanctioned traditions of both pedophelia and the rape of female captives) that exist with the Muslim community. The bad news is that the media moniker will now NOT be changed from “Asian rape-gangs” to “Muslim rape-gangs”….it will be changed to simply “rape-gangs”…..as if – for all anyone could discern – native Brits are responsible.
somehistory says
This shouldn’t have been such an issue for the editors to figure out.
When someone says “islamic terrorist,” moslims get up…dare I say on their “high horse,” and demand that those two words not be used together as they taint and paint all moslims and islam as terrorists.
Even though, putting the words islam, islamic, islamist, and moslim with the words terrorism, terrorist, and terror attacks is accurate, they don’t want to write them, as moslims protest in such violent and extortive ways.
That is why they don’t want to stop using “Asian” when writing about the raping of so many young girls by moslims from pakistan.
If they don’t want to write “moslim rape gangs,” they could just print all of the names and indicate which barracks they attend or say from which country they came.
I can completely understand the feelings of these other groups of innocent…and targeted…people who might be from an Asian country. But I wouldn’t trust the editors to keep to what they said except for the exceptions they gave themselves.
Exception: “While accurate, it is better to avoid such general descriptions but this may not always be possible,” the review added.
eduardo odraude says
For UK media and UK politicians, it is quite safe to point the finger at “Asians” with respect to grooming gangs, whlle bemoaning the disadvantages and poverty and discrimination Asians must undergo at the hands of the UK majority culture. Because then the UK media is not actually blaming Asians, but rather blaming poverty and exclusion and discrimination. But if you instead call things by their true names — namely that in the UK these rape gangs are predominantly Pakistani Muslims — then you are not dealing with a genetic or racial question and the irrational discrimination against minorities, no, instead you are dealing with a choice by Muslims to adhere to Islamic culture, and a choice, unlike one’s race, is something for which one can be held accountable. No one can be held accountable for his genes or for the poverty imposed by the majority culture. But for following a wicked ideology? For that you can fairly be held accountable, and the UK media and politicians do not have the guts to try to hold Muslim culture accountable. So they’d rather talk about “Asians.” If that means throwing Sikhs and other non-Muslim Asians and UK girls under the bus, “so be it” say the UK media and the UK pols, “so long as we can save our own asses.”
Eva says
So true, and so sick.
Bikinis not Burkas says
Allah the mute stone idol self proclaimed TERRORIST “said” in :-
Quran 8:12
(Remember) when your Lord revealed to the angels, “Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast TERROR into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes.’
Crusades Were Right says
A couple of interesting (IMHO) points:
* Sikhs in the UK campaigned for the “right” to wear their turbans in opposition to the mandated dress codes for various occupations. No “equality” for THEM – rather special religious privileges, dontcha know! Ring any bells?
* “Asia” was originally applied to the region on the eastern shores of the Aegean Sea. The people who lived there back then were Greeks and closely related peoples – in other words, EUROPEANS! lol
somehistory says
Christians get “special treatment” too. It’s called persecution.
Sometimes, it’s in the form of discrimination.
Several reports in the past were about companies forcing Christians to not wear crosses where they could be seen, but moslims and others were allowed to wear what identified their religion.
More often now, though, the special treatment is destruction of property, denial of human rights, rape and murder…and the cries are ignored by the world.
Bikinis not Burkas says
Muhammad said women are deficient of intelligence!
https://muflihun.com/bukhari/6/301
Pull on an Islamic head dress raise your hand and scream “Look at me, look at me, I agree with Muhammad, I am STUPID!”
eduardo odraude says
The eastern shores of the Aegean are still considered part of Asia — i.e., the Near East part of Asia. Where Europe ends, Asia begins. Ancient Greeks of course had colonies on the Aegean coast of Anatolia/Turkey, but there were also people of Asian background in those parts.
Crusades Were Right says
If you define an “Asian” as anyone indigenous to what the atlases call “Asia”, then sure. By that token Japanese, Indian and Lebanese people, say, are all “Asians”, but clearly of very different ethnicities.
The ancient peoples of Asia Minor / Anatolia were essentially European in ethnic character. As for Greeks having “colonies” there, one should remember that the Greeks themselves were of diverse origins – including having ancient ancestors from… guess where! lol
Eva says
Call it all what it is – moslem rape gangs, moslem knife attacks, moslem car-ramming, moslem suicide bombings, moslem terrorists.
That’s the common denominator, moslems.
Of course, it will never happen.
The corrupt bunch of a**holes running this country into the sewers and their media stooges don’t want the truth to come out, they don’t want the public to know that not only has their multi-culti ‘social experiment’ failed on a level not seen before, but that they have imported millions of wanton rapists, murderers, terrorists and all round general filth into this country.
I would truly love to see them ALL fall victim to their own imports. At least that way there would be a sense that SOME justice had prevailed.
Bikinis not Burkas says
https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/TROP.jpg?34816
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
Just ask each offender, “Are you a Muslim, or a kafir?” Is it feared that Muslims will lie and say they are kafirs?
Myron J. Poltroonian says
Just hand them a Koran and ask them to spit on it. Identification solved and allegiance revealed.
Boycott Turkey says
They where Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs and they are still there and the UK police are doing nothing I saw a news report today on it today how the police blamed the victims as trouble makers I think the UK police are corrupt and being payed of to turn a blind eye
Eva says
Without a doubt.
They also arrested victims as prostitutes, whilst sympathising with the moslems who drugged, raped and sold them.
eduardo odraude says
Yes. The use of “Asian” to designate these gangs was not just cowardly, but criminal. The UK media, in order to protect their own hides (from leftist slander and from Muslim violence), was throwing innocent groups — Sikhs, and any other Asians not involved in these Pakistani Muslim grooming gangs — under the bus. And the UK media and UK government and UK police were throwing UK girls under the bus for the same cowardly and criminal reasons.
Michael Copeland says
“The media term ‘Asian grooming’ is libellous, misleading, and inaccurate. It gratuitously slanders the Chinese, Japanese, Russian, Indian Hindu, Indian Sikh, Thai Buddhist, and many other Asian peoples. The term ‘grooming’ is misleading: to many it concerns men’s hairdressing. The principal complaint, though, is that it is inaccurate. The phenomenon is not Asian but Muslim. It is Islamic sex-slave-taking.”
From (originally posted in 2013):
https://gatesofvienna.net/2019/04/islams-sex-slaves-in-britain/
eduardo odraude says
Exactly. Muhammad, the prime exemplar for Muslims, is shown in the most trusted Islamic sources as an owner and user of sex slaves.
Infidel says
Yeah, I’ve had problems w/ the label ‘grooming’ as well: that’s something one does to dogs or horses. Not women!
Boycott Turkey says
I agree I would say it was more sexual slavery rape gang rather then grooming
somehistory says
agreed. “grooming’ is often used in innocent contexts, even with “grooming someone to take over a company” when the owner retires or dies. “Teaching” the job’s responsibility.
This disgusting moslim rape gang activity is nothing like any other way the word is used….moslims forcing children to comply with being raped and being quiet about it afterward. That is not “grooming”…it’s criminal. The only “teaching” that comes of it is they learn that islam is demonic and moslims care nothing for what is right.
tgusa says
It’s a sad state of affairs but I would enjoy seeing these journalists that have smeared all Asians as rapists “groomed”. Of course my definition of grooming is not the same as their definition of grooming.
D Cripps says
The word “Asian” will, rightly, be omitted. However, there are already signs that the occasional white participant will be made much of to obscure any association with Islam. The rape-gangs may be referred to as just that and the ideology supporting the phenomenon further buried.
Linda Rivera says
The UK Government and media must be made to pay billions of pounds to Sikh and Hindu organizations for their great wickedness in slandering Sikhs and Hindus for several decades. This money to be used to help the many Sikh and Hindu sex slave child victims of Muslim sex slaver gangs and for safe houses for the girls with guards.
The Sikh and Hindu religions DO NOT command Hindus and Sikhs to perpetrate SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE TORTURE/SLAUGHTERS. They do not command them to rape, gang rape and sexually enslave non Muslims. The Blood Conquest Cult of Islam does.
Dawne says
Well done to the Sikh community. Shame that the white British community (after all still the majority in the UK) couldn’t have achieved this. It’s telling though that even when it’s another “minority” the police and establishment still favour the Muslim community.