Back in February 2020, Jihad Watch published Pawel Uczciwek’s statement explaining what had happened and how he was being wrongly accused. And now he has been fully vindicated. Actual “Islamophobic hate crimes” are so thin on the ground that they have to be invented in order to buttress the claim of Islamic groups in the West that Muslims are victims of particular discrimination and harassment and therefore deserve special accommodation and privileges. It’s a cottage industry.
“Businessman accused of trying to rip off a Muslim woman’s HIJAB on Tube has assault case thrown out after she and her two friends gave conflicting stories, court papers show,” by Jack Wright, Mailonline, January 2, 2021 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
A Polish businessman who was accused of an anti-Islam hate crime had an assault case against him thrown out by a judge after the Muslim woman’s key witnesses gave conflicting stories in court.
Aniso Abulkadir claimed that she and her friends Luxika Rajeswaran and Oyindamola Olatuyi were assaulted at Baker Street Tube station by Pawel Uczciwek in a ‘racially abusive’ attack in July 2017.
The trio whipped up a social media frenzy by alleging that Mr Uczciwek had tried to rip off Ms Abulkadir’s hijab and had hit her. They also published his home address and called for his employer to sack him.
At the time, Mr Uczciwek, now 31, denied attempting to remove the hijab and said he had been defending his black girlfriend Yolaine Mossimi from a ‘racist attack from three random females’.
Following a police probe, he was charged with religiously-aggravated common assault by beating – which can see offenders handed a possible two-year jail sentence.
But court papers show that the case was thrown out by a judge at Blackfriars Crown Court after the trio failed to establish if Mr Uczciwek had tried to remove the hijab during the altercation.
After witnesses Ms Rajeswaran and Ms Olatuyi failed to attend the second day of the trial, the judge ordered the jury to issue a not guilty verdict and apologised to Mr Uczciwek for the ordeal.
Judge Rajeev Shetty called the case a ‘colossal waste of time’ and called the prosecution’s evidence not ‘nearly convincing enough for the criminal standard of proof which is that you must be sure that that happened before the defendant could be convicted of anything’.
Speaking to MailOnline, Mr Uczciwek has now opened up about how the ‘false accusations’ caused him to suffer ‘insomnia, stress and anxiety’.
He said Ms Abulkadir had ‘falsified a hate crime story about her being attacked and she used her religion to stir-up racial hatred and paint me as the attacker’ in order to ‘perpetuate their agenda’.
Mr Uczciwek revealed the allegations had resulted in social media attacks on him and his family, while he received ‘countless abusive, racist and life-threatening phone calls, texts and online messages from various unknown people’.
At the time, the trio shared a photo of Mr Uczciwek online, and described how he had attempted to remove her headscarf before hitting her.
Ms Rajeswaran said: ‘The man said, ‘Show me your hair!’ and tried to pull it off. Aniso [Abulkadir] has never had a racial encounter like this before and has been left so upset by it. It’s the worst thing that could happen to have it removed, she chooses to wear it and it’s for her own reasons. It’s stripping her of her dignity to do that.’
But court papers now show that Ms Rajeswaran and Ms Olatuyi contradicted each other on basic details during proceedings at Blackfriars Crown Court….
nicu says
They always play the victim card ! I NEVER heard of any attacks against Muslim women – only by their own people IF at all !
wearing a Hijab is a political statement and not about religion !
Mount Zion says
It’s just nuts , you get life threatening phone calls and online abuses for the claim of having tried to remove an hijiab , even authorities investigate accurately , only when it comes to the thousands of rape victims by mudslimes all over England and the West in general , a huge cover up takes place and Media aren’t even allowed to talk about the ethnik origin of the perpetrators wich are 99% of Asian descent , that’s the euphemism they are allowed to use for mudslimes . It’s just nuts.
TruthSeeker says
“Asian descent” is such an insult to everyone else from Asia. If they are of Pakistani Origin then they should be named. No need to drag every other Asian country to cover up the misdeeds of one !
Rob Porter says
nicu – The same thing happened here in Toronto. A Muslim girl claimed that some man had attacked twice to rip off her hijab. Police were involved, the media were involved. The disgusting Canadian media then made this phoney report go international – and then it all turned out a fat lie, a fabrication. And then every half-baked idiot decided that this girl should not be punished.
Mount Zion says
My question would be ;” If that incident had really occurred Mr.Uczciwek would have had to face serious consequences , now that it is established that the alleged victims lied , because there were conflicting statements, what kind of consequences will these female mudslimes face ?
CogitoErgoSum says
Should have to pay all court costs at the very least.
CogitoErgoSum says
If she can’t pay she might be able to raise millions of dollars on a site like GoFundMe with her tale of woe and sorrow.
Mount Zion says
That and some serious jail time . But of course that’s never going to happen . Remember the guy ho put bacon on the door handle of the main entrance of a Mosque somewhere in England ? He did get jail time for this insignificant act . Is that remotely comparable in criminal intend to what these women tried to do to Mr.Uczciwek.
Ken Johnson says
Racially incite incident (by Muslims)??.Mr UCZciwek friend wasw a black woman.and they were asssaultig her.
Cthulhu says
His surname “Uczciwek” comes from the polish word “uczciwy”, which means “honest” in English. So, his surname means something like “honest buddy” or “honest guy”. How not to believe him 😉
Keith O says
The really sad thing is that this sort of BS happens on a regular basis, not just with mudslimes claiming to be victims.
I had it happen to me. Cost me several thousand dollars to clear my name and the spineless police refused to charge her with making a false statement.
So it would seem that Mudslimes have looked at this and are in the process of perfecting the art.
gravenimage says
Sorry you have been victimized, Keith.
Keith O says
Nothing for you to be sorry about.
This seems to be standard practice for a lot of people and if we stand up on our hind legs and use the truth then the truth comes out.
Jayell says
Muslims have to fabricate this sort of garbage in order to validate their inverted-supremacist claims of ‘victim status’ or else there’s no ‘righteous justification’ for their atrocious social attitudes and behaviour, and of course their institutional dishonesty allows them to exercise their creative faculties when concocting their ‘evidence’ without any sense of moral impropriety on their part. The problem is that there can be no machinery in our justice systems to automatically vet claims and complaints from this particular community before they go to court for as long as muslims continue to hold their ‘protected’ status or indeed are presumed to have the same standards of moral integrity as the rest of us.
GreekEmpress says
It’s good to see that there’s still one judge in the UK with some common sense.
gravenimage says
Hear hear!
somehistory says
There is no way to undo injustice. The poor guy suffered from the false accusations. Many times his kind of victim loses jobs, family members are divided over the issue, and with the internet, it never really goes away. The falseness of the claims doesn’t make the news as the initial “crime- that- didn’t-happen” does.
So, the lie gets all of the attention and when the Truth comes out, few pay attention; no one calls the poor guy up and says, “Hey, Buddy, sorry I called you names and threatened you.” He can’t undo the stress he was suffering.
These scum of the female sort never face the consequences of their lies…which in the U.S. are crimes. In Florida, the punishment for lying to the police is a year in prison for each lie told. These scummy moslims just don’t show up for the trial…and what happens to them?
And as someone else posted, the actual rapes by moslim gangs against young White girls get no attention; and beyond that, the victims are called liars and their lives are put on display as if they are the real criminals. No one ever apologizes to these real victims or expresses outrage at what has really happened.
But, just let the scummy dross of the society fake an “incident”….taking a scarf…and people come out of the woodwork to show how terrible this is. How dare someone take a scarf off the head of some moslim! It’s so **deathworthy.**
And the question should be asked: Just why would some decent guy wish to touch a piece of cloth that may never have seen a drop of soap or clean water? Why risk touching hair that may never see shampoo? Probably many have cooties (lice).
It’s really good that liars can’t keep their lies straight. True is the statement: “Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.”
And it’s really good that the judge in this case realized that. He probably saw the smoke coming from the trio of liars.
truthout says
Yeah its part of financial jihad .Just another gold digging ho trying her hardest to get her ill gotten gains to give it to her Muslim cult satanic cleric. They are so much lower than you even could conceive.
gravenimage says
Money is part of it–but it is also the attempt to paint Muslims as victims of “Islamophobes”, to distract from Muslims raping and slaughtering Infidels.
Valkyrie Ziege says
; To anyone caught in a similar situation, keep in mind, the video evidence from the “security cameras”/”C.C.T.V.” everywhere. Muhammadans aren’t tech savvy, as most professional, predatory, victims seldom are.
mortimer says
A similar fake event happened in Toronto in 2018. The Muslim Brotherhood was thought to be behind it. The event happened suspiciously the morning city council was to vote on an ‘Islamophobia’ motion. The motion did not go through after the event was proven to be fake.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/scarborough-hijab-attack-1.4487716
Reported hijab attack on 11-year-old girl ‘did not happen,’ Toronto police say
An 11-year-old girl’s report last week that a man tried to cut off her hijab as she walked to school didn’t occur, Toronto police said Monday.
“After a detailed investigation, police have determined that the events described in the original news release did not happen,” police said.
“The investigation is concluded.”
The girl reported Friday that a man attempted twice to cut off her hijab as she walked to school with her younger brother. Police said last week that the alleged attack was being investigated as a possible hate crime.
CBC News is not naming the 11-year-old out of a concern for her interests.
The girl, along with her mother and representatives from the Toronto District School Board, spoke to reporters inside her school Friday after she had talked to police.
Her story captured national attention, and drew public condemnation from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne and Toronto Mayor John Tory.
No legal consequences
“These allegations were extremely serious and not surprisingly, they received national and international attention,” police spokesperson Mark Pugash said in an interview.
“Investigators worked extremely hard since the allegations on Friday. They gathered evidence from a variety of sources,” before concluding the story was untrue, Pugash said, adding that the girl who reported the incident will not face any legal consequences.
hugo says
The story of the “attack” flew around the world a dozen times, especially as Trudeau went to the scene of the non crime.
The fact she lied never got off the ground.
gravenimage says
\UK: Man accused of trying to rip off Muslima’s hijab is cleared, accuser and her friends gave conflicting stories
……………
This poor guy–glad he was exonerated. And as others have noted this was hardly the first case of fake Muslim victimhood.
These Muslims *should* face charges of false accusation–but they probably won’t.
St. Croix says
Another case of “Hijab Jihad” but in this case the truth came out.
Hijab-Jihad:
1. Forcing women to wear the veil as a social norm, and a religious rule.
2. Authorities use wearing of the veil to make Islam visible, acceptable, ever-present, unavoidable, even inevitable–in the minds of the populace.
3. Co-opting the spirituality of women. Particularly, women are drawn to Jesus. And women must be kept ignorant, suppressed and controlled in all ways particularly spiritually.
4. Women can be jihadis too! By falsely accusing infidels, as in, saying “they ripped off my veil”…
5. Wearing the veil creates a new normal, wherever it starts to be enforced and displayed. It’s a sum of what islam is about really: suppression, aggression, enforcement, violence, slavery, no-voice, no-choice.
In this article the accuser said the accused demanded “show me your hair!” Huh? Show me your…hair?? No western man, even a real rapist, is going to say “take off your hat/scarf and let me see your HAIR!” It doesn’t even sound plausible. It is ridiculous to the western mind to say such a thing. We don’t hold the view of head hair being sacred/sexual/private. This would only be the kind of thing a Muslim assailant MIGHT say (before he ripped off all her clothes and raped her).
Kathleen Walsh says
Our Justice system needs a complete overhaul. The CPS refused to charge the Muslim gangs with rape of white children for fear it would damage race relations.
How did this stupid case even get to the courts? Or even charged is beyond a joke.
What happened to wasting Police time? And perjury? It’s a one way system in favour of the Muslims. Reap what you sow. The UK will pay the price. As my Irish granny always sais. « No matter what Truth will out.
Giacomo Latta says
”Aniso [Abulkadir] has never had a racial encounter like this before”!?!
What race was this she encountered? The non-muslim race? This bit of stupidity should have sufficed for the judge to put an end to this waste of taxpayers’ money.
OLD GUY says
Sadly the left in America is using the same ploy as islam, of being the under dog and discriminated against and makes accusations of racism and blames the deplorable whites for everything. Same ploy different players.
Simon Platt says
Aniso Abulkadir, Luxika Rajeswaran, Oyindamola Olatuyi, Pawel Uczciwek, Yolaine Mossimi, Rajeev Shetty.
Welcome to England.