A hadith has Aisha recount that Muhammad said to a woman: “‘O Asma, when a woman reaches the age of menstruation, it does not suit her that she displays her parts of body except this and this,’ and he pointed to her face and hands.” (Sunan Abu Dawud 4092)
And witless Western feminists will continue to don hijabs in solidarity with hijab-wearing Muslim women who are supposedly menaced by “Islamophobes,” while the real Muslim women who are oppressed and threatened (and sometimes killed) are those who, like this man’s daughters, dare not to wear hijab.
“Death threats for wearing the veil,” translated from “Menaces de mort pour le port du voile,” by Michael Nguyen, Le Journal de Montréal, March 3, 2021 (thanks to Mason):
A Muslim Montrealer who repeatedly threatened his four daughters to kill them if they dared to remove their veils, in addition to repeatedly hitting them, was found guilty across the board.
“They were forced to wear the veil, he regularly threatened to kill them if he saw them ‘as Quebeckers’,” said Judge Josée Bélanger, in finding the violent father guilty on Wednesday at the Montreal courthouse.
The 47-year-old, who cannot be named in order to protect the identity of his four daughters, committed his crimes between 2016 and 2018, when he had recently immigrated from Algeria.
But even in Canada, he forbade them to take off their veils, wear clothes that were too short, or hang out with boys. And if they didn’t obey, they were beaten.
If the victims were too afraid to file a complaint, it was taken care of by an educator, when he asked one of them why she was not wearing the veil.
Saved by the school
“She replied that her mother knew about it, but that if her father found out, he was going to kill her,” said the magistrate.
The educator then warned the girl that he was going to report her to the DPJ.
The girl wanted to put on her veil to avoid her father’s fury if a complaint was made, but the educator refused. Soon after, the father was arrested.
At trial, the father denied having committed any crime, claiming to be the victim of a conspiracy, to no avail, as he was convicted of threats and various assaults.
Pre-trial detained, he will soon return to court for his sentence.
His wife has since left him, and he no longer has any authority over his daughters, who were present at court and who did not wear the veil during the hearing.
mortimer says
Islamic veiling is the most visible symbol of misogyny today. A veiled woman is controlled by a Muslim alpha male.
Veiling is not the only Islamic regulation that is not permitted. There are SO MANY … jihadic terrorism, private slaughtering animals, wife-beating, honor-killing … so why not ban veiling as well, since it leads to abuses like these which the judge condemned as human rights and criminal law violations?
Cases such as this show that veiling will become COMPULSORY unless it is banned from the start. In an honor-shame culture, the enforcement of veiling is the duty of the alpha male. He is shamed if he does nothing to enforce his authority in the matter of veiling.
Eur says
“A veiled woman is controlled by a Muslim alpha male”…..
The Islamic veil is a sign of mourning. The Islamic community pressures women of their community to wear it as a symbol of belonging to that community and therefore they must show exaggerated puritanical behavior. Of course it is also a symbol that this woman is not available since she has an owner (husband, father, brothers …). From the Muslim perspective, non-Muslim women are not pure and those in their community who do not wear hijab are either indecisive girls or whores. The easy and comfortable thing for a girl from a Muslim family is to wear a hijab because if not she has to give explanations, wearing it she is doing what she is supposed to do and also is doing religious proselitism with her mere presence … in return she is voided as an individual person as she becomes a member of a hive.
Crusader 666 says
Well said, Mortimer, but you omitted Female Genital Mutilation. FGM has been a crime in the U.K. for 40 years, but not one single prosecution has taken place! However, adverts for FGM are common in the British media, but are never prosecuted, because the U.K. government are terrified of a Muslim rebellion.
Eur says
I have heard some condescending idiot that the public health should offer it ka ablation to prevent them from doing it in horrible conditions (blades, pain, carnage, infections …). It is the world upside down, barbarism is colonizing us by simple demographic pressure and lack of self-defense of our values. Is incredible.
PRCS says
The “veil” is NOT just an “honor-shame culture”, as the article makes clear.
The core issue, per Qur’an 33:59 is Islamic supremacism over the kuffar.
Sahih International: O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves [part] of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.
That “revelation” obviously–and intentionally–left “filthy unbelieving” women fair game for predatory Muslim men.
Given that the sharia applies to every Muslim, everywhere and at all times, it should come as no surprise that SOME Muslims DO impose that hatefully discriminatory nonsense on others here, too.
That dear old dad has been arrested, charged, convicted and will be sentenced in accordance with the secular, man-made laws of the Western nation he immigrated to–and that his “Quebecker” children will no longer suffer his abuse–is refreshing.
Michael Copeland says
” the father …claiming to be the victim”.
Heard that before.
gravenimage says
Yep.
Walter Sieruk says
This shows the callous viciousness Islam can infect into the heart and mind of a Muslim father.
If he really does carry through his malice-filled threats and murders them then he will ,no doubt , call his ruthless murderous behavior and”honor killing”
This further proves the truth ofthe old saying ,which is that “Evil is always looking for an excuse..”
Michael Copeland says
Memo to Canadian court:
“I have been taught by my sheicks and immams that our religion was peaceful, morally perfect, and wonderful, but what I saw was that it was evil, violent and disgusting.”
Recent ex-muslim
https://www.bitchute.com/video/DBLuAUl2TAw/ at 6.25
James Lincoln says
Thanks for the video link, Michael.
Another great David Wood video…
gravenimage says
+1
Michael Copeland says
Reminder of what the judge said in a different case in Canada concerning a young woman:
“She has the right to freedom of conscience and religion, to be free to decide her future.”
Judge Bruno Langelier.
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/09/canada-muslim-teen-forced-to-wear-hijab-marry-much-older-man
This is one area where Western law is in conflict with Sharia. Let Canada continue to uphold it.
PRCS says
I remember that post/incident.
Judge believes girl
“The court believes the teenager about the fears she feels. Certainly she is under pressure and control to marry the fiancé,” Langelier said in his decision.
He noted that the girl was so afraid of her family and fiancé that she didn’t want to be present at the hearing.
He also noted that the marriage contract entered into evidence appeared to be illegal, and that the marriage was never properly registered with the government.
He said the imam who signed the contract should have known the marriage was illegal.
“The planned marriage certainly was in line with the customs of the family’s home country. However, these customs cannot prevail in the province of Quebec. There is only one rule of law, and it applies to all residents of the province,” Langelier said.
Michael Copeland says
The father’s threat to kill is no idle threat. Canada already has the example of Aqsa Parvez, the teen who did not want to wear the hijab headscarf. Her action and disobedience constituted an unacceptable tarnish to her father’s male supremacy and ownership (misnamed “honor”). He and her brother strangled her with her hijab.
PRCS says
And the Shafia family murders.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shafia_family_murders
gravenimage says
Too true, Michael and PRCS.
Walter Sieruk says
In Canada ,regarding the Muslim father who keep on threating to kill his very own daughters because they refuse to wear the hijab , which is really is symbol of the misogyny and oppression of females, both girls and women, in the bondage of the anti -female religion of Islam.
This again may serve as an of the total contrast between a Muslim father who is disappointed by his daughters and a Christian father who is disappointed by his daughters.
For if a father who is a Christian is sadly disappointed tn by the behavior of his daughters ,he prays for them , or he should. At the very worst he will shun them.
In horrible contrast ,if a father who is a Muslim is sadly disappointed by his daughters ,mau times then , he intends to or does literally murder them.
The difference between the mindset and actions of a Christian father and a Muslim father is outstanding.
Jesus taught “By their fruits you will know them.” Matthew 7:20. [N.K.J.V.]
In addition , many Westerners ,Christians or not ,Canadians or not might be should in hearing about this news report andt stop and then wonder and ask the question “Just how can that Muslim father or any other father who is a Muslim be so callous , heartless asto malicious threaten his daughter with death and many other times actually carry through this death threats by murdering them.?
The answer to that question is found in the Bible . For the Bible reveals that there are some men who are very callous m heartless ,unfeeling, brutal and cruel because they have had “their own conscience seared with a hot iron.” First Timothy 4:2.
In the cases of such Muslim fathers that “hot iron” is Islam.
gravenimage says
Canada: Muslim migrant repeatedly threatens to murder his daughters for not wearing the hijab
……………
Glad to see that he was tried and found guilty.
Kudos to those at the school who reported this to the Canadian authorities.
Michael Copeland says
The West is slowly becoming acquainted with the merciless cruelty of Sharia.
gravenimage says
Grimly true, Michael.