Saturday, on the Jaipur Dialogues with Sanjay Dixit.
Comments
Tom Champaignesays
God bless ROBERT SPENCER and protect him.
gravenimagesays
Hear, hear!
Singh T. Juniorsays
Robert Spencer fights the forces of darkness on a daily basis. He is a hero. I pray to my Gods to look over him and protected him.
mortimersays
Yes, STJ, it’s dangerous work, indeed.
Muslims consider any analysis of Islam which doesn’t actually promote Islam to be ‘haram’ activity to be suppressed by more jihad.
Singh T. Juniorsays
For all Hindus, please read “Unbreaking India” by Sanjay Dixit. Lot of history and politics is covered about the islamic terrorism, breaking up India, islamic genocides, and its continued campaign of terror and perfidy in todays times.
Rajasays
Singh T,
I didn’t know that Sanjay Dixit was such an important person. The vid is little exhausting (because of the length) nonetheless is very absorbing.
The world is in the threshold of more censorship thanks to devil’s effort of depriving man of basic freedom to choose good from the bad. Of this, jihad and Leftism are playing an important role.
God says this:
Acts 17
26 and He made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times and the boundaries of their habitation,
27 that they would seek God, if perhaps they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us;
28 for in Him we live and move and exist, as even some of your own poets have said, ‘For we also are His children.’
We are in for sad times especially in Africa and the West (oz and NZ included)
mortimersays
Sanjay Dixit is to be commended for his analysis of Islamic separatism in India.
mortimersays
Sanjay Dixit is to be commended for his analysis of Islamic separatism in India.
In general, I find most people from regions with a history of jihad know anecdotally about Islam, but seldom do they have any in-depth knowledge of the jihad doctrine … this includes Christians, Jews and Hindus as well … very unfortunate. These victims of Islam haven’t taken the time to inform themselves about Islamic political ideology.
Infidelsays
8:00 Not to detract from Robert’s book, but the account of muslim depredations against India – Jains, Buddhists, Hindus and Sikhs – are all detailed in a history series by Dr RC Majumdar. Of course, it’s a 11-volume series, so the chances of even most Indians reading it is unlikely. As far as I recall, it didn’t have the numbers of those killed, but it did describe Hindu-muslim relations pretty well, particularly in the volumes ‘The Delhi Sultanate’ and the ‘Mughal Empire’. And of course, there’s Kisari Saran Lal’s and Sitaram Goel’s books on the subject
1:00:00 Piece of advice to Harshal Vaidya: Do not discuss the subject of islam w/ muslims! If it’s pleasant, it’s b’cos they’re lying to you, and if it’s hostile, you’re setting yourself up for danger. I’ve never had muslim friends, just colleagues (where it was outside my control), and in those situations, I made it a point never to discuss islam or politics w/ them, just work discussions
1:06:30 Islam is growing where it is due to the higher birth rates of people in muslim countries. Not b’cos people are converting en masse
1:11:30 People who politically identify as Hindus (as opposed to those for whom it’s nothing more than a religion) do not endorse Gandhi’s pacifism
1:14:30 Yeah, if only the missionaries would focus on muslims, as opposed to tribal animists, assuming that they didn’t want to focus on countering jihad here at home. Incidentally, the USCIRF did itself no favors by denouncing India’s CAA or the new laws against marriage jihad
1:15:30 Reason HInduphobia is ignored is that within India, as well as a good (if not majority) of Hindu Americans, they have been won over by Trump, and are not the reliable vote bank for the Dems in the way muslims are
1:16:30 Siddhant had a brilliant suggestion of breaking up the Left-islam coalition on the ground that in no country do both co-exist if either is in power
1:21:00 On Iran, if the people of Iran actually apostatize all the way from the islams to Zoroastrianism, there is hope for that country, and that there won’t be another reversion to islam at a future date
1:22:00 On the Uyghurs, the big thing that RS missed was the fact that in this one case of real persecution of muslims, the ummah has been deafeningly silent. Also, issue is not the mere Chinese persecution of Uyghurs, even if it’s no different from their persecution of Tibetans, Christians, Falun Gong and Mongols. The issue is the Chinese have agreements w/ most muslim countries to extradite Uyghurs back to China so that they can be enslaved
Better discussion than the one w/ Sarah Khan, although to date, OpIndia’s Nupur Sharma is the one who impressed me the most. And actually, I’ve found OpIndia’s news really riveting. It’s really impressive when Jack Posoviec starts citing it (like their report on the censorship of ‘Blue Anon’)
James Lincolnsays
Excellent commentary on the video, Infidel.
Infidelsays
Thanks James
john smithsays
Seconded
gravenimagesays
+1
gregbeethamsays
Maybe it takes a dictatorship to counter Islam and Jihad, how is the West doing against it?
Infidelsays
India ain’t a dictatorship, but some elected state governments there are countering islam and jihad. Burma has had a good record combating islam and jihad both under Ahn Sang Syu Kyi as well as the dictatorships that both preceded and followed her. Sri Lanka has an elected government, but since the Easter bombings 2 years ago, they too have cracked down on muslims
gregbeethamsays
True, India is a democracy and probably not capable of dealing with Jihad. I don’t remember what role religion played in the Sri Lanka mini genocide i.e. were those Tiger rebels actually Muslim? the media here never said anything about religion, that I can remember.
Myanmar like you say got rid of Islam and a bunch of troublesome Muslims from a part of the country but of course that country is back under military dictatorship again and that’s another problem.
If it takes brutal repression like China and Myanmar enforced on their Muslims in order to get rid of Islam and Jihad how does one get rid of the brutal regime after it has done its job?
Infidelsays
I think that some states in India have been dealing w/ jihad just fine. The idea that one has to be a dictatorship before one can act is unfounded. Sri Lanka prevailed over the Tamil Tigers, who weren’t Muslims – they were Tamil separatist Leftists. What I cited was that after the Easter bombings 2 years ago, Sri Lanka cracked down on muslim organizations, and last year, they banned the burial of people on the grounds that it could infect the ground water if those people had the Chinavirus. So if any muslim wanted to be buried, his body had to be taken to Maldives, who Sri Lanka cut a deal w/. Otherwise, in Sri Lanka, they would be cremated
Yeah, Myanmar did crack down on muslims under their previous dictatorship, but note that those policies not only continued under Ahn Sang Syu Kyi, but even Dr Thet Thet, the opposition leader who ran against her, endorsed the same policy. Whatever differences there may be in Burma, one thing they all agree on is that muslims have no place in their country. So even if democracy were to be restored and either of these 2 came to power, the policy of keeping out the Rohingyas would continue
gregbeethamsays
I remain unconvinced that a democracy like ours in the West can deal with an insidious cult like Islam effectively.
Yes the pogrom against the Rohingya continued under Syu Kyi’s government but then I doubt they would have had any real authority over the army anyway, that government was ‘allowed’ to go through the motions of government by the military and now has reverted to type again, a military dictatorship who shoot their own people in the streets so I don’t like the chances of the Rohingya ever making a comeback, even if they renounced Islam I doubt that they would be allowed to return.
gravenimagesays
Actually,.the nascient United States faced down the Barbary Pirates. There is nothing wrong with freedom and democracy–just with denial and dhimmitude.
Besides, many unfree and semi-free nations are also doing poorly against Islam–Russia, for one.
gregbeethamsays
Yes the Barbary Pirates got a comeuppance from the USMC (first foreign action) and what a good job that was.
But by and large Islam is persistent, individuals come and go but the doctrine remains, it requires a permanent solution, or alternatively we could enforce the law…that might work; and if it disturbs Muslims because we enforce the law, arrest them too.
Hmm yeah Russia, if you get taken hostage by Muslims don’t get rescued by Russia.
americanpatriotsays
Jihad is aggressively launched against all remaining non-Muslim lands relentlessly by devout Muslims all over the world. the majority of international Non-Muslim folks and their leaders in government are still ignorant of this global jihad of Islam. Jihad in Southern Thailand, Jihad in Rakhine state of Myanmar, Jihad in Assam, Tripura and neighboring states in India, jihad in Africa, the list is endless.
We all need to have a unified front which promotes equal treatment of all human beings not based on faith, based on goodwill. We need to highlight evil treatment of non-Muslims by Muslims in their Muslim majority countries. We need to demand reciprocal goodwill and actions from Muslims. We need to expose more hateful teachings of Islam and objectively analyze and educate them to the public. We have a lot to do to counter this Islamic jihad to our folks.
Infidelsays
Some of the questioners in this video were patently anti-US, like the one who claimed that the US has no cultural foundations. Unfortunately, just like there are a lot of Americans who still see Russia as the old Soviet Union, there are a lot of Indians who still see the US as it was in the 80s, when it followed the (now obvious) short-sighted policy of arming the jihad against the communists in not just Afghanistan but Pakistan as well
If one wants to go that route, one can denounce India ad nauseum for the Islam-pandering policies of Gandhi (supporting the Khilafat movement in 1919), Nehru and Gandhi (preventing Hindus from expelling all Muslims out of India during partition), Nehru and Indira (following a pro-Soviet foreign policy and being rabidly anti-Israel), Indira (for adding the terms ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ to the Indian constitution) and so on. Never mind the fact that some of those have been reversed by the BJP, and some in the process of being reversed, since problems that took 70 years to accumulate won’t be resolved in 10 years
Cicerosays
A timely interview of our acclaimed Robert Spencer by Sanjay Dixit!!
Robert is in sparkling form
Needs to be translated into Indian regional languages
Discover more from
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
Tom Champaigne says
God bless ROBERT SPENCER and protect him.
gravenimage says
Hear, hear!
Singh T. Junior says
Robert Spencer fights the forces of darkness on a daily basis. He is a hero. I pray to my Gods to look over him and protected him.
mortimer says
Yes, STJ, it’s dangerous work, indeed.
Muslims consider any analysis of Islam which doesn’t actually promote Islam to be ‘haram’ activity to be suppressed by more jihad.
Singh T. Junior says
For all Hindus, please read “Unbreaking India” by Sanjay Dixit. Lot of history and politics is covered about the islamic terrorism, breaking up India, islamic genocides, and its continued campaign of terror and perfidy in todays times.
Raja says
Singh T,
I didn’t know that Sanjay Dixit was such an important person. The vid is little exhausting (because of the length) nonetheless is very absorbing.
The world is in the threshold of more censorship thanks to devil’s effort of depriving man of basic freedom to choose good from the bad. Of this, jihad and Leftism are playing an important role.
God says this:
Acts 17
26 and He made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times and the boundaries of their habitation,
27 that they would seek God, if perhaps they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us;
28 for in Him we live and move and exist, as even some of your own poets have said, ‘For we also are His children.’
We are in for sad times especially in Africa and the West (oz and NZ included)
mortimer says
Sanjay Dixit is to be commended for his analysis of Islamic separatism in India.
mortimer says
Sanjay Dixit is to be commended for his analysis of Islamic separatism in India.
https://www.amazon.com/Unbreaking-India-Decisions-370-CAA-ebook/dp/B08R42GC84
In general, I find most people from regions with a history of jihad know anecdotally about Islam, but seldom do they have any in-depth knowledge of the jihad doctrine … this includes Christians, Jews and Hindus as well … very unfortunate. These victims of Islam haven’t taken the time to inform themselves about Islamic political ideology.
Infidel says
8:00 Not to detract from Robert’s book, but the account of muslim depredations against India – Jains, Buddhists, Hindus and Sikhs – are all detailed in a history series by Dr RC Majumdar. Of course, it’s a 11-volume series, so the chances of even most Indians reading it is unlikely. As far as I recall, it didn’t have the numbers of those killed, but it did describe Hindu-muslim relations pretty well, particularly in the volumes ‘The Delhi Sultanate’ and the ‘Mughal Empire’. And of course, there’s Kisari Saran Lal’s and Sitaram Goel’s books on the subject
1:00:00 Piece of advice to Harshal Vaidya: Do not discuss the subject of islam w/ muslims! If it’s pleasant, it’s b’cos they’re lying to you, and if it’s hostile, you’re setting yourself up for danger. I’ve never had muslim friends, just colleagues (where it was outside my control), and in those situations, I made it a point never to discuss islam or politics w/ them, just work discussions
1:06:30 Islam is growing where it is due to the higher birth rates of people in muslim countries. Not b’cos people are converting en masse
1:11:30 People who politically identify as Hindus (as opposed to those for whom it’s nothing more than a religion) do not endorse Gandhi’s pacifism
1:14:30 Yeah, if only the missionaries would focus on muslims, as opposed to tribal animists, assuming that they didn’t want to focus on countering jihad here at home. Incidentally, the USCIRF did itself no favors by denouncing India’s CAA or the new laws against marriage jihad
1:15:30 Reason HInduphobia is ignored is that within India, as well as a good (if not majority) of Hindu Americans, they have been won over by Trump, and are not the reliable vote bank for the Dems in the way muslims are
1:16:30 Siddhant had a brilliant suggestion of breaking up the Left-islam coalition on the ground that in no country do both co-exist if either is in power
1:21:00 On Iran, if the people of Iran actually apostatize all the way from the islams to Zoroastrianism, there is hope for that country, and that there won’t be another reversion to islam at a future date
1:22:00 On the Uyghurs, the big thing that RS missed was the fact that in this one case of real persecution of muslims, the ummah has been deafeningly silent. Also, issue is not the mere Chinese persecution of Uyghurs, even if it’s no different from their persecution of Tibetans, Christians, Falun Gong and Mongols. The issue is the Chinese have agreements w/ most muslim countries to extradite Uyghurs back to China so that they can be enslaved
Better discussion than the one w/ Sarah Khan, although to date, OpIndia’s Nupur Sharma is the one who impressed me the most. And actually, I’ve found OpIndia’s news really riveting. It’s really impressive when Jack Posoviec starts citing it (like their report on the censorship of ‘Blue Anon’)
James Lincoln says
Excellent commentary on the video, Infidel.
Infidel says
Thanks James
john smith says
Seconded
gravenimage says
+1
gregbeetham says
Maybe it takes a dictatorship to counter Islam and Jihad, how is the West doing against it?
Infidel says
India ain’t a dictatorship, but some elected state governments there are countering islam and jihad. Burma has had a good record combating islam and jihad both under Ahn Sang Syu Kyi as well as the dictatorships that both preceded and followed her. Sri Lanka has an elected government, but since the Easter bombings 2 years ago, they too have cracked down on muslims
gregbeetham says
True, India is a democracy and probably not capable of dealing with Jihad. I don’t remember what role religion played in the Sri Lanka mini genocide i.e. were those Tiger rebels actually Muslim? the media here never said anything about religion, that I can remember.
Myanmar like you say got rid of Islam and a bunch of troublesome Muslims from a part of the country but of course that country is back under military dictatorship again and that’s another problem.
If it takes brutal repression like China and Myanmar enforced on their Muslims in order to get rid of Islam and Jihad how does one get rid of the brutal regime after it has done its job?
Infidel says
I think that some states in India have been dealing w/ jihad just fine. The idea that one has to be a dictatorship before one can act is unfounded. Sri Lanka prevailed over the Tamil Tigers, who weren’t Muslims – they were Tamil separatist Leftists. What I cited was that after the Easter bombings 2 years ago, Sri Lanka cracked down on muslim organizations, and last year, they banned the burial of people on the grounds that it could infect the ground water if those people had the Chinavirus. So if any muslim wanted to be buried, his body had to be taken to Maldives, who Sri Lanka cut a deal w/. Otherwise, in Sri Lanka, they would be cremated
Yeah, Myanmar did crack down on muslims under their previous dictatorship, but note that those policies not only continued under Ahn Sang Syu Kyi, but even Dr Thet Thet, the opposition leader who ran against her, endorsed the same policy. Whatever differences there may be in Burma, one thing they all agree on is that muslims have no place in their country. So even if democracy were to be restored and either of these 2 came to power, the policy of keeping out the Rohingyas would continue
gregbeetham says
I remain unconvinced that a democracy like ours in the West can deal with an insidious cult like Islam effectively.
Yes the pogrom against the Rohingya continued under Syu Kyi’s government but then I doubt they would have had any real authority over the army anyway, that government was ‘allowed’ to go through the motions of government by the military and now has reverted to type again, a military dictatorship who shoot their own people in the streets so I don’t like the chances of the Rohingya ever making a comeback, even if they renounced Islam I doubt that they would be allowed to return.
gravenimage says
Actually,.the nascient United States faced down the Barbary Pirates. There is nothing wrong with freedom and democracy–just with denial and dhimmitude.
Besides, many unfree and semi-free nations are also doing poorly against Islam–Russia, for one.
gregbeetham says
Yes the Barbary Pirates got a comeuppance from the USMC (first foreign action) and what a good job that was.
But by and large Islam is persistent, individuals come and go but the doctrine remains, it requires a permanent solution, or alternatively we could enforce the law…that might work; and if it disturbs Muslims because we enforce the law, arrest them too.
Hmm yeah Russia, if you get taken hostage by Muslims don’t get rescued by Russia.
americanpatriot says
Jihad is aggressively launched against all remaining non-Muslim lands relentlessly by devout Muslims all over the world. the majority of international Non-Muslim folks and their leaders in government are still ignorant of this global jihad of Islam. Jihad in Southern Thailand, Jihad in Rakhine state of Myanmar, Jihad in Assam, Tripura and neighboring states in India, jihad in Africa, the list is endless.
We all need to have a unified front which promotes equal treatment of all human beings not based on faith, based on goodwill. We need to highlight evil treatment of non-Muslims by Muslims in their Muslim majority countries. We need to demand reciprocal goodwill and actions from Muslims. We need to expose more hateful teachings of Islam and objectively analyze and educate them to the public. We have a lot to do to counter this Islamic jihad to our folks.
Infidel says
Some of the questioners in this video were patently anti-US, like the one who claimed that the US has no cultural foundations. Unfortunately, just like there are a lot of Americans who still see Russia as the old Soviet Union, there are a lot of Indians who still see the US as it was in the 80s, when it followed the (now obvious) short-sighted policy of arming the jihad against the communists in not just Afghanistan but Pakistan as well
If one wants to go that route, one can denounce India ad nauseum for the Islam-pandering policies of Gandhi (supporting the Khilafat movement in 1919), Nehru and Gandhi (preventing Hindus from expelling all Muslims out of India during partition), Nehru and Indira (following a pro-Soviet foreign policy and being rabidly anti-Israel), Indira (for adding the terms ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ to the Indian constitution) and so on. Never mind the fact that some of those have been reversed by the BJP, and some in the process of being reversed, since problems that took 70 years to accumulate won’t be resolved in 10 years
Cicero says
A timely interview of our acclaimed Robert Spencer by Sanjay Dixit!!
Robert is in sparkling form
Needs to be translated into Indian regional languages