Now deleted, but the screenshots are everywhere. Will CNN fire him? Or give him a promotion?
This guy is an actual CNN contributor. No joke. https://t.co/UZAEPzijWx pic.twitter.com/b4U7S4HV4Z
— Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.today (@JordanSchachtel) May 16, 2021
54 stories under his name pic.twitter.com/Vn2frvOEo4
— Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.today (@JordanSchachtel) May 16, 2021
Homie has been cashing cnn checks for 8 years. pic.twitter.com/l4AhhMExQa
— Jordan Schachtel @ dossier.today (@JordanSchachtel) May 16, 2021
https://twitter.com/TrumpJew2/status/1394010551689392137
jake moon says
These kind of hateful comments will continue to infest media.
Nothing will happen to these lover of peace.
Of course not..
R. Thomasson says
I had watched yesterday evening CNN news on Israel. There is not a drop of objectivity in their reports. CNN is a news outlet that can be defined hostile toward Israel, and indirectly hostile toward Israeli Jews living there. It is not so bizarre that CNN has a Muslim reporter that adores Hitler, and has wet dreams on genocide. The only people who can deal correctly with CNN are the Jewish shareholders. They can invest their money on better news channels (FOX etc). Holding shares of CNN is like being a share holder of the Großdeutsche Rundfunck; the Nazi propaganda channel during the ’30 and WWII.
gravenimage says
Very disturbing.
mortimer says
JM … you are wrong … he’s been fired.
CNN Freelancer Adeel Raja Axed After Multiple Pro-Hitler Tweets
Raja, who contributed to dozens of stories for the news network, struck a defiant tone after losing his gig.
By Ron Dicker
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/cnn-adeel-raja-adolf-hitler_n_60a23201e4b063dcceab99a9
gravenimage says
Yes–good news.
St. Croix says
He’s got the next best thing, Erdogan, he’s well on his way. Or Khameini. And how about Imran Khan?
born saturday says
the world today already has a series of hitlers in islamic and communist countries what is this demented disorientated journalist on about…. the magnificent sultan erdogan is a bright example of a hitler of the world but he is not alone… even since the nazi times there was other hitlers like ataturk…
R. Thomasson says
@born saturday. We have already a new Hitler that is threatening our world. Question is if our western governments and yours will be ready – and able – to deal with the threat that new backed Hitler is bringing for all of us? There are NOW millions Muslim BROTHERS OF THE UMMA who are held in concentration camps. But this demented and disoriented journalist has far to low education and mindset to regard it.
By the way it is an offense to compare Ataturk with nazis.
gravenimage says
The implication that Muslims are in death camps is of course utter tosh–this is not true even in undemocratic China.
And while Ataturk did in general tamp down the influence of Islam, he also presided over the last years of the Armenian Genocide. Rather a mixed bag, really.
Johnny B says
Yes, these are the times that people show their true colours (no pun intended I should say, before I offend someone, which would be terrible).
Wellington says
Just an aside observation and it is this: Though Hitler in his Table Talk expressed admiration for Islam precisely because it was “muscular” and spread by the sword, favored the strong in battle and not the weak (N.B., Hitler despised Christianity because he thought it favored what he considered the detritus of society, the very people Jesus praised in his Sermon on the Mount), he nonetheless expressed contempt for Arabs because they were Semitic and thus in no way part of the Aryan race.
Don’t think many Arab Muslims “get this” about Hitler even though all the while praising Hitler for his attempted extermination of all Jews. As usual, Arab Muslims are ignorant of so much. Their adulation of Hitler serves as a case in point.
Will Tyson says
Hitler’s table talks are of questionable reliability, apparently there wasn’t even a stenographer present for much of the events quoted in the book, but nonetheless interesting points you bring up
Wellington says
Will Tyson:
The only hesitation about Hitler’s Table Talk I have come across is that some are in English and French translations and the exact accuracy of the translations have occasionally been called into question.
Major historians like Bullock, Shirer and Trevor-Roper have all treated the Table Talk as quite reliable. Among those recording the talks by Hitler were Martin Bormann and Henry Picker. I know of no major historian who has questioned the overall reliability of Hitler’s Table Talk which covers the years 1941-1944.
Will Tyson says
There was a German studies review that found that stenographers were not present and the the talks were actually based on a collection of secretary notes.
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/vfzg-2019-0004/pdf
Wellington says
Will Tyson: I’m not at all convinced that not having stenographers present is all that important. Bormann and others taking notes serve, quite arguably, as an adequate substitute for stenographers. Not certain of course but it seems that major historians have not been bothered by this.
mortimer says
Agree with Wellington. Stenographers were often seated unobtrusively in the room to record Hitler. Some guests to Hitler’s dinner table wrote down his words right after dinner to get them as close as possible to the original wordings and meanings. Hitler rambled on and on while his guests sat in silence trying not yawn. The remarks of Hitler were recorded under Heinrich Heim, a lawyer and member of the inner circle. It is highly likely that a lawyer would demand accuracy, but much controversy attaches to those who got and transcribed some of the notes later, the Frenchman Genoud in particular, who was a confessed fraud.
It should be emphasized, though, that Albert Speer validated the collection of remarks of Hitler made by lawyer Heinrich Heim and published by lawyer Henry Picker in the original German in 1951.
gravenimage says
Agree with Wellington and Mortimer.
citoyen says
Even more questionable is any reported speech by Jesus The Christ at the Mount of Olives or anywhere else. No stenographers and no eyewitnesses. Josephus, whose father was around at the time of Pontius Pilate, says absolutely nothing about the supposedly most important event in world history: the arrival of a cosmic visitor who has taken on the appearance of a man.
It’s typical of the pious (such as Wellington) the they will mull over the veracity of recent reported events but accept without question the botched religious tracts of (possibly four) anonymous authors -Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, all of address unknown.
mortimer says
citoyen makes GREAT GUESSES. Wellington is an agnostic in religion, btw.
citoyen appears to suffer under an idée fixe. We are discussing the love of Hitler that is found among Muslims.
Please stick to the subject and see a therapist about the idée fixe.
gravenimage says
citoyen wrote:
It’s typical of the pious (such as Wellington)…
…………………..
citoyen, Wellington has said many times that he is agnostic–so what are you on about here? Moreover, I can’t recall his ever referring to Jesus at the Mount of Olives in any case.
Wellington says
As both mortimer and gravenimage have accurately conveyed to you, I am an agnostic, so I found your reference to me as pious highly amusing. Needed a good laugh and you provided it.
As for the “botched religious tracts” you mentioned, you may want to read Michael Grant’s “Jesus: An Historian’s Review Of The Gospels,” published in 1977. Grant was a first-rate historian of antiquity and published many works, including just about the best one-volume history of Rome I have ever come across. He also wrote biographies of Constantine the Great and St. Paul and was a leading authority on Roman numismatics. In his work on Jesus and the Gospels he approaches the subject matter as neither a believer nor a non-believer but as an historian.
Though a skeptic himself, like yours truly, he takes no cheap shots in this work of his and concludes there is much to learn about Jesus, historically speaking, from the four Gospels, certainly not considering them “botched” works and providing copious reasons why they tell us a great deal about who Jesus was and what his mission was, including in detail how the Gospels differ from each other, their origins, and why very often they are reliable accounts, though not in every instance. I suggest you get a copy of this tome by Grant and see how a first-rate historian treated with these four “tracts.” You might learn something.
John says
Unconditional surrender of the Hamas government should be the only acceptable conclusion. If they keep sending rockets, turn the Gaza Strip into Berlin 1945 until they surrender.
Westman says
Muslim CNN reporter: ‘The world today needs a Hitler’
Why? It has one…
The original “Hitler” of Jewish annihilation, whose pogrom is still in play, wasn’t his name Muhammad?
mortimer says
Muslims see much of their prophet repeated in Hitler and they are drawn to it with admiration.
Anyone who admires Hitler is morally distorted.
gravenimage says
+1
Gary Rosen says
My understanding is that Hitler’s dismissal of Arabs as “Semitic” changed when he found out their hatred for Jews matched if not exceeded his own. Regardless of that MENA was an important theater of WWII and he needed to cultivate them for strategic reasons.
Bruce says
And, if you want to get “technical”, Arabs are “Hamitic’, not Semitic”.
It all seems to derive from the Biblical story of Shem and Ham…..
somehistory says
And the rest of us are from Japheth.
St. Croix says
It seems most of the Arabs are Semitic. DNA studies show they are closely related to Jews in many cases, some more than others. The Biblical narratives about Abraham–who had a number of offspring besides Ishmael–ancestor of many Arabs who claim him as their ancestor under Abraham–and other descendants besides Isaac, father of Jacob (Israel). Jacob also had a twin brother, Esau, who is claimed in the Bible to be the progenitor of the Edomites if I am not mistaken. Edom was located in what is present day Jordan.
DNA studies have found the “Jordanians”–and they are looking at the lines who have stayed in that area for ages, up to the present day–to be the closest in DNA to the Jews. Which, maybe points to the closest ancestral lien to Jacob (Israel), namely his brother Esau. We can’t know for sure. But it’s very interesting.
Semi, in Hebrew, Shem in English, said to be one of the sons of Noah, and the male ancestor of the Semitic tribes–all of them have similar languages as well, and Semitic can refer to the linguistic family. Including Aramaic, Hebrew, Arabic, Assyrian and others.
Hamitic languages relied on a different form of writing, not the alphabet style of Semitic languages, but pictograms or hieroglyphs.
It’s interesting to consider all these different peoples are just families grown large and expanded outwards. Their linguistic roots being evidence, besides the DNA, of their common ancestry. All the more interesting when you consider the constant fighting between the tribes as huge familial disagreements, also maintained and grown larger over the millennia.
But we really have to ask why so many have it in for the Jews? Is it because they are responsible for the Bible? The nation God chose to “work with” to pass these things along? There is no other real reason anyone can come up with that makes sense to me, other than that people actually hate the very concept of God. Because what have Jews ever done to draw fire–and it didn’t start with Islam. Islam kind of congealed it into a system (conveniently, also fueled on by the ancient grudges of the descendants of the others sons of Abraham, and of Isaac, who were not THE chosen heir). And I believe this is one reason the Left allies with Islam–they both hate God, the Bible, and those PEOPLE, the Jews, through whom we have these stories/histories/laws etc. in cultural and textual embodiment.
There’s a good book by Thomas Cahill, The Gifts of the Jews. Quite fascinating. I wish more people were aware of the contributions of our Jewish friends, as individuals, and also a collective.
gravenimage says
Yes–that’s an excellent book.
somehistory says
The “hatred” for the Jews goes back to Genesis 3:15- where God actually said that He would “put enmity” between His people…those who would love and worship and obey Him as their God, and the people who would be of the “devil’s seed”…those who would serve and worship satan.
This “enmity” or hatred would continue until Christ causes the death of satan.
mozlums hate the Jews and Christians, but so do a whole lot of other people.
somehistory says
It began with Cain and Abel. Cain was said in the Scriptures to be 1 of “satan’s seed.”…”Not like Ciain, who murdered his brother.” (1 John)
R. Thomasson says
@St Croix. ARABS ARE SEMITES and belong to the Third World. Most eastern European Jews carry their Jewish DNA through their maternal gens (X chromosome). This is a result of centuries of pogroms and mass rape. This is why every Jewish group differ so much in its appearance. Though they were able to maintain their collective traditions and religion. On the bottom line they belong to the same ethnicity no matter they are oriental, black, Hindi or white.
gravenimage says
“Hametic” means African, and Arabia is in Asia. These terms are not much used any more, though.
Will Tyson says
It’s arguable either direction, but there was certainly no shortage of war crimes against Arabs.
‘ The division was committed on 16 May to the front in Belgium. Later, to the northeast of Cambrai, Totenkopf captured several villages from French Moroccan troops in house-to-house fighting. On 19 May, Totenkopf suffered 16 dead and 53 wounded while killing 200 Moroccan soldiers and capturing another 100 men.[9] Soldiers from Totenkopf executed many captured Moroccans, due to Arabs being considered “racially inferior”.[10]’
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/3rd_SS_Panzer_Division_Totenkopf
gravenimage says
You have heard of the Holocaust? Hitler launched a genocide against the Jews.
There was no such genocide against Muslims–and there were Muslim SS troops.
Eva says
The world today needs an Irgun.
I volunteer my service.
Infidel says
Here is a golden opportunity for CNN to make Adeel Raja its man in Islamabad
gravenimage says
Turns out this is not the first pro-Hitler quote on Twitter from Adeel Raja:
This, from way back in 2014:
“The only reason I am supporting Germany in the finals is — Hitler was a German and he did good with those jews!”
And this, from the same year:
“Palestinian genocide….inner Hitler among Germans must resurface” hell yeah!!!!
and
“Hail Hitler!”
Then there was this one:
“ISIS, TTP, TALIBAN — please go to Israel ASAP”
https://www.rt.com/usa/523996-cnn-contributor-hitler-twitter/
CNN–and Twitter–seemed fine with this.
St. Croix says
Disgraceful! How did this dirt go undisturbed for so long? Throw the book at the creep.
gravenimage says
I’m glad he’s been fired.
Clive Delmonte says
I no longer have any expectations of the world’s media so they don’t ever disappoint me now!
James Lincoln says
Clive,
The only things that the mainstream media publications are good for are things like weather reports, financial indices, PGA Masters leaderboard, etc.
Anything political is written by a Leftist. The only variable being how far Left…
mortimer says
Agree with JL. CNN is similar to USSR’s Pravda and Izvestiya. The only facts or real news were in the sports section.
CNN’s executives have admitted they are a propaganda agency.
James Lincoln says
Nothing mentioned on CNN’s website as of the present hour…
gravenimage says
Muslim CNN reporter: ‘The world today needs a Hitler’
……………….
CNN keeps getting worse and worse. Notice how almost every story touching on Muslims has a Muslim byline.
Here’s one bit of good news:
“CNN Says Freelance Writer Who Tweeted ‘The World Today Needs a Hitler’ Will ‘Not Be Working With CNN Again In Any Capacity’”
https://www.mediaite.com/news/freelance-writer-adeel-raja-will-not-be-working-with-cnn-again-in-any-capacity-after-tweeting-the-world-today-needs-a-hitler/
St. Croix says
gravenimage, I’m glad this comes out now. Let the scum rise to the surface. I’m not for censorship, and I’m not for hate-fueling through words either. But it’s sometimes a good thing that people really let it all hang out on social media. Then it’s out there for ALL THE WORLD to see and take screenshots of. No back-tracking and taquiyya possible.
Since MSM will not portray any Muslim as a thug, even when so many are doing violent, despicable acts openly and proudly, it’s actually a wonder that we have evidence right there on the internet, of what they are saying. There is NO WAY to camouflage the truth of what their goals are then. Or what was the goal of the “mentally ill person” who killed a few people while shouting “Allahu Akhbar”–he did it because he hated infidels and he was a devout Muslim! And his page or feed or whatever shows that’s what he knew, believed and in the end, acted upon.
For those with a grain of commonsense there is no need for all the dissembling on the actions of these (oh so many) “mentally ill” Muslims. They knew all along what they were doing.
Someone who has made these Hitler statements over and over, during these years, as is documented (and thank you for sharing this!), is not having a brain fart! He truly holds these beliefs dear to his heart. And now and then, it has to come out! Thankfully it came out in a way we have records of it! So he is revealed for what he really is.
And if he goes now and kills some infidels, (please God he will not), we’d know why. The same reason all the others who take the Qu’ran to heart have done similar criminal hateful acts; they are following what the Qu’ran says a true believer will be, and do.
gravenimage says
St. Croix, it’s actually a good thing that CNN does not want to continue to employ a genocidal praiser of Hitler.
mortimer says
Agree with GI … but the question remains: ‘Why are the Lefties so BLINDLY in love with Islam? And why did the Lefties at CNN not have ANY discernment?”
Don’t they bother to interview Muslims? If CNN did give a hoot, they would at least ask Muslim candidates: ‘DO YOU THINK ISRAEL HAS A RIGHT TO EXIST?’
I have found that this question turns many mild-mannered Muslims into raging, verbal jihadists.
gravenimage says
Grimly true, Mortimer.
Andrew Blackadder says
So whats the Bets on CNN either collapsing or being bought out by Alizjeera ?
Infidel says
Andrew, most of the Arab gulf states have pulled funding for islam, due to oil prices crashing the way it did – although not sure about now, when they are on their way up again. And Qatar has been busy paying off countries like Turkey and Iran so that their blockade was ineffective, although the Saudis recently lifted it due to misplaced pressure from the State Department
Also, Al Jazeera had to shut down all its foreign operations a couple of years ago (or more), so not sure they’re in a position to buy anyone. If anything, CNN is more likely to be bought by a Jack Dorsey or a Sundar Pichai
Jaehn says
The World is FULL of Hitler, anything islamic is HITLER, as islam helped hitler with the Holocaust in WW2 murdering Serbian and Bosnian Jews and Christians under the grand Mufti of Jerusalem .Amin al-Husseini and his volunteer moslen Waffen SS Divisions. Then as Amin al-Husseini was Yasser Arafat’s mentor , we all know why their will ‘NEVER” be any peace near Palestine as long as it is controlled by anything islamic. The Devil’s Advocates.
wpm says
CNN is a truly a great institution ,think about it if you are found out to be a Trump supporter and work for them you could be fired ,if you support a true Fascist who really murder millions for the crime of being Jewish you are keep on the payroll maybe given a raise or promotion ? Without Trump in office and CNN ratings in the basement because they have lost their purpose having Trump ban from tweeter and face book leaves them no easy material to use on their “opinion ” news reporting.
Infidel says
Really? Can’t they just keep bellyaching on Trump Republicans such as Ron DeSantis, Kristy Noem, Josh Hawley, Tom Cotton, Ron Johnson, Tommy Tuberville, Mo Brookes, Matt Gaetz, Jim Jordan, et al?
James Lincoln says
They do, Infidel.
But they just don’t have the emotional “drawing power” of Pres. Trump…
John Lloyd Scharf says
He is now going by @SdqJaan1 to evade Twitter.