She’s a member of the Pakistani National Assembly, not the U.S. Congress, but it’s easy to see how one might get confused.
“Pakistani politician praises Hitler for killing Jews,” The JC, May 24, 2021:
A parliamentary representative of Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan’s party has praised Hitler for killing Jews and a colleague of the same party has called for Jihad against Israel as the only solution.
Discussing the conflict between Israel and Palestine, Pakistan National Assembly member Kanwal Shauzab said that Hitler was right to kill Jews and called for the use of nuclear weapons against Israel.
Ms Shauzab said: “I remember a saying by Hitler who said he had spared some Jews to let the world know why he killed them. Today I have developed a firm faith in this. I have some pictures of 1947 which show some poverty stricken Jews , without even proper clothes on, reaching Palestine and saying that we have come with the memories of Holocaust and we are hopeful that the Palestinians will not let us down.
“Muslims welcomed Jews in Palestine but Jews have been ungrateful. Today we are deficient in faith. We are two billions in the world, we have oil wells and wealth and everything and some countries have nukes but probably we have kept out nukes to be used as crackers on Barat Night.”
Fellow assembly member Asma Qadeer, also from Imran Khan’s party, called for Jihd [sic] against Israel as the only way forward. She announced her personal participation in Jihad against Israel: “After what Israel has done to our brother and sisters it should be made clear that Jihad is the only way forward. Nothing else but Jihad. I am with you. I will go on Jihad (against Israel) before anyone else. Please put down my name for fighting a Jihad.
“I will help the Palestinians get liberated from those cursed people who have tortured our Palestinian brothers and sisters. I used to believe that Muslims should go for a dialogue but now I believe that there is no other option but Jihad against Israel. No more negotiations. Enlist me for jihad.”…
Wellington says
No surprise and demonstrating again how similar Nazism and Islam are. The one preached a master race which came with all kinds of negative consequences and the other preaches a master faith which comes with all kinds of negative consequences.
Both are dreadful, totalitarian and evil. Oh yes indeed, they really suck.
Brando says
Truly,it is worse,since there is the case of MAREK EDELMAN:
He died in 2009 and was one of the Leadesr of the Jewish Ghetto Revolt in 1943,that lasted 30 days. He escaped and later became a CARDIOLOGIST in Poland.
To become a doctor you need Minimum an IQ of 120, yet in spite of being high IQ,Edelman……..supported the PALESTINIAN cause till the end. In all his life he never bothered to study Islam and how it is a religious issue, that
they are As Much Jew-Haters as the Nazusm etc,he lacked imagination.
There is:”A Jewish hero in Poland: Marek Edelman”( 3 min )
https://youtu.be/wyg8UZx81J8
gravenimage says
Edelman considered himself a Socialist and the “Palestinians” to be laudible militants. Nasty stuff.
Brando says
I was about to say that,he was of the BUND,a labor party, they were socialists,in other words he was a Leftist.
Bund is Yiddish/German for “League”,similar to “bond” in English.
One can see Leftism is a DISEASE of the MIND. He was also a lifelong Anti-Zionist,against the existence of the state of Israel.
Brando says
To make it even more absurd, it turns out that NAZISM,from an ECONOMIC pt of view, was …..Leftist/Socialist.
Under Hitler the German economy was Controlled by the State( that is what socialism is,a planned economy ), there was No Free Market Capitalist System,
prices were regulated ( those guilty were even sent to Dachau concentration camp).
Education was free, compulsory, universal, and articulated from KINDERGARTEN to UNIVERSITY.
The key difference of course was the RACIAL aspect of the party.
gravenimage says
Fascism was a mixed bag economically. Unlike the Soviet Union, the state did not automatically run everything. But things were very insecure–any business owner could have their companies seized at any point, including for “ideological crimes” or just the whim of some high-ranking Nazi. These businesses were often handed out to other cronies.
So there was free trade–but only to a point. Anyone not in good standing with the Party was apt to lose their business–and often their freedom, and even their lives.
Wellington says
Brando: Though there were Leftist elements in the 25 Point program of Nazism hammered out in 1920, Hitler himself was never Leftist in his economic views—or in any views. Once Hitler got rid of Left-leaning Nazis like Ernst Rohm in the Night of the Long Knives (June 30th, 1934), henceforth Nazism was entirely a Far Right movement.
Hitler WAS Nazism from the get-go—and especially after the Night of the Long Knives—and he had no problem with businessmen making huge profits which is not Leftist by any measure. Even in the 1920’s, before Hitler came to power as Chancellor in 1933, he kept reassuring business interests in Germany that he was on their side and was regularly annoyed by people like Ernst Rohm and Gregor Strasser (N.B., Strasser was also killed during the Night of the Long Knives) who wanted a “second revolution” to install socialism once the Nazis came to power. Hitler did this because he knew he needed German business to fuel his political ambitions and especially the war machine he wanted to build. Capitalism in the sense of huge profit margins flourished under Hitler from 1933 onwards. German businessmen owned huge estates and only added to their wealth once Hitler was fully in charge—and this is not indicative of a socialist economy.
To reiterate, Nazism was so muddled that until June of 1934 it contained both left and right elements, but after June of 1934 Nazism was as Far Right as one could get. If Nazism was not Far Right from 1934 onwards, what regime ever has been?
I remain perplexed and amused that so many keep describing Nazism as Leftist. No it was not once Hitler finally got his way entirely. And for those emphasizing the word “Socialist” as in the National Socialist German Workers Party, one could just as easily emphasize the word “National” which is non-socialist because pure socialism looks upon nation states as elaborate ruses to keep down the world-wide working class.
All “National Socialist” reveals is how inherently mixed up Nazism was from its outset and after 1934 the “Socialist” in National Socialism was purely formal and nothing more. Indeed, Hitler, who had an entirely weird view of what socialism actually meant, as early as July 28th, 1922 said the following: “Whoever is prepared to make the national cause his own to such an extent that he knows no higher ideal than the welfare of his nation; whoever has understood our great national anthem, ‘Deutschland ueber Alles,’ to mean that nothing in the wide world surpasses in his eyes this Germany, people and land—that man is a Socialist.”
Brando, this statement by Hitler is not socialism; it is rank nationalism very thinly disguised under the term “socialism.” Don’t overlook how absolutely muddled Nazism was from its beginnings in 1919-1920 and don’t overlook the fact that Hitler didn’t have a true socialist bone in his body.
gravenimage says
Good post, Wellington.
ElderlyZionist says
A believing and practicing communist must constantly fight his own human nature in order to transform himself into a ‘socialist man’. It is literally an inhuman ideology. On reflection, it’s not surprising that communists have committed some of the worst crimes against humanity.
James Lincoln says
Excellent post, Wellington.
Filled with incredibly accurate – and important – detail…
gravenimage says
Agreed, ElderlyZionist. It is similar with Islam–an adherent has to constantly fight their better nature.
Hugh Fitzgerald says
I think his memories were too much for him, and he went haywire. There are other examples.
gravenimage says
Spending years in an unfree Communist state didn’t help, either.
gravenimage says
Pakistan: National Assembly member praises Hitler for killing Jews
……………
Hideous, but this does not surprise. I have often noted that while Muslims genrally hate and despise Infidels, they make an exception *for Hitler*.
Also note her gross ignorance of history–again, no surprise. You often hear Muslims claim that any Jews who survived the Holocaust only did so because Hitler let them live so they could tell others what happens to Jews who try to live as equals anywhere. Of course, this is quite false.
And the Balfour Agreement determined that there would be a Jewish state after WWI. The image of Jews crawling to the Levant and asking “Palestinian” Muslims for help is utterly ludicrous. It also ignores the presence of free Jewish people in places like North America and Australia.
john smith says
Yes Gravenimage, they hate all of us, but they certainly do make an exception for Hitler. Anyone who praises Hitler for killing Jews, this in itself speaks volumes as to what type of person she is. Truly evil.
gravenimage says
+1
Wellington says
+2
Goofy says
This also goes a long way to explain the warm connection between Islamic leaders and the pope.
Hitler saw himself as a good Roman Catholic and a man who was able to produce real results of the Roman Catholic antisemitism which has been around for centuries.
Who cares that Jesus Christ himself cried out in the cross: “Father forgive them because they don’t know what they are doing!”
The Muslims and the Roman Catholic church share their anti-Semitism and their veneration of Virgin Mary.
Wellington says
Goofy: Hitler, though baptized and raised a Roman Catholic, came to despise all of Christianity, including Roman Catholicism. Might as well say Joseph Stalin was a good Georgian Orthodox adherent because he was baptized and raised Christian.
Hitler did admire the organizational structure of Catholicism but that had nothing to do with any religious belief by him. In Alan Bullock’s first-rate biography of Hitler, Bullock states on p.389 of his biography the following: “In Hitler’s eyes Christianity was a religion fit only for slaves; he detested its ethics in particular.”
Hitler’s Table Talk reveals his utter contempt time and time again for all of Christianity. The only religion Hitler somewhat admired was Islam and that is because it was spread by the sword. So, please reconsider your statement about Hitler being “a good Roman Catholic.”
As for Roman Catholicism being antisemitic, certainly many Roman Catholics were (and Protestants and Orthodox as well), but Roman Catholic theology, which is to say its religious theory, was not anti-Semitic and held that the Romans and Jews who crucified Jesus were functioning in the role of Everyman, that all of mankind killed Christ, though I would agree the Catholic Church and many other Christian sects could have done far more to stave off antisemitism that so often occurred in Christian dominant areas.
gravenimage says
+1
gravenimage says
This is tripe. Hitler may have been raised Catholic, but as an adult he violently rejected Christianity for not being a martial creed (he admired Islam on that basis). Moreover, the Nazi state frequently persecuted Catholic priests.
Curious Observer says
Shauzab does have an original idea, but a stupid one. Nuking Israel will result in the utter destruction of all life in Pakistan, and she will be reporting to Allah much faster than she thinks she will.
BlackSabbath says
Government of India must allow Israel Air Force to access its bases along the western border and even allow Israel to make its own air bases. These kinds of nuclear threats, even though coming from very low IQ paksitanis, must not be taken too lightly. Turkey might use pakistan as a front to launch a nuclear attack. The retaliation will be deadly to paistan but turkey might get away.
gravenimage says
Maybe not, though. Israel–or whatever was left of her–would be undetr enormous pressure not to respond in kind.
gregbeetham says
Another stupid Muslim, you couldn’t drop a nuke on Israel anywhere without killing lots of Muslims as well.
The only value nukes have is the threat you ‘might’ use them, openly threatening to use them is stupid as it puts yourself in the crosshairs.
Actually using them is even stupider as retaliation is assured and the response might be lots worse than you thought, but yes stupid Muslim by all means do your Jihad and go to Gaza and help launch some rockets next time and go out in a blaze of glory.
tim gallagher says
This woman’s outlook on things is typical of the foul, evil, bent out of shape mentality of Muslims. She is just one more monster, so typical of the evil monsters that a Muslim upbringing produces, full of hatred and the constant desire to murder non-Muslims. And, obviously, anyone who admires a creature like Hitler is one very twisted person. Islam has to go and then we won’t have such evil monsters fouling up the world, because it is islam which produces an endless supply of such evil creatures.
Raja says
Tim Gallagher,
I can barely disagree with you. But this lady seems to be a pretty one but with an ugly brain (because of what is coming out of her mouth). Most often, I must admit that the ugliness of Islam is reflected in the faces of women of Islam.
That reminds me of the days when audit assistants of an audit firm would joke that behind the ugly face of their boss there was a beautiful brains. The opposite seems to be true here.
tim gallagher says
Thanks for the comment, Raja. Yes, it wouldn’t really matter whether this woman was the most gorgeous, drop dead beautiful woman or an ugly hag, she has a very much poisoned mind, that’s for sure. I suppose, when you admire Hitler, and are full of the desire for murder and evil, a good looking woman is probably a bit more dangerous, as her attractive appearance might win her quite a few more followers. Inside, she is a poisonous toad with views like the ones she possesses. Inner beauty, in the mind and the heart, she hasn’t got. I believe that islam creates huge numbers of monsters, full of murderous hate, just like her.
gravenimage says
+1
Wellington says
“I believe that islam creates huge numbers of monsters….”
Rather says it all, tg, and my choice for the quote of the day.
As for beautiful women who are morally evil, I think that is definitely a requirement to be a femme fatale. Which reminds me of my favorite of all Film Noir films, i.e., Out of the Past (1947), with Robert Mitchum and the beautiful but lethal Jane Greer.
tim gallagher says
Thanks for the comment, Wellington, and for the +1, gravenimage. Wellington, there are a couple of things I keep thinking about islam. Firstly, by any civilised standards, it is full of totally barbaric and evil views about every aspect of human life, so, therefore, it does produce huge numbers of absolute monsters. This woman, who admires Hitler, is a clear example. The other thing I feel is that Islam is an outdated, primitive load of crap, which should have disappeared from the human race ages ago. It should have gone the way of the Aztec religion. Islam has to go. This will stop the flow of these evil monsters that it produces continually. On those film noir type women , I guess I’d say they can be fun in movies, that is, at a safe distance. I just hope I never come across one. I have somehow, in my 71 years on the planet, avoided such monsters so far ( unless I have forgotten them, and I don’t think that is likely). I can’t recall seeing that particular film you mention. Maybe, if I did, it was long time ago.
James Lincoln says
Wellington says,
“my favorite of all Film Noir films, i.e., Out of the Past (1947)”
As a fan of classic film noir, that movie is certainly one of the very best – *way* up there.
Kirk Douglas was also great in the movie – and it was only his second major film appearance…
Raja says
tim gallagher,
Thanks for your reply. It was just an opinion from my side.Islamic minds tend to be mean and sadistic whatever their looks, women included.
You are 100% right. Bang on target !!!!
gravenimage says
I’m a big fan of Film Noir myself.
Raja says
Nothing surprising about this lady. They hate Jews so much that they cannot hide their love for Hitler. They are eternally whining that they could not eliminate all the Jews.
The world is increasing seeing the Pali- Israeli conflict as a religious one, especially in the internet media of English. This is some consolation for all the counter jihadist.
OLD GUY says
Next to Muhammad Hitler is their number two hero.
World domination by the Muslim/islamic leadership is their ultimate dream.
Islam teaches its hate of non-muslims and the abuse of women from childhood on to its male children. Male dominance of islamic families and Islamic dominance of the world that’s their plan.
Andrew Blackadder says
I guess being a Member of the Pakistan Parliament there is no requirement to know much of anything, let alone History or Geography, otherwise this silly ignorant wee lassie would have learned that muslims conquered the land, now known as Israel, centuries ago when Jews, and Christians, lived there and didnt want to convert to this new Fascist Religious Cult and so fled around the World, or were slaughtered right there. So she seems to be okay with slaughtering Jews again today, but she has a surprise coming to her… Israel aint going anywhere baby girl…