As has often been pointed out here, “Islamophobia” is used to refer to attacks on innocent Muslims, which are never justified, and to any criticism of Islam, however mild, or opposition to jihad violence and Sharia oppression of women.
School of International Studies student Momal Rizvi was asked if Islamophobia rooted in the SIS, and she “would say yes. ‘I feel like it’s definitely mixed between some professors,’ Rizvi said. ‘I think that the ones who have touched on [Islam have] tried to do so in a critical way.'”
This is poorly written. Apparently by “critical” she means “disapproving,” not “analytical,” since this is presented as her explanation of why SIS is “Islamophobic,” but it isn’t entirely certain. In any case, Rizvi objected to a class that taught that “Islam can be compatible with feminism”: “Even though my professor took a somewhat positive angle, it was still a weird scenario because I think I was the only Muslim student in that classroom.” Apparently even raising the question opened up the suggestion that Islam might not be compatible with feminism is off-limits. No student should even get the slightest impression that there might be anything negative about Islam.
Meanwhile, Chris Edelson, an assistant professor in the Department of Government, manifests the intellectual laziness that is ubiquitous today. “We talk about the history of terrorism to show that terrorism is not specific to one group; there are all kinds of terrorist groups. We talk about coverage issues involving terrorism. Unfortunately, we’ve had terrorism in the U.S. recently, carried out by people who are not Muslim: the Jan. 6 Capitol attacks. When Al-Qaeda carries out a terrorist attack, or ISIS does, it doesn’t mean all Muslims are responsible. When the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers and QAnon supporters carried out the Jan. 6 attacks, it doesn’t mean that all white people are responsible, or all Christians are responsible.”
The January 6 “attacks,” in which the only person who was killed was a Trump supporter, are not remotely comparable to the 9/11 attacks, in which nearly 3,000 people were murdered. Nor were “they” carried out by “white supremacists” or Christians.” But most egregious is Edelson’s assumption that people hold “all Muslims” responsible for jihad attacks. Who actually does that? I’m routinely accused of doing so, and yet the accusers have never and can never produce even a single statement from me to this effect. But claiming this serves to inhibit honest investigation of the motives and goals of jihad terrorists, because such investigations are “Islamophobic.”
Likewise overcooked is the article’s claim that “Islamophobic tropes” are “often portrayed in political discourse, everyday media and education,” including “terms like ‘Islamic menace’ or ‘violent foreigner.'” I just did a search for the term “Islamic menace,” and the overwhelming majority of results were for articles scoffing at the idea that there is such a thing. Likewise with “violent foreigner.” The idea that these are everyday terms is a product of Leftist paranoia, and has nothing to do with reality.
“Student petition stirs up questions about Islamophobia within SIS,” by Alisha Chhangani and Zoe Bell, The Eagle Online, June 17, 2021:
A petition that began circulating in late February on social media sparked a conversation among American University students and staff members alike — whether or not Islamophobia is rooted in the School of International Service….
Islamophobia engenders negative stereotypes that continue to discriminate against Muslim- Americans. These Islamophobic tropes are often portrayed in political discourse, everyday media and education. Terms like “Islamic menace” or “violent foreigner” lead to an association between Islam and terrorism which is biased, harmful and many times untrue.
After sophomore Marisa Sette published “How Can You Be a Feminist and Muslim?” in the School of International Service Case Studies in Intercultural Communications, the petition began circulating to have her work removed.
In an email to The Eagle, Sette wrote that she developed the case study “in good faith.”
“I wish the [Muslim Students Association] nothing but the best this Ramadan, and I hope that one day they will see that I never wrote the article with the intention of ill will nor do I hold any in my heart towards any member of their community,” she wrote.
The ensuing controversy sparked a bigger question: is Islamophobia rooted in the SIS?
Momal Rizvi, a sophomore majoring in international studies, would say yes.
“I feel like it’s definitely mixed between some professors,” Rizvi said. “I think that the ones who have touched on [Islam have] tried to do so in a critical way.”
Rizvi said that her Justice, Ethics, and Human Rights in International Affairs course covered the connection between Western feminism and Muslim women. Her professor assigned an article on the topic written by a Muslim woman and agreed with the stance of the article: that Islam can be compatible with feminism.
“Even though my professor took a somewhat positive angle, it was still a weird scenario because I think I was the only Muslim student in that classroom,” Rizvi said.
SIS professor Shadi Mokhtari specializes in the politics and human rights of the Middle East region….
When asked about Islam and the SIS, Mokhtari clarified that each professor has their method of teaching the courses.
“I don’t think there is a specific SIS approach to Islam, there are just a handful of us who are specialists in the region,” Mokhtari said. “The faculty that I know of, who teach Middle East studies and classes related to Islam, are pretty conscious and attuned to Orientalism, savage-victim narratives and Islamophobia. We make sure to address that critique and question the ways it could be applied or misapplied in all of our classes.”
Chris Edelson, an assistant professor in the Department of Government, teaches a class on presidential power in the post-9/11 era. He said he tries to take an objective, factual approach in discussions regarding Islam and debunks common misconceptions about Muslim people and terrorism.
“We talk about the history of terrorism to show that terrorism is not specific to one group; there are all kinds of terrorist groups,” Edelson said. “We talk about coverage issues involving terrorism.”…
“Unfortunately, we’ve had terrorism in the U.S. recently, carried out by people who are not Muslim: the Jan. 6 Capitol attacks,” Edelson said. “When Al-Qaeda carries out a terrorist attack, or ISIS does, it doesn’t mean all Muslims are responsible. When the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers and QAnon supporters carried out the Jan. 6 attacks, it doesn’t mean that all white people are responsible, or all Christians are responsible.”
Edelson noted that a lot of Americans’ misconceptions of Islam stem from media coverage, which portrays terrorist attacks through an anti-Muslim lens. He references Muslim-American doctor Ayaz Virji, a minority in his rural Midwestern town who spoke to various audiences about Islam.
At his lectures, audience members would acknowledge that Virji himself was not a terrorist, but ask, “Well, why is it that I always see Muslims carrying out terrorist attacks?” Edelson uses Virji’s story to highlight the prevalence of Islamophobic rhetoric in the media.
“Media coverage focuses on attacks by Muslims, and especially in the U.S. and by foreign-born Muslims,” Edelson said. “So I try to bring all this in so [my students] can understand the context.”
Jim says
It seems odd that on one side all Americans are white supremacists, Obama even said racism is in the DNA of Americans. But when it comes to Islam, there can never be any criticism at all of anything to do with Islam. And why should a president of the USA attack his own country and exonerate its enemies. Yet that is exactly what Biden does and many on the Left, as well as some on the right. Why is it that Islam is sacrosanct, but Christians and Jews are automatic targets. Or men in the West are automatically guilty, but feminists are totally symapthetic to Islamic sharia rules for women?
mortimer says
So … we see it is ‘Islamophobic’ to say that FEMINISM is COMPATIBLE with Islam’. However, it would thus be ISLAMOPHOBIC if you said, ‘Islam is INCOMPATIBLE with Islam.’ Let me explain why:
Sharia law does not differentiate between what is discriminatory and what is academically provable when discussing Islam. No. Sharia law merely says you may not ‘MENTION ANYTHING IMPERMISSIBLE’ about Islam … regardless of whether the statement is true or false … ‘truth’ does not matter.
The ‘honor’ of Islam must at all times be upheld or the ‘blasphemy’ rule of Sharia law must be implemented.
The Sharia manual ‘Reliance of the Traveller’ says:
“The (DHIMMI) agreement is also violated (A: with respect to the offender alone) if the state has stipulated that any of the following things break it, and one of the subjects does so anyway, though if the state has not stipulated that these break the agreement, then they do not; namely, if one of the subject people:
-5- MENTIONS SOMETHING IMPERMISSIBLE about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam.” – Reliance of the Traveller’ Chapter ‘O’ 11.10.05.
Sharia permits anyone to kill those who verbally OPPOSE Islam, since they are at war with Islam:
“There is no indemnity obligatory for killing a non-Muslim (harbi) at war with Muslims.” -Reliance of the Traveller, o4.17, p.593
“We have already discussed killing the person who, with intent, curses the Prophet, belittles him or slights him in any way. The judgement in this case is clear.” (i.e. death) – Qadhi Iyaadh in ash-Shifa, Volume No.2, Page No. 27
The FEMINISTS who foolishly claim that Islam is COMPATIBLE with feminism commit the SIN of ‘SAYING SOMETHING IMPERMISSIBLE’ about Islam. Namely, they are saying something that the mullahs DO NOT WANT DISCUSSED … the whole feminist issue itself. Feminism (if truthful) has to admit that Islam is in fact INCOMPATIBLE with Islam.
James Lincoln says
Good post, mortimer.
Hoi Polloi says
Good job. I notice the prof didn’t mention antifa or any other issues from January 6, and he skipped completely over an entire year of BLM violence and recent virulent anti-Semitic and black-on-Asian attacks. Seems he has more than a few biases and blind spots, including his refusal to acknowledge the failure of feminism to oppose islamic misogyny. But he says the two are cool, so it must be so.
gravenimage says
American U’s School of International Studies accused of ‘Islamophobia’ for saying Islam compatible with feminism
……………..
More proof that even grovelling appeasers of Islam can still be accused of “Islamophobia”.
SecondThoughter says
If these Muslims don’t like people exercising their First Amendment right to investigate whether or not Islam is compatible with feminism then they should quickly go back to their Muslim lands. Once again, our universities continue to encourage our own civilizational suicide.
Ken Johnson says
Yes, Austria made a directory of the Mosques in Austria. This is slamming Islam???
For the life of me I fail to see how.
libertyORdeath says
I’ve been reading articles on this site and others about the jihad threat for about 7 years and I have never seen the terms “islamic menace” or “violent foreigner”. Mr. Spencer, above most others, calls it how he sees it, therefore there is no real need for vague terms like those that paint with a broad brush.
I think this is yet another case of overhyping the supposed threat to try to cast a moral equivalence between terrorists and those who oppose them. Im just shocked that after decades and tens of thousands of attacks resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths and injuries that anyone is buying this garbage. To try to equate 1/6 with 9/11 is disgusting but the real problem today is that too many people are buying into it.
libertyORdeath says
God am I fucking sick of the “good faith” argument.
Anyone who equates Jan 6 or any supposed “white supremacy” with jihad terror is acting in anything but “good faith”.
gravenimage says
+1
Ken Johnson says
Now even a complement is anti Muslem prejudice. Evry time I think this idiocy has reachedf its limits, there’s slways something else. Ken