“The Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) has moved the Supreme Court challenging the Centre’s notification inviting non-Muslims belonging to Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan and residing in 13 districts in Gujarat, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Haryana and Punjab to apply for Indian citizenship.” The invitation to these countries’ non-Muslims constituted the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). The CAA fast-tracked Indian citizenship for Christian, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, and Parsi immigrants from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh who arrived in India before 2015.
The CAA lead to unrest from Muslims when it was passed in December 2019. Mass protests led to violence across India, and Al-Qaeda called for Muslims in India to wage jihad from within. A relentless propaganda barrage against India came from Pakistan, Kuwait and across the Muslim world. Muslims also appealed to the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, with complaints against India over “Islamophobia.” This reaction, in fact, proved exactly why infidels need rescuing from the wrath of Islamic supremacists and jihadists everywhere.
The reason for the so-called “discriminatory,” “Islamophobic” CAA was because of Muslim persecution of religious minorities in those countries; they were being offered a level of safety in India. Note, by contrast, that open-door immigration policies in the European Union have led to mass Muslim migration, and are now causing a nightmare during ongoing coronavirus lockdowns, as mostly Muslim economic migrants have steadily crashed the borders of European countries illegally (and entered the UK via the English Channel). But in the early days of the war in Syria, which created genuine refugees, Muslim refugees in UN camps attacked and terrorized Christians, and the Christians could not escape. It’s about time that some country thought of the minorities who are victims of jihad and Sharia oppression. India should be applauded for doing so.
To find out more about India’s Citizenship Amendment Act, and why it was necessary, click HERE.
“IUML Moves SC Against Centre’s Notification Seeking Applications From Non-Muslim Refugees,” The Wire, June 1, 2021:
New Delhi: The Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) has moved the Supreme Court challenging the Centre’s notification inviting non-Muslims belonging to Afghanistan, Bangladesh and Pakistan and residing in 13 districts in Gujarat, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Haryana and Punjab to apply for Indian citizenship.
The interim application argued that the Centre is trying to circumvent the assurance given to the apex court in this regard in the pending petition filed by the IUML challenging the constitutional validity of the provisions of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act (CAA), 2019.
It said that the Centre provided assurance that staying of the Amendment Act was not necessary since the rules of the Amendment Act had not been framed.
The CAA grants Indian citizenship to non-Muslim minorities – Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi and Christian – who migrated to India from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh till December 31, 2014, following persecution over their faith.
The fresh plea said the Union home ministry on Friday issued a notification to this effect for immediate implementation of the order under the Citizenship Act 1955 and Rules framed under the law in 2009 even though the rules under the CAA enacted in 2019 are yet to be framed by the Ministry of Home Affairs is manifestly illegal and runs counter to the provisions of the Act.
Also read: With CAA Rules on Hold, Centre Invites Applications in 13 Districts Under 1955 Parent Act
IUML in its plea before the top court said that the Centre had, during the course of the hearing of its plea challenging the constitutional validity of CAA, submitted before the apex court and provided assurance that staying of the Amendment Act was not necessary since the rules of the Amendment Act had not been framed.
“However, the respondent Union, in a roundabout way, and in an attempt to circumvent the assurance given to this court, have sought to implement their malafide designs envisaged under the Amendment Act through the recently issued order dated May 28,” the plea said.
IUML submitted that if the Centre’s notification is implemented and citizenship is given to persons on the basis of their religion, and, thereafter, if this court strikes down the Amendment Act and Rules, whereby the act of providing citizenship on the basis of religion is declared void, “Then, to take back the citizenship of these persons, granted pursuant to the present order, will be a herculean task and would be near impossible to implement. In the event the said exercise is conducted, it would render the entire batch of writ petitions (challenging CAA) as infructuous,” the plea said.
The petition has sought directions to the Centre to stay any further proceedings pursuant to the May 28 order issued by the Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs till such time the plea challenging CAA is pending……
Hoi Polloi says
In a sane world, their creed and their actions would disallow them any standing necessary to legal challenges.
LB says
I don’t get it. What’s the official narrative of muslims in India protesting against Indians’ (and other non-muslims) arrival from neighboring muslim countries? They don’t want them back in India becaaaaause…. the muslims in those countries would ran out of minorities to oppress? Or what?
Besides, I thought muslims and leftists are all about open borders, immigration and free citizenships, so why protest it? And how is CAA racist? Pretty sure that the non-muslims who are offered India’s citizenships are of the similar (if not exactly the same) ethnicity as the musilms, so where’s the racism?
So many contradictions here…
gravenimage says
Muslims are claiming that trying to protect people from them is “discriminatory”, and that if India allows in non-Muslims that they have to allow in more ravening Muslims. Just grotesque
Boycott Turkey says
It’s bad enough countries like Pakistan persecute non Muslims now they don’t want them escaping to safe countries like India I guess they would rather kill the non Muslims and not let them escape just like what nazis did and by the way if India is islamophobic then why are they protesting the citizenship amendment law as India wouldn’t be a safe place for Muslims to escape to in the first place as it’s islamophobic? How many Indian Muslims have to flee India to other Muslim countries ? Vs non Muslims fleeing to India ?
somehistory says
People are threatened….but not allowed to make the claim.
Little girls are raped….and not allowed to see the rapist prosecuted…because the slime isn’t prosecuted. The girls are labeled as liars, sluts, etc.
People are murdered, but the rest of us aren’t allowed to say who did it and why.
People are given access to support and help to flee the danger to their lives, and the slime can’t have that, because then they can’t carry out their evil lusts to rape and murder the ones being allowed to flee.
Why should the courts allow lawsuits in such situations? Why are the authorities so intent on helping mozlum slime invade, rape, murder, plunder, loot, and conquer the rest of humankind?
Helping satan and his evil children are the order of the day….and there will be no **reward** as they expect…only Divine Justice.
Ren says
Muslims want to keep persecuting non-muslims for it is part of islam teachings.
gravenimage says
Yep.
john smith says
The non-muslms aren’t safe in these districts, and I applaud India for offering them refuge. How annoying this must be to muslims, how dare India offer them safety.
Infidel says
India should do a trade. Every secular, pro-muslim Hindu/Sikh/Christian/Jain/Parsi/Buddhist/Jew/_____ who is opposed to the CAA, round them up, and offer Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh a trade – those secularists get deported to those muslim countries, and those hapless people who risk losing their daughters any day or who risk getting accused of blasphemy when they fart or sneeze – take them in in their place. That way, muslims will still have ‘infidels’ to persecute, while genuinely suffering good people will be free to worship Christ, the Wahe Guru, Shiva, Vishnu and so on
And I won’t be remotely sorry for those Secularists: since they believe that allah is the same as Jesus is the same as Vishnu is the same as the Wahe Guru…. they should have no issues reciting the shehada or the kalma. Since they think that ‘love jihad’ is a conspiracy theory, they should have no issues w/ their daughters getting kidnapped and married to muslims, whatever their age. Since they relish beef, they should have no issues w/ muslims inviting them to have beef. Let all the Mamatas, Vijayans, Arundhati Roys, Burkha Dutts, Mahua Moitras, Swara Bhaskars, et al go to Pakistan and live in the company of their beloved muslim brothers and sisters, and let the local muslims there give them the dhimmi treatment or convert them
gravenimage says
Infidel, not all secularists are in denial about the threat of Islam.
Then, I don’t want to see anyone fall victim to the savagery of Islam–not even dhimmi tools. (That doesn’t mean that their denial is not dangerous to themselves and others, of course).
Infidel says
Graven, in that country, they are. Secularism there is a euphamism for pandering to muslims. And they are not dhimmi tools: they are pretty dangerous people who are pro-communist and pro-islamic, and who themselves would never experience an assault from muslims. They are, in Hillary Clinton’s words, pretty irredeemable, and are nothing but 5th columnists in India
I know that all the names may not be familiar, but try Arundhati Roy from my above list: the same broad who wrote an article in the Guardian after 9/11 mocking the late Tony Snow over his FNS commentary on the attack the weekend after it happened. That’s the sort of people I’m talking about: she’d do well by getting deported to a country like Pakistan, as would others like her in my list
gravenimage says
OK, Infidel–but there are certainly some Atheists and Agnostics who know the truth about Islam–incuding here at jw.
Infidel says
Sure there are. Not talking about them
gravenimage says
OK–thanks.
Bold_Infidel says
Fully agree with you brother. These Islamists hordes are fiercely protective of their land, women etc…but will work with unity and strong purpose to capture areas and women of infidels…and they are enabled by the moronic infidels among us, professing universal humanity, brotherhood etc. …..same story everywhere…end this now, face this micro invasions head-on….be fiercely protective of yr land, women etc from these Islamic hordes and moronic infidels…. or u will be destroyed…use the OODA loop (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act) …be bold and time is now….random thoughts..
BlackSabbath says
Moslems should not be in India.
David says
I thought the idea of the creation of Pakistan was as a place for muslims to live. India for non-muslims. That would be a good idea.
gravenimage says
India: Muslim group goes to Supreme Court over Citizenship Amendment Act offering refuge to persecuted non-Muslims
…………….
Muslims don’t want *anyone* to be safe from Muslim violence. *Ugh*.
Andrew Blackadder says
Okay, heres an idea, Pakistan hands one Christian family over to India, and India hands one muslim family over to Pakistan, same with any other islamic Nation, we take the non muslims and you can take all the muslims in a fair trade that you wish to take back to every islamic country there is around the World… Deal?.
It shows me just how remarkably stupid muslims following this crap really are, as they are demonstrating about a Law that has nothing to do with them…Go figure…
All that arse sniffing and urine drinking has an effect after a while..