The jihadis are not acting in an “extremist” manner in this. The seizure of Infidel girls and their use as sex slaves is sanctioned in the Qur’an. According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful for you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses of those whom Allah has given you as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or the captives whom their right hands possess, for in their case they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)
The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Sahih Muslim 3371)
It is also in Islamic law: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” (Umdat al-Salik O9.13)
The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:
Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.
When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Koran 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point—there is no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.
Around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.
A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up [this man’s] situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”
The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”
“Is this forbidden by Islam?” I asked.
“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not—she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”
In January 2016, a female al-Azhar professor stated that Allah allowed Muslims to rape non-Muslim women in order to humiliate them.
The savage exploitation of girls and young women is, unfortunately, a cross-cultural phenomenon, but only in Islamic law does it carry divine sanction. And that sanction must be discussed if anything effective is ever going to be done to end this abuse.’
“ISIS still trafficking Yazidis out of al-Hol camp, local official says,” Shafaq, May 30, 2021 (thanks to Henry):
Shafaq News/ The administrator of the Snuny sub-district in the north of the Sinjar district, Khadida Jougi, said on Sunday that the trafficking of the Yazidi abductees from al-Hol camp in Syria to other destinations is still ongoing.
Jougi told Shafaq News Agency, “trafficking networks are still in the process of smuggling the Yazidis from inside al-Hol camp to Idlib, where terrorist organizations such as al-Nusra and Ahrar al-Sham are sending them to different territories in Syria.”
He stressed, “As Yazidi activists and humanitarian organizations, we have tried several times to enter the camp looking for Yazidi women and children; it is, however, very difficult in the presence of ISIS militants who are still under the influence of extremist ideologies.”…
Elizabeth lawson says
For all of its hallowed status – and lengthy speeches before its ‘august’ representatives from many lands, the UN continues to prove itself before a watching world as an utterly useless organization or force for good in our world. Instead, it is the repose of the proud who twiddle and twaddle over their multiple technological accoutrements, shuffle their papers, and doubtless enjoy sumptuous lunches in the best places. In the meantime, a fourteenth century collection of violent ‘humans’ , anti everything but their own, continues to enslave young children, women and men because THEIR peculiar and primitive ideology approves/demands it. The great UN is both lacking in intelligence or in motivation to put a stop to this inhuman, vile, horror. In addition, Christian men, women, children, priests, ministers and clergy generally, are being slaughtered in the THOUSANDS across Africa, India, Pakistan, Indonesia and generally speaking, the Moslem world. We in the West who have offered immigration to the followers of this ideology are now paying the price in horrifying murders of our citizens by our ‘grateful’ immigrants. Is THIS all that they know? Murder? We need an end to the Yazidi horror of sexual slavery, and an end to the slaughter of Christian citizens – but don’t depend on the resolution of either of these dreadful abuses at the hands of the UN. It will never happen.
Rarely says
The U.N. doesn’t have time for this. They are too busy working on the next resolution against Israel.(There is ALWAYS a “next resolution” against Israel).
gravenimage says
Grimly true, Rarely.
Brando says
That is the main reason Mohamed is Definitely Not a Prophet according to either the OT or NT:
1.Chapter 7:157 of the KORAN says Mohamad is prophesized in Both the Torah(OT and the Gospel(NT).
2.Notice,Mohamad has to OBLIGATORILY be in Both the Torah and Gospel.
3.If he is Not in One of the Two,then the Koran has an Error.
WHY MUSIMS SAY MOHAMED IS IN THE TORAH
It is the “prophet like MOSES,from among Your BROTHERS” in DEUTERONOMY. 18:15-20 ( repeated TWO times )
The Hebrew word “brother” also means relative (like a cousin),and the Arabs are the cousins of the Jews.
ARGUMENT BY DAVID WOOD
He argues that Mohamed disqualifies because of the SATANIC VERSES incident regarding 3 PAGAN goddesses( so that makes Islam a false religion)
VERSES TO NOTE
Verse 18:15:
“The Lord your God will raise up for you a PROPHET like ME (Moses) from among your BROTHERS. (the Arabs)
You MUST LISTEN to him. ” ( We Must Listen to Mohamed)
Verse 18:18-19
“I will raise up for them a PROPHET like YOU (Moses) from among their BROTHERS
and I will PUT my WORDS in HIS MOUTH ( the message of Mohamed from Allah,
as contained in the Koran).
He will tell them everything I (God) COMMAND HIM ( say to Mohamed,as
contained in the Koran)”
ALSO
Verse 18:19
” I myself will call to account anyone who does
NOT LISTEN to MY WORDS
that the PROPHET speaks in MY NAME. ”
( Mohamed in the Koran speaks in the Name of the God of the OT and NT)
Verse 18:20
“But a prophet:
1.Who presumes to SPEAK in MY NAME anything I have NOT COMMANDED,
2.Or a prophet who SPEAKS in the NAME of OTHER GODS ( the Satanic verses Incident : Mohamed said to Worship 3 Pagan goddesses),
3.Is to be put to DEATH.”
THE WORDS OF ALLAH FROM MOHAMED IN THE KORAN
Here it involves what is happening to the YAZIDI women: in 5 DIFFERENT parts the Koran authorizes a MUSLIM man (even if MARRIED ) to:
have sex with an UNMARRIED woman as long as she is his SLAVE.
SO?
According to MOSAIC law (Torah: 613 laws) ,and according to the NT:
The married man who does it commits ADULTERY,and if not married he commits Fornication. It goes against the morality of the OT and NT.
According to Mosaic law Mohamed would be Put to Death.
MOHAMED IN THE GOSPEL
1.And the HISTORICAL Jesus would ALSO have condemned Mohamed as a False Prophet.
2.Muslims say the PARACLETE in JOHN is a prophecy of the Coming of Mohamed ( according to CHAPTER 7:157 of the Koran)
3.Even,for argument’s sake, to say the Paraclete is a MAN who is to come and will be a prophet, it is,
according to Jesus’ Standards,
NOT a man who Justify Adultery and Fornication.
THE KORAN-ONLY MUSLIMS
Such an argument would serve to convince them,since they REJECT David Wood’s argument( which is based on HADITHS,not the Koran)
gravenimage says
Brando, Islam claims that the Torah and Gospel *used* to foretell the coming of the “Prophet” Muhammed, but that they were “corrupted” by the Jews and Christians.
Never mind that there has, of course, never been any evidence for this claim.
Brando says
Hello, I wish it were so but
in 7:157 it uses the Present Tense in Arabic,
that is why Muslim apologists even bother to get into debates about:
“Is (not Was) Mohamed in the Bible?”
7:157
“Those who follow the Messenger, the unlettered prophet,
who they FIND ( Present Tense )
in the Torah and the Gospel”
2 HR DEBATE ( Public Debate: Is Muhammed Prophesised in the Bible? James White vs Zakir Hussain)
https://youtu.be/k1T7AuTbv3E
gravenimage says
Brando, Islam does indeed claim that the Bible has been “corrupted”.
That doesn’t mean, of course, that some Muslims don’t still claim that there are hints existing in the Bible as it exists.
Hoi Polloi says
Bloody hands for the UN, Francis, et al. as well as the world’s other religious entities, western civilization as a whole, governments that see this in their own countries, women both within and without islam who look away, corps that do business with them (while forcing their employees into “training “ that would never permit this truth), and on and on for 14 centuries of ignoring that this is sanctioned in islam, something that islamophobia campaigns don’t discuss.
ElderlyZionist says
I thought that the mostly Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces were running the al-Hol refugee camp. I’m appalled to read that the ISIS die-hards in al-Hol have been allowed to keep their slaves, and even to traffic them.
Infidel says
One more reason why the Kurds are not as trustworthy as is generally believed
GreekEmpress says
They were as bad as the Turks during the genocide. The Turks encouraged them to rape, loot, and murder, and the Kurds happily obliged.
Ironic that their old pals the Turks are now persecuting THEM.
gravenimage says
This has not actually changed, GreekEmpress. The Kurds were being oppressed by the Ottoman Empire during the Armenian Genocide, yet were often the most enthusicastic of murderers.
Walter Sieruk says
As for those brutal, cruel and vile ISIS jihadist /Muslims kidnapping Yazidi girls and women and using them as sex slaves. This actually started with the founder and prophet of Islam, Muhammad, who all Muslims look to as an example of how to behave. It’s revealed in the book JESUS AND THE JIHADIS: CONFRONTING THE RAGE OF ISIS by the Christian authors Graig A. Evans and Jeremiah J. Johnson For on page 124 it informs the reader “Muhammad endorsed enslavement of all types…he endorsed sex-slavers as a gift form Allah , and enjoyed offering sex-slaves as gifts…” Further page 125 informs the reader that “Islam has enslaved more people than any other culture.”
Walter Sieruk says
Such evil actions by the jihadists of ISIS reflects that Islam is a religion of brutal cruel misogyny.
maytruthprevail says
A never ending nightmare for those poor women and children.
Pure evil.
gravenimage says
Islamic State still trafficking Yazidi women out of al-Hol camp in Syria
…………………..
This is supposed to be a “refugee” camp–but the Muslims “refugees” are still trafficking slaves. Just grotesque.
And what Muslims are buying these poor victims?
Hoi Polloi says
Seems being a “refugee”doesn’t lead to any concern for the plight of others. Especially women, but then women are equivalent to cattle for them, as everyone here knows.
gravenimage says
Grimly true, Hoi Polloi.
Besides, they are only “refugees” because the Islamic State was defeated. Otherwise, they’d be happily beheading, stoning, and burning victims to death as well as trafficking women.
OLD GUY says
SLAVERY is and always has been a major source of funding for muslim/islamic states. When islam rules the world SLAVERY will be the backbone of its economy with death and destruction of all who oppose it.
Whats truly sad is that the western governments recognize Islam as a religion instead of the dangerous political ideology that it is. No other religion is so committed to the violence, murder, racism and in human treatment of women and children as Islam. Islam is the doctrine of a criminal dictatorship regime that wants to dominate everyone.