This is no surprise. The Home Office some time ago banned Martin Sellner, Brittany Pettibone, Lauren Southern and Lutz Bachmann from entering, all for the crime of opposing jihad terror and Sharia oppression, and thereby made it clear that it is more authoritarian and unwilling to uphold the freedom of speech than ever – at least when it comes to criticism of Islam, Muslim rape gangs, and mass Muslim migration.
The bannings of Sellner, Pettibone, Southern, and Bachmann were just part of a long pattern. Pamela Geller and I were banned in 2013, apparently for life, also for the crime of telling the truth about Islam and jihad. Just days after Geller and I were banned, the British government admitted Saudi Sheikh Mohammed al-Arefe. Al-Arefe has said: “Devotion to jihad for the sake of Allah, and the desire to shed blood, to smash skulls, and to sever limbs for the sake of Allah and in defense of His religion, is, undoubtedly, an honor for the believer. Allah said that if a man fights the infidels, the infidels will be unable to prepare to fight.”
And Syed Muzaffar Shah Qadri’s preaching of hatred and jihad violence was so hardline that he was banned from preaching in Pakistan, but the UK Home Office welcomed him into Britain.
The UK has granted asylum to Yasser Al-Sirri, a convicted jihad terrorist who advocated violent jihad and the killing of Jews. The UK Home Office also admitted Shaykh Hamza Sodagar into the country, despite the fact that he has said: “If there’s homosexual men, the punishment is one of five things. One – the easiest one maybe – chop their head off, that’s the easiest. Second – burn them to death. Third – throw ’em off a cliff. Fourth – tear down a wall on them so they die under that. Fifth – a combination of the above.”
Theresa May’s relentlessly appeasement-minded government also admitted two jihad preachers who had praised the murderer of a foe of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. One of them was welcomed by the Archbishop of Canterbury. Meanwhile, the UK banned three bishops from areas of Iraq and Syria where Christians are persecuted from entering the country. The asylum application of a Christian family facing a death fatwa in Pakistan was three times rejected. But an ISIS bride was let back in and given a taxpayer-funded house, despite the fact that she has an ISIS flag on her Twitter account. No terror charges for her, of course.
Meanwhile, Manchester jihad mass murderer Salman Abedi trained with a jihad group in Libya, and traveled in and out of UK with no problem.
The British government, in its abject pursuit of support from its rapidly growing Muslim community, has long ago left behind any commitment to basic human decency.
“Iraqi refugee who ran Al Qaeda Twitter account wins right to challenge deportation from UK,” by Nicky Harley, The National, June 23, 2021:
An Iraqi refugee who ran an Al Qaeda social media account from the UK has won the right to appeal against her deportation.
The woman, who was not named in court, posted more than 45,000 tweets in Arabic to more than 8,000 followers.
Her posts encouraged beheadings and urged people to travel abroad to join Al Qaeda and ISIS.
The woman, 29, served a three-and-half-year jail sentence for terrorism offences, after which the Home Office attempted to deport her.
In sentencing, Judge Charles Wide said her conduct had “affected international peace and security”.
She arrived in the UK with her mother aged 15 when she was granted discretionary leave to remain.
But after her conviction, the Home Office removed those rights and refused her application for asylum.
Since Iraq had been designated a dangerous place, she was granted restricted leave to remain, but without the protection of refugee status.
The woman challenged the Home Office’s decision in London’s High Court where Lord Justice Warby granted her the right to appeal.
“It was suggested that she is a danger to the UK community, but the First-Tier Tribunal held that she is not,” he said.
The court heard she was a “prolific poster” on Twitter and Instagram, putting up “50-60 items a day”, many of which were in support of ISIS.
Despite the sentencing judge claiming her Twitter account was one of the leading Al Qaeda sites and encouraged young men to go and fight, the court heard she had suffered trauma while living in Iraq.
Mr Warby said she “had suffered from mental health difficulties, having witnessed traumatic events in Iraq which included being injured in an air strike, seeing dead bodies in the street and witnessing a raid on her grandfather’s house by armed soldiers”.
“She had been diagnosed with PTSD, co-morbid depression, and generalised anxiety disorder and appeared to have been socially isolated for most of her life,” he said….
Hank says
The problem is that most of the politicians today are career politicians. They are there to make a career and keep their seats as long as possible. This means talking, moving and swaying wherever the wind blows. They are not the caliber of a “Statesman” who is passionately serving the nation and welfare of the people with the “wisdom of Solomon” and possessing a moral compass. Not the “Founding Fathers” type. More like “gone with the wind” type.
Keith O says
Hank, The simple fact is that most of the UK’s political masters don’t give a shit about the plebs who put them in office.
They, like a lot of others “in power” world wide, have forgotten the simple concept that they are in office to carry out the will of the people. Not the other way around.
Beneath the Veil of Consciousness says
So glad I got to see Great Britain before it became an appendage of Pakistan.
gravenimage says
UK: Muslima ‘refugee’ who ran al-Qaeda social media account from Britain wins right to challenge deportation
…………..
More suicidal insanity.
tim gallagher says
I think our societies, that are so accommodating and allow these appeals (often over and over) are too nice. And enemies of our western way of life, such as this evil creature, don’t deserve to be treated so well. In Australia, at the moment, we have a family of Sri Lankans. So they are not evil like this Muslim woman in this report. The Sri Lankan man and woman arrived illegally separately, had a couple of kids and married while they went through appeals against being sent out of the country, probably back to Sri Lanka.. It seems that the appeals have gone on and on for years. They are still in Australia and appealing yet again five or six years after arriving illegally. Unlike this Muslim woman, they are not bad people, but I can’t believe how illegals can seemingly appeal over and over (after apparently losing their case) and years later are still here in Australia. Our societies seem to be just too nice. I’m not sure if our country has as much trouble getting rid of Muslim enemies, but I can’t believe how the appeals seem to have gone on interminably in the case of the Sri Lankan illegals. In the case of the Muslim woman in this report, I hope that appeals don’t drag on and on.
Hank says
Australia is being Islamized very rapidly because of people like Craig Foster who don’t understand that he is blocking legal repatriation. Also, Australian politicians have not established routes and tools for law enforcement to repatriate them (directly) back to their Islamic country and culture – not to some Island, Camp or hotel or resort.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-12-11/first-asylum-seekers-medevac-law-granted-visas/12969536
tim gallagher says
Thanks for the information and comment, Hank. I haven’t followed the ins and outs of how this process (all the endless appeals such as in the case of the Sri Lankan couple) takes place, but I just can’t understand how the process goes on and on and on. It seems pathetic to me. There are large numbers of people who apply to come and live in Australia and they are waiting to be allowed to come to the country in the right way and we have all these illegal queue jumpers arriving and they get to hang around for years and go through endless appeals. I have no sympathy for the illegal arrivals because they mean that the people who apply in a legal way and wait to see whether they are accepted to come here have to keep waiting overseas. There has to be a quicker process than what we have now. If you are rejected, the government has to be tough enough to move people on and not let these appeals go on and on. I have the feeling that nothing will happen though and this ridiculous process that we currently have will continue on.
Kashyap says
Fundamental rights needs to redefinition. Like many rights “fundamental rights” are should also be dynamic & contextual. Consider the Islamic laws which is what their Quran is believed to say. Once that happens such laws/ rights are no more fundamental to ‘societal human behavior / ethics”. What is fundamental is ” prevention transgression on other community living ethics. Read this in the context of Islam saying that any non Islamists is to be persecuted.. Thoughts expressed are a result of means to understand fundamental rights via visa human society ( Christians, Hindus, Jews & Sikhs.in other words non Islamists).
gravenimage says
Kashyap–with all respect–the idea that we have to redefine rights for Muslims is questionable at best. The West was not this clueless until just recently. This has more to do with suicidal “Political correctness” than there being a fundamental problem with the concept of human rights.
Eleanor says
The UK Home Office and UK Immigration have their hands tied up by the leftie Immigration lawyers. Until laws are change limiting their legal powers, the lawyers will continue to make millions of pounds obstructing deportations and supporting asylum claims.
Giacomo Latta says
”had suffered from mental health difficulties, having witnessed traumatic events in Iraq which included being injured in an air strike, seeing dead bodies in the street”
So, she joins an organization armed to the teeth, ready to use those arms at any time, witnesses dead bodies in the street, deaths caused by the group she cheerleads for if not acts for, and she is shocked, yet not shocked enough until her side becomes the losing side. Is there something your not seeing, Judge?
gravenimage says
Spot on, Giacomo.