“Those are the ones brought near in the Gardens of Pleasure, a company of the former peoples and a few of the later peoples, on thrones woven, reclining on them, facing each other. There will circulate among them young boys made eternal with vessels, pitchers and a cup from a flowing spring.” — Qur’an 56:11-18
“And they will be given to drink a cup whose mixture is of ginger, a fountain within Paradise named Salsabeel. There will circulate among them young boys made eternal. When you see them, you would think them scattered pearls. And when you look there, you will see pleasure and great dominion.” — Qur’an 76:17-20
“Saint-Brieuc: an Afghan sentenced to 15 years imprisonment for rape of a minor,” translated from “Saint-Brieuc : un Afghan condamné à 15 ans de réclusion pour viol sur mineur,” Le Télégramme, June 28, 2021 (thanks to Will):
“He never went back to play in the park again. Childhood, for him, stopped there,” said Me Le Goardet-Prigent, the lawyer of the civil parties, in front of the Assize Court of Côtes-d’Armor this Monday afternoon. “There” was on August 25, 2018, when a 12-year-old boy was raped in an abandoned house in the city center of Saint-Brieuc, not far from the Promenades playground where he was going.
Three years after the incident, jurors discovered a teenager who is trying to forget. “We have to think about what the journey of a child victim is like,” explains the attorney general, Grégory Martin-Dit-Neuville, this Monday afternoon….”He has to tell the police what he went through, once, twice, three times. Then to the doctor. Take preventive treatments for sexually transmitted diseases. Then there is psychological examination… ”
The child also saw the announcement of the crime to his parents, people whose suffering has surfaced at every stage of the trial since the hearing began on June 25 up to the mother’s discomfort on Friday night after her testimony before the jurors.
And all the suffering of this family directs the attention of the court towards the box. Where Mohammed Rahman Arsala sits. A 30-year-old Afghan. Does he express regret? Yes, as he did Monday morning when questioned by the presiding judge, but only in that he has already served “too much prison,” and that he is the victim of “ill-treatment” in detention, because he is identified as an “informer.” To get out, he is ready to “sign a certificate.” “I promise not to do it again,” he says.
We are all the product of standards, of a story. And he was born a hundred kilometers from Kabul.
The cultural factor
“He tells us that if he had been married, it would never have happened, because he would have had a wife to satisfy his needs,” Me Le Goardet-Prigent almost chokes as he says this. “But does he therefore see others only as objects?” The experts questioned his dangerousness. He never seemed to take the measure of what was being blamed on him. Rape? To the police, he replies that a young person following a stranger is necessarily consenting. Before putting forward a cultural factor.
“Bacha Bazi,” explains the attorney general, which involves making young boys sex slaves. “But a custom is not a law.” “And yet we must take into account the cultural gradient,” pleaded Me Manant in defense. “Because we are all the product of standards, of a story. And he was born a hundred kilometers from Kabul. We don’t know what it is like.”
Disturbing signals
But his career in France has been marked by worrying signals. April 2018: he invited a young girl to his house and pinned her up against the wall. “I just wanted to learn the language,” he explains. “And in May, the photos of the young people that you took in front of the school?,” asks the presiding judge. “Pictures of me for Facebook. “The girls who accuse you of masturbating at the beach in July?” “I just asked them for cigarettes.” He was also transferred from the Saint-Brieuc remand center to that of Brest: “Because the nurse reported inappropriate behavior.” And in Brest, “a fellow detainee filed a complaint for sexual assault,” the presiding judge once again notes. No response from the accused.
He was found guilty of rape of a minor, and sentenced this Monday evening, after two hours of deliberation, to 15 years of criminal imprisonment, without security penalty. A definitive ban on presence on French territory was also pronounced against him.
Check Burry says
Cultural Gradient.
More a slippery slope to hell.
mortimer says
It is hideously SICKENING that a lawyer would stoop so low to this disgusting defense!
How can a modern man defend the PEDOPHILIA CULTURE that is the worst kept secret in Islamic countries.
At least this lawyer ACKNOWLEDGES that PEDOPHILIA IS SYSTEMIC TO MUSLIM COUNTRIES.
Unwittingly, the lawyer CONFIRMS what everyone knows … PEDOPHILIA IS ISLAMIC.
Jihadists in paradise will be rewarded with BOYS LIKE MATCHED PEARLS !!!
Islam is revolting! The lawyer has acknowledged it.
Keith O says
Mortimer, To be fair, there is every chance that the lawyer was a public defender, which means he has no choice but to defend whoever lands on his desk or the lawyer is himself a mudslime.
In which case he would think this grubs actions were justified.
James Lincoln says
Yes, Keith O.
As I understand it, a defense lawyer has to mount a robust defense – even for someone that he/she “knows” is a slimeball…
gravenimage says
Even a public defender should realize that this defense is sick. Of course, I don’t think there was any other defense.
Mohini says
OMG, my heart hurts.
I wish the children were spared. ?
Fred Alan Medforth says
France: A pupil justifies terrorism, his school excludes him… but only from art classes
The art teacher at Bellevue College in Toulouse would not have thought that the nudity of Greek statues shown in class would cause such a stir. It was Toulouse teacher and whistleblower Fatiha Agag-Boudjahlat who drew attention to the case in September 2020, reports the daily La Dépêche. “In a high school in Toulouse, a young man, grandson of an imam, defied an art teacher who dared to show Greek statues (naked) and went so far afterwards as to declare that the Kouachi brothers had been justified (the terrorists who carried out the attack on the editors of Charlie Hebdo magazine, editor’s note). Disciplinary committee in charge, the punishment will surprise you,” she wrote on Twitter.
https://medforth.biz/france-a-pupil-justifies-terrorism-his-school-excludes-him-but-only-from-art-classes/
gravenimage says
Thanks for that grim link, Fred.
mortimer says
Ah, yes … the old ‘DIFFERENT CULTURE’ defense to defend a foreign-born rapist!
Next, Maître Manant will claim that his client had no choice because France did not provide Afghans with GOATS or SHEEP with which to satisfy their.
The real question here is why France would allow such PRIMITIVE CAVEMEN to visit France, let alone live there at the tax-payer’s expense.
David M says
I say deport the lawyer to live in an Islamic country for two years so he can actually learn the different cultures he is espousing.
David says
The defence lawyer is clearly pointing out the abysmally low standards of islamic countries, although French Law should apply in France.
somehistory says
Bring in the scissors and lop off his parts. He might ‘touch’ another child when freed, but he won’t get nearly the lusty pleasure. Or perhaps, he won’t survive the loping off.
islam is straight from satan the devil. The mass-murdering, ***raper of children,*** sex-slave owner, thief, slave-trader, filthy sack of demon slime, lying son of satan the devil, set the example of just how evil these mozlum creeps were to be; and ones like this scum who raped a child, tried to rape, etc., is a willing psychopath. There is no guarantee that if he “had a wife,” that he would not also be a raper of children like his fake ‘prophet.’
Many men aren’t married, but don’t go about raping children. There is no excuse strong enough to make this demonic behavior acceptable. He shouldn’t ever be let out. Scum such as he…and he is no ‘man,’ but is a son of demons…do not change or alter their behavior.
One must feel regret for an action before that one will make a change and not repeat. This slime does not feel regret for his actions…only the getting caught and being sentenced.
Dan says
This was for “somehistory” if it doesn’t go to his “reply” section.
Agree 100%
Muslims made eunuchs of the men they kidnapped, to guard the harems.
As there was NO ANESTHETICS back then, the Muslims found the “best way” to do the procedure was hold victim down and slice EVERYTHING off FAST with a specially designed V shaped knife.
Then tubes were inserted in the remains of the urinary tracts, for the bladder to drain until the swelling went down and everything “healed” and for the next three days straight the victim had to be keep up, and forced to walk around.
Survival rate?
Around 5 PERCENT so…
Let’s just make them eunuchs.
In the traditional Muslim way of course cause…
We wouldn’t want to be accused of Islamophobia.
somehistory says
Thanks, Dan, for the 100%.
My, I never knew that is how it was done. Never wondered, truthfully.
But I can see why survival rates were so low.
And, yes, as the “Golden Rule” says, “Do unto others as you wish to be done unto you,” mozlums should prepare to be treated in the same manner as they dish out treatment.
rooare says
‘somehistory’, you refer to Muhammad as a fake ‘prophet’, I beg to differ Muhammed was certainly a real prophet of Lucifer that is.
somehistory says
The slime does not fit the description/definition of a True prophet in the Bible.
In fact, there were many “prophets of ba’al” and others called “prophets” who supposedly spoke for Jehovah, but spoke only lies.
A True prophet speaks for the True God and tells the Truth, and all of his prophecies come true…because they come from God Himself.
That is why I call the murdering slime a “fake” or “false prophet.” He may have said what lucifer/satan/the devil/original serpent/dragon told him to say, but it’s all a pack of lies…no Truth included.
PRCS says
Yes, the cultural gradient surely must be taken into account.
The French culture.
And make that clear to your Muslims.
PRCS says
Yes, the cultural gradient surely must be taken into account.
The French culture.
And make that clear to your Muslims–which, in this case, has been done.
Note: per the article, this was not the perp’s first offense.
Keith O says
PRCS, Nor I dare say will it be his last.
I hope he shares a cell with the French version of Bubba.
Ken Johnson says
When defending the undefendable a lawyer must try anything. Don’t blame the lawyer.
Ken
Ken Johnson says
When defending the undefensable a lawyer must try anything. Don’t blame the lawyer.
Ken
David says
OK ken, we heard you the first time!
This wretched muslim has committed a homosexual act. The Koran does not approve of this. The punishment is to be thrown off a tall building. Does the court know of this Sharia punishment?
Alex Lund says
The defense lawyer – even if forced vy law to defend him – can be ah, innovative in his defense. To his clients disadvantage.
Just ask any german lawyer who was forced to defend a neo-nazi when no nazi-lawyer was available.
In all those cases the lawyers obeyed the spirit of the law, but in the end it would have been better for the nazis if they had just asked for the most severe punishment that the law demands.
Yes, these lawyers made sure their “unwanted” and “forced upon them ” clients ran with full speed into the knife. Sorry, into a forest of knifes with barbs and other not-nice things.
SKA says
But Shari’ah can be flexed: Ayatollah Mesbah-Yazdi, religious adviser to President Ahmadinejad, allowed the sodomizing of political prisoners as punishment for opposing the government of Allah in Iran. The conqueror of Constantinople, Mohamet al Fathi, raped the handsome sons of Roman nobility and this was justified by the humiliation of infidels as part of jihad. And then there is the very weird accommodation of Bacche-Bazi in contemporary medieval Afghanistan (can anything there be called “modern?” Other than NATO military hardware?) So the same Shari’ah that punishes with death consensual sexual relations between adults of the same sex allows sodomistic rape of the enemies of Islam. Just more spoils of war.
James Lincoln says
A rape of a 12-year-old boy – and totally preventable. Psychologically damaged for life – makes me sick!
I consider myself fortunate. When I was 12 years old, I was still playing Little League baseball – and hoping that I could just hold hands with a cute blonde girl in my class…
Walter Sieruk says
That lawyer of France is very ignorant despicable and has no law ethics as to play the politically correct card of cultural relativism in order to get that vile Muslim rapist “off the hook” for his wicked and horrendous action.
There is a clear difference between right and wrong in which every sane and rational person will understand and recognize .
Furthermore, that this lawyer has use the PC card of a ” cultural gradient ” as in “cultural relativity “defense ” of the vast difference between the West culture and the Islamic Eastern culture further proves that Islam is an evil religion since that rapist culture is based on Islam.
It also should be added the with empty words of the defense lawyer ,again further shows the old saying to be true. Which is that “Evil is always looking for an excuse.”
:
tim gallagher says
The solution to the “cultural gradient”,which I suppose is a pretty clumsy way of saying the cultural differences, is to keep these barbaric scum out of all non-Muslim countries. Problem solved. Anyway, 15 years does seem like a fairly good, tough sentence compared to some of the sentences some of these maggots seem to get. It would have been far better if this Muslim rapist was not in the country to begin with. Keeping Muslims out would prevent all the Muslim terrorist attacks and the Muslim rape gangs and other crimes Muslims always bring with them.
gravenimage says
+1
tim gallagher says
Thanks for the +1, gravenimage. Keeping Muslims out is the only effective policy I can see. Some maybe OK, but they are not worth all this trouble they always bring.
somehistory says
and the reply to the lawyer is: No! We mustn’t.
gravenimage says
France: Muslim migrant rapes 12-year-old boy, his lawyer says ‘we must take into account the cultural gradient’
……………..
Doesn’t the fact that Muslims are taught to rape little boys actually make things worse? Certainly, no Muslims should be allowed in the west, and this vicious rapist should be deported after serving his sentence.
Autar KRISHEN Gurtoo says
Human/ animal quotient must be accounted for while adjudicating MUSLIMS. Shoot to kill the animal for misbehaviour.
Jim says
We should not give anyone a pass just because of the culture that shaped them. Otherwise, the Nazi war criminals would have to be freed on bail or given a slap on the wrist.
Lavéritétriomphera says
This defense’s argument has been rejected by the prosecutor because in the case of a criminal offense, the cultural gradient is not admissible by the French law. French citizens and strangers are equal before the law in France.
I particularly have in mind the battered women …
Crusades Were Right says
In his “country” of origin – if we can call that zone of Islam, tribalism and barbarism a country – the “believers” have to resort to classifying other Mohammedans as “permissible” targets to satisfy their savage urges: “hypocrites” (fake Mohammedans), “apostates” (ex-Mohammedans).
Then he comes to a Western country, where the “dirty kuffar” is EVERYWHERE.
Did he feel like a fox who sneaked into a hen house?
Dan says
Agree 100%
Muslims made eunuchs of the men they kidnapped, to guard the harems.
As there was NO ANESTHETICS back then, the Muslims found the “best way” to do the procedure was hold victim down and slice EVERYTHING off FAST with a specially designed V shaped knife.
Then tubes were inserted in the remains of the urinary tracts, for the bladder to drain until the swelling went down and everything “healed” and for the next three days straight the victim had to be keep up, and forced to walk around.
Survival rate?
Around 5 PERCENT so…
Let’s just make them eunuchs.
In the traditional Muslim way of course cause…
We wouldn’t want to be accused of Islamophobia.
Dan says
My reply was for “somehistory.”
Don’t know WHY it didn’t end up in his “reply” section.
Dan says
And now it is.
WHAT, has been going on with the comment section the past few months?
Posting NEVER works properly.
Crusades Were Right says
@Dan: Tell me about it! lol
Ren says
Is the lawyer a muslim too?
somehistory says
Thinking of the “reasoning,” if one can call it that, that goes into arguments about “culture” and the mozlum being raised in a different one.
In some States, it is unlawful to change lanes or pass while entering an intersection. If the police see this, the driver is given a warning or ticket.
Evidently, in at least one State, it is not against the law…if the passing/lane change can be made “safely.”
So, will the driver from this one State change lanes/pass while in an intersection without a problem if he/she goes to one of the States where it is against the law? As if the law of his home State is what will be applied to his driving in the State he visits?
Since when is it okay to go to another country and do what is allowed in ones’ home country and it not matter to the authorities?
In afghanistan, mozlum males keep little boys for just such a horrible practice as this creep…and the U.S. military was supposed to ignore the screams of the children.
Some of the U.S. military personnel didn’t ignore the screams….and they were punished for interfering with the slime.
Now this slime is not in his home country. Should he not be dealt with the same as a French citizen who did the same crimes?
islam and all of its rabid, slimy adherents who do such evil acts, will be destroyed. That day can’t come soon enough.
Don Ameche says
What is it about Europe that they keep putting up with this?
Ruislamicky? says
Good question Why?
notnolib says
It’s just islam. Practiced as commanded by the pedophile pig-faced dog “prophet” mohamandcheese.