Whoever thinks that Islam would settle for colonizing parts of Europe and the French suburbs is very naive. It is the whole Earth that the Qur’an imposes to conquer, and it’s what they are working on without respite while we are getting anxious about the wearing of the veil.
In an official statement published on the website of the International Criminal Court, the prosecutor, Karim A. A. Khan QC referred to the violence in Afghanistan and called on the parties to respect their obligations, not only under international humanitarian law, but under a sura from the Qur’an.
The political analyst Dominique Lunel brought to my attention the unacceptable words of the ICC prosecutor, for which we thank her: “The price of freedom is eternal vigilance” (wrongly attributed to Thomas Jefferson).
Here is Karim Khan’s statement – if it is not quickly removed from the site, it means no diplomats have protested, which will not surprise me in the least.
I call on all parties to the hostilities to fully respect their obligations under international humanitarian law, including by ensuring the protection of civilians. I remain available and willing to engage with all parties to this end.
I end by recalling the words of the Holy Qur’an in Surah Al Ma’idah: “whosoever killed a person – …it shall be as if he had killed all mankind; and whosoever gave life to one, it shall be as if he had given life to all mankind. And our Messengers came to them with clear signs, yet even after that, many of them commit excesses in the land” (Ch 5, v 32).
It is timely that this admonition and injunction of the Holy Qur’an is recalled. Those values are echoed in the Rome Statute – and I hope and pray that the imperative underlying this verse and numerous other Islamic precepts fall upon the hearts of all individuals and that in this time of change and uncertainty in Afghanistan restraint and justice can be observed with a view to peaceful reconciliation.” (https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/item.aspx?name=210817-otp-statement)
Why it matters
A sura as international law. What does it matter, you may ask, compared to the worst geopolitical crisis America has unleashed in many decades?
Please pay attention to the wording: “Those values are echoed in the Rome Statute.”
The prosecutor is not merely referring to the values of Islam, he is saying that they precede the values of international law (and are “echoed” in the Rome Statute).
And that the Rome Statute was inspired by the Qur’an, that it derives from it, and is therefore below it.
Make no mistake, this formulation and his statement are very serious: you are witnessing the policy of conquest by small steps, the method and effectiveness which you have seen in France, applied universally.
A small step, but a very visible one, to establish the recognition that Islamic law is superior to international law, to law originating in man, because it comes from the god of Islam.
Diane Harvey says
“It is the common fate of the indolent [*] to see their rights become a prey to the active [**]. The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude [***] is at once the consequence of his crime and the punishment of his guilt.” John Philpot Curran (1750- 1817).
In other words, you better fight-&-defend or all those hard-earned rights will be taken without a moment’s notice. And as recent evidence, look at how governors and their staffs acted during the COVID-19 lockdown. You can “Let George Do It” (a post-WWII detective radio show), but what if George has no intent of doing it?
* The indolent – those who may complain but yet won’t take action even when informed that forming your own citizen-led chapter
** The active – experience has taught that the left has a never-ending list of stupid, freedom-depriving ideas; the left will NEVER leave us alone. Green New Deal; elimination of 1st Am., 2d Am., mail-in voting, shut-down orders, and on and on
*** Servitude – comes in a variety of forms, from detention (jail, stay-at-home orders) to economic deprivation via regulations (which always result in bigger government, higher prices for goods/services and greater unemployment) to increased taxation
Wellington says
What deception. Yes, Islam is against the killing of innocent people but it depends on how you define innocence. Any criticism of Islam, Mohammed or the Koran, or any taking back of land that imperialistic Islam conquered, or any assertion that another religion than Islam is the true faith (e.g., Christianity), or any hindrance upon Islam in any way will thereafter make someone no longer innocent and worthy of death.
Muslims play word games. All the time. Many are dangerous to non-Muslims. Just one more reason—and there are so many—why Islam needs to be treated as the malevolent, parasitic and deceitful belief system which it is.
There is no way that one can really know Islam, and all the while retaining common sense accompanied by a proper moral code, and conclude that Islam is all right. Islam is about as far from being “all right” as any belief system in history. Indeed, considering its mostly hideous legacy and its duration, Islam is quite arguably the most nefarious major belief system of all time. I myself would put it #1 here.
I hate Islam. I have many good reasons to do so.
Jerry says
The religion of p!!$$ strikes again.
OLD GUY says
Islam wants world domination and nothing less. The sooner the western politicians, media and religious leaders figure this out the better. There will be a major WAR, the longer we wait the worst it will be.
gravenimage says
ICC prosecutor denounces violence in Afghanistan…in the name of Islamic law
I end by recalling the words of the Holy Qur’an in Surah Al Ma’idah: “whosoever killed a person – …it shall be as if he had killed all mankind; and whosoever gave life to one, it shall be as if he had given life to all mankind. And our Messengers came to them with clear signs, yet even after that, many of them commit excesses in the land” (Ch 5, v 32).
…………………
I thought this dishonest creep might use this verse. Never mind that it refers to Jews (supposedly) not living up to the standards they had set themselves (this is a paraphrase of a verse of the Talmud); it has *nothing* to do with Muslim behavior at all.
Here is the entire verse:
“Because of that, We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land – it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one – it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors.”
This is actually castigating Jews.
Here is the following verse, Qur’an 5:33:
“Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment”.
Pious Muslims don’t want hopeful Infidels to read this.