They can beg them to stop murdering kuffar, too. Their self-importance and lack of understanding about the jihad are worthy of the utmost derision.
Ardern’s incompetence in understanding of the jihad was on full display following the Christchurch massacre. Sympathy for the victims of the massacre was one thing, but bowing down to Islam was quite another, and that is what Ardern did. She donned the hijab, ordered the national broadcast of the Islamic call to prayer, and, in an election promise, vowed to criminalize criticism of Islam.
Ardern isn’t much different from her hapless globalist chum Joe Biden, who pleaded with the Taliban to go easy in order to win the approval of the international community.
As the likes of Ardern and Guterres go on making fools of themselves, they have sent a message loud and clear to the Taliban (and to all jihadists) about just how weak the infidel enemy is.
“New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern and United Nations Secretary General Antonio Gutteres beg the Taliban to protect women’s human rights as China and Russia prepare to formally accept militants’ rule of Afghanistan,” by Ross Ibbetson and Jack Wright, MailOnline, August 16, 2021:
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has begged the Taliban to uphold women’s rights after the Islamists toppled the government in Kabul amid fears that the country will once again become ‘a breeding ground for terror.’
‘I would just again implore those who made these moves in recent days to acknowledge what the international community has called for – human rights and the safety of their people,’ she said at a news conference in the capital Wellington.
‘What we want to see is women and girls being able to access work and education. These are things that have traditionally not been available to them where there has been governance by Taliban.’
Ardern’s mediation comes as China, Russia, Pakistan and Turkey all appear set to formally recognise Taliban rule, while others like British Prime Minister Boris Johnson have warned that no state should recognise the new government.
United Nations Secretary General Antonio Gutteres tweeted last night: ‘I’m deeply concerned about the situation in Afghanistan & urge the Taliban & all others to exercise utmost restraint to protect lives & ensure humanitarian needs can be met.’
The terror group marched victorious into Kabul on Sunday, the culmination of a rapid advance across the country which was left open by the sudden U.S. and Nato withdrawal after 20 years of fighting post-9/11.
The Taliban have been on a charm offensive since the dark days of 2001 in an attempt to mitigate fears about a return to the brutally oppressive regime which ruled the country.
But Christian Guy, a former special advisor to Mr Johnson, called interventions like those of Gutteres and Ardern ‘delusional’ because they failed to understand the brutal ideology behind the Taliban.
‘They are raping women and girls, murdering adults, selling 12 year olds as sex slaves – and they are only just getting re-started. All these international calls for ‘restraint, human rights and peaceful transition’ are beyond delusional and actually insulting,’ Guy tweeted.
China and Pakistan are believed to be the first in line to break ranks with the international community in order to form closer ties with the Taliban….”
mike says
they already said yes in fact we or they will protect the rights of woman
it’s in there laws of Sharia Laws
Sharia Laws followed no problem
bill says
According to reports today a woman was shot dead in front of her child for not wearing the hijab, and yesterday a few people were shot because they took down the Talban flag and raised the Republican flag. I am sure the Talibs will moderate their behaviour after the intervention of the PM of a piddling little country in the S Pacific, when a woman’s opinions are wroth less that gnat’s piss to them.
Rob Porter says
Well said, Bill, and thanks for the chuckle you gave me. I cannot get over just how hopelessly stupid are many Western leaders. For pure ignorance and utter dopey-ness, Canada’s Justin Trudeau and New Zealand’s Jacinda Ardern take pride of place as two complete ding-bats thick as an Australian brick.
Liberal to the core, it’s evident that faith in their liberal ideals causes a sort of mental disorder. Trudeau has has said that ‘flake’ Jacinda is his “favourite foreign leader”. And these two are actually considered ‘leaders’?
Of course Joe Biden is in a special league of total ‘battiness’ and incompetence. He’s now told us that his mob of imbeciles were counting on chaos in Afghanistan. For months some Americans and Canadians were trying to arrange an exit for Afghan interpreters and embassy personnel, but now we see that their governments couldn’t organize a ‘piss-up’ in a well-stocked brewery.
Malcolm (South Afric) says
“New Zealand Prime Minister beg Taliban to protect women’s rights.”
The prime minister might want to go to Afghanistan and beg to the Taliban there and not through the media.
Infidel says
Yeah, she should do that. Then New Zealand would be better off when the Taliban take her captive
PRCS says
“lack of understanding about the jihad”
Their lack of understanding is about Islam.
Islam is a theocracy.
It never has been a warm and fuzzy “progressive” ideology, it is not now, and never will be.
99.7% of Afghanistan’s population is Muslim and their nation’s official religion is Islam.
Islamic law is so incompatible with the United Nation’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights that the 57 member states of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) created the Cairo Declaration of Human Rignts in Islam which limits those rights to those permitted by Islamic law.
Begging Muslims to protect women’s rights in nations governed by Islamic law exposes the requestor’s fairy tale understanding of the world.
tim gallagher says
Spot on, PRCS. A perfect summary of Islam and what a disgusting, evil ideology it is. Ardern and all others like her inhabit a fantasy land when it comes to islam’s nature. When such delusional people get power they endanger us all with their foolishness.
Rob Porter says
Ardern is simply a fool. About three months after the massacre of about 50 Muslims in Christchurch, Muslims in Bangledesh murdered in churches more than 300 Christians. Of this Ardern said nothing. It didn’t fit her imbecilic narrative and believes. This woman is New Zealand’s leader. The people of New Zealand actually voted this numbskull into office!
New Zealand was once part of ‘Five Eyes’ intelligence surveillance agreement to watch China, but Ardern has chosen to be buddies with China. This woman is just a complete dope.
gravenimage says
Rob, I think you are referring to the terrible Easter massacre in Sri Lanka?
tim gallagher says
I certainly agree with your estimation of Ardern, Rob. She seems like a complete fool to me as well. When idiots such as her manage, somehow, to get into office and have power, their idiocy definitely puts the people of New Zealand in danger. She does seem to run some kind of protection racket for Islam, in the usual foolish way that you find among left wingers.
Vito says
You are spot on PRCS!
The refusal by Ardern & Company to educate themselves on Islam & sticking to their Multicultural Politically Correct Agenda is dangerous & shows their ignorance. It’s not about hating islam, it’s about understanding the Fundamentals of Islam. Sharia is the prevalent law in all 57 Islamic States. Some more Fundamental than others, however it’s still Sharia! Taliban & its offshoots could care less about Western Laws & Western Values. Sadly the Arderns of the world show their ignorance & UN has become quite Useless!
Fitna says
After thousands of years of human warfare, since primitive civilizations began, it seems we’ve learned absolutely nothing from history-at least the idiots in power.
You’d think with their Ivy league educations, they might’ve been taught about past conflicts and maybe realized that fascists, terrorists, dictators cannot be reasoned with.
Arden and feminized men like Sweden’s PM Stefan Lofven are unfit to lead nations, esp. during times of war. In fact they’re downright dangerous because the use of force is never an option for them, which makes their nations vulnerable for conquest and enslavement.
Groups like the Taliban, Iran’s regime and other forms of tyrannies only understand the threat and use of force. Biologically women are nurturers and do not understand the concept of having to fight to defend one’s freedom from invaders and savages, unless those women happen to be warrior-minded, which is very rare.
If you want to protect women from a gang of barbarians, then you need to eradicate them. Unfortunately the US is run by a weak and shameful administration who’ve proven that America cannot be relied on and they’ll cut and run to serve their own interests.
The US had 20 years to wipe out the Taliban vermin-just 75,000 fighters….but refused to do it under Bush, Obama, Trump and now Biden. Sadly thousands, perhaps millions of innocent women and children will pay a terrible price for refusing to defeat these brutal savages.
Afghanistan could be turned into an even bigger terrorist state than it was before 9/11 and chances are the US will probably have to return to ‘mow the lawn’ or risk facing more terrorist attacks from this death cult.
Wellington says
I largely agree with your comment, Fitna, but I think there are more “warrior-minded” women in the West than you think there are. I also place no blame on Trump for not defeating the Taliban. What would be the point since 99% of Afghanistan is Muslim?
Trump understood that the Islamic world must largely be cordoned off just as occurred during the Cold War with the Communistic world. Sure, America and the West might establish a “special relationship” with a Communist country here and there, e.g., Yugoslavia under Tito, PRECISELY to divide the Communist world from one another. Same as Trump and his highly astute Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, looked to wean a few Muslim Arab polities to the dual cause of opposing Iran and tacitly supporting Israel (as was occurring with Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Oman, et al. until the highly destructive and stupid Biden Administration took charge and destroyed this approach).
Again, I largely agree with you but I do believe you undervalue both Western women and Trump (N.B., in complete agreement with you about Bush 43, Obama and The Nothing who is now POTUS). I write this in a spirit of friendship and with no hostility. Your turn if you care, which I hope you “exercise.”
Fitna says
Thanks Wellington, glad we mostly agree. I should mention that I’m not here very often so I reply when I can, but if I don’t, it doesn’t mean I’m offended or anything, it’s just an issue of having the time to post here and I appreciate constructive responses.
Speaking of which, I’ll keep it brief and will try to cover a few points. Certainly there may be some, perhaps many women who understand warfare in the West, but I don’t really see any of them in power, except maybe Marine Le Pen-who will hopefully become PM of France next year. The same goes for most male leaders, they’re largely cowards and traitors with a few exceptions like Geert Wilders.
As for Trump, no offense but I think people give him far too much credit for doing little to nothing to oppose Islam. He should’ve done something about the social media giants censoring and banning people, largely around the issue of Islam. He could’ve united with Israel and bombed Iran to prevent them from getting nukes, but he’s anti-war and I don’t think he has the stones for a fight.
As for cordoning off Islam, that is one solution but since we’re already there, I think it’s better for humanity overall if we neutralized the threat of Islam globally, by deconverting the nations that had Islamic rule forced on them.
For the long term that would’ve been a lot better for the women and children trapped in those regimes. So Trump could’ve and should’ve taken out the Taliban and tried to turn Iraq and Afghanistan into secular-democratic nations like our own.
Let’s recall they used to be Hindu and Christian nations in the past and they were a lot more peaceful and tolerant them, as both these religions are superior to Islam when it comes to being humane and civilized.
The trouble is that we’re being lead by fools who don’t understand the enemy and just kicking the can down the road for the next generation to deal with which will make the fight that much harder and longer. Ok I’ll leave it there, wish you well, regards.
Wellington says
Thanks for your reply, Fitna. One major area where we disagree is about Trump. He had the stones to decimate ISIS, take out Solem Kassemeini and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. He also stopped flights from seven Muslim nations (most of the worst).
Trump also pursued a divide and conquer strategy by encouraging certain Gulf states to cease their animosity to Israel because they faced a common enemy in Iran (and don’t forget he moved the American embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, something other Presidents said they would do but didn’t). If Trump were still President I think this endeavor whereby hostility to Israel by certain Muslim nations would be far reduced would be much further along but the Biden Administration completely effed this up as it has effed up everything.
There’s only so much Trump could do and don’t forget for four years he was hounded by Democrats and the MSM daily over first the bogus charge of Russian collusion, then the Ukrainian phone call farce and even undermined by many in the federal bureaucracy, including some in the White House itself. There’s also the fact that Trump had a lot more on his plate than just Islamic matters, including renegotiating NAFTA with the USMCA, securing our southern border at best he could (and he was vigorously opposed here too), making NATO members pay more, being the only leader in the world to take on China over its currency manipulation and tariff policies, dealing with the psycho regime which is North Korea, getting tax cuts through, making VA hospitals much better and better funded, et al.
I rate Trump one of the ten greatest Presidents in American history and, for me, I think him the greatest living American (I’m inclined to put Robert Spencer in second place here). Anyway, thanks for the back and forth and take good care.
gravenimage says
Fitna wrote:
As for cordoning off Islam, that is one solution but since we’re already there
………….
Fitna, I’m afraid that Islam is anything but isolated right now–instead, the West is importing millons of Muslims. This is not isolation. I agree, though–we were much safer wnen Islam *was* isolated.
As for Afganistan, it is statistically 100% Muslim–there is widespread support for JIhad and Shari’ah there. This was never just a small minority there. In fact, 99% of Muslims there support Shari’ah law.
And while I am not a warrior myself, I certainly understand the importance of fighting–sometimes militarily–to defend freedom. My mother and aunt were in the British Army as young women during WWII.
gravenimage says
Good posts, Wellington.
Fitna says
Hi Graven,
I think you misunderstood, Wellington believes in the strategy of containment/isolation and while I agree that is an option I prefer eliminating the ideology of Islam like we largely eliminated Nazism, I believe that will be better for the world overall.
I was saying “since we’re already there” meaning in Afg/Iraq (or at least we were) then we could’ve tried to establish secular-democratic nations like our own. Unfortunately today we lack strong, intelligent leaders to have the willpower to go throw with such a project, so isolation is the better solution for now until we get the right people in power.
Thanks for raising the point of Afghanistan being 99% Muslim, I meant to answer that earlier when Wellington raised it. I believe there is a spectrum or gradation of belief. Those Muslims trying to escape Afg probably feared being under strict Islamic rule.
While they are all Muslims not all of them follow Islam as strictly as some extremists like the Taliban. So by eliminating the Taliban you can create a space for a truly more moderate or reformed Islam if the Muslims that are left prefer a less violent barbaric Islam.
I have opposed the idea of Reformation since the Islamic texts don’t really allow for it, however if Muslims can be convinced to discard or ignore the violent teachings the way Christians have done, then at least you can get a tamer, more civilized Islam. It’s not the best solution but good in the meantime and something Muslims could probably go for.
Ofc that would mean dealing very aggressively with groups and individuals who want a more brutal Islam. Though as mentioned I’d prefer Islam was gone completely and the sensible Muslims should be allowed to convert to any other ideology they like.
Wellington says
Fitna:
On a very specific point you raised with gravenimage, and keep in mind I am not religious at all, you stated something to the effect that if we can get Muslims to ignore and discard violent teachings as Christians have done, then there is some kind of hope. But there are no violent teachings in the New Testament and any violence in the Old Testament was for one time and place only—descriptive v. Koranic prescription.
So, when Christians were violent in the name of their faith, they were violating the tenets of their creed, contra Muslims big time. The theological blueprint of Christianity has nothing in it that condones violence to spread Christianity while the condoning of violence to spread Islam is all over the place in Islamic scripture (e.g., 109 verses alone in the Koran v. 0 verses in the New Testament, never mind all the violence glorified in the hadiths and sira). See the problem and the difference? Huge I would contend.
After all, ideology matters and just as there is no gentle Marxism or Nazism, so I would argue there is no gentle Islam. Or, as Ibn Warraq has put it, there are moderate Muslims but there is no moderate Islam. Herein lies the rub of rubs I would argue. Islam cannot be reformed anymore than Marxism or Nazism can be because it too is, as Bertrand Russell noted a century ago, the only major religion which is totalitarian in both structure and ideology.
gravenimage says
Fitna, thanks for your reply. You wrote:
I think you misunderstood, Wellington believes in the strategy of containment/isolation and while I agree that is an option I prefer eliminating the ideology of Islam like we largely eliminated Nazism, I believe that will be better for the world overall.
………………….
Fitna, I’m sure everyone here would love to see the end of Islam. But unlike Nazisim, where there were never more than about 8.5 million Nazis at its height in 1945, there are in the neighborhood of *1.8 billion* Muslims today–whereas only about 20% of the world’s population lives in a free country–fewer than the population of Muslims..
And while most Nazis were contingent on the leadership of Adolf Hitler, Muslims have followed Islam for about 1400 years, and believe that it is the perfect faith.
Then, the *last* people Muslims are going to listen to are those they regard as the “filthy Infidels”. In fact, the Qur’an and Hadith warn against Kufar trying to sway Muslims from their faith.
More:
I was saying “since we’re already there” meaning in Afg/Iraq (or at least we were) then we could’ve tried to establish secular-democratic nations like our own. Unfortunately today we lack strong, intelligent leaders to have the willpower to go throw with such a project, so isolation is the better solution for now until we get the right people in power.
………………….
This would have been nice–but I don’t think it would have made much difference. Pious Muslims never would have adhered to a secular-democratic government–they certainly don’t even here in the west.
I don’t think this would work no matter what Infidels were in power in the west.
More:
Thanks for raising the point of Afghanistan being 99% Muslim, I meant to answer that earlier when Wellington raised it. I believe there is a spectrum or gradation of belief. Those Muslims trying to escape Afg probably feared being under strict Islamic rule.
………………….
Fitna, as I noted the *vast* majority of Muslims in Afghanistan want Shari’ah. Less than one percent do not–more common are Muslims who want Shari’ah, but simply want to be holding the whip hand themselves rather than the Taliban. It’s not as though Muslims there have suddenly changed their minds.
More:
While they are all Muslims not all of them follow Islam as strictly as some extremists like the Taliban. So by eliminating the Taliban you can create a space for a truly more moderate or reformed Islam if the Muslims that are left prefer a less violent barbaric Islam.
………………….
Even under the previous Afghan government, 75% of the women in prison are there for crimes such as fleeing forced marriages or abusive marraiges, “Honor Killings” of women and homsexuals are winked at, and *stoning* is back on the books. This may be more “moderate” than the Taliban, but not by a whole lot. Do we want to see Americans die for this? Because we already have.
More:
I have opposed the idea of Reformation since the Islamic texts don’t really allow for it, however if Muslims can be convinced to discard or ignore the violent teachings the way Christians have done, then at least you can get a tamer, more civilized Islam. It’s not the best solution but good in the meantime and something Muslims could probably go for.
………………….
Actually, there are no violent teachings in the New Testament–so violence goes against Christianity. This is *hardly* the case with Islam. You are right that Islam does not allow reform. Sometimes Muslims become lax, especially if they have a lax ruler–but Islam itself does not change. Note that almost all “reformers” are in the west, are not supported by other Muslims, and in most cases spend more of their time trying to snow Infidels about how mainstream their views are instead of actually trying to convince their coreligionsts that they are right. Not very promising…
More:
Ofc that would mean dealing very aggressively with groups and individuals who want a more brutal Islam. Though as mentioned I’d prefer Islam was gone completely and the sensible Muslims should be allowed to convert to any other ideology they like.
………………….
Note that leaving Islam has the death penalty–and many Muslims are all too happy to kill for it. How are you going to convince Muslims to mass apostize from a faith they are told is perfect–especially the most devout Muslims who wage Jihad?
Emilie Green says
Jacinda Ardern = Hillary but with a smaller land area
Infidel says
Also, Hillary would have led the world’s most powerful nation. Ardern leads a pretty irrelevant country that likes pretending to be of consequence
RichardL says
she is incredibly dumb. Hillary is just evil
E T says
Justine Trudeau comforted the Canadian people by consulting with Hillary about Afghanistan the other day. Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy. Canadians must vote anything but Liberal.
Johnny B says
I will never stop wondering how such ignorant people constantly seem to make it to the top???
OLD GUY says
Turds float.
Wellington says
The New Zealand Prime Minister wearing an hijab tells you in microcosm really all you need to know about how pathetic most of Western leadership is in our time. She could serve as the “poster girl” for Western collapse.
As Tucker Carlson just the other day opined, America—and by extension so much of the West—is presently led by buffoons. And the forces of authoritarianism like the Islamic world, Russia, China, et al. are simply delighted by how farcical Western leadership has become.
We are in the process of losing the greatest civilization of all time because self-criticism in the West has reached mindless, suicidal proportions (coupled with a dearth of accurate knowledge). Most of the rank and file of many Western nations still don’t buy into this rot but a very large majority of the Western elites do. Shame on these destructively foolish elites forever. A la Shakespeare’s Henry V, eternal shame, nothing but shame.
savvyone says
N.Z. Prime Minister thinks they have to go along, to get along. She and Angela Merkel think alike. They are foolish. Wafa Sultan, on YouTube, at least I think she still is, tells all who will listen…Islam is not compatible with any other system of government.
Wellington says
No disagreement here.
James Lincoln says
Wellington says,
“Most of the rank and file of many Western nations still don’t buy into this rot but a very large majority of the Western elites do.”
Absolutely true.
The people currently “in power” in the United States – a small minority – do not generally reflect the values of the general population…
tim gallagher says
Well said, Wellington. I agree that western civilisation is the greatest achievement and it does seem to be in danger. Too much self loathing, well extreme self criticism, among too many members of our societies. I suppose the march of the left through the universities, schools and the media, all brainwashing people, has probably caused this situation. Then the brainwashed people vote in these buffoons, Ardern being a classic example.
Kepha says
I’m sure the Taliban will heed the honorable lady from EnZed, and any number of Social Democrat jurists from Europe who echo her. Why?
1. The most educated people tell us that Islam is all about peace and tolerance.
2. Wiser and better people than I assure me that women and Muslims are both classes of people oppressed by the evil, imperialist, white, Western patriarchy. Surely the Taliban, having defeated an imperialist project, would not oppress other oppressed persons with whom they are in scientifically (hush, hush, genuflect) solidarity.
3. Western feminists agree that the hijab and burka protect the dignity of the Muslim woman. A religion which puts so much emphasis on the dignity of women would surely not alienate their supporters among international feminists. If Afghan girls no longer go to school, no doubt some of our feminists here will argue that female literacy is just a away to subjugate women under men’s propaganda.
4. Time in power will turn the Taliban “moderate”. That apparently means that the Taliban will start wearing their beards shorter, so they won’t tickle the women they take as wives and concubines.
5. The Taliban, as enemies of the USA, are all for the rule of international law and equitabe justice. Surely they’d oppress nobody, now that they’ve freed their country.
6. Because of the basic uprightness and goodness of mankind, the Taliban will surely honor any writ waved in their faces by a Social Democratic Belgian jurist.
7. If the Taliban renege on their promise to honor women’s rights in Afghanistan, I’m sure they live in mortal terror of the monstrous regiments of educated, progressive, white Western women who will take up arms and occupy the passes of the Hindu Kush and Pamir in order to save their Afghan sisters.
8. Any Afghan woman who feels oppressed by the new regime will be granted asylum in the West–along with the Taleb who kidnapped and raped her in order to be her husband, AK-47 and terror manual and all (these weapons will be recognized as sacrosanct parts of the reufgee male’s culture, even in Western jurisdictions where nobody but outlaws and members of terror cells ever manages to get his hands on a firearm).
PRCS says
That was a VERY entertaining post, Kepha.
Thank you.
Kepha says
@PRCS: Just repeating what my intellectual betters would have us believe. sarc.
This is the sort of drivel being pushed in American ejjikashun. And, seeing that our Embassy in Kabul was flying the gay pride flag as well as the US flag, I’m not surprised morale and everything else collapsed. Did we really want to tell Afghans that we wanted to be their bacha bazi boys?
gravenimage says
Grimly hilarious, Kepha.
Crusades Were Right says
[She… vowed to criminalize criticism of Islam]
Seems as if this Dhimmi Dame par excellence is publicly expressing doubts about the moral standing of a group of Muslims!
Doesn’t that count as “criticism of Islam”?
Oops! lol
gravenimage says
UN chief, New Zealand Prime Minister beg Taliban to protect women’s rights
…………….
Grimly laughable–but consider the source…
Yogi says
That women is sick in the head …
Ty Ader says
She is a clueless imbecile.
Hank says
Silly disoriented person. Ever learning but never finding the truth about Islam, Taqiya, Jihad, hatred of non-Muslims, hatred of Israel, death to this and death to that, et al.
One commentator on JW wrote that Islam is pretending to be a religion but is actually Government bent on usurping power in any non-Muslim nation where it creates itself.
She could at least look at some of the quotes from the Quran. Its self-explanatory. You can’t argue with that.
Nitwits like this are falling for the ruse and going full speed ahead with Islamization. Importing, creating and enlarging Islamic minority groups where there was practically none previously. Hastily joining the likes of Trudeau Canada, Merckel Germany, Australia, Sweden and so on (The Left-Green-Muslim Alliance). They don’t even have a clue that Islam and its followers kill (infidels) thinking they are doing a service for their Islamic god. Shouting “Allahu Akbar” in a frenzy doesn’t mean Merry Christmas.
Minette says
I live in Adernland and believe me she is every bit as ignorant, deluded and dangerous as previous commentators say. She is ruining New Zealand, a once peaceful ( if isolated and lomewhat old-fashioned) country and turning it into a racially divided and poorly educated disaster. Unfortunately it seems that a majority of the population support her and don’t tealise that she is a past president of an international socialist organisation who appears intent on rebuilding the country according to Marxist philosophy. Thank Gid my grandchildren lare being raised overseas.
OTTER says
Men, you can understand, why they might support Islam–all the sexual preferences they get. But women? Why? Note she is another white woman and one in power. Over to you Gravenimage. Forget about talking about me. I am irrelevant. Note how the West is being destroyed by white woke women!
gravenimage says
Of course Ardern is an idiot–I have noted that myself many times.
The idea that she is the *only* idiot in this situation is absurd, though–Biden, Boris Johnson, and the Pope have all begged the Taliban to act in a civilized manner in the past few days–but of course OTTER wants everyone to ignore that.
“Biden Pleads and Bribes Taliban to Spare U.S. Embassy and 2,000 Americans”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/08/biden-pleads-and-bribes-taliban-to-spare-u-s-embassy-and-2000-americans
“UK: Boris Johnson says West could recognize Taliban if they protect ‘human rights and inclusivity’”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/08/uk-boris-johnson-says-west-could-recognize-taliban-if-they-protect-human-rights-and-inclusivity
“Pope Francis says ‘dialogue’ is the only path to ‘peace and security’ in Afghanistan”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/08/pope-francis-says-dialogue-is-the-only-path-to-peace-and-security-in-afghanistan
Note that OTTER does not say the west is being destroyed by these fools. This is about “wokeness” and political correctness–not about gender as OTTER consistently pretends.
And why does OTTER say that I should not talk about him? Because he wants everyone to forget what else he has said–which is the crux of this stuff from him. He has said that men need to control white women, prevent them from getting an education or working outside the home. He has said that white women must be forced to breed–in other words, that they must be raped. .
How is this different from Islam–from the Taliban itself?
“Afghanistan: Taliban going door-to-door, forcibly marrying girls as young as 12, forcing them into sex slavery”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/08/afghanistan-taliban-going-door-to-door-forcibly-marrying-girls-as-young-as-12-forcing-them-into-sex-slavery
One presumes that the only reason OTTER opposes Islam is because he himself wants to be the one controlling women. *Ugh*.
gravenimage says
That OTTER considers men supporting Islamic polygamy, forced marriage, child marriage, rape, and sex slavery to be understandable is pretty appalling–but given his personal statements here, it hardly surprises…
E T says
She should leave for Afghanistan immediately- sort the mess out. I shall never forget as long as I live the 50 very young sex slaves, the cowards beheaded just before running away from the troops. How the barbarian cowards paraded a 10 year old, pregnant girl around the town, wearing ONLY a dog collar. Yes, she should go and have a rational dialogue with them.
James Lincoln says
Maybe it’s my imagination, but New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern seems to have the same bug-eyed spaced-out easily triggered look as AOC…
E T says
One might describe her look as disturbing, out of it, la la la la la la la….. I will follow you….
gravenimage says
Christian Guy seems pretty savvy about things. (I wish this were true of all Christian guys…).