At least Daniel Haqiqatjou is honest, unlike so many other Islamic apologists in the West. And though many do dissemble to lull Westerners into complacency regarding Sharia, others have been forthright about this as well.
According to Islamic law, Muslim men can take “captives of the right hand” (Qur’an 4:3, 4:24, 33:50). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet! Lo! We have made lawful for you your wives to whom you have paid their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses of those whom Allah has given you as spoils of war” (33:50). 4:3 and 4:24 extend this privilege to Muslim men in general. The Qur’an says that a man may have sex with his wives and with these slave girls: “The believers must win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or the captives whom their right hands possess, for in their case they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)
The rape of captive women is also sanctioned in Islamic tradition:
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Sahih Muslim 3371)
It is also in Islamic law: “When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.” (Umdat al-Salik O9.13)
The Egyptian Sheikh Abu-Ishaq al-Huwayni declared in May 2011 that “we are in the era of jihad,” and that meant Muslims would take slaves. In a subsequent interview he elaborated:
Jihad is only between Muslims and infidels. Spoils, slaves, and prisoners are only to be taken in war between Muslims and infidels. Muslims in the past conquered, invaded, and took over countries. This is agreed to by all scholars—there is no disagreement on this from any of them, from the smallest to the largest, on the issue of taking spoils and prisoners. The prisoners and spoils are distributed among the fighters, which includes men, women, children, wealth, and so on.
When a slave market is erected, which is a market in which are sold slaves and sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Koran 4:24]. This is a verse from the Qur’an which is still in force, and has not been abrogated. The milk al-yamin are the sex-slaves. You go to the market, look at the sex-slave, and buy her. She becomes like your wife, (but) she doesn’t need a (marriage) contract or a divorce like a free woman, nor does she need a wali. All scholars agree on this point—there is no disagreement from any of them. […] When I want a sex slave, I just go to the market and choose the woman I like and purchase her.
Around the same time, on May 25, 2011, a female Kuwaiti politician, Salwa al-Mutairi, also spoke out in favor of the Islamic practice of sexual slavery of non-Muslim women, emphasizing that the practice accorded with Islamic law and the parameters of Islamic morality.
A merchant told me that he would like to have a sex slave. He said he would not be negligent with her, and that Islam permitted this sort of thing. He was speaking the truth. I brought up [this man’s] situation to the muftis in Mecca. I told them that I had a question, since they were men who specialized in what was halal, and what was good, and who loved women. I said, “What is the law of sex slaves?”
The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”
“Is this forbidden by Islam?” I asked.
“Absolutely not. Sex slaves are not forbidden by Islam. On the contrary, sex slaves are under a different law than the free woman. The free woman must be completely covered except for her face and hands. But the sex slave can be naked from the waist up. She differs a lot from the free woman. While the free woman requires a marriage contract, the sex slave does not—she only needs to be purchased by her husband, and that’s it. Therefore the sex slave is different than the free woman.”
In January 2016, a female al-Azhar professor stated that Allah allowed Muslims to rape non-Muslim women in order to humiliate them.
The savage exploitation of girls and young women is, unfortunately, a cross-cultural phenomenon, but only in Islamic law does it carry divine sanction. And that sanction must be discussed if anything effective is ever going to be done to end this abuse.
somehistory says
He says this…this disgusting and evil thing…and yet, how many people will listen and realize this is the teaching of islam, and not just the ideas of a few “radicals” or “extremists,” or of some mozlums who don’t understand that islam is a *peaceful* and *noble* religion?
No woman is “free” under islam…not the believing female, nor the captive slave.
islam is straight form satan the devil.
mortimer says
Does this make Daniel Haqiqatjou a WHITE SUPREMACIST ???
I wonder how many Muslims will openly disagree with Daniel Haqiqatjou, seeing that his opinions are based on the LIFE OF MOHAMMED ???
I wonder if REZA ASLAN will disagree?
I wonder if you can count the Muslims on one hand who will OPENLY denounce Daniel Haqiqatjou?
You know the answer.
gravenimage says
I checked out more about Daniel Haqiqatjou. He runs a site called Muslimskeptic.com.
Topics include his claims that the French are slaughtering Muslims in Africa because they hate “Mohamet”, claims that Jews are actually pagans (not just false but a terrible insult in Islam, and one that makes Jews fair game for murder at any time), demands that Muslimahs in the west wear Niqab, claims that Newsweek isn’t sucking up to Muslims enough, slamming the US imprisoning Jihadists at Guantanamo Bay, excoriating Atheists, condemning Muslims who act like disbelievers in any way, and claiming that the west is not superior to the horrors of Islam.
These and more ugliness here:
https://muslimskeptic.com/
Ecosse1314 says
Hi GI. the whole of this turds rantings can be found on “the apostate prophets” you tube station
mortimer says
Excellent research, GI. So Daniel Haqiqatjou is soliciting genocide. By the way, the Koran claims that Jews have made the prophet EZRA the ‘son of Allah’.
(“The Jews say “Uzair is the son of Allah” K. 9.30) This claim is totally absurd and proof of the falsehood of the Koran. Fanatical Muslims like Haqiqatjou have no reasonable explanation for this error in the Koran.
K. 9.30 is iln fact the excuse the Koran gives for attacking and exterminating Jews who oppose Mohammed … namely, the they are POLYTHEISTS. Polytheists offend Allah so much that he commands Muslims to kill, enslave, rape and exterminate them.
I wonder if Facebook and Twitter are at all concerned about Haqiqatjou’s genocidal speech … It seems Muslim ‘conservatives’ (who are extremely traditional Muslims) have free speech as well as a free pass to spread genocidal hatred, but Americans defending the constitution do not have a right to criticize those like Haqiqatjou who are enemies of all modern human rights codes.
The Red-Green Axis of Evil defends traditional Muslim genocidists like Daniel Haqiqatjou.
gravenimage says
Thanks, Ecosse and Mortimer.
mortimer says
A large part of Sharia law manuals is concerned with SLAVERY and a large part of the SLAVERY SECTION in Sharia manuals is concerned with SEXUAL MATTERS between the Muslim male masters and their female slaves … particularly what happens to the children born in slavery.
NONE of the Sharia law regarding SEX SLAVES has been abrogated or declared annulled. ALL of the Sharia law concerning slavery is STILL IN EFFECT since it is from ALLAH and MOHAMMED, so it is still considered Islamically ‘correct’.
tim gallagher says
What a primitive heap of shit this Muslim scumbag is. It is basic islam of course, though many people won’t ever seem to believe that. Imagine anyone actually still defending slavery and sex slavery in 2021. Of course, Islam’s ideal, on all aspects of human life and human relationships is that we should all go and live our lives the way knuckle draggers in 7th century Arabia used to live. What a load of barbaric garbage islam is.
Keith O says
I wonder how many mainstream media outlets will have this little gem on the 6pm news??
And how many feminist organisations are screaming opposition to this??
This also needs to be played during a public debate with the cruds who run CAIR. Now that would be worth sitting back with a six pack of cold ones for a good laugh!
Walter Sieruk says
The former Muslim , Ibn Warraq in this book THE ISLAM IN ISLAMIC TERRORISM does explain in it that slavery is an established in Islam and that within the fold of Islam are created solely for the purpose of giving pleasure to men and child bearing – functions that confine the, to the home …”
pages 345,346.
As for the later part of that sentence ,this helps explain to television news views of America why they see so few women out in public when compared to the great number of men they see outside on the streets and at other public places in Islamic nations.
In addition this information is further upheld by Brigitte Gabriel who explain in her book [1] that “Control of behavior and disregard for human life are key elements in Islamic ideology.”
Of course , Islamic ideology is completely and totally based on theology of Islam.
Moreover in her same book she also reveals that ” the horrific treatment of women who are sold into sexual slavery by their own families . Women are not viewed as equals in Islamic countries ,they are thought of as property.”
[1] THEY MUST BE STOPPED by Brigitte Gabriel pages 171,,182
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
Why are translations from the Quran into English so cruddy? Let’s take one example: “The believers must win through, those who humble themselves in their prayers; who avoid vain talk; who are active in deeds of charity; who abstain from sex, except with those joined to them in the marriage bond, or the captives whom their right hands possess, for in their case they are free from blame.” (Qur’an 23:1-6)
Why is the word “through” followed by a comma? Isn’t “through” a preposition? Is the meaning “The believers must win through (by means of) those who humble themselves in their prayers”? What does that even mean, and what does one win? Can someone please translate this passage into coherent English?
gravenimage says
Why is the word “through” followed by a comma?
…………
Because this is the end of Qur’an 23:1. The comma just indicates the end of this verse.
And Qur’an 23:1-6 means that Muslims succeed if they say their prayers and only have sex with their their wives and sex slaves. This is what Islam considers “chaste”.
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
Thank you, gravenimage. I never knew about, and am surprised by, the punctuation rule to insert a comma between successive verses. But I still don’t understand how a Muslim will succeed by means of other people who “humble themselves in their prayers”. How does this provide any benefit? Does praying humbly provide more benefits to others than praying robustly does? Where in the Quran is that explained? A passage like this makes me glad that I’m an infidel who doesn’t have to figure out what it means.
mortimer says
Reply to Mark Spahn: it is not the English translation of the Koran that are cruddy. It is the original Arabic Koran that is so confused, ungrammatical and opaquely incomprehensible that it is impossible to translate.
Ali Dashti, Twenty-Three Years: A Study of the Prophetic Career of Mohammed
Iranian Koran scholar Ali Dashti wrote:
“The Qur’an contains sentences which are incomplete and not intelligible; foreign words, unfamiliar Arabic words, and words used with other than the normal meaning; adjectives and verbs inflected without observance of the concords of gender and number; illogically and ungrammatically applied pronouns which sometimes have no referent [dangling modifiers]; and predicates which in rhymed passages are often remote from the subjects… To sum up, more than one hundred Qur’anic aberrations from the normal rules and structure of Arabic have been noted.”
(Ali Dashti, Twenty-Three Years: A Study of the Prophetic Career of Muhammad, p 48)
gravenimage says
Mark, Mortimer is right–the problem is the original tet of the Qur’an. And I wish this verse were the most irrational thing in the Qur’an, but this is very far from the case.
Mark Spahn (West Seneca, NY) says
Thanks, mortimer and graven image, for your further clarification. It looks like the author of the Quran, whoever he or she was, must have been, uh, exaggerating in saying the Quran clarifies things.
mortimer says
Since MOHAMMED was called ‘THE WHITE MAN’ and since he owned BLACK SLAVES, then Mohammed was a WHITE SUPREMACIST.
That makes Islam a WHITE SUPREMACIST RELIGION.
– MOHAMMED WAS A WHITE MAN ACCORDING TO MORE THAN 31 HADITHS:
-legs were white: Sahih Bukhari 4:56:767; Sahih Muslim 8:3325
-Thighs were white: Sahih Bukhari 1:8:367, See Also Sahih Muslim 19.4437
-Shanks were white: Sahih Bukhari 1:8:367, See Also Sahih Muslim 19.4437
-Armpits were white: Sahih Bukhari 8:78:631, See Also Sahih Bukhari 9.086.108:1:1, Sahih Bukhari 9.089.286:1:1, Sahih Bukhari 9.089.305:1:1, Sahih Bukhari 3.047.769:1:1, Sahih Muslim 20.4511:1, Sahih Muslim 20.4509:1; Sahih Bukhari 5:59:612, See Also Sahih Muslim 31:6092, Sahih Muslim 31:6092; Sunan Abu Dawud 3:898
-Forearms were white: Sahih Muslim 4:1014
-Abdomen was white: Sahih Bukhari 9:90:342, See Also Sahih Bukhari 4:52:90; Sahih Muslim 19:4442
-Cheeks were white: Sahih Muslim 4:1208; Sunan Abu Dawud 3:991; Sunan Abu Dawud 3:1002
-Complexion was white: Sahih Muslim 30:5777, See Also Sahih Muslim 30:5786
-General appearance was white: Sahih Bukhari 1:3:63; Sahih Bukhari 2:17:122; Sahih Bukhari 4:56:744; Sahih Muslim 30:5778, See Also Sahih Muslim 30:5778
-Mohammed the WHITE MAN owned Black Slaves
-BLACK SLAVES OF MUHAMMAD
Sahih Muslim, Book 10, Number 3901:
Narrated Jabir ibn Abdullah:
There came a slave and pledged allegiance to Allah’s Apostle (peace_be_upon_him) on migration; he (the Prophet) did not know that he was a slave. Then there came his master and demanded him back, whereupon Allah’s Apostle (peace_be_upon_him) said: Sell him to me. And he bought him for two black slaves, and he did not afterwards take allegiance from anyone until he had asked him whether he was a slave (or a free man).
-It is just and commendable that Muhammad does insist on paying the owner, and that he (possibly even) frees this convert (though this is not mentioned), but what about those other two black slaves?
-Mohammed referred to Blacks as “raisin heads”. (Sahih al-Bukhari vol. 1, no. 662 and vol. 9, no. 256).
In another Hadith, Mohammed is quoted as saying that Blacks are, “pug-nosed slaves”. (Sahih Moslem vol. 9, p. 46-47).
Ahmad ibn Sulayman, Sahnun’s companion, said “that whoever says that the Prophet was black is killed. The Prophet was not black.”
Source: Qadi Iyad http://www.masud.co.uk/ISLAM/misc/alshifa/pt4ch1sec5.htm
RANDALL ANDERSON says
ALL THIS IS TRUE… WHICH CONDEMNS THE ENTIRE LEFT for their collaboration with the SUICIDAL, GENOCIDAL, PEDOPHILE CULT OF ISLAM.
gravenimage says
U.S.-based Muslim preacher defends slavery, including sex slavery, under Sharia
……………
Just sickening. Slavery was *never* necessary to defensive war. And note that he says that sex slavery “preserves marriage and the family”, without ever saying how this is so. Recall this next time Muslim apologists lie about Islam preserving marriage and the family.
Is Daniel Haqiqatjou an American citizen? He should be deported if he is not, or has been naturalized. His Mosque should be shut down.
gravenimage says
He was born in Texas, and so cannot be deported.
revereridesagain says
The Left doesn’t care. He can praise slavery to the skies because “Islamophobia” trumps endorsing slavery any time. Muslims are exempt from the designation of “hate speech” because they are “oppressed” and their “oppression” intersects with that of BLM, LGBTQ and other denizens of the Intersectionalism Zone.
And he can say it about female sex slaves in Texas all he wants. Since women now officially do not own their bodies in the Lone Star State, the slaves of Allah can relocate there and breed all the little slavelets they want on their child brides, since no victim of rape or incest has any say in the matter.
If it is the law that a raped child bride must be forced to have her rapist’s baby, then how can it be illegal for her to be a child bride in the first place?
Or am I being to impertinent?
somehistory says
impertinent? If “not pertinent to a particular matter” is your definition, then Yes.
Tiring, and stupid. You just want to have something about which you can complain and compare Christians…and many others who don’t claim a *faith* but still value the lives of the unborn…with mozlums and their despicable, evil, demonic actions.
Really, you should try to see the world from the perspective of those who value life.
If you were travelling, your car broke down, your cell’s battery was dead, just who do you think would stop to help you?
Christians and others who believe in a Higher Power, feel an obligation and a duty to that One to help other humans in need….strangers stranded on the road, and others. Of course, mozlums would not stop for you, seeing as you are an old white woman. They don’t use their *belief* to help others.
The person who puts no value on life, and doesn’t feel obligated to help, will just pass you by without any conscience tugging at them.
You are much to be pitied.
Trevor Loughlin says
No this is in fact a brilliant comparison of Texas with Islamic nations, one of the most regressive states in the union with its death penalty and enforced child bearing. Obviously Texas has some way to go before it reaches the level of misogyny and barbarism of Islamic nations,but it is still a disgrace by Western standards. Take no notice of the obvious Trump supporters on this board. I feel sorry for Americans having to choose between a madman and a senile old fool but that is what your corporations and private healthcare providers funded, and BOTH let the people of Afghanistan go to hell. As for sexual slavery, this is one of the chief motivations of Islam, which is basically an organization of Incel rapists who are too ugly and stupid to get women conventional romantic means.
somehistory says
Texas people value life…the life of the unborn is just as valuable as the life of an adult…and in fact, the **newest** law regarding this subject in Texas is to protect the ****woman***** who uses the baby-killing Pill.
The arguments that it is the “woman’s body” or “reproductive health” are totally bogus.
The “woman’s body” is not the one being destroyed, unless the one performing the hit is a quack. And the “reproductive” is being eliminated for that baby who has been “reproduced” to whatever point in time that the baby is murdered. And the “rape or incest” is also bogus as most of the hits are not because the woman has been raped or is a ‘victim’ of incest, but for the simple fact of convenience to the woman who does not want a baby.
The State of Texas is far and away so much better than what islam anywhere has to offer. To say otherwise is to lie.
By her own words, rra is way too old to be personally affected by this law in Texas and doesn’t live there anyway.
Trying to prevent dying by murder is the direct opposite of what mozlums do… and…. moral people know this whether they are Trump supporters or not.
gravenimage says
revereridesagain, I understand that you do not like abortion laws in Texas, as is the case with some others. But your constant claims that rape, sex slavery, pedophilia, and child marriage is legal in Texas and that Muslims are flocking there is obviously false, and does your argument no favors.
You are not being impertinant, just dishonest.
tgusa says
I bet he gets his news from OAN. Just kidding. Probably gets his news from mslsd.
If he votes does he vote for democrats or republicans? Tough thing to pinpoint these days.
Billy Chickens says
Of course he supports sex slavery under Sharia law. Look at him! How else is he going to get sex?
Fred van de Bunt says
Psychopaths have special reasoning, based upon their special rights and believes, why psychopaths have the right to rob, rape, enslave and kill.
For instance, they will tell you that God gave them the holy right to commit these acts.
Psychopaths, if caught exercising their criminal and anti-social rights, are punished, by nurturing and re-educating them in a confined environment. The victims of their criminal acts have to be taken care of too. It all is very costly, if one thinks of the emotional and monetary losses, that society suffers.
Preventing psychopaths from preaching and spreading their anti-social believes seems logical.
mortimer says
Agree, but MOHAMMED is the head PSYCHOPATH and he is the psychopath that pious Muslims must imitate or they will go to hell.
To end this psychopathy, you must end belief in Mohammed.
Fred van de Bunt says
Psychopaths have special reasoning, based upon their special rights and believes, why psychopaths have the right to rob, rape, enslave and kill.
For instance, they will tell you that God gave them the holy right to commit these acts.
Psychopaths, if caught exercising their criminal and anti-social rights, are punished, by nurturing and re-educating them in a confined environment. The victims of their criminal acts have to be taken care of too. It all is very costly, if one thinks of the emotional losses and monetary losses, that society suffers.
Preventing psychopaths from preaching and spreading their anti-social believes seems logical.
Alfredo says
This execrable douchebag Daniel Haqiqatjou is “culturally enriching” the West, according to the perveyours of the Marxist intersectionaliy scam.
This is the perfect formula the NewLeft is applying to undermine, subvert and sooner than even they dream of overturn the decadent democracies; ripe for the picking.
The unholy alliance between the NeoLeft and the Jihadis, birds of a feather, because both are authoritarian totalitarian fascist ideologies, will destroy the Western nations if the Patriotic freedom loving silent majority doesn’t shed its self-defeating innate shyness. These are not the times to be silent anymore, these times call for decisive action!
The internal enemies of the West are fully aware of the pent up fury and devastating power that if unleashed can wreak havoc on the carefully planned and increasingly rapid implementation of policies that if not arrested by the Patriots, will lead to the imposition of the utopian wet dream of all totalitarians, the dreadful and murderous police state.
This decay is being accelerated by the enabling useful idiots as Vladimir Ilich Lenin rightfully called them. This is the result of the rampant spread of the mind pathogen known as “Woke” ideology. The self-confidence zapping phenomenon that can rightfully be labeled the Woke Idiocy Syndrome.
The very Western nations that valiantly fought and defeated Fascism and Communism in more courageous and self-confident times are now faltering appallingly.
This is the result of decades of what Antonio Gramci called “The Long March Through The Institutions.”
notnolib says
Have any of the terrorists at the terror org CAIR come out to condemn this misunderstander of the ultimate ROP ™?
Lavéritétriomphera says
It seems he is never bankrupt of ideas on women https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nHoJWkpRNW4.
gravenimage says
Scum. But this is orthodox Islam.