Mrs. Thushara Ajith Kallayil, a female restaurateur who opened an exclusive non-halal restaurant in Kerala’s Ernakulam on January 15, 2021, suffered serious injuries in a brutal assault on Monday, October 25. It has been alleged that she was attacked by the halal mafia for serving non-halal meat and pork. Thushara has been receiving threats from Muslims ever since she opened her first restaurant, Nandhuzzz Kitchen, at the Palarivattom, and openly advertised that her restaurant served non-halal meat and pork, going against Islamic religious law and are catering to Hindus and Sikhs. The first of its kind, Thusara’s restaurant attracted huge crowds.
Prompted by the positive response of customers, Thushara decided to expand her business and booked commercial space at Kakkanad. She has also invested generously in her new project. Muslims in the state of Kerala were angered by seeing restaurants cropping up in the state that served meat that didn’t comply with their religious beliefs, as these restaurants were taking business away from the halal mafia. Thushara says that these economic jihadis have been trying to find ways to annihilate Hindu businesses in and around the thriving InfoPark area of Kakkanad.
Thushara reveals that she has been getting threats since last week; she was warned against advertising non-halal food on signboards, and against serving pork in the Kakkanad area. But she refused to give in to these Muslims, and went ahead with her project; the restauranteur was preparing to inaugurate the new dining space. However, the trouble intensified when she visited the site a few days ago.
She was confronted by jihadis who didn’t stop at just verbally threatening her, but physically assaulted her as well. They tore off her clothes, kicked her in the stomach, and hit her in the chest. The blows were so brutal that the female entrepreneur began to urinate blood. It was then that her staff, armed with with kitchen knives, rushed to rescue her. Thushara had to be hospitalized. There are prominent signs of the attack on her breast. She recounted the disturbing experience in a Facebook video.
A victim of Muslim mob violence, Thushara says she received no assistance from the local police. While they refused to lodge her complaint against the Muslims, the police in turn accused her of selling non-halal meat, and lodged a case against Thushara’s husband Ajith, who was not even present at the site when the violence broke out. Police were waiting outside the hospital room to arrest her, Thushara stated.
It is difficult to comprehend the action by the police and their response to the beating of Thushara. India is a secular and independent country in which citizens are allowed to engage in any legal business and practice their faith. Thushara’s business of selling non-halal meat was in accord with the faith she follows, and was not illegal. So why did the police ignore the Muslim mob and book Thushara?
To understand this, one needs to understand the dynamics of Kerala. This southern state of India has been ruled for years by a pro-Islamic Communist government. Under the rule of this Communist government, proponents of jihad and Sharia have thrived in the state. It has become a breeding ground for ISIS, which has over 3200 sleeper cells there. The Communist government cannot afford to anger the Muslims of the state, as they are a major voting bloc. The state police generally obey the state government and do what state officials demand, even at the risk of committing an unconstitutional act.
As for halal food, the South Asian market is at a stage where the halal economy is destroying all other businesses. Not only meat products, but even grains and spices are sold with halal certification. The growth of the halal economy translates to jobs for Muslims, which is a faith-based employment and discriminatory against non-Muslims. A halal certification attests that the product complies with Islamic law and is permissible to be used by a Muslim. Promoting halal products to non-Muslims is a passive imposition of Islam on them, given that it forces non-Muslims to purchase and consume a product approved under Islamic law. Consumers around the world must wake up to the seemingly harmless halal jihad that is tightening its tentacles around global economies.
Fitna says
Where’s the Indian gov’t? Are they not aware their country has been under Muslim invasion/occupation for 800 years or more? Why are they not stepping up to protect their fellow Hindus. Imagine 1 billion people afraid of 150 million, what a joke.
If enough brave Hindus stepped up, the Muslims would quickly realize how badly outnumbered they were and would probably leave the country.
What also infuriates me about Islam is that they think they have the right to impose their beliefs on non-Muslims. All other religions understand and accept that we have different beliefs and no one should be forcing others to follow their religious customs.
This is just another reason why Islam is particularly insidious because it compels Muslims to cause confrontation and warfare, it is unavoidable. Until the only choice remaining is to surrender or to fight back.
Raja says
Fitna,
Law is a local state subject and so the Federal govt can only formulate policies. With the concorrance of local govts they can do wanders but that is a distant pipe dream. Though the imposition of lawlessness is all too pervasive, because of what islam is, most don’t understand that islam is a war and subjugation machine thrust on infidels, the “rewards” of which are reaped by Islamist. e.g. Rape, murder, stealing, you name it, you have it.
The Indian prime minster, though somewhat principled hasn’t made much headway in showing islam its place (dungeon). He had said in the aftermath of Charlie Hebdo massacre that the terrorist and the religion needs to be separated. So awfully off the mark !. I don’t know when people will learn that islam is the problem.
Jean Elizabeth Terry says
It is insidious. This woman is very brave. God bless and protect her. Where Muslims are there is no fairness. It was an enormous mistake to allow those Somali’s into America. I think that was during Obama’s time. Now who knows how many terrorist type Muslims have been brought in from Afghanistan. I am not talking about those who helped us in Afghanistan. It is those planeloads of men who were brought in first.
Wellington says
Raised a pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic (N.B., Vatican II killed off the old Catholic Church and it’s never coming back), I could not eat meat on Fridays (which was OK by me because since boyhood I have loved seafood). But the Catholic Church enforced this provision ONLY on Catholics. Similarly, Judaic Law requires many things of Jews, including not eating pork, but Judaic Law, as with traditional Roman Catholic Canon Law with practicing Catholics, only required this of practicing Jews.
By contrast, Islamic Law, wherever it can, desires to force its provisions on EVERYONE, believer or non-believer alike. This represents yet one more fault about the abominable faith which is Islam, i.e., it is control-freakish and, just as with every other totalitarian ideology (N.B., among the major religions of the world, only Islam, as Bertrand Russell noted a century ago, is totalitarian in both structure and ideology), will not allow disagreement from its official positions, just as Marxism does not allow for capitalism within a socialistic framework (though one can be a socialist and practice it with others in a capitalistic framework—this is because capitalism is rooted in freedom and socialism is not) and Nazism did not allow for any defense of Jews or Slavic peoples.
What a monstrosity Islam truly is. One reason among so many others, another being abhorrence of real liberty, is that it is rooted in control-freakishness and there is no more annoying human being than a control-freak (like the boss you work for and can’t stand or some relative). Well, ditto for a belief system which has control-freakishness written all over it—like Islam.
Yuck—and now time for a beer and a BLT. Screw Mo and screw Islam.
James Lincoln says
Wellington says,
“Islamic Law, wherever it can, desires to force its provisions on EVERYONE, believer or non-believer alike.”
100% true.
I was in the grocery store the other day getting ready to buy a pork chop.
I had this feeling that in the near future, a muslim may approach me and say something like: “You can’t buy that because it is against my religion.”
I would reply: “But it’s not against my religion”.
And then he would say: “But my religion is the one that counts.”
Wellington says
All too possibly true, James, in the near future. My God, what a mistake admitting millions of Muslims into the West has been. Perhaps the greatest Western mistake ever in the entire history of Western Civilization, a civilization so very different (and superior) to Mohammedan civilization.
Utterly sick of Islam. Utterly sick of excuses for Islam.
mortimer says
Reply to Wellington and James Lincoln re ‘halal for all’.
This is not correct in principle, but it may work out that way in practice.
In fact, KAFIRS may eat what they like, but they must do it out of sight of Muslims. Otherwise, they are ‘TEMPTING’ Muslims to stray from strict halal and the non-Muslims kafirs will be held responsible for a Muslim straying, thus requiring them to be ‘punished’ … normatively with burning down the kafir’s establishment and then murdering the kafir with members of his family.
Islam is not benign towards the kafir. If the Muslim claim it’s the kafir’s fault, then it IS the kafir’s fault and nothing will then stop a mob sent by the local mullah.
James Lincoln says
mortimer,
Thanks for the added info.
gravenimage says
Wellington wrote:
Raised a pre-Vatican II Roman Catholic (N.B., Vatican II killed off the old Catholic Church and it’s never coming back), I could not eat meat on Fridays… But the Catholic Church enforced this provision ONLY on Catholics. Similarly, Judaic Law requires many things of Jews, including not eating pork, but Judaic Law, as with traditional Roman Catholic Canon Law with practicing Catholics, only required this of practicing Jews.
……………..
Also, this was never *enforced* with violence on Catholics or Jews. I went to heavily Catholic schools in my neighborhood in grade school and we typically had fishsticks or macaroni and cheese for lunch in the cafeteria on Fridays–but there were always kids, including Catholic kids, who would bring meat sandwiches on Fridays as bag lunches. I went to a heavily Jewish prep school in high school, and the Jewish kids sometimes twitted each other for either keeping kosher or not keeping kosher, depending on their predilections–but it never went beyond this.
Needless to say, the Catholic Church and Jewish Orthodox and Conservative Synagogues do not enforce this through violence, either, even on their own congregants, let alone on anyone else.
Raja says
Thanks Gravenimage, for the finer points about Catholics and Jews not imposing their views even amongst their own flock. islam is a different material all together. Freedom sapping for mankind…Satan’s own idea…
gravenimage says
Absolutely, Raja. I’m not saying that there’s never been a case of some Catholic or Jewish kid deciding to punch someone over food choices, but even in the rough neighborhood I grew up in I never heard of this. And no adult, let alone the Church or Synagogue, would ever consider violently enforcing this kind of thing.
Yes–Islam is entirely different.
Infidel says
Hindus and other non-muslims in India need to boycott halal as much as possible. Right now, there are a number of industries where one can only find muslim workers, due to Hindus trying to gravitate towards government jobs. First of all, Indian companies should introduce as much automation as possible into those low skill jobs that are usually dominated by muslims, so that muslims automatically get boycotted by non-muslims. Then they should look at bridging the skills gap that’s as prevelant in India as it is here, so that people like plumbers, auto mechanics and so on become available.
They should look at a ‘Non-halal’ or even ‘Haram’ certification so that people who wanna boycott muslim business and not fund a jihad against themselves should have that option. Have that covered for everything – be it food, apparel, industrial goods and so on. So that Hindus throughout India know what they’re buying, even if the halal alternative might be cheaper
Raja says
Infidel,
While you are busy formulating strategies to reign in the marauding Islamist, I would say that they are in for big trouble. If things continue this way they will be like the sick Ottoman empire in the medium and long term. e.g. Paki, Afghani and others that might be in the long queue. I have seen in Gujarat and Maharashtra where the hatred for Muslims is very deep. Their business circle is already pretty small and boycotting Muslims might be a very potent weapon against jihad, as they will be marginalized. Uneducated Muslims might already have difficulty in finding jobs and hence they put up petty shops, meat shops, including key making etc.
I for one avoid buying anything from Muslim stores or companies because I am very very conscious that a fraction of my money might (very high chances) go to Islamic charities, euphemism for terror funding. If we can show some sensibilities for others we are on the right course!
Infidel says
The anti-muslim sentiments in those 2 states is something that’s been there forever: I lived in Maharashtra in 1985-91, and in Gujarat in 1992. In the latter, people just refused to do any business w/ muslims – from buying from them to allowing them in their homes. Problem however is that most Hindus are not entrepreneurial like in Gujarat, so they look around for government jobs, but don’t fill up some of the major jobs out there, like plumbing, car repair and so on. Muslims end up filling them
I work in an apparel store, and typically, the countries where most of the clothes are made are Vietnam, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and in some rare cases, India or China. Whenever I shop from there, I make it a point to look at the label and avoid anything made in Bangladesh: I sometimes make an exception for Indonesia, but try avoiding that as well. Although w/ the news of Sukmawati Sukarnoputri and 30,000 of her followers converting to Hinduism in Bali seems to be good news, so far, and that more Indonesians may be looking at reverting (in the real sense) to Hinduism
Raja says
Infidel,
Thanks for the reply. Your concerns about the marauding tribe is also my concern, especially in the light of grave injustice they bring in and propagate across the globe.
Some bright spot in the news of Sukwawati leaving islam in the full pubic glare. There are so many leaving the foul cult and so many forced to leave, thanks to China. It is the evil Left, including the evil leaders of the West, who are never happy seeing the world in some sense of peace, their zeal in stirring up the pot everywhere is simply astounding.
On your analysis of Hindus and Muslims taking up odd vocations, I don’t know how things are going to pan out, since nature takes care of such things. What is paramount is there should be much restricted business with Islamists as they have “declared” war on you and me even before we could wake up from bed. This is plausible in Maharashtra and Gujarat but don’t know how this will be received in other parts of India or even globe. Hope this is done on war footing, as islam has gone full throttle in global jihad since late 1970. It is also very imperative that the global Petro-dollar glut is neutralized (at the soonest) as the top enabler of global jihad and a fodder for Islamic proselytizers.
PMK says
Raja and Infidel,
Avoiding trade with Islamists is easier said than done. Our national focus today is on China, but the globalists have made it all but impossible to avoid trade with Islamists and Islamic supporting countries. I used to spend more to buy clothing made in the USA, but even those American companies have shut down textile jobs in the USA and moved them offshore. Parts can be manufactured in multiple countries and the consumer good assembled somewhere else.
gravenimage says
I try to avoid buying goods made in Muslim countries, but it is not always easy. Sometimes you don’t have a choice–somethings are only made by one company–and if you buy online you often cannot tell ahead of time where the stuff was manufactured.
Infidel says
PMK and Graven
While it’s true that boycotting China is all but impossible, boycotting the ummah is a lot easier – not counting gasoline, which Biden has forced us to resume importing. Yeah, online shopping would make it tricky, but for things like apparel, I generally shop brick & mortar stores – and particularly w/ shoes (which are still China dominated). But clothes – since I work in one of them now, I get to notice the labels, and while I’ve seen stuff made in places like Egypt and Pakistan, in my store, Bangladesh and Indonesia are the main ones. But they’re by no means a majority of the designs or styles
Also, I made it a point to boycott Amazon given both their political leanings as well as their business practices. I’ve seen Tucker’s exposes on the suicides at that company, people having to urinate in jars and so on, and so although I have an account that I’ve had since 2007, I rarely use it unless something I need is unavailable anywhere else
I do take heart at a lot of things moving from China to Vietnam, and I do hope that trend continues as companies assess the risk of doing business w/ China. And hopefully, the situation at our ports forces companies to onshore more operations, automating wherever possible. Of course, it does require the bulk of the population to get off our fat @$$es and taking up these jobs, and employers taking the trouble to train people for them
sidney penny says
You can advertise Hahal but not Non Hahal?
and remember a halal certification that attests that the product complies with Islamic law is not free and has to be paid for by the person seeking the certification and the cost of the certification is added to the product and ultimately passed on to the consumer. ( which includes infidel consumers)
gravenimage says
India: Muslims attack Kerala woman who opened restaurant serving pork and other non-halal meat
………….
Just horrifying. Note that no Jewish person or vegetarian or anyone else who doesn’t eat pork would do anything like this.
And this is not Pakistan–it is *India*. And not even some part of India bordering Pakistan or Bangladesh, but Kerala in the very south of the country. It is just slightly over a quarter Muslim.
But that’s enough for this savagery. Are Indian authorities going to do anything to protect this poor woman?
Infidel says
Law & order is a state issue, and this Indian government has shown a great reluctance to interfere in individual states if law & order breaks down. It was the case in Bengal, Delhi and now this. So no point expecting anything. As for the state government, as Ashlyn noted, it’s currently run by communists (and if it weren’t, it would be run by Congress). So no hope of any justice for this lady
gravenimage says
I am *so sorry to hear this*, Infidel. Suicidal insanity.
rp says
UK is same ,today if Indian food places do not have halal they will run you out of business. They generate million out of halal certification and money is used purely to promote Islam. Halal restaurants feed over 90% of non Muslims and English are happy to eat ,then they complain why more mosques are built ?? It the money they are happy to pay by eating halal. When you make any statement to that effect, you are called racist???
gravenimage says
And even worse, some of this money goes straight to funding violent Jihad.