“The guest then said ‘I am paying to be here, so I have the right to complain’ to which the employee said – ‘No, you don’t.'”
That’s right. In shattered, staggering, dhimmi Britain today, you have no right to complain about what the political elites are doing to the country. If you do, you’ll be publicly humiliated as a “racist” and probably worse.
“Stunned holidaymakers say they have been branded racists by staff after complaining about Afghan child refugees ‘running riot’ at Scarborough’s historic Grand Hotel,” by Katie Feehan, MailOnline, October 8, 2021:
Holidaymakers were branded ‘racists’ when they complained to staff about the children of Afghan refugees ‘running riot’ at Scarborough’s Grand Hotel.
Coach-loads of migrant families fleeing the Taliban have been arriving at the iconic venue which was evacuated earlier this week in a bomb scare believed to be linked to their arrival.
Hotel guests say they have every sympathy with the 200 refugees staying there until they find permanent homes – but their children have disrupted their stay and caused havoc.
According to the complaints, unruly Afghan children are running in and out other people’s rooms, screaming and shouting and setting off fire extinguishers,
The unsupervised youngsters were also said to be riding scooters all over the hotel, pressing all the buttons on lifts, causing damage, and ‘intimidating’ guests.
Visitors who complained to hotel workers about the disruption or requested an early checkout say they were stunned to be accused of racism by the staff.
Two women from Billingham who requested a cancellation of their £338 stay from booking agent National Holidays say they were warned they would not get a penny back.
One said: ‘Our concern is about safety and leaving things in our room, because of what we read about theft and kids running wild.
‘By no means are we racist – I’ve worked with refugees, and it is not their fault.
‘I totally agree they should have got out the country, but my concern is the company didn’t inform us what the Grand Hotel was doing.’
TripAdvisor for the Grand Hotel, a Grade II listed building which was once the largest hotel in Europe, has been deluged with complaints about alleged conditions at the hotel and the behaviour of the children.
One woman wrote that after queuing for an hour to check in she and her partner went to their room and were shocked by what they found.
She said: ‘On the way I realised there were a lot of people just stood about while hundreds (or seemed like) of children raced around screaming and shouting.
‘After plenty of “excuse me” etc we found the room. After squeezing past folk in we went.
‘P**s up the walls and no quilt on the bed and these said children running in and out of the room!
‘We decided we didn’t want to stay there and headed back downstairs (same carry on as going up!).
‘I overheard people talking angrily about the kids and people just stood about, they were refugees and more buses were just parking up.
‘I didn’t have a problem with this. I just felt we should have been made aware that the hotel would be this “hectic” then we could decide if the noise would be a problem for us.
‘I spoke to the man on the desk and asked for a refund and explained why. He then started shouting at me calling me a racist!
‘I am no racist – I booked the break when the school holidays had ended so it would be quieter!
‘He flatly refused me a refund so we left. We went on to pay £150 to get a room for 1 night then left and went home a day early as we were both worn out.
‘As I was at the desk getting insulted at least three others were demanding a refund for the same reasons.’
Another disgusted guest wrote: ‘The place is full of uncontrolled refugee children, who are absolutely out of control and nobody is disciplining them.’
Another review read: ‘People called racist by the receptionists if they complain. I saw a man getting in a lift after a queue of 30 people.
‘He said to an employee – Why are all these people staying here to which the man who works at the hotel said to him – You are a racist you should not complain.
‘The guest then said “I am paying to be here, so I have the right to complain” to which the employee said – “No, you don’t”.’…
Yogi says
There you go , All over Europe Muslim have more rights then own people!!, this beautiful hotel soon will be shit hole thanks to this “ refugees “ 7th. century savages, which they don’t know what toilet is , that’s what Europe became Islamic shit hole , heartbreaking..
mortimer says
If you are a paying patron of a hotel, and you get crummy service and a crummy environment and pint-sized terrorists running everywhere, you now have no right to complain.
Well, we still have a right to vote with our feet.
The employee who told the guest he had no right to complain should immediately be fired for insulting the guest.
Bob C says
and of course, the article doesn’t give the nationalities of the hotel “worker staff”
JimJFox says
And nobody thought to call the manager? Dhimmwits. Unbelievable!
bill says
Mortimer:
william carr
15 minutes ago
I happen to know something about this hotel as I am a Yorkshire man and keep in touch via the Yorkshire Post. There have been many complaints about the hotel in recent months and before the refugees were billeted there. The once stately hotel has been described as dilapidated and dirty, not fit for purpose. Bird droppings and even rats! Many have expressed disgust after visiting there.
As for the ‘racist’ accusations if I was staying in a hotel and kids were running around out of parental control I would be complaining whatever their origins. Being a refugee does not excuse bad behaviour. In fact being a (paid) guest in a country requires the best behaviour. Being called a racist is just a way of shutting people up. If the staff were any good they would impose control themselves as it is their job to make all guests comfortable.
The reputation of this hotel was already bad even earlier, according to news reports. Oh, and by the way I am sure people in the government were aware of the conditions at Scarborough when they sent the refugees there.
Furthermore these people are not ignorant peasants, as they have worked with the coalition forces they will have encountered Western type toilets before and during their flights to UK and other countries, So there is no excuse for them not to know how to use them.
gravenimage says
Thanks for that view on the ground, Bill.
As for these Afghans having worked with westerners before, though, maybe not–it turns out that a lot of supposed translators don’t even speak any English, so who knows *who* these invading Muslims really are.
Doomer says
The hotel staff must be Leftist,for them Muslims and Islam are wonderful.Only if a Muslim were to tell them that sex-slaves,slavery, jizya,tribute to Muslims by non-Muslims,
wife-beating, is approved by the Quran, only then, can they be shocked,really shocked,redpilled.
For some.That is why Daniel Haqiqatjou proclaiming all that in the debate “Sharia or Human Rights?”, is the most effective way to redpill some Leftists.
If an ex-Muslim says it,the hotel staff would call him anti-Muslim racist, uncle Tom,traitor to his people, one who has an inferiority complex, brown on the outside,white inside.
Daniel,as others have pointed out,could have easily stated the Muslim doctrine of Public Utility,Common Good or MASLAHAH.
It is very old,the concept was first clearly articulated by al-Ghazali (d. 1111), the most important theologian in Islamic history, who argued that maslaha
was Allah’s general purpose in revealing the divine law, and that its specific aims was preservation of five essentials of human well-being: religion, life, intellect, offspring, and property.
With it Muslim clerics could say,that due to circumstances, parts of the Quran were to be prohibited. It was used in the 1850s,in the Ottoman empire.
In 1840 the British ambassador to the Ottomans asked that they forbid slavery,they said no. Then came the Crimean war (1853-1856) ,where the French,English and Ottomans fought Russia, with 900,000 killed.
The British forced the Ottomans:
1.To abolish the slave trade in the Black sea in 1853.
2.To abolish the slave trade with Africa and the jjizya,tribute paid by Christians and Jews,in 1856. Then, Christians were about 50% of the population. Romania,Bulgaria, Macedonia,Montenegro, were still part of the empire.
Jizya is in the Quran. I repeat, tribute by non-Muslims. To abolish it, the Ottomans use Maslahah. Daniel could have used it as an argument in favor of Sharia law using Maslahah to
forbid wife-beating, marrying children, killing apostates and homos.But he didn’t. That detail has led some to think he did it to shock the Leftists ,because if an ex-Muslim like Harris Sultan,atheist,Pakistani or ex-Muslim Apostate Prophet,atheist,Turk, or
ex-Muslim Navid Armin,atheist,Iranian,who has debated Daniel, would have said it, the Leftists, like the hotel staff, would have ignored them as anti-Muslim haters.
The hotel staff would do well to see this Daniel video,”Yes, Islamic Slavery Is Morally Justified: Analysis of Haqiqatjou vs Sultan Debate”
https://youtu.be/GFUY0XNIVeo
Doomer says
I want to add more about the Daniel Haqiqatjou vs Harris Sultan debate “Sharia or Human Rights?”. Others have pointed out that Daniel could have, in his favor, used a certain argument against Harris, but didn’t.
Daniel has studied philosophy in Havard,I think he has a masters in it.He could have told Harris that as an atheist, his defense of human rights was
defending a myth,a fiction. Everybody who has studied political philosophy knows that only Christians can claim human rights really exist,as OBJECTIVE truth. It is all based on the belief all men and women are born equal,
because all are born in the image of God. Being born equal, and because the Golden Rule or Law,as it is called in the New Testament, which is the ethical essence of Christianity,
and due to the concept of natural law, all being born equal means all are born with 3 natural rights called right to life,liberty and property.
It was stated by the School of Salamanca,Catholic movement, in Spain in the 16th century and later by John Locke,another Christian, and the founder of Liberalism,the Age of Enlightenment. Locke also wrote “The Reasonableness of Christianity”.
Daniel could have told Harris,if you don’t believe me, read,for example,”God, Locke, and Equality: Christian Foundations in Locke’s Political Thought”(2002) by Jeremy Waldron.
Harris would have said that Daniel,by defending Sharia,was doing the very same thing, defending a myth, Islam is false.
True,but Daniel would have said to Harris,”For you it is a myth,but not for me. But you Harris ,you are an atheist,not a Christian, you don’t really believe all are in the image of God, and so don’t really believe
human rights as a reality, an OBJECTIVE truth.”
Daniel would have told him that human rights is based on the idea of natural law,which as we understand it, essentially comes from another Christian,Thomas Aquinas, most important philosopher of the Middle Ages.
Aquinas said there is revealed law,divine law,got from the Bible,and law that can be discovered via reason only……natural law.
That Paul the apostle referred to it in Romans 2:14-15, in such a way that is called by us the natural law,the law of the heart,”Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law,
do BY NATURE things required by the law, they are a law for themselves, even though they do not have the law.
They show that the requirements of the law are written on their HEARTS”
Aquinas was a great admirer of Aristotle.Aristotle said men are not born equal, some are born to be free,
some are born to be slaves. Aquinas disagreed, he condemned slavery as evil.
Thomas Aquinas said that slavery was in opposition to natural law.
Aquinas said that he could find no justification for slavery. Following Aquinas, the medieval Catholic Church held that holding slaves was a sin.
Harris could have said as a counterargument “Ok,Daniel, so slavery can be condemned,according to Aquinas,
by natural law, law obtained via reason only, not divine revelation, so Sharia’s acceptance of slavery and sex-slaves,
part of Allah’s divine law in the Quran,
can be rejected using reason alone.”
Daniel would have said,” You are wrong Harris since in Islam the concept of natural law, which is human law, does
NOT exist.”
Daniel could have said,”Harris, read this by the University of Cambridge,” Natural Law and Natural Rights in Islamic Law”(2015),
so I as a Muslim, am in no obligation to accept natural law.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-law-and-religion/article/abs/natural-law-and-natural-rights-in-islamic-law/26A89F299CB8F0817096CA3F5FBD482B
It says,”
To even begin suggesting that a natural law tradition exists in Islamic law, one has to overcome the hurdles set by those who avowedly deny that such a tradition exists.
Respected Islamicists such as Patricia Crone and the late George Makdisi have stated in
no uncertain terms that there is no natural law tradition in Islam.”
I think Daniel,who certainly knew all of that, did not say it on purpose,to redpill Leftists about the reality of Islam. That is why some think he could be a secret ex-Muslim.
St. Croix says
Thank you for this detailed exposition of your understanding re: Natural Law, slavery in Islam and historicity of the Christian church against slavery. I will check out the links. Many of my friends who lean towards Leftism are quite ignorant about the reality of Islam, and I was as well, until the appearance of ISIS on the scene in the last decade. THEN I started to learn, fast.
Because they know nice Muslims, they cut Islam slack, and believe it is being twisted for political ends, as other belief systems are, including Christianity. Well I know people twist belief systems to their agendas. Happens all the time. Islam however, is founded on the twisted roots that those who have looked into see very plainly. It’s the big bad wolf disguised as Granny. Just look at the tail hanging below the petticoat, Leftists! Thanks for the resources that can help my well-meaning but deluded friends.
Listening to some of the stories of Yazidis women and girls who were enslaved and escaped, really really hit through my heart, and I cannot understand anyone who has half a brain cutting any slack for Islam whatsoever. What they did to those people, and many many other non-Muslms, speaks volumes, and is every bit, EVERY BIT, justified, endorsed, encouraged and recommended in the Islamic texts. Let no fool say “that’s not Islam!” Oh, it is.
Doomer says
Thank you,though I know it was long what I wrote. Regarding Aquinas,according to wikipedia, and we know how hostile it is to Christianity, even they say,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Church_and_slavery
“Saint Thomas Aquinas taught that, although the subjection of one person to another (servitus) could not be derived from the natural law,
it could be appropriate based on an individual’s actions”
That today is, lifetime prison for a violent crime,but having to work also.
The wikipedia article also says,”Aquinas did not believe slavery was justified by natural law,
since he thought that all men are equal by nature”
Aquinas agreed a person who was a criminal,I don’t know,I guess a murderer,rapist, mafia boss,
a criminal could be punished lasting till he died. But instead of only being in prison, he would have to work to help society.
Wikipedia says,”Jarrett & Herbert concur with historian Paul Weithman,
explaining that Aquinas held that slavery could not be arrived at as a process of Natural Law.
It could, thus, only be arrived at as a consequence of man’s action.
Thus slavery could not be the natural state of man, but could be imposed as a legal or political consequence for actions.”
And then,”Aquinas’ contemporary, the Franciscan Saint Bonaventura argued on ethical grounds
that slavery was “infamous” and “perverting virtue”, but accepted its legality.”
Bonaventura was the chief leader and head of the Franciscan order.He had a direct connection with the founder, Francis of Assisi,who died in 1226. Bonaventura was born in 1221, also
wrote a life of Francis of Assisi, and reports that he was saved from death by the personal prayers of Francis of Assisi.
And in the 4th century there was an important church leader called Gregory of Nyssa,Nazianzus, who also condemned slavery,in “Gregory of Nyssa – A Lone Voice Against Slavery”
https://www.reformation21.org/blog/gregory-of-nyssa-a-lone-voice-against-slavery
Another voice against slavery was French philosopher Jean Bodin, this article by Britannica says,
https://www.britannica.com/topic/slavery-sociology/Ways-of-ending-slavery
“Jean Bodin (1530–96), the French founder of antislavery thought, for example,
condemned the institution as immoral and counterproductive
and advocated that no group of men should be excluded from the body politic. “
gravenimage says
Doomer wrote:
Daniel has studied philosophy in Havard,I think he has a masters in it.He could have told Harris that as an atheist, his defense of human rights was
defending a myth,a fiction. Everybody who has studied political philosophy knows that only Christians can claim human rights really exist,as OBJECTIVE truth. It is all based on the belief all men and women are born equal,
because all are born in the image of God…
………..
Doomer, you seem to be obsessed by the idea that Agnostics and Atheists have no right to believe in and defend human rights, even though clearly many of them do, including here on this site.
Then, you also appear to beleive that pious Muslims preaching the horrors of Jihad and Shari’ah like Daniel Haqiqatjou–wife beating, raping children, murdering Jews and gay people–are all secret ex-Muslims.
You never once say why an ex-Muslim would preach this Islamic savagery–but you seem to greatly admire him nonetheless. *Very* odd stuff.
The fact is that pious Muslims actually believe in this barbarism.
Grace says
Dear America,
Coming to a hotel near you.
There are the willfully blind, the woefully ignorant and timid victims who won’t stand against it. Where is the tipping point? Seems it doesn’t exist.
In a world gone mad the jester is king.
Check Burry says
Hopefully this hotel will once rid of infection, go down the tubes. NORMAL guests should have been told of the other “untrained occupants, and refunded. The conservative party have a new conference phrase, Levelling up, seems it doesnt apply to this old victorian doss house, which it will be soon.
Seems to me the staff where racist to the UK guests.
somehistory says
Rule number 1; the Customer is always right, even when the customer is wrong.
Rule 2: if the customer is wrong, refer to rule number one.
This applied before mozlums invaded every spot on earth…with the help, support, invitation and encouragement from the group of people who have all agreed to turn the entire earth into a “new world order” which is, at this time, pure, evil filth due to islam., and other demonically inspired goings-on.
Those making the invitations believe…big mistake…that when the rest of us are all converted, cowed, or dead, they can take over full control and rid themselves of these mozlum vermin.
mortimer says
A refund is in order for these people who had not expected to be terrorized or treated rudely.
somehistory says
Go away.
Infidel says
Long term, they’ll go out of business. Mohammedans won’t visit their hotels and pay them (the refugees in that hotel were paid for by the government), and the non-muslim British visitors won’t go there b’cos they won’t want to be accosted by rapefugees, no matter how islamophilic they are. Good luck to the Grand Hotel staying in business
somehistory says
One can wonder whether the hotel staff were ordered to abuse the paying guests. In either case, word will spread and no one with any sense will book rooms there.
Infidel says
If the hotel staff was constituted of woke school graduates, they may have done it on their own accord. Just like here we have store employees sometimes refuse to service customers b’cos they’re known to be on the right. Like a Burger King employee who tossed a drink over a customer wearing a MAGA hat
somehistory says
That’s certainly possible. They may have also just gotten tired of saying “sorry” for the things over which they had no control.
Customer Service reps are told when confronting an unhappy customer/client, to “own the problem.” That gets mighty tiring over time, and esp would that be so in a case like this.
gravenimage says
Yes–appalling in any case. I can’t imagine any guests wanting to stay in a hotel overrun by barbaric Muslim invaders.
Michael Casmer says
When you say the hotels are being paid by the government don’t you mean the taxpayer?
gravenimage says
Yes–British taxpayers are having to pay for this invasion.
Check Burry says
Yes and gov spent £6,500 on pitzas for them, whilst many English folk have to use food banks.
Infidel says
Michael, Yeah. The reason I said government is that the taxpayers are not asked whether they approve of such spending
somehistory says
And….there is more to the story:
https://www.westernjournal.com/afghan-refugees-beg-sent-home-rescue-cant-take-anymore/?utm_source=
The “refugees” don’t like having to stay in hotels and they are begging to go back to taliban territory.
gravenimage says
Thanks for that link, Somehistory. Yes, this is absurd.
There were Jewish refugees after WWII who were given temporary asylum in Sweden after being rescued from the death camps or from in hiding. Authorities hoped they would be processed in a few months, but were still living in tents come wintertime. They did not complain, and none of them had a hankering to return to Auschwitz.
If you are really in fear of your life you don’t have a problem with spending a few weeks in a posh hotel. This is utterly ludicrous.
Hank says
All this needless chaos and strife can all be traced back to that amateurish, chaotic, bungled pull-out from Afghanistan which only assisted the Islamic Migration Jihad. End result: more Islamization and destabilization of non-Islamic host nations.
mortimer says
The bungled, precipitous and ill-advised pull-out was totally stupid and defied the expert opinion of the generals who should have been heard.
The bungled debacle of Afghanistan is the worst military debacle in US history. Biden is responsible. He is chronically incompetent and morally, mentally and physically unfit for that high office.
Unfortunately, the American system has no way to force such a bumbling idiot out of office even after arming one of America’s worst enemies.
Tony Naim says
Dhimmitude may be a scorned poor choice in the west.
It is a crushing harsh reality imposed by sharia in the East.
Wellington says
If only all the West had, as was the case for some 1350 years, continued to look upon ALL Muslims as pariahs. But the 1960’s happened and this was the beginning of the West going into stupid mode. We are now living with the results of this most destructive of decades in all of Western history. Pope Francis represents one such “result.” So does the forever foolish Joe Biden. Macron another. BoJo too. And let’s not forget that insufferable fool to the north of the US who now leads Canada, Trudeau by name, and even worse than his father.
What do they all have in common? I would argue the 1960’s. Yes, the third and fifth centuries AD were more destructive CENTURIES to the West, but the 1960’s continues to remain the single most destructive DECADE to the West. And by the 20th century you could condense a century of wrong into a mere decade of wrong due to modern communications, a lazy assumption of Western affluence and freedom as a given, etc.
Hence my excoriation of the 1960’s and how it functions as the root cause in decade form of all that the West is now suffering today for no good reason. I despise the 1960’s and I take on all comers who would wish to prove me wrong here. Give it a shot.
Ecosse1314 says
In 99% you are right. The music though wasnt bad even though written and played mostly by left wing idiots.
James Lincoln says
Ecosse1314,
Agree.
Culturally, the so-called “60s” – in my humble opinion – really began with the assassination of Pres. Kennedy. Before that, the early 1960s had a postwar 50s type culture. And the 1960s culture did bleed over into the early 1970s.
A lot of the popular music in the 60s was phenomenal. And yes, performed by people who would now be considered to be Leftists.
I mean, David Crosby (CSNY) voted for Bernie Sanders…
Ecosse1314 says
My personal favourite was that so- called “working class hero” john lennon. Who in fact was brought up middle-class and died a multi-millionaire.
Also agree that the assasination of JFK did lead into the 1960s proper as we now know it.
Wellington says
To you, James, and to Ecosse1314:
I agree about much of the music and the 1960’s also got a couple of other things right like the NASA space program and civil rights (which since then has gone way too far in the other direction), but overall the 1960’s were a disaster.
Incorrigibly yours,
Wellington
Ecosse1314 says
Totally agree but still like the music not the societal disruption or Vatican 11
gravenimage says
Great exchange.
gravenimage says
UK: Hotel guests called ‘racists’ by staff after complaining about Afghan refugees ‘running riot’ in hotel
………………
Just sickening–and ultimately suicide for a business, too, although they don’t seem to care. Are these staff members dhimmi tools or are they Muslim? Disgusting in either case.
Of course these Muslim invaders don’t care about acting decently–after all, they regard Infidels as nothing more than slaves.
“Further 150 Afghan refugees to be housed in Scarborough after 92 were given accommodation in hotels”
https://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/further-150-afghan-refugees-to-be-housed-in-scarborough-after-92-were-given-accommodation-in-hotels-3370123
somehistory says
Since hotels where I have stayed and the two where I worked, the doors are locked until someone opens the lock with a key card. I’m wondering how the kids were going in and out of the rooms…they must have had help getting in.
gravenimage says
Yes, Somehistory, I worked in several hotels myself, and experienced the same. I don’t know if the kids pushed their way in after the guests opened the door to the room or if they were already running around the room. Unacceptable either way.
somehistory says
The one woman said that there was ….on the walls, which leads to the idea that they had already been in the room before the women entered.
In any case, it is totally unacceptable, but since the customers are being denied their right to complain, not much will be done about it.
gravenimage says
True, Somehistory–this implies that the Muslims had been running around in people’s rooms beforehand vandalizing them. Just grotesque. That these “refugees” are acting like this in their hosts’ “home” shows what kind of “citizens” they are going to make. Poor England…
Check Burry says
Complain to the hotel honcho not the monkey.
These stories if given enough exposure, will be a great member boosting tool for the “alternative parties”
VICTOR COWEN says
Surprise surprise ….what could possibly go wrong with bringing these people into our civilisation?
Goodbye ‘Grand Hotel’ Scarborough.
Rooster says
Typical Muslim philosophy….they are always right and infidels are always wrong. Europe is dying by being smothered with Muslim refugees. The only cure to save yourself from Muslim tyranny is to deny entry to all Muslims. Then when they insist entry by waging WAR defending your sovereignty is necessary even to the death! Where’s Charles Martel when he’s needed?
Giacomo Latta says
Muslims are never the most appreciative of guests at the best of times but housing them even for a few days at accommodation such as this raises their expectations. When a later move to something more modest is arranged then they are once again victims of ”Islamophobia.” I don’t know if Scarborough has any slums but, if so, why not arrange for some current slum dwellers use the hotel and place the newcomers in the slum housing? If anyone is a supposed victim of the British way of life then it is the indigenous, not those who have chosen not to stay in Afghanistan and fight for a better way of life then what Islam has to offer.
James Lincoln says
So, according to the feature article:
“UK: Hotel guests called ‘racists’ by staff after complaining about Afghan refugees”
The term “racist” it’s so overused that it is absolutely lost its edge – which is beyond regrettable. It is now used primarily to shut down any criticism of “Left-think”.
Sound familiar?
Recall islamophobia.
Recommendation: do not be intimidated by the terms racist and islamophobe.
Never!
somehistory says
I agree. If someone labels one a racist or a phobe…let it run off as water on a duck or a rock in a stream.
As you say, it is meant to stifle speech. We must not allow that.
James Lincoln says
somehistory,
Thank you for your reply and best wishes.
somehistory says
:0 and the best of wishes for you, J.L.
somehistory says
That was meant to be a smile 🙂
OLD GUY says
America is heading for the same problems that the UK and Europe has been going through with the muslim migration invasion of their society. From the looks of it there must be tons of cash flowing into off shore bank accounts of political leaders who are selling US out to the Middle East overlords. Other wise it makes no sense at all to invite the enemy into your country.
Del says
I don’t get a refund??
I might be wrong, but I think I smell smoke. Should a guest activate the fire alarm? If I got a refund, I wouldn’t be a guest, would I? How long would it take for everyone to get out?
somehistory says
mozlums are known for committing arson as a means of terrorism. It could happen and at that very hotel….from where many may wish to leave. If it burned down, they would be allowed to go.
gravenimage says
More stupidity:
“TripAdvisor suspends reviews on The Grand Hotel in Scarborough after influx of ‘racist’ posts”
Some guests have claimed that ‘unruly’ refugee children have been ruining their stay
https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/news/local-news/tripadvisor-suspends-reviews-grand-hotel-21808238
somehistory says
I had wondered if those services…hotels.com or tripadvisor, etc. would have a reaction and what it would be. The Truth is just flat-out unacceptable today.
gravenimage says
Grimly true, Somehistory. It looks as though this hotel had problems before this–poor cleanliness, hours’ long check-in lines, sub-par food–but it is all many times worse with the Afghan invasion there.