At the same time that Purpose for Life doxxed the British teacher, the charity also stated “that the teacher had committed an act of ‘terrorism’ by ‘insulting Islam.’“ The Islamic charity fully intended to bring harm to the teacher by doxxing him. It served as a call for all jihad-minded Muslims to attack him, in similar fashion to French teacher Samuel Paty, who was beheaded in France for showing a Muhammad cartoon to his class. Even after his death, all over the Muslim world there were protests over Paty blaspheming Islam. High-profile leaders, such as the Grand Mufti of Al Azhar, Ahmed al-Tayeb, made excuses by stating that the man who beheaded Paty didn’t speak for Islam, but warned against “insulting religions.” Al-Tayeb’s statement translated to: “Islam is a religion of peace, but if you get murdered insulting the religion, then it is your own fault.” Sheikh Ali Al-Yousuf of the International Union of Muslim Scholars praised the Muslim migrant teen who beheaded Paty, stating that the teen “only took it upon himself to carry out the death penalty for insulting the Prophet Muhammad.”
This is the kind of threat under which the Batley Grammar School teacher now lives. Add in the worry he has for his loved ones. Gone are the days when kaffirs were free under Western laws.
Back in April, the Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, surprisingly came out in support of the teacher in the Muhammad cartoon controversy, saying: “In this country, we have to hold on to freedom of speech.” Unfortunately, dangerous Muslim groups such as Purpose for Life, which incite violence, discord and division, will continue to exist in peace in Britain while causing terror for everyone who dares to criticize Islam and Muhammad. Such groups will continue to escalate in their self-appointed function as hyper-watchdogs for the cause of Islam, and to propagate the “Islamophobia” subterfuge, all while victimizing and terrorizing kaffirs.
When your Lord revealed to the angels: I am with you, therefore make firm those who believe. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them. (Quran 8:12)
“Islamic Charity ‘Inflamed Tensions’ by Doxxing Mohammed Cartoon Teacher, Watchdog Rules,” by Kurt Zindulka, Breitbart, October 3, 2021:
The Charity Commission has accused an Islamic charity which doxxed a British teacher who showed his class a caricature of the Muslim prophet Mohammed of inflaming tensions and risking the safety of the teacher.
In March, a teacher at the Batley Grammar School in the North of England was forced into hiding after the local Islamic charity Purpose for Life shared his identity online, saying at the time that the teacher had committed an act of “terrorism” by “insulting Islam“ by showing his class a caricature of Mohammed from the satirical French magazine Charlie Hebdo during a lesson on blasphemy.
Following complaints lodged by free speech campaigners, the Charity Commission launched an investigation into the Islamic charity. After months of deliberation, the watchdog issued a formal warning on Friday to Purpose for Life under section 75A of the 2011 Charities Act, The Telegraph reported.
The commission found by releasing the name of the teacher, the Islamic charity failed to account for the “foreseeable risk to the person’s safety” and that the message “was written in such a way as to be likely to inflame existing tensions within the local community”.
The notice said that the regulator “considers that a breach of trust and/or duty and/or misconduct and/or mismanagement has been committed in connection with the charity”. The warning will be attached to the charity’s register entry for at least one year.
The Charity Commission threatened the Islamic charity with “further regulator action” if it failed to make reforms to its operation, including implementing “effective written oversight and/or control mechanisms for the charity’s social media channels”, and for the leaders of the charity to familiarise themselves with data protection law.
The general secretary of the Free Speech Union, Toby Young — who launched the initial complaint against Purpose for Life — welcomed the ruling from the watchdog.
Mr Young said: “I welcome the action the Charity Commission has taken: naming the teacher at Batley Grammar School on Twitter was an irresponsible thing to do, given that a French teacher embroiled in a similar row had been beheaded by an Islamist terrorist the year before.
“Teachers should be free to discuss controversial topics without having to worry that they will be doxxed by activists who take a particular aide in those controversies and their lives put in danger.”
The school’s trustees had launched an independent investigation into the teacher, who had been suspended from his post, eventually clearing him of any wrongdoing. Though the investigation found that the teacher “genuinely believed that using the image had an educational purpose and benefit” and therefore did nothing wrong, it is unlikely that he will be able to return to his job, as he and his young family remain in hiding over safety concerns.
The school had also said it would not be using the image of the Islamic prophet again….
SAFI says
Outlaw islamic “charities” now!
Check Burry says
Purpose for LIFE seems like a contradiction, I suggest a change in one title word, the word starts with a D.
Im sure the Charity commis warning has them shaking in their sandles.
mortimer says
Don’t you know??? Islamic so-called charities are set up to pay for jihad. One of the destinations of all Islamic charity money is to pay for the expenses and weapons of JIHADISTS according to Sharia law.
The most authoritative source for such information is “The Reliance of the Traveler, A Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law.” A whole section of RoT is devoted to the rules of zakat (charity money), including “THE EIGHT CATEGORIES OF RECIPIENTS.” In section h8.17, one category is labeled:
“THOSE FIGHTING FOR ALLAH”
“The seventh category (of recipients of zakat) is those fighting for Allah, meaning people engaged in Islamic military operations for whom no salary has been allotted in the army roster (O: but who are volunteers for jihad without remuneration). They are given enough to suffice them for the operation, even if affluent; of weapons, mounts, clothing, and expenses (O: for the duration of the journey, round trip, and the time they spend there, even if prolonged. Though nothing has been mentioned here of the expense involved in supporting such people’s families during this period, it seems clear that they should also be given it).”
SAFI says
Spot on. That’s exactly why I say banning these “charities” is completely justified. I’ve been around long enough to conclude that their main purpose for existing is to provide logistical and moral support to jihadi ideology with a parallel function as pressure groups aiming to silence any resistance to islamic totalitarianism. Case in point the story above.
gravenimage says
Yes–one of the main purposes of “Zakat”–often mistranslated as “charity”, is funding violent Jihad.
Check Burry says
Purpose for LIFE seems like a contradiction, I suggest a change in one title word, the word starts with a D.
Im sure the Charity commis warning has them shaking in their sandles.
mortimer says
The Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby is well-informed about the jihad doctrine. Those Anglican clergy who have served as military chaplains are very well-informed about jihadism. The same goes for military chaplains of other denominations as well.
Meanwhile, it is British politicians who have not been doing their job of protecting the freedom of expression of their fellow citizens because they are afraid of losing Muslim voters, many of whom want MORE censorship and anti-blasphemy laws. The Red-Green Axis of the Marxist Labour Party defends and shields Islam from any valid criticism.
We see from Muslim sensitivity about Mohammed that Mohammed is the real god of Islam, because blasphemies against Allah or the Koran never seem to be a concern meriting beheading.
For the first centuries of Islam there was no concern about depicting Mohammed in illustrations. That sensitivity to depicting Mohammed only developed in the 3rd and 4rth centuries of Islam.
Because Labour protects Islamic terrorism from criticism, Islam is the only religion in UK which may not be openly discussed. Even the Church of England does not get shielded from criticism.
Christopher Watson says
We allow these people into our country, we give them money, they seem incapable of work, we give them free education, we give them good free health care and we don’t even ask for gratitude. They have their mosques where they abuse us and our leaders and they make plans to kill us. And our leaders invite them in and shower them with gifts. It is clear, abundantly clear, that in the next 40 years, and possibly less, we will lose our country. It will start slowly at first: prayers at the beginning of council meetings will be to allah, women’s clothing will begin to be more ‘modest’, towns will acquire moslem ‘safety patrols’. The stabbings are not ‘isolated’ acts of violence; they are one of many, all linked: one in Britain, then one Germany, then one in France. It’s a campaign to make us fear them, and it’s working. Everything we do is a threat to allah. If showing a drawing of allah didn’t work they would say our breathing is an offence.
Raja says
Christopher Watson,
You have summed up the strategies of islam pretty well. In full agreement with you.
OLD GUY says
100% dead on. Islam uses and abuses anyone that doesn’t follow Allah. The Muslim/Islamic migration invasion grows at a faster and faster pace as we open our borders to this invading enemy.
Keith O says
Inciting violence against a person is against the law in the UK, but it would seem that this law only applies to any infidel who insults Islam.
Quite often this only takes for the infidel to be breathing or to not get down on bended knee to a mudslime for this to be called a crime by the sharia compliant British government and the media.
gravenimage says
UK: Islamic charity doxxed Muhammad cartoons teacher, endangering his life
…………..
Terrifying. This is no charity–not in the way we use the term.
David Foot says
In 2008 the House of Lords found that Islamic law is incompatible with English Law
in 2016/ 2018 the European Council found that Islamic law is incompatible with European Law
in 2021 the government lead by the Turkish descendant Boris Johnson and the anti-English Conservative party (Only waves our flag when they want votes) protects “the poor Islamic victim” Sadiq Khan who attacks English Heritage, who promotes the entry in to the UK of dangerous benefit seekers some of them Moslem like the Reading Moslem assassin or the Manchester Moslem assassin. Sadiq who forces us to pay for Marxist propaganda of the clenched fist in London New Year fireworks forcing Marxist politics in to New Year celebrations and sport!! Who attacks English sports people saying that we can only get to a final because of immigration etc etc. Rubbish of that calibre is being protected by the police and not the Batley teacher who has every right to show cartoons of the disgusting rubbish of a “prophet” who insults non believers in his texts which the Turkish descendant Boris Johnson DOES allow free distribution in England and to be shown to children!
In Batley under Boris Johnson Sharia law took precedence over English law, over its sovereignty, over freedom of speech! Boris is also letting in with no control incredible number of Moslems without any sort of checks (this has proved dangerous already in the past many times), our country is put at risk by the anti-English Conservatives, Patel is letting in thousands and thousands put us all at risk! In Batley under Boris Johnson Sharia law took precedence over English law, over its sovereignty, over freedom of speech! Boris is also letting in with no control incredible number of Moslems without any sort of checks, our country is put at risk by the anti-English Conservatives, Patel is letting in thousands and thousands put us all at risk!