Imagine what Willy-Brandt-Platz is going to look like when Muhammad’s birthday comes around in 2031, or 2041.
Meanwhile, here is a good Qur’an verse for the next banner: “Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are ruthless against the unbelievers and merciful among themselves.” (48:29)
“City hangs Islam banners,” translated from “Stadt lässt Islam-Banner abhängen,” Bild, November 2, 2021 (thanks to Medforth):
Leipzig – Loud music echoes from a tent over Willy-Brandt-Platz. It is lined with huge banners with Arabic script. Without exception, young men hand out flyers to passersby in front of the banners of the green color of Islam.
According to the city administration, this was a public event that was announced as continuing until Friday and had the motto “Historic Arab Monument.” However, the banners had to be removed at the behest of the city: “They are not part of the permit,” said a city hall spokesman.
On site, the participants explain to the BILD reporters that they are celebrating the Prophet Mohammed’s birthday – even if it was 14 days ago.
The flyers and banners advertise the “mercy” and “humanity” of the prophet. Among other things with sura 9, verse 128: “A messenger has now come to you from your own ranks. It is depressing for him when you are in distress, (he is) eager to help you, gracious and merciful to the believers.”
gravenimage says
“City hangs Islam banners,” translated from “Stadt lässt Islam-Banner abhängen,”
However, the banners had to be removed at the behest of the city: “They are not part of the permit,” said a city hall spokesman.
……………….
So–did the city hang the banners, or did the Muslims illegally hang the banners on city property? Sounds like the latter.
More:
The flyers and banners advertise the “mercy” and “humanity” of the prophet. Among other things with sura 9, verse 128: “A messenger has now come to you from your own ranks. It is depressing for him when you are in distress, (he is) eager to help you, gracious and merciful to the believers.”
……………….
“Gracious and merciful to the believers”–and nothing like this to unbelievers, including native Germans. The very next verse warns unbelievers if they “turn away”.
So this is the “invitation to Islam”–and if Infidels don’t heed it, they are fair game to war against.
Grace says
When does Europe become bi-lingual?
john smith says
Yes Gravenimage I also picked up on that, “gracious and merciful to the believers.”
PMK says
If they’re Arabic language banners, how can non-Arab speakers read them or understand them?
Aren’t Muslims offended by music? Why hang their banners in a place with loud music that should be haram to them?
b.a. freeman says
:-).
nobody ever said that islam was logical, PMK!
Anjuli Pandavar says
“If they’re Arabic language banners, how can non-Arab speakers read them or understand them?”
—
Just like the hijab, that is not the point. The point is that Islam occupies the consciousness in preparation for complete take-over. It is called psychological warfare.
Ray Jarman says
Maybe like some of the characters in Goethe’s “Faust,” maybe the Muslims should have their noses removed. Leipzig is the city where Goethe wrote “Faust.” and to have it desecrated by these slugs is beyond the pale.
If anyone ever visits this beautiful city, I suggest they try the Auerbachs Keller for a great dinner. It is not only where Goethe wrote his fabulous poem but it has never been closed to business for several hundred years, come war or peace.
Mike says
Auerbach’s tavern is one of the scenes of the game Faust undertook with the Devil. This beautiful work of art says a lot about the author himself. In 1770 Goethe received a translation of the Koran from Herder. Previously an agnostic, he was fascinated by Islam for the rest of his life. A bit like Foucalt.
Ray Jarman says
I do remember the art as one walks down the stairs to the tavern and it was beautiful.
VICTOR COWEN says
OMG – we white Christians (of all orders) told yer. so…I pity my children-I will be out of it soon.
Proud Islamophobe says
This is a catholic ‘church,’ not a Christian one, so it’s no wonder that they said something so stupid. As for Germany, I think it’s getting exactly what it deserves.
Proud Islamophobe says
Whoops, sorry, wrong page. But I do stand by that Germany is getting exactly what it deserves.
Joh says
The Shahada and the Name of Prophet Mohamed (Ibn Abi Kabsha).
The Shahadah is not in the Quran. No Muslim can find it. It is not there. It was written in AD 691-692AD, at the same time the Al Aqsa mosque was built. The Shahadah, testimony, is one of the pillars of Islam. Yes it is a pillar. It is used when praying five times a day and in conversion to Islam.
The first time the Shahadah was revealed ,was on the coins of Damascus. Abdul Al’Malik, the Caliph and Governor of Damascus, removed the bust of Caesar, from the coins.and replaced it with the Shahadah.
The final time the Shahadah was revealed, was in the Al Aqsa mosque. This was the moment Abdul Al’Malik moved to unite the Arab tribes. The Arabs, conquered the Levant but still operated as individual tribes. Some were pagans and others followers of Abrahim and Zoroastrian. This is important. They were not Muslim. The Arabs who invaded Spain were not Arab or Muslim but known as Moors from Morocco.
The oath or testimony, important, proving their loyalty to the Caliph as a united force, was the Shahadah. The name of Mohamed at this stage, was unknown. Abdul Al’ Malik, united the tribes by calling them Muslim. This is important. Their new religion Islam. Mohamed’s name was not in the Al Aqsa mosque. The “Praised One” was the name used. Why….??
Abdul Malik needed a holy book. He gathered the Qurans (recitations) or aghruf (seven dialects,given to Mohamed from the “angel”), from all the tribes and combined it into what we now know as the Quran. This explains why the Quran is so hard to read and not in chronological order. There were many Aghruf (dialects) and Readers or Isnaad (very complicated). The Aghruf was from all the tribes who conquered the Levant. Scholars can not define the Aghruf.
He then needed a prophet. There was a Warlord/King in Arabia with the credentials. This explains why Mohameds’ name is only listed four times in the Quran, 3:144, 33:40, 47:2, 48:29. The name Mecca only once. Why??? The Praised One”, according to Al’Bukhari Volume 1, Book 1, Number 6 :
Mohamed, was the King of Bani Al Asfar, who’s name was Ibn Abi Kabsha. Muslims do not know this.
Quote,“The narrative has holes”, unquote.
The fables of this King became the Prophet of Islam and is still growing in the 21st Century.
Most tribes never knew this prophet, The Quran refers to the “unknown” prophet as the,”messenger of Allah”, but they accepted him and his deeds. They called him “Mohamed”, only after the Al Aqsa mosque was completed. The “Praised One” was no longer used. There are debates whether the “Praised One” was a reference to Jesus. The noun Mohamed, was now the identity of Islam. The Quran uses “The messenger of Allah” not “Mohamed” because each tribe had their own deity. There were 360 idols around the Kaa’bah. This explains the different Aghruf. This also explains why the name of “Mohamed” is not in the Al Aqsa mosque. Why don’t Muslims ask these questions.
Today scholars argue and debate the Aghruf. Yassir Qadhi and Shabir Alley admits this. There are many Qurans or Aghruf. The most popular Hafs AD796, Warsh AD812 and Al Durie AD860. These were all written, 180 years after the death of “Mohamed” of the “traditions”. . These are very different in theology and written by men who never knew or met “Mohamed” (Ibn Abi Kabsha).. They depict the different tribal beliefs when Abdul Malik united them .
The Quran of Uthman, is nowhere to be found. He wrote nine and sent it into the Levant. Scholars can’t agree as to what happened to the Uthmanic Qurans. Why…??
Al Bughari died in AD870. Mohamed died in AD632. Shahadah 692. These do not line up historically. The traditions have them all in the same time of “Mohamed”.
The formula was complete, They had a religion, holy book and prophet. They were united as Muslims, the new religion., to defeat the Byzintine, Roman Catholic Empire. Not Christains. Abdul Malik achieved the wishes of Marwan his father who laid the groundwork for this. Muhammad was no Prophet, just a Warmongering Rapist Pedophile.