Here is a video thread of muslim cooks/qazi spitting on food and hands in the name of blessings.
Post corona, pre corona doesnt matter, things are still same. pic.twitter.com/EfobSM37wv
— D P D 🌈 | Ram Mandir Stan Acc (@kannadaveera) November 20, 2021
Ghaziabad Police arrest cook of Hotel for spitting on dough before making rotis pic.twitter.com/UP1ojBwJ5V
— 🇯🇴🇭🇳🇾 🇿🇮🇩 ♥️🇮🇳 (PARODY) (@Johny_mera_name) November 16, 2021
On November 15, a video of a kufi-wearing cook in a restaurant spitting into the dough while cooking tandoori roti, a thin handmade bread common on the Indian subcontinent, went viral across social media platforms in India. Soon it was discovered that the cook was a Muslim, working in a restaurant named “Muslim Hotel” in Loni, Ghaziabad, in India’s National Capital Region. The Hindu Raksha Dal lodged a complaint against the disgusting act with the Loni Police Station, and the cook was detained for questioning.
Gaziabad Police later released a video of the Circle Officer of Loni, stating: “A video has gone viral on social media in which a man was seen spitting on roti before putting it in tandoor. During the investigation, it was found that the video was of Muslim Hotel located near the Bathlana flyover in the Loni Police Station area. The man in question has been arrested for further questioning. Police will take appropriate action as per the law so that no one’s sentiments are hurt in the future.”
This is not a one-of-a-kind occurrence. Just a couple of months ago, another video showing another cook spitting in food in a Dhaba went viral, and again, after Hindu associations lodged a complaint with the police, a Muslim named Tamizuddin, who was working as a cook at Chicken Point in Panchvati Ahimsa Vatika market in Gaziabad, was arrested.
In February 2021, another Muslim named Naushad was arrested in Meerut for spitting into tandoori rotis at a wedding. After interrogation, it was revealed that he has been making and spitting in tandoori rotis for ten to fifteen years. In March 2021, two Muslims, Mohammad Ibrahim and Anwar, who were working in a West Delhi eatery, were arrested by Delhi Police after a customer caught them spitting on rotis. Again in March 2021, a Muslim named Mohammad Mohsin, who was hired to make rotis at a Hindu engagement ceremony, was arrested after being caught red-handed while spitting on the dough. Mohammad Khalik’s video of spitting on rotis at Madeeena hotel in North East Delhi went viral the same month; taking cognizance of the matter, the Delhi Police arrested the cook. This activity was perpetrated by more people than just cooks making rotis: fruit vendor Mohammad Farman was caught spitting on sliced watermelons, and was detained by Muzaffarnagar Police. Such cases were reported by the dozens in this region; there have been do many of them that they do not shock Indians anymore.
However, what is outrageous is the impenitence with which Leftists, liberals, and Muslims in the entertainment industry and the media rush to defend those who are spitting on food. When Naushad was caught spitting into dough and was arrested, renowned Islamic apologists defended him, accusing right-wing organizations in India of targeting these people solely because they were Muslims, and claiming that all they were doing was “passionately cooking.” They then lament at how Muslims are supposedly being jailed in India under Modi for doing nothing.
This is what we have come to. Muslims should be allowed to spit in food being cooked for the consumption of non-Muslims, because they are a religious minority in the country. If you raise objections to this, and if you refuse to eat food that has been spat on, you are a religious bigot. How dare you not eat a roti a Muslim cook has so passionately spat upon?
Recently, in a televised debate, when presented with clips of kufi-wearing people licking the plates and spoons of what appeared to be a restaurant, an Islamic cleric claimed that these people were not contaminating the utensils with spit. He asserted that what they were doing was a part of their faith. He also asserted that the fruit seller Mohammad Farman was not spitting on the fruit, but cleaning it. After massive outrage, the news channel had to take down the debate, but a portion of it is still available on social media.
A few weeks ago, another video surfaced, showing Muslim clerics cooking food in large quantities for a party. One of them took a plate full of food, blew on it, and mixed the content of the plate with food that was in a larger container. It has been a subject of debate in India as to whether he was spitting on the plate. Islamic apologists have defended his act by claiming that he was reading a prayer over the food and blowing upon it as per Islamic tradition. Even if that were true, what is the likelihood that tiny droplets of spit went into the food with the holy “blow”? If this “blown on” food is served only to Muslims, then we would not have much to say. But if this “blowing” is practiced while preparing food for those who do not follow Islam, then do the consumers have a right to object, or would that be “Islamophobia”?
raja says
Islamists like Lefties are great spin masters. They are good in whatever evil they do, nothing wrong in calling them winners.
I know of a big business house in India, who were robbed of about 50 acres of land. As the challengers to wrongful deal started to vanish one by one, the mafia started to move courts to have the legal challenges vacated. When I met the chairman of the business house, he called the mafia winner. I couldn’t agree to it but had to see his point of view, in lighter vein. The court case was restored by the chairman.
Infidel says
Sanjay Dixit, who once interviewed RS several months ago, did a pretty good explanation of how the muslims see what they are doing when they spit on food. It’s in Hindi, so am not sharing that here, but essentially, the summary was that they think they’re doing both islam as well as the people they’re serving a favor by doing that here
He also did a series called ‘Deen ki dawaat’, where he discusses some execrable practices advocated by the ulema, such as consumption of urine and fecal matter. Given this stuff that appears in some hadiths about Mohammed’s companions competing for the privilege of drinking his urine, I find it more convincing proof of RS’ theory that in reality, Mohammed never existed and was a concoction of Abbasid fiction writers
jay kumar says
Infidel, what did RS say? could you please tranlate to English and write in say 4-5 sentences why Muslims do it?
Infidel says
Who are you asking about? SD gave an account of why muslims do it in this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQyuxMn_rRs
Kagman says
I used to truly enjoy imported food from Germany, France… Others. I know damn well the Islamic rabble that has infiltrated those nations take great pride and pleasure in contaminating food-stuffs. And I also know many of these invaders are working in the very plants producing the food I so enjoy.
I no longer eat the stuff. If I want a good strudel, I’ll make it myself – along with every other specialty.
Is there no part of life not contaminated by this rabble?? I’m so fed up….
Infidel says
Good idea! It sucks to have to prepare it oneself, but failing that, it’s better to patronize a local cultural appropriator who can prepare those strudels for you in the original fashion
LB says
Exactly! Never eat anything that was possibly prepared by a muslim such as numerous “exotic” Eastern foods. In the UK, 9 out of 10 Indian food joints are owned by Bangladeshi muslims posing as Indians and there was no shortage of food poisoning reports coming out of those places, and closing them down would be “racist” so they keep operating without a hitch.
Same thing with muslim doctors. Never trust any of them.
Preparing your own food is the only way to go. Even though I live in Eastern Europe, the most ethnically homogeneous part of Europe where there is zero risk of muslims working in the food industry, I still home cook all my meals and only buy raw meat from local manufacturers that I personally know. Never bought meat from a supermarket because god knows where it came from and I have the health to show for it — it took me less than two days to get over covid with no medication and no latter consequences (sense of taste was a bit iffy for a few days but that’s about it).
That said, most people living in the muslim-infested West have no choice but to order take out or eat at restaurants, usually because of work hours, but mainly due to the breakup of traditional family units where a mother is cooking home-made recipes passed down by her mother and her grandmother and her great-grandmother, etc. Finding a millennial (my generation) Western woman that has maintained that family tradition is like hunting for Big Foot — there are thousands of evidence (low-res pictures, videos, etc.) of its existence yet no one has ever seen one in real life.
Infidel says
If you are an Indian – be it Hindu, Sikh, Christian, Buddhist, Parsi, Jain or Jew – just boycott any business that’s
‣muslim owned
‣employs muslims at all
I recall a controversy some years ago when a restaurant customer refused to accept food brought to him by a Zomato driver who happened to be muslim. There was a huge hue & cry over why Zomato did that, and a lot of people just assumed that the customer was a fanatic. But given all these stories of cooks and servers spitting on food, was he really unjustified in refusing to accept the food brought to him by a muslim?
raja says
Infidel,
I am familiar with that incidence. I had no qualms about that, and I would not especially when anyone calls out islam for what it is.
Wish people had some clarity on strategies to deal with evil islam, like the one highlighted you about boycotting anything Muslim owned or employed.
I strongly feel that Islamic hellholes like Afghanistan, Pak etc should be allowed to die a natural death and that NONE should come to their rescue. Even nature/God cannot stand that.
Infidel says
Careful, raja! Mortimer will condemn you for being devoid of compassion for those innocent muslims
BTeboe says
Well you can label me an Islamaphobe, because I will not eat any food that someone has spit on or contaminated in any way.
somehistory says
Not a phobe, but wouldn’t touch this *food* with a ten-foot, my feet or anything else.
Nasty, disease-causing practice, for whatever *reasons.*
john smith says
If a muslim had covid or any infectious disease, they wouldn’t hesitate on spitting on food if they knew is was going to be eaten by a non-muslim.
CogitoErgoSum says
How can spitting in someone’s food be considered a blessing while spitting in a person’s face is a serious insult? What is the thinking here? It’s insane. This is just further proof that Islam has to be one of the most stupid religions, if not THE most stupid religion, of all time.
Michael Hulden says
I have seen the same happening in Finland about 2 years back . I was going to have lunch and was out of curiosity looking trough the window of a small Lunch place owned by some Kurd Muslims . The man spitting was preparing the tomato sauce for pizzas etc in a small kitchen …Needless to say I never entered that place again.
Claudius says
They are following the example of the Prophet: Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah: … So I came (to my house) and Allah’s Apostle too, came, proceeding before the people. When I came to my wife, she said, “May Allah do so-and-so to you.” I said, “I have told the Prophet of what you said.” Then she brought out to him (i.e. the Prophet) the dough, and he spat in it and invoked for Allah’s Blessings in it. Then he proceeded towards our earthenware meat-pot and spat in it and invoked for Allah’s Blessings in it. (Sahih al-Bukhari: Volume 5, Book 59, Number 428)
Infidel says
This, and the stuff about Mohammed’s companions enjoying his urine, convinces me even more of RS’ hypothesis – that Mohammed was a fictitious and composite character designed by an Abbasid committee
faraway says
It definitely wins first prize for the most idiotic of the major religions, in a crowded field.
If someone created a sect on the same principles, he would end up in prison or dead. Or both.
Infidel says
The only advantage that Mohammed – assuming that he actually existed as pointed out by our esteemed host here – is that he got to do his stuff in the 7th century, when there were none of the law enforcement institutions that would have intervened. Had he gotten to do his stuff today in the modern era, he’d quickly have earned a death sentence
Hank says
Even nature uses spitting in a sinister way: Spitting Cobra.
But Mr. Mohammed from the 6th century practices it and the Quran documented it.
Jedothek says
Compare this madness to the policies of a rational activist, Mohandas Gandhi, who made modern hygiene a centerpiece of his effort to gain the respect of all for his vision of an independent India.
Infidel says
Evidence?
OLD GUY says
I guess the mask mandate hasn’t gotten to muslims either. We need to send Dr. Lousy over to India and get their health care system up to standards. Mask up and you can’t spit on others food.