A spurious concept designed to inhibit criticism of jihad terror could soon be funded by your tax dollars. My latest in FrontPage:
Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Mogadishu) and Jan Schakowsky (D-Lightfootland) have determined to take action against “Islamophobia,” and their initiative is gaining traction. The House Foreign Affairs Committee on Friday approved their bill calling for a State Department “Islamophobia monitor,” and now it will go to the full House for further consideration. The idea that Pelosi’s House would reject such a bill is virtually inconceivable.
This all started back in October, when Omar and Schakowsky introduced the Combating International Islamophobia Act, which would, according to a press release posted on Omar’s website, “require the State Department to create a Special Envoy for monitoring and combating Islamophobia, and include state-sponsored Islamophobic violence and impunity in the Department’s annual human rights reports.”
This would supposedly “help policymakers better understand the interconnected, global problem of anti-Muslim bigotry. It will also establish a comprehensive strategy for establishing U.S. leadership in combatting Islamophobia worldwide.”
The press release said nothing whatsoever about combating jihad terror or about how suspicion of Islam may be created by the all too common spectacle of Muslims committing acts of violence while screaming “Allahu akbar” and justifying their actions by reference to Islamic texts.
Omar and Schakowsky claimed that “this year, the United States has seen over 500 documented complaints of anti-Muslim hate and bias.” Their link went to another press release, this one from the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), claiming that these documented complaints include “hate crimes, harassment, school bullying, discrimination, hate speech, and anti-mosque incidents.”
“Hate speech”: this means that trivial incidents in which someone who is rude to a Muslim gets counted in as a hate crime, inflating the numbers of those crimes and contributing to the false impression that Muslims are victims of widespread discrimination and harassment in America today. With that low a bar, it’s no surprise that the press release at Omar’s site goes on to note that “in March, the United Nations Human Rights Council cited discrimination and hatred towards Muslims has risen to ‘epidemic proportions.”
Omar claimed that “we are seeing a rise in Islamophobia in nearly every corner of the globe. In my home state of Minnesota, vandals spray-painted hate messages and a Nazi swastika on and near the Moorhead Fargo Islamic Center. These types of incidents are all too common for Muslims in the United States and beyond. As part of our commitment to international religious freedom and human rights, we must recognize Islamophobia and do all we can to eradicate it. That’s why I’m proud to partner with Rep. Jan Schakowsky to create a special envoy to put an end to this bigotry.”
Really, that Nazi swastika business is terrible. But let’s try to keep some perspective, shall we? Muslims in Nigeria are subjecting Christians to murderous jihad attacks on a near-daily basis. Muslims in Pakistan persecute Christians and other religious minorities by means of that country’s draconian blasphemy laws, which have seen lives destroyed on rumors and false charges. Compared to that, some spray-painted graffiti just isn’t that big a deal, although certainly the louts who did it should be caught and prosecuted.
Omar doesn’t say anything about Muslims being beaten or murdered, or even denied jobs and preferment, in the United States, because such incidents are vanishingly rare; to establish her victimhood bona fides she has to fall back on graffiti.
Nonetheless, Schakowsky chimes in with a claim that is part accurate and part Leftist victimhood fantasy:
“For over a decade we have seen increasing incidents of violent Islamophobia both in the U.S. and worldwide — from the genocide of the Rohingya in Burma, and Uyghurs in China, to the attacks on Muslim refugees in Canada and New Zealand. It is past time for the U.S. to establish a comprehensive plan for combating this hatred worldwide. I am proud to join my friend and colleague, Congresswoman Ilhan Omar, in introducing the Combating International Islamophobia Act. This critical legislation will create a Special Envoy for Monitoring and Combating Islamophobia to ensure the U.S. dedicates the resources necessary to safeguard human rights and religious and cultural freedom around the world.”
All right. But will this Special Envoy for Monitoring and Combating Islamophobia note the large number of faked anti-Muslim hate crimes? Will this Envoy make a clear distinction between the two quite different ways the propaganda neologism “Islamophobia” is used? The term “Islamophobia” is an illegitimate conflation of two distinct phenomena: crimes against innocent Muslims, which are never justified, and honest analysis of the motivating ideology of jihad terror, which is always necessary.
Islamic advocacy groups and their leftist allies have been insisting for years that such analysis, too, constituted “Islamophobia.” Omar and Schakowsky speak of Islamophobic violence, but if this Special Envoy is created, he or she will without any doubt crack down on any honest discussion of how Islamic jihadis use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and oppression, because for years such discussion has been labeled “Islamophobia” along with real acts of anti-Muslim bigotry.
The Special Envoy would just be another agent in the Left’s escalating war against freedom of speech, silencing opposition to jihad violence and Sharia oppression of women, and thereby enabling unarguably sinister forces. Don’t tell me you’re surprised.
somehistory says
Guess we all better comment as often as possible and say exactly what islam, i elmi, alias omar, are all about. Include the c.a.i.rats and their hate=filled language against Christians and Jews.
islam is from the devil. islam is satanic. islam is putrid, evil, filth and the so-called “prophet” was written about as a mass-murdering, raper of chldren. The maggot dung, sack of filthy lying flesh, was said to be a trader in sex-slaves and a thief.
islam is pure filth, top to bottom, inside out, and is worthless as a way of life. mozlums who are devout, are liars for the spread of islam and wish to take over every nation and subjugate all people to theirf ake ‘god’ and fake ‘prophet.’ The devout lie for satan, rape for satan and murder for satan.
islam is all about the lust for blood and the hatred of every living thing that does not fit their twisted demonic way…even each other if not seen as devout enough.
mozlums, such as i. elmi, lie, commit fraud and demand things their way.
Until the next time….mozlums who follow satan are his “children” by choice…..I’m done.
PRCS says
“islam is from the devil. islam is satanic……the so-called “prophet” was written about as a mass-murdering, raper of chldren.”
Satan (the so-called devil) is but a belief and you don’t know if that Muhammad even existed.
When the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, actually did rape women and children in China, the Philippines, and other nations, tortured and beheaded POWs, conducted horrific medical experiments on captives, and a raft of other atrocities were they doing the devil’s bidding, too?
How about the Aztecs? The Vikings?
mortimer says
Good for PRCS. ‘somehistory’ doesn’t cite historic references, he just makes stuff up and rants. He does a disservice to the counterjihad by such uninformed rants. He has no use fro real history which is more nuanced. It would be good for him to read a book on historiography.
Susan says
No, the Japanese, the AZtecks, and the Vikings are not the same as Muslims who are truly the children of the Devil, for they do his will, they lie, they kill, they steal..because, their Quaran, their dumb evil prophet, demands it of them. They are the children of the Father of lies and abominations.
PRCS says
1. “truly the children of the Devil
Prove it.
2. teir dumb evil porphet
You don’t know if THAT Muhammad actually existed.
PRCS says
their dumb evil prophet
gravenimage says
PRCS and Mortimer, neither of you say what there is about Islam that you *don’t* consider evil. You have both (quite rightly) been critical of Islam yourselves.
PRCS says
Islam IS evil.
A man-made evil.
somehistory says
i.elmi, alias i omar is a fraud, an ugly inside- and-out snake. Her religion is putrid and evil and anyone who supports her, is supporting evil. anyone who defends her, or speaks up for her, is a supporter of evil.
i.elmi, fraudulently called i omar., is a daughter of satan the devil by her own choice.
Jesus Christ identified “children” of their “father, the father of the lie,” and she fits the description Jesus gave for “children of satan.”
Anyone who denies the Truth of the words of Jesus are lacking integrity.
PRCS says
“Anyone who denies the Truth of the words of Jesus are lacking integrity.”
That is utterly idiotic nonsense.
YOUR beliefs do not define another’s integrity.
You are as much a supremacist as any Muslim.
tgusa says
Go ahead and monitor me. Make mine a double. I am already monitoring all of you and keeping a list. Democrat females will eventually have to live under sharia law. The dem party leaders won’t have the spine to stop it. This is another reason why we need to segregate ourselves from democrats. I will laugh out loud when Jan is forced to live like that. And don’t come crying to our side to bail you out when that happens Jan. You asked for that and as a kind and considerate American I believe you should get exactly what you desire no matter how bad that might be.
Jan, just to get ahead of the game you should practice up on your submission and obedience. Men are in charge of women in islam. And forget about the rights of American women you wont even have basic human rights. If you act up and dishonor men you will be beaten or killed. All American women who value the rights they have should steer clear of these bat**** crazy democrat women. It goes without saying that females on our side will continue on unmolested with the same rights and freedoms that they have now.
mortimer says
‘Islamophobia’ is a gaslighting word, and a Trojan-horse word meant to facilitate the imposition of Sharia blasphemy law by other means.
stardot says
Most Democrat women would look much better with a head bag, don’t you think?
susan says
Go get a life you low life moslim, God Almighty is in control…..happy freedoms to your women wearing black curtains to hide behind, and get stoned just because someone in their family demands his honor from killing. You kill your women in the streets and everyone watches on, the slow evil that is going on…take your Islam and shove it up where the sun doesn’t shine. You are only a man like any other man who has a lifespan of 3 score and 10 years and then you are no more. The legacy of your Devil god will not live forever, so if you are smart you will repent, and start loving your neighbor, else you go to the quenching fires that God Almighty has prepared for your fried the devil.
Doomer says
The endgame of Ilhan Omar is to convert the US into a THEOCRACY.
Her intrigues against those guilty of “islamophobia” is a means to that theocracy.
Hashmi-Danios ( the one who debated Robert Spencer ) in a review of the Harris Sultan-Daniel Haqiqatjou debate “Sharia vs Human Rights”, in a youtube video entitled
“Dr. Javad T Hashmi’s Reaction to Harris Sultan vs Daniel Haqiqatjou Debate”, at almost the end,
minute 46:45 he says,
“This is our SHARED premises ” ( STOP)
This is what PREMISE means, a PREVIOUS proposition from which ANOTHER is INFERRED or follows as a CONCLUSION.
(CONTINUE):
“between Christians, Muslims and Jews is that God dignifies man and sanctifies humans.
So there is,what I am trying to say,
HUMAN RIGHTS ITSELF,
was BUILT on Religious Premises that are
SHARED by people,believers, definitely, of the ABRAHAMIC traditions”.
Hashmi,by Abrahamic traditions means “Muslims,Christians and Jews”.
Holy Crap!
If anybody who has ever studied the appearance of the Concept of human rights( originally called NATURAL rights) knows, it is based on the idea that the NATURE of humans is they are in the Image of God.
That is 100% rejected by the Quran.
a) Since all by Nature,at Birth, are in the Image of God, then All by Nature,at Birth, have certain RIGHTS ( not favors),
the Right (not favor given ) to Life, Liberty and Property.
b) Plus since all by Nature,at Birth, are in the Image of God, then All by Nature, are born EQUAL.
It gets worse.
JORDAN PETERSON and MOHAMMED HIJAB had a conversation in Peterson’s podcast,(Nov 10,2021) and there Peterson,at min 19:45,
shows how Ignorant he is about some Basic Things. In the redpill community he is partly looked-down upon for some of his ideas.
He said:” I think ISLAM is PART of the WEST, by the way,
because we are All People of the Book.”
Peterson doesn’t know what the Greco-Roman and Judeo-Christian heritage really is.
Here is their conversation:”Islam and the Possibilities of Peace | Mohammed Hijab | The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast – S4: E66″
https://youtu.be/qgYMuRqXPr0
Doomer says
All those arguments about having 3 Natural Rights (Life,Liberty,Property) were stated by the 16th century School of Salamanca, begun by Francisco de Vitoria,in the 1530s, with several successors, and ending at the beginning
of the 1600s with FRANCISCO SUAREZ,Jesuit.
Vitoria denied the validity of the Treaty of Tordesillas,whereby the Pope divided the non-Christian world between Spain and Portugal. That Spain and Portugal had the Right to Conquer all that area (Imperialism).
a) Suarez is a fascinating figure,for example, at that time KING JAMES I of England ( of the King James version of the Bible),
was giving intellectual arguments in favor of the doctrine of the DIVINE RIGHT of KINGS. Suarez was opposed to it and said it was false.
b) The School of Salamanca also elaborated on ECONOMICS, Joseph Schumpeter,Austrian,
one of the most influential economists of the 20th century, in his “History of Economic Analysis” (1954) says the School of Salamanca
created the science of economics.
Believe it or, the adherents of the School of Salamanca DEFENDED the FREE MARKET ( in other words, the Essence of Capitalism ),
where the fair price of a good would be determined by
supply and demand.
gravenimage says
Ilhan Omar Bill to Require State Department to Monitor ‘Islamophobia’ Moves Forward
……………
Of course this is intended to shut down any criticism of the horrors of Islam. “Blasphemy laws”…
somehistory says
If they followed existing law, then they would have to give equal protection to Christians and Jews….and where would that put i elmi and the c.a.i.rats, and tlaib, and a wad….all of them would be putting themselves in a court of law.
But, if it passes, equal protection will be ignored. Because if it passes, it eliminates freedom of speech and that’s first in the guarantee department.
gravenimage says
Agree, Somehistory.
Westman says
Ohmar: “For over a decade we have seen increasing incidents of violent Islamophobia both in the U.S. and worldwide — from the genocide of the Rohingya in Burma, and Uyghurs in China, to the attacks on Muslim refugees in Canada and New Zealand.”
Did anyone notice how she smeared the US without listing a single example of US, “violent Islamophobia”, while citing examples in Burma, China, Canada, and New Zealand?
What is strange about her demands of respect for Islam is her personal life has not been in accordance with the Quranic demands of Allah. She wears the facade yet lives according to her own dictates. Certainly, CAIR could find a better example. Power is not virtue.
When she makes anti-Israeli statements she should fully expect criticism.
Westman says
Correction:
Jan Schakowsky: “For over a decade we have seen increasing incidents of violent Islamophobia both in the U.S. and worldwide — from the genocide of the Rohingya in Burma, and Uyghurs in China, to the attacks on Muslim refugees in Canada and New Zealand.”
Did anyone notice how she smeared the US without listing a single example of US, “violent Islamophobia”, while citing examples in Burma, China, Canada, and New Zealand?
What is strange about Omar’s demands of respect for Islam is her personal life has not been in accordance with the Quranic demands of Allah. She wears the facade yet lives according to her own dictates. Certainly, CAIR could find a better example. Power is not virtue.
When Omar makes anti-Israeli statements she should fully expect criticism.
somehistory says
If she and c.a.i.rats and talib were to be successful in getting the evil filth to be the law of the land…unlawful as it is…then she might find herself and her husband on the chopping block. Unless he converted, she did a big bad no-no when she married him.
She would lose her job in government, just as women in afghanistan did when the taliban took over. and her daughters would be bought and given to the ugliest old creep available for daily rape.
But, right now, she’s feeling powerful and power is very addictive.
somehistory says
Someone like Ted Cruz or Tucker Carlson should call out Schakowsky and force her to admit that including the U.S. in her statement was a lie.
gravenimage says
Shortly after 9/11, Jan Schakowsky said she “denounces terror in any form”–right, because Infidels are waging terror attacks in Dar-al-Islam. Oh…wait…no, they’re not…
gravenimage says
Good point, Westman–Omar cites not a single example from the US, even though this is where this oppressive bill is going to be imposed.
Walter Sieruk says
What nonsense ! There isn’t any real ,genuine, Islamophobia because the Muslims propagandists as well as the many other apologists for Islam have made much progress in making the religion of Islam look good in the eyes of the uninformed and gullible American public.
In contrast that is now much “Jewish -phobia in America because of Ilan Omar and other people like her.
Related to this are the words of the former US President, William Howard Taft , ,wisely, declared in a speech that “Anti-Semitism is a noxious weed that should be cut out it has no place in America”
gregbeetham says
Jews in America suffer more attacks, mostly by Muslims, than Muslims do, how about a Judaphobia law to protect Jews from Muslims? When will we see that bill put forward from Omar?
Istvan Vogel says
Brilliant idea! Perhaps anti semitism could be added to the bill.
Wellington says
Anyone who buys into the Islamophobia rot should ALWAYS be confronted with what happens to non-Muslims in Muslim countries and all the humiliations they have to go through, even with death often a distinct possibility. Moreover, it is a lie that Muslims are targeted in the West. My God, in a country like America they have the right to freely worship, build their houses of worship, preach their faith to others, etc. Do non-Muslims enjoy these right in Muslim lands?
Islam is one gigantic hypocrite, also a giant parasite as well. It sickens me. Got this Muslims? Well, get it.
PRCS says
The response, the excuse for the horrors carried out against non-Muslims in Muslim lands–which their useful idiots will eagerly embrace and parrot of course: those people have hijacked “the religion of peace”.
Muslims in America have a good ground game.
gravenimage says
+1
Relic says
sometimes Ilhan shows ears, haram
sometimes ‘she’ shows S&M fingernails
Beneath the Veil of Consciousness says
Is anyone watching the show on PBS titled,
Amen, Amen, Amen: A Story of Our Times.
What a disgusting white washing of the Muslims and Mohammed. Shame on PBS for spreading the historical lies of muslims.
gravenimage says
Thanks for that head’s up.
Here’s a trailer for this whitewash:
https://www.thenationalnews.com/arts-culture/film/amen-amen-amen-new-documentary-tells-the-story-of-the-uae-s-first-jewish-community-1.1129217
gregbeetham says
Thing is, YouTube, Twitter and to some extent Facebook and Google already impose censorship on those who criticize Islam, they even impose reverse censorship where if you accurately report in your own video something that a Muslim said that was threatening/violent/aggressive in his YouTube video your video can be taken down as hate speech but the original Islamic inspired Muslim’s video remains, and they are proud of that.
I suspect there is a large Muslim action group who complain vociferously and attack anything that a non Muslim says and the various administrations meekly capitulate to the hysterical mob.
The Muslims seem to have the social media giants doing their bidding and now with the aid of some fake Smollett-esque anti Muslim propaganda they hope to get some legislation in place to ban criticism of Muslim murderous attacks in the USA or anywhere basically. If the Republicans still have any common sense they will oppose such an attack on the constitution.
Infidel says
If their bill passes, then the US would be doing pretty much what the OIC does in going after ‘islamophobia’. But wonder how they’d deal w/ the Saudi ban on dawa activity in their country, or w/ the ban on the Tablighi Jamaat? Had any non-muslim country banned it, it would have been called ‘islamophobic’. Question: can a muslim country be guilty of islamophobia?
Of course, this vaginal Somalian is doing the one thing she cares about as an elected official: performing her jihad. Rep Boebert had her pinned absolutely right!
livingengine says
I’m telling you this a sharia police position that has force of law, teeth, amd will be a device to bring government pressure to bear.
CAIR and the Envoy – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihaRx7MLTq8
libertyORdeath says
500 is a really small number to undertake something like this, especially when supposed “hate speech” and “bullying” incidents are included.
I would bet that there have been more of these supposed “hate crimes” perpetrated by muslims despite their tiny population.
somehistory says
According to Mr. Raymond Ibrahim, there are far more incidents of persecution of Christians than any other group in the world…and most of the time, the perps are mozlum.
GreekEmpress says
https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/army-of-faithful-plan-protest-against-paul-verhoevens-blasphemous-film-benedetta-301434231.html
Meanwhile, The movie industry insults Catholicism again.
somehistory says
Yes. For as many years as I can recall, the industry has made many attempts to make Christians out to be the bad guys, fanatical about forcing their family members to follow their extreme rules, greedy, stupid, etc.
And even here, on this site, some wish to stop the freedom of expression about Christianity and Jesus. Even some who pretend to be Christian do some Christian bashing.
However, the Fatih has survived every attempt to squash it and will continue to do so. It will prevail over islam and other evils.
somehistory says
Faith is misspelled in my comment above.
stardot says
Did you catch the massive outpouring of love and disaster relief by muslims to tornado swept Kentucky?
Me neither.
somehistory says
They only give such things to their fellow terrorists.
gravenimage says
Lots of people have rushed to help. Here’s on such story, froim my own neck of the woods:
“California sends rescue specialists to help search for tornado survivors in Kentucky”
https://fox40.com/news/california-connection/california-sends-rescue-specialists-to-help-search-for-tornado-survivors-in-kentucky/
Muslims, not so much…
PRCS says
They would only lend a hand if doing so advances Islam’s goals.
gravenimage says
Yep.
Jim says
She is basically a lobbyist for Islamic influence in America. But that is not something that the government should facilitate. The whole strategy of the Demo party seems to be to ambush the voters. They promise to be moderate, middle class, Christian, but they immediately begin doing the opposite. And they seem to prefer snatch and grab tactics too, Immediately trying to push through the most radical agenda before the opposition can mobilize to stop them. Ilhan is part of this Demo tactic. Increase the power of our enemies so that the Democrats can instrumentalize the ensuing chaos to their own power advantages. And beside the Chinese, the Muslims seem to be among the greatest threats to America. Not radical extremist white supremacists. This is presumably a straw man argument to distract from the real threats, which they are supporting.
RP says
I am Islamophobic! Come and get me? Phobic = Scared, Yes I am scared about Islam. So I am Islamophobic.
Infidel says
Actually, ‘phobic’ implies an irrational fear, even if the root term in Greek may simply mean fear. A fear of Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity would be phobic. A fear of islam wouldn’t be
gravenimage says
So true. Nothing irrational about a fear of Islam.
Violet C says
Can you imagine the number of race hustlers would be charged if this ‘law’ was Caucasian-ophobia? I hear not much but hate towards whites and Jews from that ungrateful pos Ilham who Americans saved from a refugee camp and her own sh*t hole country. She hates the west, she hates our traditions and culture, she’s a danger to our liberty so she should be returned to the place she came.
mortimer says
All religions should be freely criticized, because abuse is frequent when people are not held responsible.
It is necessary to hold Muslims responsible for jihadic terrorism and to be criticized when they promote it or do nothing to stop it.
gregbeetham says
What we often don’t take into account is the absolute inversion of values in the world of Islam, Muslims consider us to be conducting terrorism against Muslims when we prevent them from carrying out Jihad and killing Kaffirs (us) because killing Kaffirs enables a devout Muslim to avoid being burnt for eternity in the afterlife, being killed in the process is of lesser concern to them than being burnt for eternity.
You have to get your head around the concept and think about it for some time to fully appreciate how far off the planet they really are and realize what we will be dealing with into the future should the clerics continue to have access to Muslim children.
gravenimage says
True, Greg. Mortimer, this is not just abuse–as you know, this savagery is what Islam itself teaches.
mortimer says
The main motivation for Europe’s movement for freedom of expression was the freedom to express religious freedom from the authoritarian churches of Europe.
Since the main reason for freedom of expression is to criticize religion, we must insist on our right to criticize all religions, including Islam.
OLD GUY says
Islamophobia is a PROPAGANDA PLOY to stop public and media criticism of Islam as well as Muslim/or Islamic actions and ideology. If You think Ilan Omar represents the Citizens of America you are wrong, she represents first and foremost the foreign invasion of Muslim/Islamic states.
Jedothek says
“monitoring and combating Islamophobia”: those two gerunds are terrifiying, Do the actual provisions of the bill allow for wiretapping without a court order ? — Putting people in jail for writing articles against Islam? don’t assume the courts would prevent this: that’s only if we’re lucky. What is the number of the bill? can we read it online ? it’s obviously a bad bill, but I want to know HOW bad.
gravenimage says
It’s all unclear so far–which is part of the problem.
Jedothek says
the bill is at
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/5665/text
gravenimage says
Thanks for that link, Jedothek.
Oddly, a lot of this seems to be aimed internationally. Is the US supposed to go to war if someone in France or the UK says something critical about the savagery of Islam?
gregbeetham says
I suppose the US could impose sanctions against countries who allow unbridled free speech and critics of Islam to say what they think or quote the passages in the Koran that normal people would find offensive.
You can’t have people wandering around in foreign places talking truthfully, they’ve got to be shut up somehow, they’ve already got the major social media corps running scared and doing censorship for them but there’s always room for more censorship as Islam is so fragile it can’t withstand criticism.
gravenimage says
Scary.
somehistory says
Did you notice that it has a part about “child marriage”? Nothing about preventing it.
And, it says the same things over and over….as though someone without a brain wrote it.
Besides calling what Mr .Trump did a ban on mozlums….it mentions “racism” and “bigotry,” …as though islam is a “race” and one must be forced to like and approve of mozlums.. How is the “envoy” supposed to address the situation if someone, somewhere , doesn’t **like** islam and its terror carried out by their local mozlums?
And, it does seem to be targeted at other countries…saying “foreign” countries, government and non-gov entities.
Did you notice all of the people supporting it? The entire jihad squad and others of like mind..
The “incitement” thing is probably what they will hone in on…probably have this website in their crosshairs. Along with FrontPage, and a few others that point out the evils of islam and the mendacity, threats and terror carried out by adherents of the filth.
gravenimage says
True, Somehistory. This passage:
(2) in section 502B (22 U.S.C. 2304), by—
(A) redesignating the second subsection (i) (relating to child marriage status) as subsection (j); and
(B) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
“(k) Information Concerning Acts Of Islamophobia In Foreign Countries.—The report required by subsection (b) shall include, wherever applicable, a description of the nature and extent of acts of Islamophobia and Islamophobic incitement that occur during the preceding year…
Is clear as mud. What is this bill saying about child rape? Who knows?
This is like the bill that needs to be passed so that we can find out what is in the bill…
Jedothek says
one of the childish details in the bill is the reference to “a Muslim ban, such as the one instituted by former President Trump.” The order was not a Muslim ban, and to call it such in the text of a bill is propgarnda, not the way a real law is written.
Infidel says
Does anyone think that Ilhan Omar is a career legislator, as opposed to a propagandist? The reason the above phrase is in the bill is that there are illiterates in the Democrat party writing it
somehistory says
Yes. She is no lawyer and her speech shows just how illiterate she is about stuff in general.
So many idiots are elected by other idiots to make idiotic laws for the rest of us to be constrained in ways that are essentially illegal.
This bill isn’t just idiotic, it’s evil in its intent.
i elmi, alias omar, is one of the worst humans to ever set foot anywhere, but esp in the seat of government.
JCA Reid says
Pathetic! Kow – towing to this perverted, degenerate ideology. A “phobia” is an irrational fear. There is nothing irrational about seeing the spread of a misogynistic, paedophilic, bandit, supremacist endorsing credo, dressed up as a “Religion”.
So all those people warning the World about the rise of German Nazism in the 19 were “Naziphobics”?
How this idiotic has any credibility, let alone hold a Elected position is beyond me!
stardot says
Did you catch the massive outpouring of love and disaster relief by muslims to tornado swept Kentucky?
Me neither.
PRCS says
We agree.
PRCS says
their dumb evil prophet
Alfredo says
This I’ll intentioned legislation is yet another self inflicted wound on the American body politic. A low blow by dirty American-hating people. These people play dirty. Whoever doesn’t have that clear, they’re easy pray for these wolves disguised as sheep.
This wicked law promoted by the America-hating squad amounts to another cut towards their final aim, death of America by a thousand cuts.
This legislation is another step towards their final aim, the imposition of Sharia law by stealth. Under that wicked law, any critical opinion of Islam and their deity, their “prophet” is strictly “Haram” (VERBOTEN).