Trump nearly broke the Islamic Republic, but now Biden’s handlers have given it a new lease on life.
Today, a molarity police assaulted a women on the bus and wanted to arrest her because her hair was not covered. Other women stopped her. This is a daily struggle for Iranian women. Last year Islamic Republic hired 7000 under cover morality police in Tehran.#MyCameraIsMyWeapon pic.twitter.com/cyFl2q3dRF
— Masih Alinejad ?️ (@AlinejadMasih) December 6, 2021
‘Brawl breaks out on Iranian bus as woman refusing to wear a veil fights off female member of country’s feared morality police,” by Chris Pleasance, MailOnline, December 9, 2021 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
This is the moment an undercover member of Iran’s morality police tried to haul a woman off a bus for failing to wear a headscarf.
Video captured on a public bus in Iran shows a young woman with her hair loose being targeted by an older woman in a full headscarf and abaya robe.
Footage shows the older woman trying to force the other off the bus, saying that she needs to be handed over to police for violating the country’s strict dress code.
But other women intervene, telling her to ‘get lost’ and ‘give up’ before forcing her out on to the street.
It is not known exactly when or where in Iran the footage was captured, but it was shared on Twitter by Masih Alinejad – an Iranian women’s rights campaigner currently based in the US.
She wrote: ‘Today, a mrality [sic] police assaulted a women on the bus and wanted to arrest her because her hair was not covered. Other women stopped her.
‘This is a daily struggle for Iranian women. Last year Islamic Republic hired 7000 under cover morality police in Tehran.’
Iran, like many Middle Eastern nations, enforces laws on what women can wear in public with an emphasis on ‘modesty’.
Women in Iran are compelled to wear headscarves, must cover their arms and legs, and are banned from wearing clothing deemed too colourful or close-fitting.
The laws derive from comments made by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini following the Islamic Revolution of 1979.
‘The women who contributed to the revolution were and are women who wear modest clothes,’ the Ayatollah said in the days following the overthrow of the Shah.
‘Coquettish women, who wear makeup and put their necks, hair and bodies on display in the streets, did not fight the Shah,’ he said.
‘They have done nothing righteous. They do not know how to be useful, neither to society, nor politically or vocationally. And the reason is because they distract and anger people by exposing themselves.’…
Walter Sieruk says
Those so called “morality police” in reality are only just misogynistic vicious bullies looking to find a girl or a woman to gang up on together and harass and then throw in prison.
bill says
The Morality police are very often women who want to enforce ‘morality on other women, just like many women join cults to enforce ‘morality’ on others, especially their children.
Women in most Islamic countries are supposed to ‘contribute’ by being invisible and producing children.
gravenimage says
True, Bill, about the “Morality Police”.
GenEarly says
But at least most everyone on the bus was wearing their Covid Masks!!! OMG, Does anyone think these masks are “our” Medical Tyranny Morality??? Because Masks Don’t Work to block Covid!!!
Brainwashed is brainwashed, Comrades. and I suppose JoBama won the 2020 sElection too.
Iran isn’t the only country ruled by Tyrants, try looking at DC.
Maureen Chaloner says
Good for them Its time Muslim MEN stopped controlling women…STOP following the words of a muderous warlord who died 1400 years ago. Leave us women alone ffs!!!
mortimer says
The Islamic scarf is the ultimate symbol of MISOGYNY and OPPRESSIVE PATRIARCHY. The veil actually has NOTHING TO WITH WORSHIP or PIETY. The veil is a symbol of the female SUBMISSION to a patriarch.
No feminist should EVER TOLERATE the Islamic scarf. I repeat: THE ISLAMIC SCARF IS NOT ABOUT WORSHIP, BUT ABOUT PATRIARCHY.
gravenimage says
Iran: Morality police officer assaults woman with uncovered hair, other women prevent the woman’s arrest
…………..
So glad to see these women fighting back! You go girls!
I notice the men did nothing, one way or another.
mortimer says
The words of the Ayatollah Khomeini were absolute lies and he knew it, because secular Iranian women opposed the shah in the hope of a more feminist future … how wrong they were.
The ayatollah lied through his teeth:
‘The women who contributed to the revolution were and are women who wear modest clothes,’ the Ayatollah said in the days following the overthrow of the Shah.
‘Coquettish women, who wear makeup and put their necks, hair and bodies on display in the streets, did not fight the Shah,’ he said.
Over 100,000 women who had supported the overthrow came into the streets of Tehran to protest the veil.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/long_reads/iran-women-revolution-hijab-protests-ayatollah-khomeini-a8251686.html
eduardo odraude says
Didn’t the aging Khomeini marry a 12-year-old? These rulers have no right to be guardians of morality. They should institute real democracy instead of the sham democracy they have in which only candidates approved by the Ayatollah and mullahs can run.
I gather Iran has an incredibly low birthrate. And Islam is not helping, indeed is destroying the society because Muhammad was “the most obvious false prophet in history” (that’s the brilliant David Wood’s trademark line). The Iranian population is going to drop almost by half with each generation, given their incredibly low birthrate. This may make the Iranian government more dangerous, unfortunately, because they are aware of the problem and may seek to do maximum damage soon while they still can.
RegT says
Khomeini was far worse than simply raping a 12 year old “wife”. He said – as the Supreme religious leader in Iran – that sodomy of an infant was acceptable, in his two-volume book on “proper” muslim conduct:
https://dharmaawakening.wordpress.com/2012/10/03/ayatollah-ruhollah-khomeini-mohammed-and-the-muslims/
Wellington says
Paradox, overall phoniness and hypocrisy on display yet again, to wit, Biden, a dimwit, a creep and stupid man overall—a complete nothing who gets virtually everything ass-backwards—pretends to be for women’s rights but will say NOTHING about the decrepit and evil Iranian regime oppressing women’s rights in the name of the worst religion of all time, i.e., Islam. Ditto for calling out China on its repression of liberty while excoriating Georgia for its election laws which are enlightened compared to those of Biden’s home state of Delaware.
But when Trump was President, which the horrible excuse which has become the Democratic Party tried through lie after lie to destroy this stalwart American, Trump regularly took on so many of the evils emanating from the Islamic sphere of mankind, whether it be Iran, ISIS, et al. Yes, sometimes Trump still had to play nicey/nicey with an Islamic creep like Erdogan because of a myriad of realities, but Trump v. Biden where combating Islamic evil is concerned blows the horribly deficient Biden (and his idiotic/wicked handlers) away. And one knows this or should know it.
So tired of those in America and the West at large who still don’t know all this. They’re fools (or worse) and enablers of the longest-lived malevolent ideology of all time, “Islam” by name. In any case, show me someone who still gives Biden a “thumbs up” and I will show you a horribly deficient excuse for a human being. No exceptions. Not one damn one.
Doomer says
MIKHAILA PETERSON, the daughter of Jordan Peterson, has a show,podcast called “Opposing Views” , where 2 people who have utterly different positions argue:
like pro-bitcoin and anti-bitcoin, pro-vaccine passports and anti-vaccine passports.
On December 13 there will be an “Opposing Views” with MOHAMMED HIJAB and AYAAN HIRSI ALI.
Anybody who has read her books,and those of Sam Harris, against Islam, notices that she hardly quotes the Quran and hadiths to support her criticism of Islam. She and Sam Harris make affirmations, but to affirm something without
precise textual evidence, make you think, ” I think they are against Islam more based on EMOTION than rationality.”
My prediction is Hijab will be able to “win” the debate. In this very short video Mohammed Hijab announces the coming podcast.
https://youtu.be/mfSYfCO2TuI
eduardo odraude says
She’s quite rational. I don’t think her approach — the fact that she does not cite Islamic texts very much — is due to an emotional approach. I think she has reasons (whether they are correct reasons or not, I don’t know) for taking a different approach. It might be (this is a guess) that she is not interested in Islamic scriptures. After all, she is an atheist (isn’t she?). As an atheist, she might simply find Islamic scriptures frightfully boring. And there might be other more substantive reasons she does not refer to scriptures, qur’an, hadith, etc., that much.
Doomer says
Yes, but it would really be good if at the end of her books,just 5 pages,there should be a section:
“Quran suras and hadiths that show how anti-human rights Islam is”
Most people are too lazy to search for them.
She is for human RIGHTS but I do not know if she knows the following
(and Hijab,who knows the subject well, will tell her ( an atheist )
that her human rights beliefs are a Myth, a Fiction, based on Theology) that “rights'(not favors, concessions) of people ,
formerly known as “natural rights” ( till the 1948 Declaration of Human Rights),
is ( here I will quote Leftist Wikipedia, article “Natural Rights and Legal Rights”, to show even they concede it).
“The idea that certain rights are natural or inalienable
also has a history dating back at least to the STOICS of late Antiquity, through CATHOLIC law of the early MIDDEL AGES”.
And:
“The Stoics held that no one was a slave by nature”
However,as usual, WIkipedia Omits Information:
1.That the reason the Stoics believed in the equality of men was that they said ( whether they believed it or not is uncertain) that the Reason was
all are born with a “Divine Spark”( have the quality of being LIKE GOD, being divine, essentially the same as the Christian belief all are in the IMAGE of God).
2.Wikipedia totally omits that THE major proponent of Natural Rights in Western culture is Thomas Aquinas, and again, all are born with natural
rights because all are born in the Image of God.
3.WIkipedia totally omits that the Catholic priests of the Salamanca philosophical school in the 16th century, founded by Francisco de Vitoria,
father of international law, said the natural rights (human rights) of all are right ( not favor) to life ,liberty and property. Since,for them,
by NATURE ( all are born with the Same Nature, that nature being born in the Image of God) , then all are born equal. Vitoria was followed by later disciples who also spoke about the economy:
Martín de Azpilcueta, Domingo de Soto, Luis de Molina, Tomás de Mercado, and Francisco Suárez.
They also wrote a lot about economics,another vital contribution.
4.Wikipedia mentions Locke and his natural rights but doesn’t say Locke,the founder of the Age of Enlightenment , was a CHRISTIAN,
who based his natural rights to life,liberty and property, on the same reasons given by the Salamanca School. Nor that Locke wrote a book entitled
“The Reasonableness of Christianity”.
Again,to quote Leftist WIkipedia ( article “School of Salamanca”):
“The juridical doctrine of the School of Salamanca represented the end of medieval concepts of law, with a
revindication of liberty not habitual in Europe of that time.
The natural rights of man came to be, in one form or another, the center of attention, including
rights as a corporeal being (right to life, economic rights such as the right to own property)
and spiritual rights (the right to freedom of thought and to human dignity).”
And,from the same Leftist Wikipedia article:
“Possibly the one who went furthest in this direction was FRANCISCO SUAREZ, whose work Defensio Fidei Catholicae adversus Anglicanae sectae errores (The Defense of the Catholic Faith against the errors of the Anglican sect 1613)
was the strongest defense in this period of popular sovereignty.
Men are BORN FREE by their NATURE and not as slaves of another man,
and can DISOBEY even to the point of DEPOSING an unjust government. ”
Even more:
“For Suárez, the political power of society is contractual in origin because the community forms by consensus of free wills.
The consequence of this contractualist theory is that the natural form of government is either a DEMOCRACY or a REPUBLIC.”
gravenimage says
Doomer, I know you have claimed many times that Agnostics and Atheists have no right to uphold human rights–and have even claimed that they somehow are not sincere in their support–even though those ex-Muslims like Ayaan Hirsi Ali have risked their lives to take this civilized stance.
Personally, I appreciate *everyone* who stands against the savagery of Islam.
I know that you have also lauded the barbaric Mohammed Hijab many times here–even claiming that he (somehow) isn’t really a savage Jihadist, but has secretly left Islam and is just pretending to still be a Jihadist for some unknown reason. Odd and disturbing stuff.
Beneath the Veil of Consciousness says
You got it all wrong. This is Iran’s latest reality show, The Fashion Police.
“
Ade Fegan says
where the police are the most immoral
Alfredo says
That’s how you make an ancient nation regress to the dark ages of mindless bigotry and stupidity.
The look in the eyes of the “morality policy” thug says it all, it is the look of complete hysterical madness.
OLD GUY says
Muslims/islam will always support the mans power over women. According to islam women are worth half that of any man, ain’t that great. Allowing this ideology to spread around the world through a migration invasion of freedom loving countries is vary dangerous and a slap in the face of our women by the governments failure to protect them.
Walter Sieruk says
The vicious Islamic “morality police” raising such a horrendous brutal fuss of a little bit of hair showing o nom a woman’s head not only proves true the old saying that “Evil is always looking for an excuse.” But this also further exposes the malicious and oppressive misogyny of Islam and of that Islamic tyranny of Iran.
For that vicious and cruel “mullah regime” of Iran is brutal and cruel violator of human rights. Especially regarding the human rights of girls and woman.
For example, to imprison women for not wearing the hijab is but one part of the anti-female tyranny of this tyrannical “mullah regime” of Iran.
For that ruthless cruel brutal heinous l regime of Iran that is so unfittingly has the word “Republic” in its title ,for its called “ The Islamic Republic of Iran” [ I R I].
That brutal cruel Islamic tyrannical regime of Iran is full of ruthless malicious misogyny.
On the topic of this Islamic tyranny of Iran a former Muslim revealed that “The IRI system recognizes women as dependent upon men and incomplete human beings who need to be supervised and controlled by men and the State. This author further exposed that “Women are created for the purposes of giving pleasure to men and childbearing – functions that confine them to the home” This is a male Chauvinistic as can possibly be.
In addition this writer further makes it known that “The IRI legal system still retains traditional patriarchal bias that can be described as nothing but systemic subordination of women , which is undoubtedly a human rights violation .”
This author further reveals that “Iran is of what Islamic fundamentalists desire, an Islamic State, and the consequence of achieving it “State Terror. Instead of utopia, Iran is an Islamic totalitarian nightmare…” and “the Islamic Republic of Iran exists and operates as what every Islamic fundamentalist dreams of, an Islamic state ruled by Sharia …What followed its establishment was the inevitable consequence and inexorable logic of its Islamic premises; state terrorism, a merciless tyranny.” [1]
This heinous Islamic has been also exposed by another author who was born and lived in a Middle Eastern nation for many years. She wrote “Female freedom and independence is one of the greatest sins in Islam…” and “Women in Islam are considered unclean, deemed inferior even to dirt.” [2]
All this is wicked, unjust and misogynistic to the extreme. Islam had not regard for human life, regardless of what the apologists for this religion will claim.
[1] THE ISLAM IN ISLAMIC TERRORISM BY Ibn Warraq. pages 345-347.
[2] THEY MUST BE STOPPED by Brigitte Gabriel pages 62, 172