Here’s the latest installment in the Annals of Idiocy: “Inclusiveness: a European Commissioner recommends no longer using ‘Christmas,’ ‘Christian’ names and the masculine,” translated from “Inclusivité : une commissaire européenne recommande de ne plus utiliser “Noël”, les noms “chrétiens” et le masculin,” Valuers Actuelles, November 29, 2021 (thanks to Medforth):
European Equality Commissioner Helena Dalli launched an internal guide for inclusive communication at the end of October. This prohibits a number of expressions deemed to be stigmatizing according to gender, sexual identities, ethnic origins or culture, the Italian daily Il Giornale revealed on Sunday (November 28). These recommendations aim to “reflect diversity” and to fight against “stereotypes deeply rooted in individual and collective behavior.”
One “stereotype” that racists have is that many black people have names like “Dequan” and “Lashonda” and “Takeesha.” So in order to combat that stereotype, all such names should be banned. No sense giving white racists grist for their mill.
Using Italian names for gangsters in movies about the Mafia simply reinforces stereotypes about “Italo-American” criminals. The only solution is to make sure that no Italian names are used for Mafia members. “Henry” and “Charles” are acceptable as gangster names, but “Enrico” and “Carlo” are not. No Mafia gangster should be shown either cooking, or eating, a plate of pasta. Garlic should also not be mentioned.
Similarly, in a movie about Mexican drug traffickers, their names must not lead anyone to think that they are in any way “Mexican”; that would not be fair, as such names would only reinforce a “stereotype” that far too many of us unthinkingly accept. Give them names like “Randolph” and “James” and “Alice.” Under no conditions should any Mexican drug trafficker be called “El Chapo” or “El Gordo” or “El Mata Amigos.”
In general, the report suggests that no one should be identified on the basis of their particularity or in a way that is not [sic] offensive. For example, the use of the masculine form “by default” should be prohibited and the salutation “Dear Sir or Madam” should be replaced by “Dear Colleague.” Gender-specific terms such as “workmen” should also not be used. As the document – Dalli’s internal guide –is written in English, some recommendations are not applicable to other languages. The text also provides that one should never ” imply ” a person’s sexual orientation or even their gender identity. Similarly, it considers that a reference to elements of Christian culture “assumes that all people are Christians.” It therefore recommends deleting the reference to Christmas and speaking instead of “holidays.” Christian names such as “Mary” or “John” should be banned, according to the Commissioner.
But how can you write, say, an application letter for an academic job and use as your salutation — as Helena Dalli recommends – “Dear Colleague”? You aren’t anyone’s “colleague” yet – that’s what you are applying to be – and use of that salutation would merely come across as presumptuous, and likely nip in the bud your chances to be hired.
To eliminate all gender specific names, start with the easy ones. Thus “workman” can become “worker.” But what do we do when we come, say, to weddings, where there is an insufficiently “inclusive” focus on the “man” and the “woman”? Revise the text. “Do you take this man to be your lawful wedded husband” should instead become “Do you take this man or woman or non-binary other, to be your lawful wedded husband or wife or non-binary other”? Eventually it might be a good idea to provide a single word that can refer equally to both “husband” and “wife.” We’re working on it.
Using the “masculine” form “by default” should. be avoided, according to Helena Dalli, EU Equal Opportunities Commissioner, working tirelessly to make the world a better place by erasing all distinctions. But “Dear Sir or Madam” doesn’t use the “masculine” form “by default” – it carefully allows, in full diversity-inclusivity-equity mode, both the masculine and the feminine possibilities.
The claim that a reference to “elements of Christian culture” necessarily “assumes that all people are Christian” is utter nonsense. If I mention “the Bamiyan Buddhas,” does this make me guilty of assuming “that all people are Buddhist”? If I write that “the holiday of Diwali is observed differently by Hindus, Jains, Sikhs and Buddhists, creating a rich tapestry of cultural traditions and customs,” have I thereby assumed that everybody in the world is either “Hindu, Jain, Sikh, or Buddhist”? If I mention “Hanukkah” or a menorah, or show on YouTube a lesson on “how to spin a dreidl,” have I assumed that everyone in the world is “Jewish”? Should all references to the Bible be eliminated, because such references would be unacceptable, as “too Christian” or too “Judeo-Christian”? Surely we can’t have that in our brave new world that hath such creatures in it as Helena Dalli. Indeed, as the Bible itself is a venerable vehicle for what we now recognize as sexism, why not go beyond forbidding the reading of the Bible, and make possession of the book itself a crime?
Helena Dalli, the powerful EU Commissioner, thinks we need to rid the world of names that are too linked to Christianity. She mentions as examples of names that must no longer be used “Mary” and “John.” But these are just the names that come immediately to mind. We need to get rid as well of other names smacking of Christianity, including “Peter,” “Simon,” Thomas,” “Joseph,” “Martha,” “Christopher,” George” (which makes one think of “Saint George”), “Andrew,” “Samuel” and so many more names that are “too Christian” for Christians – or anyone else — to use.
But why does Helena Dalli not mention the need to abolish names that are “too connected” to the religion of Islam? Why should “Mary” and “John” be eliminated, but “Mohammed” and its many variants — Mahmoud, Ahmad, Muhammad, Magomed, Mahmad, Mehmet, Mamadou, Muhammadu, Mahamed, Mohamad, Mohamed, Mohammad, and so on – be tolerated inside the EU? Helena Dalli should provide us with a list of names that she believes are unacceptably linked to religions other than Christianity, the sole faith she mentions and for which she appears to bear a deep animus. Then we can get to work banning those names as well.
She’s also against mention of the very word “Christmas.”
Even the expression “colonizing of Mars” is considered negative, as it would be reminiscent of colonialism, and should be replaced by the phrase “sending people to Mars.” The report [by Helena Dalli] also advocates a form of positive discrimination. It suggests not convening working groups where only one gender is represented and thinking about inviting people from different ethnicities to events and photo shoots. Helena Dalli has already been criticized for the polemical campaign “Freedom with the Hijab” and the participation of Islamist associations in the campaign.
It will be fascinating to see if the EU Commissioner manages to make every single working group at the EU “gender diverse.” How will such a rule work in practice, particularly with the Muslims, whose unequal treatment of men and woman is legitimized in the Qur’an itself and who insist even on separating male from female worshippers in the mosque?
A verse in the Quran – 4:34 – gives husbands the right to “beat” their wives if they even suspect them of “disobedience.” Honor killings by Muslim men of their wives, daughters, sisters, and daughters-in-law – which may be prompted by a multitude of sins committed by females in the family, such as refusing to wear a hijab, or being seen talking to a non-Muslim boy – lead to very light punishment or in some cases to no punishment at all. The misogyny of Islam can also be seen in the fact that a Muslim woman’s testimony is worth only half that of a man, and a daughter inherits only half what a son receives. Will Helena Dalli be able to force Muslim males to include females in their meetings? I suspect she will not even try. Her desire to impose restrictions of all kinds on “religions” ends up with her applying her humorless and bizarre restrictions to one religion only – Christianity.
As for doing away with the very word “Christmas,” the cast of Seinfeld, trying to be as ridiculous as possible, already provided some years ago a different word for that day, even less “Christian” than the word “holiday” (which derives from “holy day”); they called it “Festivus.” That should please Helena Dalli. A Festivus Tree, Festivus Lights, Festivus Presents, Festivus Cards. What’s not to like?
I know what you’re thinking. You are thinking that her idiocy will be rejected all those who have kept their wits about them, that the thinking world will rise up and laugh to scorn Ms./Mrs.Mr./Non-binary/Equal opportunity Helena Dalli. But she’s not just some Hyde Park Corner lunatic; she’s the EU Equal Opportunities Commissioner. In that post she can do – she’s already done — a lot of damage. She needs not just to be laughed at, but to be relieved of her position. Please, EU, put her, and therefore us, out of her misery.
PMK says
“Eventually it might be a good idea to provide a single word that can refer equally to both “husband” and “wife.” We’re working on it.”
That’s the easiest one to fix: spouse.
Do you take this person to be your lawfully wedded spouse?
It works for all marriage ceremonies – traditional or otherwise.
In grammar class (way back when), we learned that the male was the default only if you didn’t know the gender of the noun it referred back to. You only have to concern yourself with gender if you need to substitute a third person singular pronoun or a possessive. All other pronouns are gender-neutral.
The notion that Spanish names cannot be used in movies or stories about Spanish-speaking people is a laugh riot. What Mexican or Chilean would name a son Randolph? Any writer who does this would be accused of being Anglo-centric, when we live in a multicultural society.
When Muslims give up Ramadan, then maybe you can do away with all other holidays. Until then, Merry Christmas!!!!!!
Jim J Fox says
Excellent! My personal favourite- MANHOLE. In fairness, should be WOMANHOLE. Ohh…maybe not. Ahhh, that’s it – PERSONHOLE!!
Yogi says
It’s so disturbing, she should be removed from the office immediately!!! Our Christianity culture is for 2000 years !! About removing Rwanda !! It’s sickening about just remove all Christians from Europe!! As replace Muslims scums how will be wonderful.. speechless..
Wellington says
Proving again that Leftism isn’t just stupid but actually a mental disorder.
Jim J Fox says
Yep
Check Burry says
What race, gender, nationality, birth place is she? Must be in the masculine water eh.
Ray Jarman says
Why does she not change her first name to “No Name” since Helena refers to the beautiful Helen of Troy that caused the downfall of the great city state; at least according to Homer.
A very fine friend of mine, named Aisha, who worked as the chief telephone receptionist at the US Embassy in Abuja, Nigeria had no idea from where her name was derived and she was also a Muslim.
Keith O says
I don’t know what mind altering drugs these fools are on but they must be awesome!
If they aren’t on drugs then they should be taken in for a mental health assessment.
Know I shouldn’t be, but I’m constantly stunned by the abject stupidity and bias of the wankers who write these reports, and as a side note, it’s us poor bloody tax payers who are often the ones who foot the bill for this drivel.
gravenimage says
Just When You Thought The World Couldn’t Get More Idiotic
…………..
How is barring Christmas, Christian names, and masculine references “inclusive”? In fact, it is *anything but*.
I have a traditional Christian name–but even if I did not, the idea of *banning* such names is grotesque.
Oh, hey–you know who else has a traditional Christian name? Helena Dalli herself (itself? themselves?). Why doesn’t she/it/they/zhe change her/its/their/zheir name to something less culturally Christian? I know I’m offended…sarc.off
Ray Jarman says
+1
Proud Islamophobe says
1. People with the birth names of “Christian,” “Christina,” etc. aren’t going to change their names, nor are people *not* going to call them by their names, including their parents.
2. I wonder what word she’s going to use to her doctor to describe feminine problems. and does that apply to men, too, when they say something about their “things”? Things to the wall. The doctor holds your things and you cough. oh, like your coat and umbrella?
3. When the police are looking for a suspect and describe the suspect to the public, they’re going to be unable to say male or female – oh wait, the libturds have already done that.
4. “Merry Holiday.” oh, wait, we can’t do that either, because a holiday for one group of people doesn’t apply to another group of people. and of course what’s “holi” to one group of people is an abomination to another group.
5. Will we be arrested if we say we’re hoping for a “white” Christmas?
6. Will we be arrested if we describe a room as pitch black?
7. Will I be arrested if I say I’m craving pasta?
8. I guess that means we can’t talk dirty in the bedroom anymore, either?
I think I’ll send these questions to her.
Lisa Tea says
To list a few other Biblical Christian names that would have to be eliminated per this person’s criteria, we’d need to add: Adam, Eve, Abraham, Sarah, Moses, Miriam, Aaron, Noah, David, Saul, Paul, Joshua, Jacob, Benjamin, Abel, Cain, Seth, Nathan, Rachel, Rebecca, Solomon, Esther, Ruth, Naomi, Leah, Johnathan, Magdalena, Elizabeth*, Mathew, Mark, Luke, Jonah, Judah, Daniel, Joel, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekial, Hosea, Ezra, Amos, Micah, Zachariah, Malachi, Barnabas, Priscilla, Caleb, Nathaniel, Phillip, Stephen, James, Jude, Titus, Timothy, Delilah, Bathsheba, Matthias, Andrew, Bartholomew, Thadeus, Levi, Jonas, Reuban, Simeon, Anna, Gabriel, Michael, Hannah, Tobias. These are just the names I could quickly remember or look up.
* By extension, would we need to eliminate names derived from Elizabeth like Liz, Lisa, Melissa, Eliza, Elisa, Elise?
C’mon Man!!!
gravenimage says
And remember that if you use names from another part of the world it is considered “cultural appropriation”–so what are Westerners to do?
I guess they will just have to make up names, like Darth or Moon Unit or Equality 7-2521 (cultural kudos if anyone recognizes where this last name came from).
Major Tom says
“Professing themselves wise…….they became fools……”
Siddi Nasrani says
She should STOP sniffing the glue or if addicted removed to a Mental Institution for her
safety & well as our own.
OLD GUY says
I wonder what she thinks about Islam’s wonderful culture of grabbing young girls and women for sex-slaves and how that works into her inclusiveness program.