“Pro-migration activists are escalating their race-themed “Hate” PR campaign against critics of federal migration policy– even though many recent polls show the critics are mainstream, multi-racial, and multiplying.”
The latter point does not matter to Leftist pro-migration activists. They claim to represent “human rights” and opposition to racism, but ignore the global jihad, which inflicts the worst human rights abuses globally. They care nothing about the astronomical numbers of jihadist blacks who are murdering Christian blacks in Africa. To Leftists, some black lives don’t matter. Useful idiots scream “racism” at critics of irresponsible immigration policies, dismissing those critics who are from multiracial groups. Meanwhile, advocacy for open-door immigration policies threatens the sovereignty and security of Western countries.
Heidi Beirich is a hardcore Leftist activist who formerly led the SPLC’s “Intelligence Project.” Beirich is now working with another “social justice” activist group, the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism. She insists contrafactually that “the argument for curbing immigration is just a ‘white nationalist’ argument that America should be for white people, and everybody else is somehow subpar and doesn’t belong.”
Beirich took a run at me in the Toronto Star, calling me “anti-Muslim” for writing for Jihad Watch after I was fired by the Trudeau Liberal government for criticizing Islam. She was quoted as saying that “Douglass-Williams has been ‘on the anti-Muslim circuit for some time’ and has written hundreds of articles for Jihad Watch since 2012.” She falsely asserts that Jihad Watch is “anti-Muslim.” Jihad Watch is about the stealth and violent jihad; is she then insinuating that all Muslims are jihadists?
She and a colleague landed the Southern Poverty Law Center in a lawsuit for falsely designating the Center for Immigration Studies as a “hate group.” And after Robert Spencer was blacklisted by Mastercard, Beirich said: “We want PayPal, we want Mastercard, we want all of them to stop servicing hate groups.” And she herself is the self-appointed arbiter of what constitutes a hate group.
In 2017, Judicial Watch warned that evidence had emerged that Middle Eastern jihadists were entering the United States across the Mexican border. It is a common sense observation that jihadists on a mission of conquest would exploit open borders. But Leftists, especially those who materially gain from the business of open-door migration, continue to defame and libel genuinely concerned citizens. Should anyone oppose the obvious dangers of open-door immigration policies, they are called “racists,” “Islamophobes,” “anti-Muslim,” and “white supremacists.”
Meanwhile, jihad training camps have been operating “in America’s back yard,” and with the opportunity that reckless open-door immigration policies offer, and the fact that martyrdom is the jihadist’s ultimate calling, America is in trouble. And drug traffickers and other unvetted criminals are also all welcome.
“Pro-Migration Activists Accelerate ‘Hate’ Campaign Vs. Immigration Reformers,” by Neil Munro, Breitbart, December 16, 2021:
Pro-migration activists are escalating their race-themed “Hate” PR campaign against critics of federal migration policy– even though many recent polls show the critics are mainstream, multi-racial, and multiplying.
The argument for curbing immigration “is just a white nationalist argument that America should be for white people, and everybody else is somehow subpar and doesn’t belong,” said Heidi Beirich, who named her activist group, The Global Project Against Hate and Extremism.
The GOP has “benefited enormously from [establishment] media outlets actively normalizing anti-immigrant hysteria,” according to an op-ed published by the Los Angeles Times.
“This movement has very sinister origins, right? Racist eugenicist beliefs that have shaped the ideology,” claimed Lola Ibrahim, the director of the Migrant, Immigrant & Refugee Rights Alliance. She spoke at a December 9 online meeting of progressives seeking to minimize media coverage of Americans’ views about immigration.
The mainstream groups include the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), NumbersUSA, the Federation for American Immigration Reform, and the Immigration Reform Law Institute.
“The point is to intimidate people and prevent them from articulating these mainstream policy views,” responded CIS director Mark Krikorian. He continued:
If they can shut us up, they have a good chance of preventing these views from being articulated by politicians and writers. [If] so, they would’t have political effect because even if people agree with you, if no one is talking about those issues and no politicians are running on them, then people’s opinions and views can’t translate into policy.
It is somewhat successful but not nearly as much as they want. Obviously, concerns about excessive immigration are breaking out of the box that these groups would like to confine them to. It’s not just [President Donald] Trump — Trump was more a manifestation of that happening rather than the cause of it.
Multiple polls show the public is increasingly opposed to the federal government’s economic policy of cheap labor migration. That policy cuts Americans’ wages, raises their housing costs, and diverts politicians from national problems of productivity, alienation, health, education, research and prosperity.
For example, the left-wing Equis Research group reported December 13 that almost 51 percent of Latinos want to rollback asylum migration, and 45 percent want to reduce legal immigration:
A YouGov poll reported in November that 63 percent of whites, 52 percent of Hispanics — and 40 percent of blacks — believe President Joe Biden has not been tough enough on migration:…..
Jim says
The problem seems to be that illegal and asylum migration have supporters who profit financially from this. The benefits of reducing and eliminating this sort of immigration are spread over society, and there are no big winners who are motivated to keep the money rolling in. The left has so far owned the topic of race, identity politics and grievance politics. So they simply start ranting about the racists who oppose their immigration policies. That tends to shut up opposition. It would be desirable to make the racist label stick on the left. Why do the Democrats subsidize Planned Parenthood, when PP is targeting black neighborhoods? That might be labeled racist, for example. Or, the left supports men competing in women’s sports. It could be argued that this hurts black female athletes, who are denied the possibility of upward mobility through athletic success. Another case is the push for resegregation which the left supports. It could be pointed out that the left called segregation racist in the 50s and 60s, and why should they change their tune now? The left is more vulnerable than they think. Likewise, the left says the government should hurt the rich to benefit the poor, but leftists often profit from their immigration policies, so they should be hurt to restore equity. The question is whether the Republicans will make the effort, and also, a lot of Republicans are RINOs or have financial interests at stake. Many may have business ties that benefit from cheap labor. Still, the development of robots reduces the need for cheap labor and hence for illegal immigrants or poor unskilled immigrants. As well, the left pushes for sending our industry to China, which reduces the jobs for Americans. Perhaps the left should be bombarded with questions about this practice. Why are the leftists profiting at the expense of middle class and poor Americans. And why are they importing poor people, when the jobs are sent to China. Why not send the poor migrants to China too? Lots of possibilities for fighting back against the leftists with their endless rants about racism. They are the big racists. They would probably argue that slave labor plantations were good for slaves, if we still had slavery. The Democrats were the big proponents of continuing slavery, even as the industrial revolution made slavery less profitable. So why let them corner the topic of anti-racism?
noel b says
I being an American born and raised here feels that we will or the conquered from iMuslims. Look at Europe
Infidel says
Given that islam and jihad are joined at the hip, it’s not false to assert that being anti-jihad is being anti-islam. The only question then remaining is whether that’s anti-muslim as well? If one defines a person as being muslim only as long as he follows islam, then I’d think it is! If otoh it defines one who’s muslim at any stage, even if one has left, then it’s not. In other words, Jihad Watch wouldn’t be against Syed Wasim Rizvi, who converted to Hinduism, but it would be against Ilhan Omar, who’s actively supporting jihad causes
After the disasters we’ve seen both at the border as well as the mass migration of ‘Afghan refugees’ this year, good luck to Ms Beirich on getting most people to accept her message. Especially since those illegals are exempt from any of the ‘Covid’ laws that the rest of us are subjected to
Kdesq says
Why is it ALWAYS white liberal scum that about the loudest racist slurs? Always! And why are they always the ones that would make a train take a dirt road?
mortimer says
Heidi Beirich makes a living by calumniating people with different views from her own … that is, people who are not fascisto-Marxists.
Anyone who is in favor of freedom of expression is a ‘racist’ to her and worse. Freedom of speech is the bulwark of democracy. Without freedom of expression, Heidi Beirich and her ilk can say whatever lies they want unchallenged.
Heidi Beirich and her ilk want a monopoly on all information … a fascisto-Marxist-Globalits monopoly.
Pray Hard says
Show me a leftist who isn’t an evil, whining moron.
Peter WF says
How selfish and self centered are the pro migration lobby! Do they ever think about what skilled migration does to the emigrant’s country? Imagine your country’s skilled are constantly being pilfered by another country. In what economic shape would it be? Constantly pouring money into education to see the educated leave for greener first world pastures. Why can’t the 1st world afford to train its own young? Its own skilled people? Consider this loss goes on to all 1st world countries and the cumulative effect is huge. It is the 1st world preying on the 2nd and 3rd world for their people resources. The employment market is the ONLY economic market that is legally manipulated by importing people whenever business complains about the cost of labor.
john smith says
Heidi Beirich is the most obnoxious, loathsome, nauseating leftard idiot that I have come across for quite sometime. She is your typical snowflake lefty who believes she is morally superior to the rest of us, when the truth is she’s anything but. This pro migration activist wants to demolish all borders, intends to flood our countries with those beautiful peaceful jihadi’s who are only searching for a better life, what a truly wonderful person she believes herself to be.
Such people as Heidi Beirich and pope Francis sicken me, they really do, both believe they are opposing evil when in fact they are embracing it. They attack very people who are trying to defend our borders, our liberties, and our lives, and have taken the side of those that intend to slaughter us. Both will have the blood of many innocent people on their hands, but they are so blind to this fact I don’t believe either of them will ever see it.
jewdog says
It would never occur to any of the morons in the SPLC that the Muslim immigrants are far-right fascists in their religious bigotry, attitudes towards women and hatred of gays. Do they really want the US to be inundated with the unwashed, illiberal masses of reactionary primitives from the world worst hellholes? They are fighting racism to import racism, and worse.
OLD GUY says
Heidi Beirich what world does she live in, or I guess you could say does she want to live in. Where do these NUTS come from, or is it like so many of these Activists, it is all about making money. Support or create a problem that can’t be fixed and keep collecting contributions from other nuts. The SPLC will never go away, it collects lots of cash, and doesn’t want the problem cured as that would but them out of the money and power.
libertyORdeath says
Opposition to open borders is a virtual consensus in most Western countries. It’s only the elites and politicians that support unlimited migration, while about 75% of their citizens oppose it.
They don’t care what we think. Illegal immigrants are a benefit to those in power, including so-called conservatives. If we don’t insist on lowering the rate of illegal immigration and deporting the 90% of those who do not qualify for asylum, then we will be slowly replaced, making our votes and voices useless. Vote for candidates who will enforce the immigration laws or the outcome is inevitable.
gravenimage says
Pro-migration activists escalating race-themed ‘hate’ PR campaigns against critics of mass migration
…………..
Yes–disgusting.