My latest in PJ Media:
Critics of the “Islamophobia” bill sponsored by the winsome and patriotic Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Mogadishu) say that it will be used not just to combat vigilante attacks against innocent Muslims, which are never justified, but to stifle any criticism of Islam at all, including opposition to jihad violence and Sharia oppression of women. Omar’s latest husband, the amply remunerated political consultant Tim Mynett, has just proven this concern to be abundantly justified by accusing a U.S.-based Iranian dissident of opposing the bill just because she dislikes Muslims. It’s an ugly false charge, and it reveals that the foes of Omar’s “Islamophobia” bill were right all along.
It all started Tuesday, when human rights activist Masih Alinejad took to the Washington Post, of all places, to point out some of the risks involved in Omar’s “Islamophobia” bill. Alinejad, who was recently the target of a kidnapping plot launched by the Islamic Republic of Iran, wrote: “I should make clear: I have nothing against Omar personally. Like her, I have many relatives who are pious Muslims I love and respect.” Alinejad added: “My mother is a devout Muslim who wears hijab all the time. I, on the other hand, challenged clerical rule with my journalism until I was thrown out of Iran. I launched a campaign against compulsory hijab, demanding that Iranian women be given the freedom of choice to decide their own destiny. Will such criticism of compulsory hijab be labeled as Islamophobia?”
The answer, of course, is a resounding yes. While witless Western feminists, oblivious to the fact that the hijab has been and remains the instrument of oppression for untold numbers of women, have made Hijab Day an annual event, standing in solidarity with hijab-wearing women in their struggle against imaginary impression from fictional MAGA-hatted yahoos and ignoring the fact that women have been brutalized and even killed for not wearing the thing. The fatuous non-Muslim hijabs have been celebrated as multicultural, tolerant, and everything that is good, while those who have dared to call attention to the plight of women in the Islamic world have been derided as “racists” and “Islamophobes.”
Accordingly, Alinejad writes: “Creating a mandate to monitor Islamophobia comes with its own risks. The legislation does not provide a clear definition of Islamophobia, nor does it make any clear effort to exempt the crimes of Islamist states against their own people. Is criticism of the Taliban a form of Islamophobia? What about criticism of the Islamic Republic of Iran? Can one criticize Hamas or Hezbollah as terrorist organizations?” Yes, yes, and no. “Islamophobia” neatly bottles up even the slightest negative word about jihad or Sharia-inspired oppression and consigns it all to the dustbin of bigotry.
There is more. Read the rest here.
somehistory says
That face…ugly, disgusting front for her evil, demonic soul, as a child of satan the devil, doing his desires.
The Apostle John tells us the difference between “children of God and children of the devil.”
(1 John 3:4-10) and this ugly creep is a prime example of the latter “children.”
“Whoever makes a practice of sinning is of the devil, for the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the works of the devil. 9 No one born of God makes a practice of sinning, for God’s seed abides in him; and he cannot keep on sinning, because he has been born of God. 10 By this it is evident who are the children of God, and who are the children of the devil: whoever does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor is the one who does not love his brother.”
https://biblia.com/bible/esv/1-john/3/4-10
Wellington says
There is something profoundly disturbing about Omar’s face, somehistory. I’ve noticed this for years now. Well, a person’s true self so often is revealed by their countenance, especially by the eyes.
mortimer says
Toxic narcissism, taqiyya and sadism.
somehistory says
I agree, Wellington.
As the saying goes, “the soul is in the eyes.” and when a patient is seen by a doctor, eye doctor or otherwise, the eyes are examined for signs of illness.
Her eyes show just what is in her soul and it is an evil sickness. She really does remind me of a snake, sneaking up on an unsuspecting bunny rabbit.
somehistory says
Or, even more well-known, “The eyes are the windows to the soul.”
Jesus said, “The eye is the lamp of the body. If your eyes are good, your whole body will be full of light” ( Matthew 6:22 )
PRCS says
“That face…ugly, disgusting front for her evil, demonic soul, as a child of satan the devil, doing his desires.”
For crying out loud!
As he is just another superstitious belief, she is NOT a child of “Satan”. C’mon. And what ever do her physical features have to do with this?
There are plenty of legitimate points to make about Omar and her idiotic husband.
gravenimage says
Ilhan Omar’s Husband Accuses Iranian Dissident of ‘Islamophobia’
………………
So if you are against *forced veiling* or anything else about the bloody Mullahs you are guilty of “Islamophobia”? Madness. If unchallenged this will be the death of freedom of speech.
Wellington says
Madness indeed, gravenimage. No criticism of Islam of any kind allowed lest it be called “Islamophobia.” And which is why only the wicked or the stupid use this word as though it has legitimate meaning. It has none.
gravenimage says
Spot on, Wellington.
mortimer says
The “Islamophobia” smear is a Trojan horse for Sharia blasphemy law and Muslims see it as such, but will not admit this truth.
“Islamophobe”, for Muslims. is the secularized way to say ‘KAFIR HARBI’. A ‘kafir, is a non-Muslim. A kafir is either 1) ‘submissive’ to Sharia law or 2) non-submissive, even rebellious, to Sharia law.
‘Submissive’ kafirs are DHIMMIS. ‘Non-submissive’ kafirs are called ‘HARBI’ … that is, they are AT WAR with Islam and therefore Muslims must ‘fight’ (q-t-l) them. The Arabic q-t-l means ‘fight to the death’.
Thus, a kafir harbi should be fought and killed. A peculiarity of Sharia law is that a kafir who fights Islam through verbal discourse is a KAFIR HARBI and must be executed, since Mohammed is not alive to pardon him. Thus, anyone who verbally opposes Islam or lowers the prestige of Islam by exposing Islam’s flaws, is a KAFIR HARBI and automatically forfeits the right to live.
This is why the “Islamophobia” smear contains such a deadly Trojan horse within it.
Wellington says
Thanks for that information, mortimer. Hmmm. Perhaps I’ll have to start ending my missives to friends and acquaintances by signing off as “Harbily yours.”
gravenimage says
Yes–all non-Muslim countries are considered “Dar-al-Harb”, or the “House of War”, even if they are not at war with any Muslim country. Just not being under the Muslim heel is considered aggression.
OLD GUY says
Omar represents a foreign regime not America.
raja says
Old guy,
Foreign regime or the unseen regime of Satan? She gives the impression that she is enjoying every moment of anti-humanism and anti-Americanism. And she sure cannot be counted amongst humans. Like all pious Muslims she represents the devil which some idiots don’t understand.
somehistory says
Absolutely!
Alfredo says
Why are these devious characters being cuddled? Do these useful idiots know what these haters do to Jews and Christians in their lands?
Do these naive people have any clue of what animates these haters?
They should, nay, in fact they MUST go to their Holey Qur’an, a-Haddith and their Sunnah and their Tafsir.
That would be quite an eye opener for them indeed. It would dispel all their romantic but misguided notions of the so called religion of peace…
Islamophobia is a term invented by the Muslim Brotherhood to engage in Taqiyya and use it as a battering ram to silence the ones who know the true nature of this demonic cult.
All the pieces of the puzzle in their uninformed minds would fall into the right place. Thereafter everything would become crystal clear.
They would no longer fall prey to Taqiyya like bumbling fools taken for a ride astride the Buraq. The mythical beast with the face of a woman. A cross between a mule and a donkey.
The perfect description of an Abdul.