The problem with this is that virtually any presentation that is remotely critical of Muhammad is smeared as “insulting” by Islamic supremacists, no matter how true and accurate it may be.
“Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind moves SC over hate speeches; ‘insulting PBUH akin to attacking very foundation of Islam,'” Asianet Newsable, January 2, 2022:
The Supreme Court was approached by a Muslim organization, which sought action against hate speeches against their community, stating the state officials had failed to take action despite many complaints.
Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, president Maulana Syed Mahmood Asad Madani, filed a complaint stating, “Such speeches go beyond the limits of a permitted critical denial of another’s beliefs, and are certainly likely to incite religious intolerance…”
The petition further reads “insulting Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) is akin to attacking the very foundation of Islam.”
The plea read, “many violent acts have taken place in which many precious lives have been lost most of the people belonging to the weaker section of the society, majority of them belonging to the Muslim community”.
The advocate MR Shamshad said the organization waited for a “considerable” amount of time before approaching the SC. They gave enough time to the state authorities to act against the hatred and restore peace but were left disappointed….
Boycott Turkey says
It’s a blasphemy law they want basically hopefully it’s rejected by the Supreme Court I can’t believe there’s actually going to be a similar law to this in the US thanks to Ilhan Omar why should people not critise Mohammed the way he persecuted others and oppprsssed women I guess the truth hurts some
gravenimage says
I hope this is resisted, both here and in India.
GreekEmpress says
Contact Senators to vote no—
If it passes, it could mean the end of JW and other anti-jihad sites.
Boycott Turkey says
Good luck Greek Empress I hope this blasphemy law doesnt pass if it did it could shut down jihad watch and stop the awareness of persecuted Christian’s Hindus and Apostates in Islamic dominated countries things look bleak but miracles can happen
Keith O says
Would naming a pet pig Mohammed be classed as an insult to islam?
Boycott Turkey says
No But it would be a insult to the pig
Save Europe says
Superb humour ???????
gravenimage says
India: Islamic group goes to Supreme Court to stop ‘insults’ to Muhammad
The problem with this is that virtually any presentation that is remotely critical of Muhammad is smeared as “insulting” by Islamic supremacists, no matter how true and accurate it may be.
The petition further reads “insulting Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) is akin to attacking the very foundation of Islam.”
…………….
This is true–so if you say anything critical about Islam preaching robbery, rape, mass murder or imposing Islamic law you are “insulting Muhammad”.
What these Muslims want is for India to impose Islamic blasphemy laws on its people.
GreekEmpress says
+1
falconslayersamraamdodgers says
Fyi recently Delhi High court refused to ban Wasim Rizvi’s book ‘muhammad’. The court said if you do not like the book then don’t read.
gravenimage says
Good.
Infidel says
The Indian Supreme Court is even more brazen than SCOTUS in making up its own laws. And if it makes up a law here to satisfy this jihadi group, no one – especially the BJP – will dare oppose them. Like I said, India needs a new Hindutva party, since both the BJP and the Shiv Sena have betrayed Hindutva
As for the BJP, they have a new slogan that translates as ‘With everyone, for everyone’s development and everyone’s trust’: the underlying point being winning the support of muslims, since they’ve won everyone else’s support. Except that they’re never gonna get the support of muslims
falconslayersamraamdodgers says
From 1947ad to 2014ad India was the only country that had an ignominious track record of excreting politicians ministers including home ministers who reveled in shaming the country. Even with all of our disagreements with Modi his tenure has been actually good with exceptions of few cases. Overall he has done good job now its time to win 2024. He can do a lot more in remaining 2 years for example notification of Caa set at January 2022.
notnolib says
Without insulting the false prophet, is it ok to “point out” facts about the pedophilic pig-faced dog mohammed?
gravenimage says
Not if it is said critically. Too often truth does not matter.
OLD GUY says
I wonder if the U.S. Supreme Court would hear a similar case to stop insults of TRUMP. I guess the big question is what constitutes an insult? Is telling the truth about something Mohammad did or questioning something written 1400 yrs. ago about him, an insult? Who decides what an insult is. I’am insulted almost daily by the rape, murder and general violence being done in the name of Islam and Mohammad. These atrocities being carried out by islamic followers who are indoctrinated some can’t even read or wright, yet alone make a rational decision of whether Mohammad and Islam is right or wrong. I guess thats what the Islamic leadership wants, blind followers who question nothing they are told to do. “DICTATORSHIP”
falconslayersamraamdodgers says
Modern nation states don’t encourage civic duties but only rights a lethal flaw in democracies.Democracy and secularism in prety much every country today is about mooslames getting away speaking anything about majority. And a bunch of minority gets to decide and drop certifications regarding what should be considered phobic secular or communal.Historically speaking, multicultural societies nations have seen a lot of infighting and the situation can only improve if the focus is towards integration and assimilation of all communities by finding common grounds. Most of the multicultural democracies of the world do not have mixed neighbourhoods but packets of different communities who feel comfortable in their own zones these democracies are perceived to be liberal and secular. You can surely assimilate pretty much every community sooner or later but this scenario is not tenable at all when it comes to mooslames.
Go on to make list of fatal perversions there are many the people of knowledge can ofcourse add to the list.
1)Tolerance of intolerance in the name of tolerance.
2)Perpetuation of inequality in name of equality.
3)A joke of freedom that impinges upon freedom.
4)Silently democracies have become sanctuaries for jihad.
5)social ruptures, sectarianism and secessionist trash.