“Indeed, those who malign Allah and his messenger, Allah has cursed them in this world and the hereafter, and has prepared for them a humiliating punishment. And those who malign believing men and believing women undeservedly, they bear the guilt of slander and obvious sin. O prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to draw their veils close around them. That will be better, so that they may be recognized and not molested. Allah is always forgiving, merciful. If the hypocrites and those in whose hearts is a disease and the alarmists in the city do not stop, we will indeed urge you on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it only for a little while. Cursed, they will be seized wherever they are found and killed with a slaughter.” (Qur’an 33:57-61)
Abu ‘Afak was a poet who was over one hundred years old, and had mocked Muhammad in his verses. Muhammad asked his companions: “Who will avenge me on this scoundrel?” One of them murdered Abu ‘Afak in his sleep. Likewise with another poet who mocked him: the poetess ‘Asma bint Marwan. Muhammad on another occasion cried out, “Will no one rid me of this daughter of Marwan?” One of Muhammad’s companions, ‘Umayr ibn ‘Adi, went to her house that night, where he found her sleeping next to her children. The youngest, a nursing babe, was in her arms. But that didn’t stop ‘Umayr from murdering her and the baby as well. Muhammad commended him: “You have done a great service to Allah and His Messenger, ‘Umayr!” (Ibn Ishaq, 674-676)
Then there was Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf, another poet whose crime was mocking Muhammad. Muhammad again asked his companions: “Who is willing to kill Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His Apostle?” One of the companions, Muhammad bin Maslama, answered, “O Allah’s Apostle! Would you like that I kill him?” When Muhammad said that he would, Muhammad bin Maslama said, “Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Kab).” Muhammad responded: “You may say it.” Muhammad bin Maslama duly lied to Ka’b, luring him into his trap, and murdered him. (Bukhari 5.59.369)
More on this story. “Gujarat: Kishan Bharwad’s murder executed on instructions of two Maulvis, Police identifies the suspects and arrests murderers,” OpIndia, January 28, 2022:
On Thursday, the Ahmedabad Police arrested two persons and discovered links of two Maulvis in the murder case of 27-year-old Kishan Bharwad on January 25. Kishan was shot dead in Dhandhuka as he along with his cousin, was passing by the Modhwada locality on his two-wheeler.
According to the Zee News Gujarati, the murder was carried out on instructions of two Maulvis, one from Ahmedabad and another one from Mumbai. A Maulvi from the Jamalpur area of Ahmedabad had allegedly provided weapons to the murderers and Maulana from Mumbai had given the instructions….
The matter came to light when the cousin of the victim, Bhaumik lodged a police complaint in the case and said that the murder could be related to Bharwad’s social media post around 15 days back. It is alleged that Kishan had shared a post on social media platform which the Muslims found offensive.
The video shared by Kishan had an image of Prophet Muhammad. As reported, the police had taken against Kishan over the post as some people had outraged over it. His social media account is currently set to private and police, too, have not specified the content of the allegedly controversial post….
The Police has so far identified and arrested two accused murderers who fired at Kishan and is investigating the matter concerning the social media post and involvement of Maulvis.
Boycott Turkey says
The Muslim clerics should also be arrested and charged with terrorism I wonder what media platform it was posted on the picture of muhammed and how they where able to track the victim ?
Kashyap says
What a barbaric these Muslims are. After all they are driven by their religious text in the form of doctrines. Being cruel lot those who do not follow are killed.
falconslayersamraamdodgers says
When your cult has no terrorism, you say ‘religion has no terrorism’. When your cult has terrorism, you say ‘terrorism has no religion’.
falconslayersamraamdodgers says
When your religion has no terrorism, you say ‘religion has no terrorism’. When your religion has terrorism, you say ‘terrorism has no religion’.
Ramakrishna K says
¤
Anyone indulging in such Killings should be
1. Lashed 1000 times before hanging
2. Their Properties should be seized
3. Their Parents & Siblings should be disenfranchised.
4. The Mullah who inspires such deeds should be kept in jail for 40 years
Infidel says
Your #4 falls short. If you or anybody either incites murder, or plots one, you’d be facing serious charges, even in India, and for the right victim, one would even face the death penalty there. But none of the mullahs/maulvis/imams/whatever ever get booked in India, for crimes that anyone else would go to jail for. And this under what is ostensibly a ‘Hindu nationalist’ government, and in the above story, in a state that got the third degree for being anti-muslim
Sometimes, I agree w/ the Juna Akhara Mahamandaleshwar – Swami Yati Narasinghnand, when he says that India just has 7 more years before it gets a muslim prime minister and then rapidly transforms into the next Pakistan. I have not seen any action from any Indian government outside UP or Assam or Tripura to convince me otherwise
gravenimage says
I mostly agree with you. But I think that family of Jihadists should be investigated, not disenfranchised. And preaching murder is actually a serious crime.
gravenimage says
India: Two Muslim clerics ordered murder of Hindu for posting image of Muhammad
………………..
Did these Muslims clerics get Islam wrong? Of course not. It calls for murder for daring to criticize Islam.
And note that the police *targeted the victim* before his murder for non-violent posting of images. Just appalling in what is supposed to be a democracy.
Infidel says
On the last point, I’m willing to bet – not that it should matter – that him posting images of Mohammed was not unprovoked. Chances are that he saw muslims mocking Hindu deities, and in retaliation, he posted these. This is how things normally start: muslims ain’t satisfied w/ the freedom to worship allah: they have to denigrate deities of other faiths, and do. When the devotees of other faiths retaliate in kind, then they get violent
It’s good that the residents of Ahmadabad called a bandh (strike) in protest, but I miss the spirit of 2002, when riots broke out. That’s what India needs, b’cos muslims have been taking things too much for granted
John Allan says
There’s an IMAGE of Mohammed!? Not as a paedophile, I’ll warrant!