Islamic State brides are often as dangerous as their jihadist husbands. Some also commit human rights abuses and atrocities, and are on a mission to spread the Sharia globally and train their children (who were known in Islamic State domains as the Cubs of the Caliphate) to do the same.
The cases involving Islamic State brides trying to get back “home” to the West have similar characteristics everywhere, and that includes the case of Hoda Muthana. Bleeding hearts advocate for them while they exploit the female victimhood routine, and are frequently pictured in the mainstream media with smiles while holding their children. (Imagine truthful pictures of them assisting in the murder and rape of minorities). They always state that they regret joining the Islamic State; does anyone really expect them to say otherwise? They are desperate after the fall of the Islamic State that they joined in its glory days.
Islamic State brides can be highly dangerous to national security. Many do not regard “home” as their real home. They regard all Western countries as dar al harb (the houses of war) to be subverted under Islam.
In Canada, however, Justin Trudeau rolled out a welcome mat to Islamic State returnees.
“Supreme Court denies appeal of regretful Islamic State bride,” Associated Press, January 11, 2022:
The U.S. Supreme Court has refused to hear the appeal of a woman who left home in Alabama to join the Islamic State terror group, but then decided she wanted to return to the United States
The justices declined without comment on Monday to consider the appeal of Hoda Muthana who was born in New Jersey in October 1994 to a diplomat from Yemen and grew up in Alabama near Birmingham
Muthana left the U.S. to join the Islamic State in 2014, apparently after becoming radicalized online.
While she was overseas the government determined she was not a U.S. citizen and revoked her passport, citing her father’s status as a diplomat at the time of her birth. Her family sued to enable her return to the United States….
…Muthana surrendered to U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces as Islamic State fighters were losing the last of their self-declared caliphate in Iraq and Syria and going to refugee camps.
Muthana said she regretted her decision to join the group and wanted to return to the U.S. with her toddler child, the son of a man she met while living with the group. The man later died.
Her current whereabouts aren’t clear. Family attorney Christina Jump of the Constitutional Law Center for Muslims in America did not immediately return an email seeking comment Tuesday.
The decision to revoke her passport was made under former President Barack Obama. The case gained widespread attention as former President Donald Trump tweeted about it, saying he had directed the secretary of state not to allow her back into the country.
MIke says
this is a Trojan Horse wake up western world
European pagan says
She can go to Yemen if Yemen allows her to enter the country.
Infidel says
She has a host of choices – Yemen, Afghanistan, Pakistan,…
The good news is her current whereabouts being unknown (assuming it’s not in the US or even in the western hemisphere). Hopefully, she meets w/ an islamic end
ChrisFromCincinnati says
Once an enemy of the USA, always an enemy of the USA. She made her bed… she can sleep in it. GOOD job Supreme Court!
Infidel says
Yeah, all they had to do was refuse to hear the case, and that did it! Didn’t even have to depend on the bizarre judgements of Sotomeyer or Breyer
gregbeetham says
I’m always impressed by their audacity, they seem to think their religious dementia has some kind of legitimacy but unfortunately for those possessed by Satan like Islamic State followers they have none, the burning pit awaits them.
The true God does not order people to be killed in his name, only Satan does that.
PRCS says
As with other religious whack jobs, they are deluded.
Know what I mean, Greg?
gregbeetham says
Yes, I occasionally revert to language they understand, God, (Allah) Satan, burning pit, if there is one thing Muslims are terrified of it is being tossed into the burning pit for eternity in the afterlife and if there is such a thing that’s where murdering lowlifes such as them are going.
Keith O says
I think Greg missed the point!
gregbeetham says
I got the point alright, I was talking like a religious whack job too by referencing God, (Allah), Satan and Muslims getting tossed into the burning pit for eternity because that’s the kind of language that Muslims believe in.
gravenimage says
PRCS, are you implying that Greg is dangerous as are members of ISIS because he believes in God?
Hoi Polloi says
OK, USSC 1. Let’s see if they can improve their score. They haven’t been doing so well lately.
Clive Delmonte says
US Supreme Court got this one right!
PRCS says
“Muthana left the U.S. to join the Islamic State in 2014, apparently after becoming radicalized online.”
What does it mean for a Muslim to become radicalized? Does the INDEPENDENT’s writer know or ever wonder about it? What does the general public think it means?
Michael Copeland says
This is the UK Government’s definition of “radicalisation”:
“process by which a person comes to support terrorism and forms of extremism leading to terrorism”?
Other users of the word seem to use it to indicate that the “radicaliised” person has somehow misinterpreted or misunderstood the message. Such meaning is encouraged by muslims seeking to keep the truth concealed.
The UK government’s definition neatly describes the instruction given in mosques.
https://gatesofvienna.net/2018/01/instructing-radicalisation/
gregbeetham says
When I did chemistry at school there was such a thing as a radical so I’m thinking that’s what Muslims are aiming for when they blow themselves up, becoming a cloud of free radicals and the media being very astute have picked up on the chemistry of the whole thing just like I did, unless they have some other even stupider explanation like there are different versions of Muslims or some such crap.
Infidel says
A ‘radical’ in chemistry is an ion that’s made up of more than one element. Such as sulfate – SO4 – would be the negative radical in sulfuric acid. Doesn’t necessarily imply explosive, since a lot of compounds that are not explosive include radicals in them
I prefer the term ‘islamized’ when referring to muslims that have decided to go all jihad
gregbeetham says
I didn’t actually say the radical was ‘explosive’ I described the liberation of a cloud of free radicals due to the Muslim setting off his bomb and vaporising himself and seeing as how they came from a ‘radicalized’ Muslim in the first place, if the loose association and my poetic licence is too much of a stretch try not to be too concerned about it, life is too short.
Yeah islamised is ok but the media and the establishment always annoy us with the term ‘radicalized’ which they did on this occasion.
gravenimage says
Good point, PRCS. This is orthodox Islam.
Frank Anderson says
I will keep lighting my candle: A criminal conspiracy is unlimited in maximum number of members or duration. It can involve millions or even billions of people and last hundreds of years. The acts of any one member are the legal responsibility of all members. The short description of a conspiracy, which islam satisfies every element is 1) an agreement 2) of 2 or more people 3) for an unlawful purpose or to use unlawful means for an otherwise lawful purpose 4) ANY overt act by ANY one member in furtherance of the goal.
Islam has the goal of worldwide conquest, slaughter, slavery, looting and destruction. Depending on who is counting, between 250 and 1000 million people have been murdered and more every day. There is no reason to give it protection from its legal obligations because it claims to be a religion. A very well-written, concise explanation of conspiracy can be found for free online by reading the case United States v. Gary Greenough, from the Southern District of Alabama, 609 F.Supp 1090 (1985).
Islam should be routinely described as a criminal conspiracy instead of a religion.
Michael Copeland says
“Participating in a Terrorist Criminal Association” is what the accused in the Paris massacres trial are charged with.
Islam qualifies as a terrorist criminal association.
https://gatesofvienna.net/2020/10/participating-in-a-terrorist-criminal-association/
It is taking a mighty time for this penny to drop amongst lawyers, who persist in assuming that Islam only involves worship. They are entirely unacquainted with Islam’s rules – political rules.
Islam is Government.
https://gatesofvienna.net/2020/07/islam-is-government/
Lawyers’ shortcomings need to be remedied. They would do well to consult the Manual of Islamic Law, “Reliance of the Traveller”.
tim gallagher says
A good, tough decision by the Supreme Court. Unfortunately, over time, I suspect that most of these vile scumbags who went to join in with the sadistic grubs from ISIS will end up back in the western countries that they left. All of them should be left to rot away in those refugee camps where many of them seem to be now living. It is a mistake and a big risk to let any of these evil people back into any civilised, non-Muslim country. They all knew what evil they joining in with when they joined ISIS and good riddance to them.
gravenimage says
US Supreme Court denies appeal of Islamic State bride
…………
*Good*.
OLD GUY says
Thank You U.S. Supreme Court. These brides are traitors and have given aid and comfort to the enemy of America and have given up their right and citizenship to join the enemy. She made the BAD decision to join the islamic terrorist organization in Syria, now she has to live with that mistake or NOT.
Linde Barrera says
I am very glad to learn the US Supreme Court declined to hear Hoda Muthana’s case. And I was happily surprised to read that the decision to revoke the passport of Hoda Muthana was made under President Barack Obama. Obama was raised Muslim. ?
gregbeetham says
I wouldn’t be surprised if quite a lot of Muslims reject the rigid Wahhabi/Salafist fundamentalism of imposing Sharia law, it’s a death cult basically, the death of everyone who isn’t a Wahhabi, they don’t come more rabid than them.