The activity of Muslim rape gangs in Britain is well known, and such activity goes beyond Britain. The Quran teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30).
Also, most Western women are uncovered, which is against the tenets of Islam. Again, according to the Quran:
“And tell the believing women to reduce of their vision and guard their private parts and not expose their adornment except that which appears thereof and to wrap [a portion of] their headcovers over their chests and not expose their adornment except to their husbands, their fathers, their husbands’ fathers, their sons, their husbands’ sons, their brothers, their brothers’ sons, their sisters’ sons, their women, that which their right hands possess, or those male attendants having no physical desire, or children who are not yet aware of the private aspects of women. And let them not stamp their feet to make known what they conceal of their adornment. And turn to Allah in repentance, all of you, O believers, that you might succeed.” (Quran 24:31)
If a woman does not cover, she is fair game to be assaulted:
O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.(Quran 33:59)
Double take: “It is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.” Under the Sharia (and of course not every Muslims follows its abusive aspects), the onus is on women to cover. The Sharia is considered to be the law of Allah, so no other laws supersede it. Those who accept these teachings believe that they are permitted to take infidel, uncovered women at will, regardless of the laws of the West.
The 22-year-old Austrian woman was fortunate to get away, unlike the multitude of other women who have been victimized. But what kind of system would charge a woman as a criminal who defended herself from rape and possible additional personal injury?
Also, what message does this send to Muslim men who accept the Sharia permission of rape and assault of infidel women? The police also were accused of hiding the incident to avoid public scrutiny. We hope that this case will provoke enough of an outcry for Austrian authorities to stop putting this woman through further torment. It is a case that has significance for all law-abiding Austrians.
“Austria: Woman charged with ‘bodily harm’ for stabbing Syrian migrant who tried to rape her in Vienna,” by Dénes Albert, Remix, February 14, 2022:
The Vienna police are being accused of hiding a rape case involving a Syrian migrant after only making the case public three days after it occurred, and only after a request for information from the Austrian press. The police have also controversially charged the female victim for “bodily harm” for stabbing her attacker, despite the man being accused by the police for trying to rape her.
Shortly before midnight on Tuesday last week, the 22-year-old woman attempted to enter the front door of her apartment building on Schönbrunner Strasse in the district of Meidling when she was attacked out of nowhere. Police say a Syrian migrant pushed the woman into the courtyard, immediately grabbed intimate parts of her body and pushed his victim to the ground, according to Austrian newspaper Kronen Zeitung.
But then the rape attempt took a dramatic turn: the woman, with presence of mind, managed to pull a knife out of her purse. She stabbed her attacker several times with it until he let go of his victim. He then grabbed her purse and ran away badly injured. The perpetrator was discovered by the police a short time later with cuts and stab wounds at a nearby subway station and taken to a hospital.
After being provided with medical aid, the 24-year-old man was arrested. He is a Syrian asylum seeker who, when arrested, had alcohol in his blood and a small amount of marijuana in his pocket. The Syrian initially denied the crime.
The Vienna police made the case public only Friday afternoon, after a three-day delay, in a press release, but only at the request of Austrian newspaper Kronen Zeitung, which was informed of the case by attentive readers. Some Austrians are accusing the police of hiding the information, which the police department denies.
In addition, the public prosecutor’s office has charged the woman for bodily harm….
Clive Delmonte says
The Austrian authorities are mad, but I fear their insanity has already reached the UK, for example, in the police handling of the Rotherham Muslim rape gangs.
Everyone seems terrified of the accusation of Islamophobia. Why I know not.
Ordinary decent, honourable people wish to discuss the forced marriage of 9-year old girls, the murder of women in “honour” killings (never men) and the second class status of women in law and in practice. .
Islamophobia is a trick to avoid such discussions but it has no real existence.
Keith O says
Four words come to mind.
YOUR FUCKEN SHITTING ME!!!!
This is just a sick joke.
Hoi Polloi says
Mind-numbing, even given that pepper spray is banned in much of Europe. What defense do women then have? Is the plan to appease these men who came believing the women were theirs for the taking and “End Racism™” by forcing women to have their children? Next time, kill him so he can’t lie in court, then say the knife was his and she wrestled it away. How much more on its knees can this government be?
mortimer says
Women in Europe will have no choice but to find means to defend themselves, whether legal or not. Sharia law contains no punishment for a Muslim who rapes a kafir. Kafir women are ‘MUBAA’ (licit for rape), especially when they are unveiled.
The Islamic scarf is meant to ‘IDENTIFY’ the Muslim women who are not ‘mubaa’, but who are ‘haram’ (forbidden).
The rape of kafirs is a part of jihad so that the ‘honor’ of kafirs is lessened and the supremacy of Muslims is increased at the expense of the kafirs. This is also a form of Islamic terrorism, and thus, Islamic rape is a part of jihad..
raja says
Hoi Polloi,
It is sad to note that the Arabs and almost all of Muslim nations treat women so shabbily. Equally ugly is the way the West treats its own women folk. Even a third world country like India treats a women better, for whatever news that comes out occasionally. These was a pregnant woman in Punjab who cut of the penis of a rape attempter. And then there was another young women, in the late 1980’s, who feigned to pass out when a rapist attempted to rape her on a moving bus in Delhi (when lonely) and then kicked the conductor unconscious (on his nose) to successfully jump off the bus. She got president’s award for bravery. I wish I had the links off hand.
Hoi Polloi says
To raja and mortimer: I consider support for islam a litmus test; all the more for women.
Eva says
It seems to me that these idiot western politicians WANT moslems to take over the world.
I’d love to see what happens when their private army of murderers, rapists, thieves and fanatics come after them, but I doubt I’ll have survived the takeover.
Westman says
“So when you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them..” – Quran 47:4
Obviously this attacker was either an unbeliever or an apostate doing drugs and not realizing that he was no longer a Muslim under quranic requirements. Certainly for the victim, a battle to save herself ensued. Suppose she had “struck his neck”, dumped the body, and said nothing. Would that be justified by Quranic demands? And there would be no charges if she said nothing, ever, about the incident.
Such a strange justice system has Austria to charge the VICTIM in what, in the early 1900s, would have been a hanging crime for the perp.
Potential criminals must realize, under socialism and its actual social estrangement, the citizen only has himself/herself as a defender and even that defense might be prosecuted. It’s open season in Austria for criminals with brutal intent. And more recently, it’s shoplifting season in California, USA. Gotta’ love socialism.
mortimer says
Disagree somewhat with Westman re ‘this attacker was an apostate’. No, he was a sinning Muslim, and his sins would be forgiven, for this was an act of jihad against the kafirs. By attacking the ‘honor’ of the kafirs and by terrorizing them, the Muslim attacker was doing two things pleasing to Allah. He was the ‘winner’ in his mind. All a ‘sinning Muslim’ needs to do to be restored is to wash himself in the ‘wudu’ ritual and then proceed to Islamic prayers. Then the sins disappear by the will of Allah. His merit for an act of jihad would be appreciated.
gravenimage says
Raping Infidels is not a sin in Islam–it is instead sacralized.
Infidel says
So ‘bodily harm’ is something that only applies if the body in question is muslim, and not anyone else. Got it!
Fitting for the country that gave us Herr Hitler
Muriel Altiparmakyan says
I am dismayed at the Police in Austria and before them it was the British police that arrested and there has been jail sentences now for many Pakistani rapist but there are more cities s under siege in UK and these children need to be protected and these men deported with their families back to Pakistan and the mosques need to be closed ..
Walter Sieruk says
How absurd, awful and terribly wrong of those in power in the court system of that country to press an charges against the young female for defending herself from that rapist.
That Muslim migrant should be charged with attempting rape and sexural assult, he is the real criminal.
The evil , insidious ,sinister ,warped unjust and unfair politically correct ideology must have infected and contaminated the legal system of Austria and well as in other Western countries.
This tragic and an affront against this young woman and also an affront against genuine justice.
Hoi Polloi says
Slate.com used to regularly demand that white rape victims not turn in or prosecute their poc rapists. Needless to say, I no longer read those evil people.
gravenimage says
Yes–sickening.
Jedothek says
the bodily harm charge may be contingent: If the Syrian is convicted of attempted rape, bodily harm will be dropped; if he is acquitted of attempted rape, the prosecutor can go forward with the bodily harm charge.
gravenimage says
He also robbed his victim.
Walter Sieruk says
This is are worse than terrible it’s heinously unjust because this young women in the innocent person and that Muslim migrant who attempted to rape her is real criminal and should be arrested and have charges pressed against him.
Furthermore, the Bible reads “Acquitting the guilty and condemning the innocent – the Lord detests them both.” Proverbs 17:15. [N.I.V.]
born saturday says
great respect to the woman that stabbed him… people have the right of self defence in any abuse they receive! she is at the forefront of the ressistance against islamic occupation!!!
we all have a right to defend our selves nomatter what the european union forced legislation that has been imposed upon us laws are!!!
anyone who is not ready to defend himself and his family in the same way in occupied areas does not have a good survival rate…
these animalistic demons that we have imported respect nothing less than their own barbarocity imposed upon themselves…. this is how muslims have been since the begining of islam and up untill today…. the people who knew that, historically survived….
PRCS says
“Double take: “It is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.” Under the Sharia (and of course not every Muslims follows its abusive aspects), the onus is on women to cover. The Sharia is considered to be the law of Allah, so no other laws supersede it. Those who accept these teachings believe that they are permitted to take infidel, uncovered women at will, regardless of the laws of the West.”
The onus is on Muslim women to cover so that they will be known–to Muslim men–and not be molested by them.
Hijab, jilbab, etc., does not prevent men of other faiths–or none–from abusing them.
It doesn’t protect them from Muslim men either, given the many “honor killings” carried by Allah’s slaves.
mortimer says
The kafirs have it coming to them. (sarc/off)
Robert Corrow says
+1
gravenimage says
Yes–this is how Islam sees it.
somehistory says
Someone posted a link to this a few days ago….and it’s totally wrong to charge someone such as this poor woman just defending herself. Many rape victims don’t survive the rape…what was she to do? wait until he was done and then call the police? Self-defense in such a situation is now a crime?
And Mr. Daniel Greenfield wrote about the mozlum in Manhattan who murdered the poor Asian lady in her apartment ;and he quoted the new “law” in NY…it is a crime to call for help if no crime has taken place.
So, this NY citizen, being raped and murdered, would have been in legal trouble had she called when she saw the attack about to happen. Sounds like the prosecutors in Austria and NY are *thinking* alike.
gravenimage says
Austria: Woman charged with ‘bodily harm’ for stabbing Muslim migrant who tried to rape her
………..
Just appalling miscarriage of justice–she had *every right* morally to defend herself. Are Austrian authorities say that she should have let herself be raped and possibly murdered?
John Allan says
She should have made it worthwhile … and finished the job!
Phil says
Proud of her and to hell with the appeasers/lefties/traitors. Who wants to have to live with a knife in their bag permanently for fear of attackers? Our governments and those who pull their strings are guilty of high treason each time a muslim commits a crime in our countries.
Pray Hard says
She should have cut his head off.
James Lincoln says
Pray Hard,
I was actually thinking of “something else” that she should have cut off.
Proud Islamophobe says
Wait for the double standard when police and prosecutors’ daughters or sisters or mothers or wives are attacked. Then when those victims *aren’t* charged for defending themselves, may Austria have an uprising that is heard clear across the oceans.
OLD GUY says
She should have killed the son-of a bitch.