My latest in PJ Media:
The perpetrator’s distinctive mustache in his mugshot makes it clear that he is an admirer of Adolf Hitler, as if that weren’t already clear when he painted swastikas on the wall of a synagogue and on the grounds of a Jewish high school in Chicago. The man who did this, however, is not a white supremacist neo-Nazi out of establishment media central casting; instead, he is a Muslim named Shahid Hussain. Hussain’s attack on the synagogue follows closely after another Muslim, Malik Faisal Akram, took hostages in a Colleyville, Texas synagogue, demanding the release of convicted jihad terrorist Aafia Siddiqui. Is this the future for synagogues in this country?
Cook County Associated Judge Barbara Dawkins on Tuesday set Hussain’s bail at $250,000 and called his actions “a textbook case of a hate crime.” Hussain, who has previous convictions for burglary and driving under the influence, is accused of painting yellow swastikas on the wall of the F.R.E.E. Synagogue in Chicago, as well as on a shipping container used by the Hanna Sacks Bais Yaakov High School, which is down the street from the synagogue.
According to Fox32 Chicago, “Hussain is also accused of shattering a glass door and cracking another at a synagogue several blocks away, in the 2800 block of West North Shore, police said. He also allegedly kicked in a side window at a synagogue in the 3600 block of West Devon, where two teens in a dormitory saw Hussain wearing a cape and a red hat as he yelled outside about ‘Jews’ while breaking lights, Assistant State’s Attorney James Murphy said.” Hussain was also captured on video pantomiming firing a shotgun and making Nazi salutes. Really, what a charmer.
Hussain has been diagnosed with “mental health issues,” which was predictable. Malik Faisal Akram also supposedly had “mental health issues,” and the claim that jihadis are suffering from mental illness is an excuse that authorities frequently employ in order to avoid having to speak publicly about aspects of Islamic teaching that can incite violence. Last November in San Francisco, a knife-wielding Muslim screaming “Allahu akbar” charged at police, who shot him in self-defense. The establishment media insisted he was mentally ill. Also in November, a Muslim named Emad Al Swealmeen blew himself up in a taxicab outside a Liverpool hospital; police told the public that he suffered from periods of mental illness. In Germany, a Muslim migrant stabbed four random people, and although authorities acknowledged that he could be an “Islamic extremist,” he was placed not in a prison but in a psych ward.
There is more. Read the rest here.
gravenimage says
Chicago: Man With Hitler Mustache Paints Swastikas on Synagogue
……………
Despite his being an Infidel, pious Muslims *love* Hitler–and murderously hate Jews.
“California: Muslim lawyer praises Hitler, calls for new genocide of the Jews”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/01/california-muslim-lawyer-praises-hitler-calls-for-new-genocide-of-the-jews
“Muslim CNN reporter: ‘The world today needs a Hitler’”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/05/muslim-cnn-reporter-the-world-today-needs-a-hitler
There are several “Hitler” restaurants and shops in the Muslim world, and an upscale mall in Turkey had banners of Hitler.
“Hitler honored in upscale mall in modern, moderate Turkey”
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2013/01/hitler-honored-in-upscale-mall-in-modern-moderate-turkey
BexarKat says
Islam has indeed inherited the legacy of the Nazi power structure. Nothing has changed since the Grand Mufti promised Hitler to make “palestine” Judenrein.
Devasur says
That’s not swastika it’s haken kreuz of nazis. Basically calling it Hindu/buddhist swastika which has no connection you are blaming it on Hindu/Buddhists. Own up to your crimes instead of blaming it on the innocents far away in the east.
Infidel says
I didn’t see any blame of Hindus or Buddhists in the above article. Calling it a swastika instead of a hakenkreuz doesn’t make Hindus or Buddhists the perps
Devasur says
It definitely does as people have already associate it with Hindu/buddhist and claiming how they influenced Nazis.
If it doesn’t change anything why borrow the Indian name swastika instead of the name used by nazis Haken Kreuz.
Other than to associate it with Hindu/buddhists.
Why use swastika name when nazis never called it swastika.
gravenimage says
This is silly, Devasur. The Swastika is used all over the world, and not just by Nazis and Hindus and Buddhists, but also by the Byzantine Christians, many pagans, and Native Americans. “Swastika” is the general word for these symbols, even though they have had other local names.
Most people understand that the meaning of these symbols varied greatly–the Buddhist and Hindu symbol is the wheel of life; the Nazi symbol derived from the Teutonic symbol for the hammer of thor.
Devasur says
gravenimage, How is it silly? That symbol is used all over the world not the word swastika.
How is swastika the general word? Then are you accepting that this symbol originated from Hindu/Buddhists?
if no, then why use the word other than to associate nazis with Hindu/Buddhists.
By your claim, the nazis should have called it swastika but they never called it as such because they are not Hindu/Buddhist.
Nazi symbol derived from german churches, which Christians adopted from german pagans.
Ironically you don’t want Christianity to be associated with nazis but have no problem associating it with Hindu/Buddhist swastika which in return is associated with Hinduism/Buddhism.
own up to your crimes instead of blaming it on the people in the faraway east.
Use the german name which nazis used Haken Kreuz instead of the swastika of Hindu/Buddhist.
gravenimage says
Devasur, the hammer of thor symbol did not derive from German churches–thor was a pagan god.
Then, the term “Swastika” was used in the West as a general term for this symbol, which before the Nazi era was mostly a symbol of good luck in tyhe West. Your claim that using this term is meant to smear Hinduism and Buddhism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika
The idea that citing simple facts of history which are in no way anti-Hindu or Buddhist are “crimes” makes no sense.And what makes you imply I am a Nazi? I have condemned the savagery of Fascism as long as I have been here. Why lie about me?
Devasur says
gravenimage, read my comments properly that symbol was pagan and it was adopted by the German church.
No, this term was not used as a general term in the west for that symbol, if it is so then nazis would have called it swastika, not its german name Haken Kreuz.
That only shows it is a lie, next first translation of main Kempf didn’t call it swastika but hooked cross, it was later changed to the swastika.
Oh please if you are going to cite anti-Hindu/Buddhist Wikipedia as proof.
Yes, it is used to smear Hindus/Buddhists otherwise why use a term that nazis never used.
In fact from germans to Finnish no one used the term swastika why call it as such.
Next, where did I call you nazi? to justify the smear and association of fascism with Hindu/Buddhists. Why are you lying that I called you nazi?
Same tactics which left use.
Please read this article to understand what I am saying
https://swarajyamag.com/ideas/swastika-is-hindu-and-the-hooked-cross-is-nazi-the-rest-is-conspiracy
gravenimage says
The term Swastika has long been used *in English* for this symbol, which did not in any case have negative connotations before its use by the Nazis.
The idea that these facts are anti-Hindu is just silly–there is nothing anti-Hindu here.
The idea that English speakers should have to use a German term is truly odd.
Meanwhile, this is just distracting from the actual story above. The issue here is the Muslim affinity for Fascism and its hatred of Jews. None of this is anti-Hindu or anti-Buddhist. In fact, Hindus and Buddhists are also frequently threatened and victimized by Muslim violence. This is something I actually care about.
gravenimage says
And good to see so many cartoons by Bosch Fawstin at Jihad Watch lately.
Wellington says
Fitting since Islam is the ideological predecessor of Nazism in so many ways, one of them being master faith v. master race. Another is the hatred of Jews and by extension many “others”—non-believers for Mo’s deluded followers and other “inferior” ethnicities for Nazism, for instance the Poles. Yet another is the hatred of freedom.
Ah, so much in common. No wonder huge amounts of Mohammedans admire Adolf. Pathetic, but that is the way of matters with decrepit belief systems—they share so much which is wicked in nature and thus produce mutual admiration societies for one another.
Rufolino says
Nazism and Islam also share a hatred of homosexuals. Judicial murder of gay people is part of sharia law. The Nazis appear to have preferred a form of slow “judicial murder” with torture in concentration camps. By the end of this century in Europe under the burgeoning influence of sharia, the murder of gays is likely to be a regular occurrence.
gravenimage says
Another thing these two vicious ideologies have in common, Rufolino.
OLD GUY says
Hitler had a large following then and there will always be individuals for what ever reason that will follow his ideology of hate, Just as many muslims follow islamic hate of others. Human not so good nature.
gravenimage says
Not all humans are like this, OLD GUY. But some will–especially if they are raised with this savagery from birth many will embrace it.
Beneath the Veil of Consciousness says
BexarKat- You’ve got it backwards. Nazis inherited the legacy of Islam.
gravenimage says
I think these hatreds developed separately–but they were certainly made for each other. Hitler admired the barbarism of Islam, and many Muslims admire Hitler to this day. *Ugh*.