Oddly enough, Sweden’s celebration of diversity is quickly becoming rather monochromatic.
“Islamist party promises ‘to take over Skåne,’” translated by Gary Fouse from “Islamistparti lovar ”ta över hela Skåne,”” by Isac Boman, Nya Dagbladet, February 9, 2022:
In a Twitter posting, the Islamist party Nyans declares that is on the way “to taking over all of Skåne” and that Malmö is the first.
Nya Dagbladet has earlier drawn attention to the party which, among others, demands that Islamophobia should become its own crime classification and that Muslims should receive a special minority position in Sweden-They have also accused all other Swedish parties of being racists.
Founder and party leader Mikail Yüksel has a past in the Center Party but was forced out of the party after it was discovered that he had close contacts with the pan-Turkish, extreme right organization, Grey Wolves, and the party is believed to have close contacts with the Turkish dictator Recep Erdogan.
In a posting on Twitter, Mikail Yüksel posts a photo from the party’s candidate meeting and writes that, “Soon we will take over all of Skåne with Malmö at the top.”
Thus far, the interest on the part of the mass media for the party that describes itself as the obvious alternative for the country’s Muslims has been relatively cool, but the party, which among other things, wants to make it illegal to criticize religious extremism, has still received a certain space in which to market itself in both the tax-financed SVT (Swedish State TV) as well as the evening newspapers.
In Muslim-dominated and immigrant-dense areas, the Social Democrats till now have been the most popular party by far.
born saturday says
we are under occupation!!! the traitor leaders of most europe are leading us to the cliffs!!!! they have all been bribed and sold their people off with few exceptions…
islamic occupation in much of europe is spreading as long as the immigrants keep flooding in and the ones inside are running demographic jihad!!!
all the muslim invaders, many of which have been trained in criminal and guerilla warfare in pakistan or turkey, obey to the new mahdi erdogan, and are ready to make an armed upsrising attacking civilians to diminish the non muslim population at the sultans command….
civil war is bount to be the result for any country that has taken in the muslim invaders and tries to ressist islamization….
so far the non muslim population is divided, and the current governments in most europe are surrendering us to islamization….
mortimer says
Sharia supremacism has no benefit in it for the kafir (non-Muslim).
Sharia supremacism is a plan for indigenous Swedes to become second- or third-class in their own country.
Melc says
Yes if they do not openly submit to Islam they will become dhimmies and be forced to pay the Jizya either directly or indirectly. Why aren’t the Sweds reacting?
Paul says
As for me here in Germany, I agree
Lisel Sipes says
I believe it. Their fat perverted politicians do nothing. They help the filthy muslime invaders whenever they can and always side with them against Swedish people.
Jaydam says
It beggars believe that the Swedes are so blind and ignorant, and heading for a horrible disaster.
There will come a point when to reverse this inverted Muslim colonialism will be virtually impossible.
If this is not a stark warning to the rest of Europe, and other western countries around the world, then i don’t know what is.
Terry Gain says
The Swedes are no different than most European countries except those like Poland and Hungary which have lived under the boot. The Swedes are just more advanced, so to speak. This progress is also coming to Canada and the United States if the current insane immigration policies continue.
Like hires like and like congregates with and supports like. One can hardly blame them. This is human nature.
abu taleb says
The Swedish choose their left government, so they get what they deserve. It is not too late to act now to save Sweden, but will the Swedish do that?
I doubt that from what happens in Canada or France, the French picked Macron over Le Pen, the Canadians picked Trudeau (and look what happens now in Canada).
The western people may try to do it later when it is too late to save western civilization.
Wellington says
This didn’t have to happen—in Skane, in Sweden, in the West in general. And herein lies the ultimate tragedy of it all.
Terry Gain says
Well my friend, one had to come up with a strategy to prevent it. Unfortunately too few of us were prepared to declare that Islam is a conquest ideology. So far those who argued that it is a religion have won the argument.
Congratulations.
Wellington says
If only Islam had to this day been characterized as an evil religion, which it was by the West for some 1300 years, this would have been enough. “Evil” is the important part, not the “religion” part.
Sure worked pretty damn well until the disastrous 1960’s began to change this. Really, if virtually all Westerners characterized Islam to this day as a religion, but a wicked religion (which Pope Benedict XVI effectively did), do you really think we would still be in the mess we’re in?
Terry Gain says
Americans don’t believe religions are wicked. It is bred in the bone. So much so that freedom of religion is guaranteed in the Constitution.
somehistory says
I am an American…born here, live here and that is a stupid statement to make that quoting you: “Americans don’t believe religions are wicked. It is bred in the bone”
You don’t speak for this American and many, many others I personally know.
Wellington says
Seconded, somehistory. And it is only since the moronic 1960’s that Americans in huge amounts, due primarily to overall ignorance and a “kumbaya” idiotic attitude, have gone into self-destructive mode.
As for Terry’s “bred in the bone” statement, it should be clear to Terry that when the Constitution was formed, the Founding Fathers had the Judeo-Christian tradition in mind—and little or no other religious tradition. Here I don’t fault the Founding Fathers, but I do fault those who will take the literal words of the First Amendment and thereafter assert that, hey, any religion, including Islam, was the intent of the Founding Fathers. IT WAS NOT! And which is why original intent is so important.
somehistory says
Thank you, Wellington.
As the words of history show, many absolutely knew the evils of islam and never meant for it to have the “freedoms” it has now. Since the religious demands of “kings” and tyrants had so affected them, they knew and understood what lack of freedom means and wanted something ever so different for themselves and their progeny.
islam having freedom means the rest of us lose.
James Lincoln says
Wellington says,
“…I do fault those who will take the literal words of the First Amendment and thereafter assert that, hey, any religion, including Islam, was the intent of the Founding Fathers. IT WAS NOT!”
I agree.
Just wondering how the Founding Fathers would have dealt with islam “back in the day” if muslims were present in significant enough numbers…
gravenimage says
Terry, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson–founding fathers–understood that Islam is an evil religion. Are you claiming that they are not Americans?
Terry Gain says
Graven image
If you see this, excuse my delay in responding
Of course not, even if it’s true. I’ve asked you for evidence of your assertion in the past and you’ve not provided any. Where is the evidence that Islam was even discussed? I don’t believe that the founders planted the seed of America’s destruction in its Constitution.
Most of the founders were Christians and America certainly developed as a Christian nation.
https://isi.org/intercollegiate-review/faith-of-our-founders-the-role-of-religion-in-americas-founding/
gravenimage says
Terry, Thomas Jefferson wrote on his “Notes on the State of Virginia”, “But it does me no injury for my neighbour to say there are twenty gods, or no god. It neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg”.
This makes it pretty clear as I see it that someone’s religion is not valid under American law to the extent that it *does* pick a man’s pocket or breaks his leg. Much of Islam, of course, does just that.
The constant claim that the First Amendment of the Constitution means that Muslims have the right to do things like impose Shari’ah on us, enslave us, or slaughter us because it is their religion is simply not borne out.
Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with the Ambassador to Tripoli in 1786 in London and learned that the ambassador said the pirate raids were a jihad against infidels. Muslim privateers felt “it was their duty to make war upon them [non-Muslims] wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could as Prisoners, and that every Mussleman [Muslim] who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
The First Amendment was written in 1789–three years *after* this encounter. So the idea that the Founding Fathers were entirely ignorant about Islam is simply not the case–never mind that Jefferson also owned a Koran at this time.
I have been through all this with you several times before–and you consistently choose to ignore it.
mortimer says
When they finally take power, the Muslims will be merciless to the kafirs whose countries they took over so easily.
The Leftists think they will be able to control Islam, but only Stalinism and Chinese communism has succeeded.
The Uighurs will soon be extinct from forced sterilization of all women.
Fitna says
Spot on Mortimer and I think the Chinese have the right idea….it’s a different kind of war, but their Muslims will disappear within a few generations.
Sterilization is another means of eliminating one’s foes without actual bloodshed or mass expulsions.
When the non-Muslims finally wake up in the West and realize they’re being conquered from within by Islam, they’ll also scramble for solutions, if they still maintain power.
Should they fail to act quickly enough, it’ll be the Muslims who’ll set the agenda, which will, convert or die for non-Muslims.
gravenimage says
I think that many in the West are still in denial over Islam being a threat.
somehistory says
swedenistan. Freedom of speech is over everywhere moslums are taking over….because they cannot allow people to know the Truth.
and, they want it both ways….they are **taking over** the country and bragging about it, but they are a put-upon *minority* that needs special protection.
The fat lady is singing in sweden. Just as she has in so many other once-free lands.
Terry Gain says
The fat lady is singing in Sweden? Wow, I know Whoopi Goldberg is taking a hiatus, but I didn’t know she was in Sweden or that sheccould sing.
Michael Copeland says
“Islam is not here to integrate, Islam is here to dominate.
There is no room for compromise within Islam!”
speaker at Khilafah conference 2016
“Islam must dominate, and not be dominated.”
– Hassan al-Banna
“you have to live like a state within a state, until you take over.”
– Dr Ijaz Mian
Terry Gain says
Yes. Islam is a conquest ideology posing as a religion. Only those who study Islam know how irrational it is as a religion. As a conquest ideology, it is ingenious. Islam is fooling a lot of smart people in an age that has turned away from religion.
Wellington says
Though we disagree, Terry, about Islam being a religion (I think it is, so does Robert Spencer, and you don’t), I do agree with you that a huge portion of the West turning away from religion, which effectively means turning away from Christianity, the major religion of the West from Constantine onwards, has had enormous negative consequences.
It is my conviction, as it was with Benjamin Franklin (himself a skeptic like myself), and with Winston Churchill too, who described himself as “an optimistic agnostic,” that the Judeo-Christian ethic is highly constructive to the betterment of mankind.
Put another way, one can accept three things: 1) the Judeo-Christian ethic is a superior ethic which works wonderfully well with the democratic tenets that the ancient Greeks invented; 2) one need not accept the theology of Judaism or Christianity to still admire the ethical norms these two religions so sapiently established (thus an alliance of great importance can and should be constructed between agnostics like myself with religious Jews and Christians BECAUSE of the paramountcy of the ethical factor—and militant atheists who hate all religion, who actually make a religion out of not having one, should be dismissed as losers in the intellectual realm and in many other realms, so one dimensional are they ); 3) Islam has not only an idiotic theology but a heinous ethic; it is antithetical to liberty across the board and, ultimately, an enemy of mankind in sundry ways.
There. That’s my position and I’m stickin’ to it. Best to you and yours and God bless the Canadian truckers, who serve as an inspiration to us all.
john smith says
+1
Terry Gain says
Wellington
Thank you for your civil reply. I’ve been too busy to respond. I ask you and GI to consider what Jefferson knew about Islam when America was founded.
gravenimage says
Terry, I have considered what Thomas Jefferson knew about Islam many times–and have shared much of this with you.
gravenimage says
Sweden: Islamic party declares that is on the way ‘to taking over all of Skåne’
…………….
Note that Skåne is the southernmost part of Sweden, right accross the narrow Kattegat from Sweden.
It has been settled for centuries, and *not by Muslims*. It is in fact one of the oldest inhabited parts of Sweden.
Malmo is estimated to be anything from about 16% Muslim to over 25% (the government pointedly does not keep track). Whatever the actual numbers. the Jewish population is increasingly threatened there.
JCA Reid says
The Swedes, along with other Western European People are simply lemmings wanting to throw themselves & their countries over the cliff. There can be no compromise. Islam is all about Terror, Deceit & Subjugation of non-Muslims.
The problem with the USA’s Founding Fathers is that Islam was literally non-existent in Europe & the then American Colonies, so did not see it reaching their shores.
As for Muslims calling the White Europeans “Races”, I’d like to see a White dude call a Black Person of African descent, “Raisinhead”! This was Mohammed’s term for Ethiopians. If Mohammed had got himself further south into Africa, no doubt that term would have been more commonly used.
gravenimage says
Actually, the Founding Fathers did indeed understand Islam, and were instrumental in freeing the Mediterranean Sea from piracy, which had suffered this for a thousand years at that point.
James Lincoln says
gravenimage,
With respect, how did the Founding Fathers, at that time, classify islam?
1. An evil religion.
2. An evil totalitarian political ideology masquerading as a religion.
Terry Gain says
James, GI and Wellington (and not you, somenastyhistory)
Is there any evidence that Islam was even discussed? Certainly Jefferson knew nothing about Islam until after the attacks by the Barbary Pirates.
gravenimage says
Yes, Thomas Jefferson understood that Islam was a religion, James. In his “Notes on the State of Virginia”, he refers to the “the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahomedan, the Hindoo, and Infidel of every denomination”. This does not mean that he necessarily saw all of these faiths as *morally* equal, but that he did recognize them all as religions.
And Terry, I don’t believe that Somehistory is “nasty” for saying that the idea that Americans are too stupid to realize that not all religions are benignant is mistaken. In fact, many Americans question and criticize religions on a regular basis, and most Americans agree that everyone has the freedom to do this. This is a core part of the First Amendment as well. It protects freedom of speech–it is *anything* but a “blasphemy” law that prohibits criticism of religion.
somehistory says
G,
Often when people are wrong, they get abusive and engage in name-calling. And some few commenters who come here, do that very thing because they are out of real arguments. I appreciate that you object to those tactics.
I wish I could recall the specific name of a book that I read some large portions of a few years ago. It was all about the religious convictions.. quoted in their own words…of the Founding Fathers. It was a compilation of their words about their faith and what they hoped for this country. I can’t even recall the name of the author, which frustrates me greatly.
Perhaps some day soon, it will return to me because I’d like to post it here.
This country was founded on their belief in Christianity and they would never have sanctioned the abuses that have come by way of islam.
Terry Gain says
Somehistory
You are the one who was abusive. You aren’t smart enough to disagree without being disagreeable. This is your history wth me.
Unlike you I am not anonymous. You attack me while wearing a mask. Pathetic coward.
gravenimage says
Agreed, Somehistory. And that sounds like a great book. I’ll look for it.
Here are two possible candidates: “The Faiths of the Founding Fathers” by David L. Holmes, and “The Religious Beliefs of America’s Founders: Reason, Revelation, and Revolution” by Gregg L. Frazer,. I have not read either one, but have seen them both around. Do either of these ring a bell?
somehistory says
g,
The one by Holmes sounds the most like what I can recall tonight of the author’s name. I’ll have to see if I can find a copy of each.
And thanks. My memory is not what it used to be…too much stress, and other factors, that leave me with fragments…enough to recall there is more to recall. 🙂
somehistory says
Ah, yes, “terry”…saying that your statement was “stupid” in your *mind* was calling you stupid. Perhaps you are right in that case.
Disagreeing with you is always taken by you as being “disagreeable” and “abusive” and shows a lack of intelligence. That’s arrogance. Arrogance shows the lack.
And, there is no “proof” that your name is actually the one you use here. I could write something in and you would have reasonable doubt….as I do about you…that the name I chose was real. And. by the way, calling people “coward” is also meant to insult. But, I have developed a thick skin when it comes to that tactic.
Take it as you wish. But, don’t expect any more conversation with me personally to continue on this thread because I don’t regularly engage with liars.
James Lincoln says
gravenimage,
Thank you for your reply.
Thomas Jefferson completed his first version of “Notes on the State of Virginia” in 1781, with revisions in 1782 and 1783.
A few years later, in 1786, the new United States had to confront the muslim Barbary pirates.
Just wondering how Jefferson’s writings would have reflected this new reality if his “Notes” had been written after 1786.
gravenimage says
James, you are right that the young United States was soon to learn more than they likely ever wanted to about how ugly Islam is.
Terry Gain says
Graven Image
You are obviously an educated woman and yet when you are asked to provide evidence for your claim that the founders knew and discussed Islam you provide no proof of your assertion.
So once again, where is your proof?
gravenimage says
Terry, in my post above at Feb 12, 2022 at 10:50 pm above I note that Thomas Jefferson and John Adams learned several years before the Constition was written that Islam teaches its followers to target Infidels who do not submit to Islam to slavery and murder. I have actually cited this numerous times before, as you well know.
mea says
it is called a ‘soft invasion’ it is`part of the muhammadan plan to take over the world… the cuitizens in your country are at least as`stupid as any American citizen… the problem s the idiot citizens refuse to do anything to stop the take over oftheir country while the bought and paid for Hate Sweden to destruction politi’Kal ‘Klass has been bought off… those people`are 1,000 x more dangerous an organised crime family of traitors than Quisling ever managed to be.
Clifford Fodor says
War should have been declared on Saudi Arabia and Islam. Instead, after the 9/11 attacks, stupid George Bush labeled Islam as a religion of peace. Those Muslims who carry out the will of Mohammad are said to misinterpret the Koran. Islam should have been declared an enemy of the republic.
gravenimage says
Clifford, I think we should have cut ties with Saudi Arabia then–they have never been an ally of ours. But I don’t think that declaring war on them would have much helped–just like Iraq and Afghanistan, there is no way we could have civilized this stretch of Dar-al-Islam.
Terry Gain says
Graven Image
You are obviously an educated woman and yet when you are asked to provide evidence for your claim that the founders knew and discussed Islam you provide no proof of your assertion.
So once again, where is your proof?
gravenimage says
Please see above.
tim gallagher says
No surprise at all in this. It is just Islam aiming to do what it has always done for its whole miserable, destructive history. In any country where they have been allowed to live, to migrate into, once their numbers have built up they will always try to impose their evil, barbaric , horrendous way of life on all of us. Maybe in sweden and most other western countries, most people are wanting to ignore reality and enjoy the wonderful, pleasant life that our mellow western societies offer people, and it is a damned good way to live, and therefore won’t have the willpower to get tough enough to deal with the Muslim invaders. It is sad to watch this happening in so many countries.
Goofy says
What makes Sweden and the Swedes very vulnerable is the fact that Sweden is one of the least religious countries in Europe. The Swedes in general sadly have a very rudimental impression of what their own religious background is. Swedish society and it’s laws were firmly based on Protestant Christianity, but that has been replaced by the pseudo religion of Political Correctness. The Church of Sweden itself is nowadays little more than a liturgical extension of the Social Democrat Party and it is preaching the gospel of political correctness, which includes that Islam is the religion of peace. That happens in spite of the fact that Sweden is now seeing numbers of murders, rapes and humiliating robberies perpetrated by the Muslim community, which have never been seen before.
Even the few commentators who raise their voices against this development do it facing the risk of being prosecuted for hate crimes. In Sweden the victims get close to no compensation but the perpetrators get lavish monetary compensations to the tune of EUR 100,000 in case they were sentenced as being older than they were at the time they committed the crime.
For a year I have encouraged them to buy The Critical Qur’an as soon as they can lay their hands on it. I have hopes for Sweden but they may not be very realistic.
James Lincoln says
An interesting picture accompanying the feature article.
I did not see one “stunningly attractive” native blonde, blue-eyed Swedish woman.
It begs the question regarding native Swedish women:
1. Are they still seen publicly in Sweden?
2, Do they stay inside?
3. Do they dye their hair dark brown – and wear a hijab just in case?
Terry Gain says
James
I believe they live as traditional Swedes in all areas not yet conquered. The conquest will proceed slowly, then all at once. The frog in slowly boiling water is the best description of how it will occur. The frog thinks Islam is harmless, even a religion. My goodness it’s a great Abrahamic religion. Who are these crazies warning us about the dangers of a nice warm bath?
James Lincoln says
Thank you for your reply, Terry.
OLD GUY says
Sweden has allowed itself to be invaded and taken over through the migration invasion of ISLAM. Somehow the WOKE who believe that diversity is wonderful, missed the fact that under Islamic sharia law there is no DiVERSITY only Islam.
Terry Gain says
OLD GUY
My goodness. Perhaps you might explain how the self-sacrificing entry of adherents of a great Abrahamic religion is an invasion. Surely,;we are indebted to them for making us more enlightened and diverse. Oh, and they love Jesus. He was one of them.
gravenimage says
Terry, your implication that Robert Spencer and everyone else here at Jihad Watch regards Islam as a “great Abrahamic religion” is simply mistaken. Where has Jihad Watch *ever* lauded Islam in this way?
Terry Gain says
Graven Image
You, and others, Including Wellington, Robert Spencer, and my clearly misguided Marxist Pope laud Islam by conceding that it is a religion. It is in fact the antithesis of a religion. Islam is at war with all other religions. It is quintessentially anti-religion.
Religions connect us to God, not the devil.
Terry Gain says
GI
BTW, not everyone here agrees with you and disagrees with me on the issue of whether Islam is (somehow) a religion.
And even if that were true, have you forgotten that the mob asked that Barabbas be freed.
Are you still glad to see me back?
gravenimage says
Terry, when have Robert Spencer, Wellington, or myself *ever* ‘lauded Islam’? Citations, please.
And the definition of religion says nothing about any given religion being in agreement with other faiths one way or another.
You are right that some people don’t think that Islam is a religion–but these are largely people who do not understand the definition of religion. Others do understand the definition, but think that we should have to change the meaning of our words for Islam. I do not consider this useful.
I have never said that you should agree that Islam is a religion because it is acknowledged as such by a majority of people–I would never say this is a good reason for changing one’s point of view, nor *have* I ever said such a thing.
I think it makes sense to recognize that Islam is a religion because it is a religion *by all definition*. Calling things by their right names is logical–and I believe that in the fight against the threat of Islam that we have the truth on our side.
And yes–I am still happy to see you back. Firstly, I don’t expect everyone to agree with me on all points in any case.
Then, there are staunch Anti-Jihadists whom I disagree with on some discreet point or other. I still consider your contributions here overwhelmingly positive, despite our disagreement on this issue.
Terry Gain says
Graven Image
Regarding your 12:18 AM post in which you state essentially that Thomas Jefferson and John Adams were both aware of Islamic doctrine before the constitution was written and your assertion that you have provided proof of these remarkable and incredible assertions before, I am requesting that you provide them once again , as I have not seen your previous proofs.
Thank you very much. I do not believe that the founders were this stupid, so I invite you to prove me wrong.
gravenimage says
Here it is again:
Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with the Ambassador to Tripoli in 1786 in London and learned that the ambassador said the pirate raids were a jihad against infidels. Muslim privateers felt “it was their duty to make war upon them [non-Muslims] wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could as Prisoners, and that every Mussleman [Muslim] who should be slain in Battle was sure to go to Paradise.”
The First Amendment was written in 1789–three years *after* this encounter. So the idea that the Founding Fathers were entirely ignorant about Islam is simply not the case–never mind that Jefferson also owned a Koran at this time.
…
Not sure if you are saying you didn’t see this, or that you don’t believe it. If the former, I have presented this again in this post. If the latter, here is one link citing the original source:
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Jefferson/01-09-02-0315#:~:text=The%20Ambassador%20answered%20us%20that,of%20all%20they%20could%20take
Terry Gain says
Graven Image
I found this article which supports your opinion. The evidence seems rather skimpy. I don’t see that the issue was debated. Clearly it should be debated before the ideology makes further inroads.
And clearly those who thought that Islam was benign, separate and apart from the worth of individual Muslims, would have benefited if people with the knowledge of Robert Spencer and David Wood had been around to educate.
Regarding your argument from authority that Robert Spencer believes Islam is a religion, I would respectfully say he has no choice in the matter. Notwithstanding his vast knowledge of Islamic doctrine and history Mr. Spencer has a tiny following. Even his current reach would be diminished were he so bold to claim otherwise. And no, I am not accusing Mr. Spencer of bad faith.
I am relieving you of your assignment. Enjoy Super Bowl Sunday. I would suggest that you not watch the half time show unless you are being paid to do a report.
https://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/0205/tolerance.html
Terry Gain says
I would be remiss if I didn’t point out that Robert Spencer has in fact supported the argument that Islam is not a religion by questioning whether Muhammad even existed.
Robert Spencer is the best advocate of freedom of speech that I know of. He is so good that he even allows less knowledgeable people to argue with him on his website. He is a man of great principle.
gravenimage says
Terry, I know that you have implied before that Robert Spencer secretly agrees with you that Islam is not a religion, but is simply too craven or too obsessed with popularity to admit it. I counter by saying that Spencer has been relentlessly courageous in his pursuit of the truth–if he believed that Islam was not a religion I believe that he would openly say so.
Then as I have noted umpteen times, acknowledging that Islam is a religion by definition *does not* mean regarding it as either good or true.
Then, one can question any aspect of Islam or any other faith–Spencer has *never* supported “blasphemy” restrictions barrring research on any faith–in fact, he is a staunch supporter of freedom of speech–guaranteed, incidentally, by the First Amendment which you consider to be so misguided.
gravenimage says
Terry: alas, I realize that your “relieving me of my assignment” likely means that you will ignore the evidence I have presented here, and that a few weeks or months hence this same basic exchange will happen all over again, to similar effect. Ah, well–there are much greater frustrations in life. 🙂
I do very much agree with your assessment of Robert Spencer here, though.
somehistory says
g, I just saw this:
“By the miraculous care of providence, I have been protected beyond all human probability or expectations; for I had four bullets through my coat and two horses shot under me yet escaped unhurt….”
- George Washington.
Watch the official pre-release streaming only on EpochTV
This previously untold story depicts the true account of young George Washington’s journey as he encounters danger and develops as a leader and most importantly, as a man of faith. Don’t miss this feature movie, as it shines a light on the sacrifice and perseverance of our founders in their quest to win the very freedoms that we are at risk of losing today. ”
Pre-release streaming on EpochTV.com on Feb. 18 at 7 p.m. ET/PT
Presidents’ Day, Feb. 21, exclusive premiere on NTD at 8 p.m. ET/PT.
gravenimage says
Thank you, Somehistory, I will try and see this if I can access this streaming.
Walter Sieruk says
In Sweden a large Islamic political party openly declared that it’s on its way to take over all of Shane’
This is one of the types of methods used by the stealth jihadists to gain Western lands, area by area, as much time as it takes to “take over” one part then, they hope, and entire Western nation for Islam and its Sharia.
This Stealth jihad otherwise called the Muslim method of Islamic Gradualism. In contrast to the way of the violent jihad or also called the militant jihad. This nonviolent form of the jihad for Islam is a very sly, insidious, subtle and deceptive way of working for the advancement of Islam.
This Muslim scheme for achieving the goal of the Islamic agenda is as, many times, as subtly effective as it is insidiously clever.
Furthermore, this Islamic gradualism, in some ways, is very similar to the instruction printed in the book entitled THE ART OF WAR by Sun Tzu. Which reads “At first, then, exhibit the coyness of a maiden, until the enemy gives you an opening; afterwards emulate the rapidity of a running hare, and it will be too late for the enemy to opposes you”