On February 21, 2022, out of nowhere, the official Twitter account of the United Nations in Geneva sent out a tweet containing a link to an article defending Islamist opinion-maker Rana Ayyub, who is known for propagating false claims of the victimhood of the Muslim community, and is accused of money laundering. The tweet suggested that the Indian judicial system was targeting this Muslim “journalist” for her religious identity, accused India of judicial harassment, and demanded that the Indian government protect her against any such attacks.
The self-proclaimed “journalist,” who is in reality nothing beyond an op-ed writer with an agenda-driven leftist platform, has been booked by India’s Directorate of Enforcement. The Directorate, which has attached funds worth ₹1.77 crores ($237,000) from her bank accounts, has accused Ayyub of misusing funds for her personal needs. These funds were accumulated through an online crowdfunding platform against promises of charity work towards victims of the Corona pandemic. As no acts of welfare were undertaken, the Directorate alleges that the columnist had tried to launder this money by using the bank account of her family members.
This is not the first time this self-proclaimed journalist has found herself on the wrong side of the law. A champion of Islamic causes and their expansion, she has carved a career out of criticizing the sitting Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi. Accusing Modi of being the central force behind the Gujarat riots, a riot that broke out in retaliation for the burning of the Sabarmati Express train by a mob of Muslims, she published a piece of fiction and sold it as factual: Gujarat Files: Anatomy of a Cover Up. Though the book initially helped further the anti-Modi trend among the liberal-leftist and Muslim clique, it was harshly criticized by India’s Supreme Court, which observed that it was “based upon surmises, conjectures, and suppositions and has no evidentiary value.” Yet the discredited book also secured Ayyub a job as an op-ed writer with the Washington Post, which cordially provided her a platform to further her anti-Modi agenda.
It was striking that the UN assumed that it could exert pressure on India, an independent and sovereign nation. Indian representatives took immediate cognizance of the UN’s unwarranted meddling and showed it its place, reminding the UN that not even an Islamic propagandist – regardless of her influence within an increasingly mistrusted organization – was above the law in India.
One of the “experts” who compiled the piece defending Ayyub was UN Special Rapporteur Irene Khan. She is a Bangladeshi lawyer. This is exceedingly interesting in light of what Khan did when mobs of Muslims were hounding the Hindus of Bangladesh – a marginalized community in the country – torching their temples, vandalizing their shops and homes, and killing Hindu devotees to avenge the blasphemy committed by another Muslim man, Iqbal Hossein, who had placed the Qur’an at a Hindu pavilion during the Durga Pujas of 2021. Nothing. A nationwide anti-Hindu pogrom was carried out in Khan’s country, and she did nothing.
Aside from one inconsequential tweet from the account of a UN official based in Bangladesh – not the UN’s official account – the organization remained quiet during the Bangladesh violence. It routinely gives millions of dollars in grants to Bangladesh; it wouldn’t have been difficult for them to compel the Hasina government to protect the Hindus.
The UN also did nothing when the Taliban overthrew a government and took over Afghanistan, took little girls as sex slaves and shot down women for showing a sliver of skin. The UN chief “urged” the Islamic jihadis to “demonstrate real commitment to be part of the international community.” Yes, because we must handle terror outfits with “urges.” That works.
Just a few days ago, following the Sharia, a Mexican woman working in Qatar was sentenced to 100 lashes and seven years in prison by the Qatari judiciary for getting sexually assaulted in that Islamic nation. This was a classic case of state-sponsored targeting of a woman and was crying out for the UN’s attention. But again, they don’t want to meddle with the Sharia and hurt Muslim feelings.
There have been multiple brutal murders in India in the past couple of months. Some were lynched for celebrating their festivals, some for upholding the principle of equality. The victims were Hindus and the accused are all Muslims who are insistent on establishing an Islamic caliphate in the last piece on non-Islamic land in this part of the world. The UN has maintained a perfect silence in these matters.
Making a farce of humanitarianism, the United Nations is a piece of obsolete machinery that has run its course and needs to be dismantled for good. It plays into the hands of Islamic propagandists, and if it continues on the path it is on now, it will turn into a full-fledged Islamic organization and work toward establishing a global caliphate.
somehistory says
The U.N. is a beast, set up by satan in a bid to control…completely…the people of earth. Its members claimed in the beginning that it was set up…as the “league of nations” …to promote peace. That org went down in the flames of war.
The “united nations,” in no way “united” except against honesty and justice, is now largely controlled by mozlum nations.
Should anyone expect that the members will say anything against a mozlum? The un members would be in favor of India going full-on islam and eliminating all others.
Pray Hard says
The UN is nothing but a moslem boy’s club and sock puppet of the OIC. It should be destroyed utterly.
gravenimage says
It shouls just be abandoned by civilized nations and ousted from using NYC as a base for its crap.
Pray Hard says
I’m always fascinated by the dead eyes of moslems. They remind me of zombies.
gravenimage says
UN Geneva Defends Islamic Propagandist Rana Ayyub, Demands Indian Government Protect Her Against ‘Harassment’
…………
Disgusting–but considering the UN’s victimization of Israel and ignoring the horrors of the Taliban takeover in Afghanistan, this does not surprise.
OLD GUY says
Gee to bad the UN won’t take a stance against the violence and murder of CHRISTIANS around the world by Muslims Islamic leaders and their followers. OOPS thats islamophobia.
JM says
The most important thing to notice about the article linked in the tweet from UN Geneva is that it is based on the opinion of “UN Human Rights experts”, one of whom is Ms Irene Khan, a Bangladeshi Muslim woman. This woman did not utter a word about the atrocities committed by Bangladeshi Muslims recently against innocent Bangladeshi Hindus who are a minority there and are declining in numbers rapidly.
Ms Irene Khan was born in Bangladesh but educated at Manchester University and Harvard Law School. Despite this she jumped in to support a fraudster “journalist” Rana Ayyub just because she is a Muslim, and got UN Geneva to tweet about it from their official account!
This one instance clearly tells us about the nefarious designs of those working for the “Ummah”. They know the weaknesses of democracies and have been positioning their people in important positions constantly while we fall for their Western looks and education. “Al Taqiyyah” at its best! It is time people of good conscience recognize this chicanery and boot these people out of our democratic countries and institutions.r