A film about Islam and jihad which quotes Islam’s primary source texts, quotes its canonical authors and quotes modern university authorities on Islam is STILL ‘Islamophobic’, because Muslims DO NOT WISH non-Muslim kafirs to be INFORMED about jihad or about Islam’s SECRET TEACHINGS about world conquest.
In fact, Islam requires all Muslims to participate in Islam up to their own capacity to help the cause, whether by money, propaganda, political action or direct action to support jihadists and collaborate with them. Even though that is TRUE and ACCURATE, it still counts as ‘Islamophobic’, because Muslims don’t want kafirs to know how Islam works at the innermost level.
One of the most important parts of jihad is PROPAGANDA (also called ‘verbal jihad’). VERBAL JIHAD involves lying to non-Muslim kafirs about Islam and jihad in order to keep them complacent and unprepared to resist jihadic aggressions.
Verbal jihad is also called ‘TAQIYYA’ (sacred prevarication).
To comment on VERBAL JIHAD would also be called ‘ISLAMOPHOBIA’ because Muslims don’t want kafirs to know about VERBAL JIHAD (taqiyya).
mortimersays
Robert Spencer and David Wood both agree that IN SPITE of the fact that Allah says the Koran’s verses are CLEAR and EASY to understand, why do so many Muslims around the world MISUNDERSTAND Islam is exactly the SAME WAY? Namely, why do they believe that the Koran’s 164 jihad verses mean that Muslims should conduct jihad?
It is a constant PUZZLE to Western pseudo-journalists and politicians that Muslims take the 164 jihad verses LITERALLY (as calls for violence), rather than interpret them as calls for human rights and equality?
Devasursays
Conservatives are not up to the game that’s why they are losing all over the world. Let’s look into the propaganda of pseudo-liberals, for ex how pseudo-liberals redefine everything like who is a true Liberals/Christian/Hindu/Buddhists etc.
How they hail any non-Muslim supporting Islam as true Liberals/Christian/Hindus/Buddhists etc.
Whereas conservatives are not able to do the same. They are struggling to oppose the propaganda because the pseudo-liberals have taken over from media to universities.
It has become so worse that even some of the conservatives promote pseudo liberalism.
The only thing left for pseudo-liberals is to wipe out the remaining resistance coming from small groups.
After that is achieved nothing will stop them from completely taking over.
James Lincolnsays
Devasur,
If the mainstream media / educational systems did not support the false narrative of the “pseudo-liberals”, Western civilization would not be in the fix that they are currently in…
Devasursays
Yes, but it is also the fault of conservatives. Who let them take over everything.
James Lincolnsays
Good point – and I agree – Devasur.
mortimersays
Disagree with Devasur. That is oversimplifying. There are trends and swings in thought. This trend is a sweeping trend started by the Frankfurt School. It is extremely insidious like poison.
Relicsays
“misunderstanding islam by quoting the h*ly qur’an”
The odd thing about “JIhad Rehab” is that the filmmaker is actually *sympathetic* to Jihad terrorists. More proof that no amount of appeasement is *ever* enough.
Glad that David Wood and his wife have recovered from Covid! So this is why the weekly coverage of Jihad hasn’t happened this past month.
Wow–hearing that Wood was debating a pious Muslim on whether it is “Islamophobic” to decry child rape jusdt minutes from where a Jihadist was taking Jews hostage at a Synagogue demanding the release of a another Jihad terrorists would be funny if it were not so grim.
Another thing that would be funny–some apologists for Islam claiming that the Jihad hostage situation at the Synagogue was actually done by Zionists in order to make Muslims look bad, while at the same time Al Qaeda (and his Muslim community in Blackburn) laud the Jihadist as a Martyr for taking Jews hostage and threatening to kill them.
Then we have another case of a victim who had been *working to settle Muslim refugees* sexually assaulted by one of them–a supposed poster boy for how lovely and grateful these same Muslims are. Maybe not so much…
Then a thousand miles or so from there another Afghan refugee was caught molesting *a three year old child*–and this fine fellow defended himself by noting that this sick stuff is part of his culture. Grimly, this is true…another reason not to import Muslims here.
One small thing I disgree with Spencer and Wood on–the idea that Muslims pretty much go nuts when external control threats under Shari’ah are removed. This might be true with things like drinking alcohol, but abusing Infidels and unattended children is *always* Halal–as one of the perps said, this is his culture.
It is *certainly* true, though, that morality is not taught in Islam at all.
Then we have a Muslim schoolteacher who wants to blow up shopping malls, and several Muslims terrorizing Infidels while holding the Qur’an, including in church. This is in fact canonical Islamic symbolism–the Qur’an and the sword (often updated these days to the Qur’an and Kalashnikov).
This is enormously common–especially with new converts. And why? Because new converts tend to be especially wedded to the teachings of their new faith. This is why converts to Judaism tend to be especially zealous about keeping Kosher, converts to Christianity are especially zealous about sharing that good news with everyone, and converts to Islam are especially apt to want to murder Infidels. These are just the core elements of the respective faiths.
Then, as much as pious Muslims hate Infidels in general, so many of them make an exception when it comes *to Hitler*. Very telling.
And wife beating rears its ugly head again–and why not? There is nothing so Islamic as this. Of course, women do not have the right to beat their husbands–let alone the idea that no one should have the right to beat their spouses.
And then there is “Honor Killing”–it is not just an extension of wife beating, but also that in so many Muslim countries these murders are not prosecuted, or at most receive very short sentences. And very important point about “disobedient” women not being considered practicing Muslims, and hence fair game for any brutalization, including murder.
And “blasphemy” laws are horrifying in places like Pakistan–and the efforts to impose these horrors here proceeds apace. And in places like Bangladesh victims cannot even file police reports for murder, if the victim is non-Muslim.
Then on the screen we find a cute cartoon of a Muslamah identified as “Leema” saying “Islam will submit D Wood someday”. Now, this may just be poor English–but I doubt it. Note that it doesn’t say that Wood will change his mind and decide to submit to Islam some day (highly unlikely, but not theoretically impossible). But turning to what it *does* say, of course, Islam itself has no power to make anyone submit to anything. So this is most likely a threat that her coreligionists will force Wood to submit–either by threatening him severely enough that he submits out of terror, or that they will simply murder him outright. After all, that is a type of forced submission to Islam as well.
Then, more terrorizing of churchgoers and murder of Christians and other Infidels, including 90-year-old victims.
There is more, of course–as there always is.
Grim subject, but good stuff as always from Robert Spencer and David Wood.
Infidelsays
Yesterday, I stumbled upon Wood’s video ‘Cat walking on a Quran’, and that, as usual was hilarious. The coup de grace was when the same cat didn’t step on the bible, even though David scattered some catfood on it 😂
gravenimagesays
I haven’t seen that David Wood video, Infidel–I’ll look for it.
I could have debunked that one myself. My cats often lie on whatever books I have been reading recently, including the Qur’an–also the Bible, Winston Churchill’s “The Gathering Storm”, and a couple of mysteries, just in the past couple of days.
Claiming they will not do so is absurd and easily disproven. Pretty lame “miracle” in any case, as David Wood notes.
Good summaries and perspicacious comments from GI, especially, “… whether it is “Islamophobic” to decry child rape”.
Answer: yes, it is ‘Islamophobic’, because Islam is an ‘HONOR/SHAME’ culture and the mere ‘mention’ of something that reduces the ‘PRESTIGE’, ‘IMAGE’ or ‘HONOR’ of Islam is per se ‘ISLAMOPHOBIC’. Only the PROMOTION or POLISHING of Islam’s ‘IMAGE’ is ‘HALAL’ or ‘PERMISSIBLE’.
Even TRUE-AND-ACCURATE comments about Islam are ‘HARAM’ (impermissible) if they REDUCE the PRESTIGE or IMAGE of Islam.
Do you understand ‘ISLAMOPHOBIA’ now???
You are welcome.
gravenimagesays
Yes–saying anything about Islam that is critical or even will be seen negatively by the Infidels is forbidden. But when Muslims are in full power there is no bar to bragging about the savagery of Islam.
The Taliban declaration is virtually meaningless, since it no doubt refers to the SHARIA LAW definition of ‘free’ which means no more than that a MUSLIM woman is not enslaved as property. The ownership of women under Islam is in terms of ‘imprisonment’. Women are the prisoners of men in Islam according to Mohammed. They are ‘domestic animals’.
Under Sharia, women do not have equal rights or privileges as Muslim men.
This type of ‘freedom’ is only a step or two above that of actual slaves in Islam. The Muslim woman is imprisoned.
– “Treat women well, for they are [like] domestic animals [awan] with you and do not possess anything for themselves. You have taken them only as a trust from God and you have made the enjoyment of their persons lawful by the word of God, so understand and listen to my words…Lay injunctions on women kindly, for they are PRISONERS with you having no control of their persons.” (Sirat Rasul Allah. Translated in English by A. Guillaume. First published by Oxford University Press, London in 1955)
gravenimagesays
Yes–and these injuctions to treat women kindly since they are virtual prisoners is mostly more recent. Islam itself has more to say about beating women than treating them with kindess. And there is, of course, nothing about treating women with respect.
Discover more from
Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.
mortimer says
A film about Islam and jihad which quotes Islam’s primary source texts, quotes its canonical authors and quotes modern university authorities on Islam is STILL ‘Islamophobic’, because Muslims DO NOT WISH non-Muslim kafirs to be INFORMED about jihad or about Islam’s SECRET TEACHINGS about world conquest.
In fact, Islam requires all Muslims to participate in Islam up to their own capacity to help the cause, whether by money, propaganda, political action or direct action to support jihadists and collaborate with them. Even though that is TRUE and ACCURATE, it still counts as ‘Islamophobic’, because Muslims don’t want kafirs to know how Islam works at the innermost level.
One of the most important parts of jihad is PROPAGANDA (also called ‘verbal jihad’). VERBAL JIHAD involves lying to non-Muslim kafirs about Islam and jihad in order to keep them complacent and unprepared to resist jihadic aggressions.
Verbal jihad is also called ‘TAQIYYA’ (sacred prevarication).
To comment on VERBAL JIHAD would also be called ‘ISLAMOPHOBIA’ because Muslims don’t want kafirs to know about VERBAL JIHAD (taqiyya).
mortimer says
Robert Spencer and David Wood both agree that IN SPITE of the fact that Allah says the Koran’s verses are CLEAR and EASY to understand, why do so many Muslims around the world MISUNDERSTAND Islam is exactly the SAME WAY? Namely, why do they believe that the Koran’s 164 jihad verses mean that Muslims should conduct jihad?
It is a constant PUZZLE to Western pseudo-journalists and politicians that Muslims take the 164 jihad verses LITERALLY (as calls for violence), rather than interpret them as calls for human rights and equality?
Devasur says
Conservatives are not up to the game that’s why they are losing all over the world. Let’s look into the propaganda of pseudo-liberals, for ex how pseudo-liberals redefine everything like who is a true Liberals/Christian/Hindu/Buddhists etc.
How they hail any non-Muslim supporting Islam as true Liberals/Christian/Hindus/Buddhists etc.
Whereas conservatives are not able to do the same. They are struggling to oppose the propaganda because the pseudo-liberals have taken over from media to universities.
It has become so worse that even some of the conservatives promote pseudo liberalism.
The only thing left for pseudo-liberals is to wipe out the remaining resistance coming from small groups.
After that is achieved nothing will stop them from completely taking over.
James Lincoln says
Devasur,
If the mainstream media / educational systems did not support the false narrative of the “pseudo-liberals”, Western civilization would not be in the fix that they are currently in…
Devasur says
Yes, but it is also the fault of conservatives. Who let them take over everything.
James Lincoln says
Good point – and I agree – Devasur.
mortimer says
Disagree with Devasur. That is oversimplifying. There are trends and swings in thought. This trend is a sweeping trend started by the Frankfurt School. It is extremely insidious like poison.
Relic says
“misunderstanding islam by quoting the h*ly qur’an”
matryoshka dolls
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_73NU6OlNuw
gravenimage says
The odd thing about “JIhad Rehab” is that the filmmaker is actually *sympathetic* to Jihad terrorists. More proof that no amount of appeasement is *ever* enough.
Glad that David Wood and his wife have recovered from Covid! So this is why the weekly coverage of Jihad hasn’t happened this past month.
Wow–hearing that Wood was debating a pious Muslim on whether it is “Islamophobic” to decry child rape jusdt minutes from where a Jihadist was taking Jews hostage at a Synagogue demanding the release of a another Jihad terrorists would be funny if it were not so grim.
Another thing that would be funny–some apologists for Islam claiming that the Jihad hostage situation at the Synagogue was actually done by Zionists in order to make Muslims look bad, while at the same time Al Qaeda (and his Muslim community in Blackburn) laud the Jihadist as a Martyr for taking Jews hostage and threatening to kill them.
Then we have another case of a victim who had been *working to settle Muslim refugees* sexually assaulted by one of them–a supposed poster boy for how lovely and grateful these same Muslims are. Maybe not so much…
Then a thousand miles or so from there another Afghan refugee was caught molesting *a three year old child*–and this fine fellow defended himself by noting that this sick stuff is part of his culture. Grimly, this is true…another reason not to import Muslims here.
One small thing I disgree with Spencer and Wood on–the idea that Muslims pretty much go nuts when external control threats under Shari’ah are removed. This might be true with things like drinking alcohol, but abusing Infidels and unattended children is *always* Halal–as one of the perps said, this is his culture.
It is *certainly* true, though, that morality is not taught in Islam at all.
Then we have a Muslim schoolteacher who wants to blow up shopping malls, and several Muslims terrorizing Infidels while holding the Qur’an, including in church. This is in fact canonical Islamic symbolism–the Qur’an and the sword (often updated these days to the Qur’an and Kalashnikov).
This is enormously common–especially with new converts. And why? Because new converts tend to be especially wedded to the teachings of their new faith. This is why converts to Judaism tend to be especially zealous about keeping Kosher, converts to Christianity are especially zealous about sharing that good news with everyone, and converts to Islam are especially apt to want to murder Infidels. These are just the core elements of the respective faiths.
Then, as much as pious Muslims hate Infidels in general, so many of them make an exception when it comes *to Hitler*. Very telling.
And wife beating rears its ugly head again–and why not? There is nothing so Islamic as this. Of course, women do not have the right to beat their husbands–let alone the idea that no one should have the right to beat their spouses.
And then there is “Honor Killing”–it is not just an extension of wife beating, but also that in so many Muslim countries these murders are not prosecuted, or at most receive very short sentences. And very important point about “disobedient” women not being considered practicing Muslims, and hence fair game for any brutalization, including murder.
And “blasphemy” laws are horrifying in places like Pakistan–and the efforts to impose these horrors here proceeds apace. And in places like Bangladesh victims cannot even file police reports for murder, if the victim is non-Muslim.
Then on the screen we find a cute cartoon of a Muslamah identified as “Leema” saying “Islam will submit D Wood someday”. Now, this may just be poor English–but I doubt it. Note that it doesn’t say that Wood will change his mind and decide to submit to Islam some day (highly unlikely, but not theoretically impossible). But turning to what it *does* say, of course, Islam itself has no power to make anyone submit to anything. So this is most likely a threat that her coreligionists will force Wood to submit–either by threatening him severely enough that he submits out of terror, or that they will simply murder him outright. After all, that is a type of forced submission to Islam as well.
Then, more terrorizing of churchgoers and murder of Christians and other Infidels, including 90-year-old victims.
There is more, of course–as there always is.
Grim subject, but good stuff as always from Robert Spencer and David Wood.
Infidel says
Yesterday, I stumbled upon Wood’s video ‘Cat walking on a Quran’, and that, as usual was hilarious. The coup de grace was when the same cat didn’t step on the bible, even though David scattered some catfood on it 😂
gravenimage says
I haven’t seen that David Wood video, Infidel–I’ll look for it.
gravenimage says
Hilarious, Infidel. That video is here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eSOWhIv5lq0&ab_channel=Acts17Apologetics
I could have debunked that one myself. My cats often lie on whatever books I have been reading recently, including the Qur’an–also the Bible, Winston Churchill’s “The Gathering Storm”, and a couple of mysteries, just in the past couple of days.
Claiming they will not do so is absurd and easily disproven. Pretty lame “miracle” in any case, as David Wood notes.
Infidel says
And this video has a sequel as well 😂 🤣
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBwvPJa0HPE
mortimer says
Good summaries and perspicacious comments from GI, especially, “… whether it is “Islamophobic” to decry child rape”.
Answer: yes, it is ‘Islamophobic’, because Islam is an ‘HONOR/SHAME’ culture and the mere ‘mention’ of something that reduces the ‘PRESTIGE’, ‘IMAGE’ or ‘HONOR’ of Islam is per se ‘ISLAMOPHOBIC’. Only the PROMOTION or POLISHING of Islam’s ‘IMAGE’ is ‘HALAL’ or ‘PERMISSIBLE’.
Even TRUE-AND-ACCURATE comments about Islam are ‘HARAM’ (impermissible) if they REDUCE the PRESTIGE or IMAGE of Islam.
Do you understand ‘ISLAMOPHOBIA’ now???
You are welcome.
gravenimage says
Yes–saying anything about Islam that is critical or even will be seen negatively by the Infidels is forbidden. But when Muslims are in full power there is no bar to bragging about the savagery of Islam.
somehistory says
OT
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/taliban-pleads-ignorance-as-2-foreign-journalists-detained-in-kabul/ar-
“Kabul — Two international journalists who were on an assignment for the United Nations refugee agency have been detained in the Afghan capital, ”
“Taliban declares women “free,” but nobody is celebrating “
mortimer says
The Taliban declaration is virtually meaningless, since it no doubt refers to the SHARIA LAW definition of ‘free’ which means no more than that a MUSLIM woman is not enslaved as property. The ownership of women under Islam is in terms of ‘imprisonment’. Women are the prisoners of men in Islam according to Mohammed. They are ‘domestic animals’.
Under Sharia, women do not have equal rights or privileges as Muslim men.
This type of ‘freedom’ is only a step or two above that of actual slaves in Islam. The Muslim woman is imprisoned.
– “Treat women well, for they are [like] domestic animals [awan] with you and do not possess anything for themselves. You have taken them only as a trust from God and you have made the enjoyment of their persons lawful by the word of God, so understand and listen to my words…Lay injunctions on women kindly, for they are PRISONERS with you having no control of their persons.” (Sirat Rasul Allah. Translated in English by A. Guillaume. First published by Oxford University Press, London in 1955)
gravenimage says
Yes–and these injuctions to treat women kindly since they are virtual prisoners is mostly more recent. Islam itself has more to say about beating women than treating them with kindess. And there is, of course, nothing about treating women with respect.