Well, sure. It isn’t as if Mohammad Raisuddin joined a group dedicated to opposing jihad violence and Sharia oppression of women. That would have been incriminating.
“Oath accepting ISIS Chief as Caliph of Muslims not incriminating: Bombay High Court grants bail to UAPA accused,” by Satyendra Wankhade, Bar and Bench, June 28, 2022 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
The Bombay High Court on Monday granted bail to Mohammad Raisuddin, a man arrested under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in 2016 for allegedly being linked to the Islamic State (ISIS). [Mohammad Raisuddin v. NIA & Ors]
According to Justices Revati Mohite Dere and VG Bisht, an oath allegedly signed by the applicant, which the prosecution said showed allegiance to a terrorist organisation, did not seem to be incriminating.
“Even a perusal of the Oath (Baith) allegedly written by the appellant, at the highest, appears to be a declaration of the acceptance of one Abi Bakar Al Baghdadi Al Hussaini Al Quraishi as the `Caliph’ of the Muslims. Prima-facie, a perusal of the said Oath (Baith) does not appear to be incriminating,” they held.
The appellant before the High Court sought quashing of a 2019 National Investigation Agency (NIA) Special Court order that rejected his bail application.
The prosecution relied on conversations that the appellant had with four others over threats to Islam, actions of the ISIS and other issues like beef ban, communal riots, injustice to Muslims in Palestine, etc. As per the witnesses’ accounts, the appellant would inspire them to work for Islam, referring to these incidents.
Special Public Prosecutor Aruna Kamath Pai opposed the appeal and asserted that no interference was required with the special court order, as there were prima facie serious allegations levelled against the appellant. She argued that delay in commencement of the trial was not a ground for enlarging the appellant on bail.
According to the appellant, there was no legitimate evidence to connect him with the alleged offence. His counsel denied that his client either wrote or signed the oath (Baith) pledging allegiance to the ISIS chief, on the basis of which he was arrested.
Since he had been in custody since 2016 and not one witness out of the 550 witnesses in the case had been examined, he claimed that the trial would likely take a long time to commence and thus prayed for grant of bail.
The Court noted that the prosecution, in its charge-sheet, had not produced allegedly incriminating WhatsApp chats that connected the accused with the offences….
Infidel says
India also needs to do a complete purge of its courts. A lot of people are holdovers from not just the Congress era, but even the Raj: India’s Attorney General K Venugopal is in his 90s, and studied when the Brits ran the place. Time to put him to pasture, and w/ him, an entire class of Nehruvian judges
gravenimage says
India: Bombay High Court grants bail to Muslim who swore oath of allegiance to ISIS: ‘not incriminating’
……………………..
Suicidal insanity. Sometimes India is as clueless about Jihad terror as is the West–and with even less excuse, since India has, sadly, had far more experience with it.
Devasur says
These are the Islamic judges who barge into every thing Hindu including in things in which they don’t have jurisdiction. While running away from anything Islamic and always been pro Islamic. These leftist scum judges need to be thrown in Indian border or in Islamic ghettos In India.
To make these scums understand the reality. Judiciary reform is need of the hour in India. Otherwise these scumbags will create another Pakistan.
Fitna says
India (and the West) must be absolutely ruthless towards Muslims in keeping them out of positions of power and other places where they can prove highly detrimental to their host nation.
They should also be punished ruthlessly (rather than the critics of Islam) and put deportation on the table for any crimes they commit.
The problem is that non-Muslims are doing exactly the wrong thing. They don’t want to inflame tensions by handing down harsh sentences, but Muslims see it for what it is, weakness, cowardice.
If you want Muslims to behave peacefully, then be very tough on them. If they step out of line, make them pay dearly. In time they will learn their place or they will be expelled or worse.
Muslims have proven over and over they only understand and respect force/power, anything else is an invitation to more aggression.
This should be obvious now esp. to Hindus who lived under 800 years of brutal Islamic rule and only took their country back a short while ago.
We also need strong unity among non-Muslims. Band together against Muslims, because that’s how they behave towards us.
joanofark06 says
Wether this “person” on this “high court” is pro-islam, or not, they just showed all muslims in that country, that they can continue advancing islam, in the way they see fit (aka, by satan’s bible, the koran).
I’ve been archiving/collecting all the horrors, that muslims are doing all over the world, and I got plenty to show that India, is pretty much finished, in regard to their Hindu religion. Needless to say, it’s very sad to watch. And to know that’s only one country out of many, that are falling to islam, is beyond horrifying. Watching islam advance around the world, country by country, is like watching a forest fire spreading so fast, and there’s not a soul out there, to help put it out!
But I believe I know what the reason is, of why this is happening. It has to do with prophecy, and the one word in this verse of Rev 20:4.