They will be out of prison very soon, and by then, what will have been done to disabuse them of their Islamic supremacism and willingness to become violent at perceived insults to Islam? Nothing whatsoever. Any such effort would be “Islamophobic.” If anything, they’ll come out of prison more dangerous than they were when they went in.
“Three men are sentenced to prison after the Easter riots in Linköping,” translated from “Tre män döms till fängelse efter påskupploppen i Linköping,” by Jennifer Snårbacka, Expressen, July 21, 2022:
Three men have been charged with gross sabotage against police operations after the violent riots in Linköping on April 17. The riots began after Rasmus Paludan, leader of the Danish far-right party Stram Kurs, announced that he would hold Koran burnings at the site.
He didn’t show up.
On Thursday, the verdict was handed down against the three men in the Linköping district court. They all threw stones at police officers or their vehicles and, according to the verdict, “acted out of a complete lack of respect for the work of the police.”
Four years in prison
21-year-old Moulham Abo Gamous was sentenced to four years in prison. According to the district court, he “threw a large number of stones at police vehicles and policemen on repeated occasions and at different locations in Skäggetorp.”He also “kicked a police vehicle, rushed with the crowd and made aggressive gestures towards the police.”
26-year-old Elvedin James Emini got three and a half years in prison. According to the verdict, Elvedin James Emini “was instigating by using gestures and calls to urge the crowd that the police managed to disperse to return.” He admitted that he was the one who was seen throwing stones in footage from the scene – but denied the crime.
Elvedin James Emini has stated in questioning that he “got angry when he was told by the police and saw ‘black,'” writes the district court.
A 19-year-old man was also sentenced to two years and six months in prison. According to the verdict, he masked himself and “on repeated occasions” threw stones at and kicked police vehicles.
All deny wrongdoing. The evidence includes plaintiff and witness interviews as well as film material from the scene. At least 25 police officers have stated that they were injured as a result of the riots in Linköping, of which two had to seek hospital treatment.
A month after the riots, a man in his 30s was sentenced to six months in prison for violent riot and attempted violence against an official during the riots in Rinkeby.
At the end of June, four men – Abdullahi Abdiwali Ibrahim, Hussein Al-Maliki, Hussain Kafarnawi and Ali Kafarnawi – were convicted of aggravated police sabotage after the riots in Sveaparken in Örebro. The prison sentences were between four and five and a half years, and the district court also decided that two of the men should be deported. The verdict has been appealed.
Earlier in July, another verdict was handed down against four other men after the incident in Sveaparken. The punishment was imprisonment for between two and six years.
somehistory says
Next report will be that they have been released early. It’s kind of strange that some were sentenced to longer terms than some terrorists and some rapists have been.
and, they were photographed, one admitted to it but said he didn’t “commit a crime.” If one cannot see…as in understand…that what was done was a “crime,” then that one should be deported back to a place where they can “see”…but they won’t be, not if things continue as they have been.
one look at their eyes…dead as a fish out of water for three days.
If this had been someone burning Bibles, only the one burning Bibles would have been at risk…of setting himself on fire by accident.
and as it was, no burning of the unholy filth that mozlums worship even occurred.
raja says
Somehistory,
These “holy warriors” will most likely be hero-worshiped by the mosques for doing what they did. That would absolutely negate what Sweden would intent to do. In other words, the laws of Sweden and other Western demos are grossly inadequate to deal with Islamic terror and sundry war mechanizations of islam. With the West it is all the more dicey as its people have lost the will to live or failed to understand the purpose of life.
somehistory says
raja, I’m afraid you are right. It’s funny, I don’t consider myself the smartest tool in the shed, but I can see this evil clearly for what it is, and that makes me recall what the Bible says, ”God chose the foolish things of the world to put the wise men to shame.”
I guess that’s why I can see it, but still not sure why the “wise” don’t see it too.
Devasur says
These savages will riot and destroy public property for the sake of creating fear within infidels. Yet these scums are supported by MSM and projected as very honest and good people whereas other immigrants like Hinus/Buddhists as evil.
Devasur says
Now, this become a routine, the media and govt will help non-Muslims to accept it as new normal.
Andrew Blackadder says
How come Im not shocked anymore by stories like this, and so I wonder is it because I have become numb or is it because its now so very very common to see and read such stories not only from Sweden but across Europe.
I wish somebody could explain to me what was wrong with the Old Sweden that caused that Government to destroy the entire country by bringing in a people of a different Race, value system,and a fascist religious belief.
Walter Sieruk says
First, that rioting Muslim did wrong for taking part in a riots over a Qu ‘ran burning in Sweden. For his action were wicked and as it’s been said “Evil is always looking for an excuse.
”
After all, the Marxists of BLM in American publicly burned Bibles. No Christians liked it, but Christians didn’t becomes violent over it.
Second, burning the Qu ‘ran isn’t the isn’t an intelligent way to handle the subject of Islam and its violent and deadly jihad. A better way to study and examine the Qu ‘ran and make known the errors and contradictions it contains.
For the very foundation of Islam is the Qu ‘ran, this leads to very important question: “Is the Qu ‘ran the Word of God or is it a fabrication of a man. Thus, is the Qu ‘ran the truth or a fiction and a hoax ?”
The answer is clearly given on pages 145 through 157 in THE ISLAMIC INVASION by Robert Morey in which he wrote a section on the Qu‘ran with its self-contradictions. Just two of the many he cited are the following “The Qu’ran differs on whether a day is a thousand years or fifty thousand years in God’s sight’ and “Who was first to believe? Abraham or Moses [Sura 6:14 versus 7:143]? The above is inconsistent and illogical. Further, Morey wrote about “The fact that Judaism and Christianity broke up into different sects was used in the Qu ‘ran to prove that they are not of God [Suras 30:20-32. 42:13, 14]. Yet Islam has broken up into many warring sects and therefore cannot be true if the Quran is right.”
Moreover, Morey in his book shows many more contradictions and absurdities in the Quran, there are and how Muhammad incorporated extra Biblical and Jewish folklore along with pre-Islamic Arabian myth and parts of Zoroastrian and Hindu stories into the Qu ‘ran.
Furthermore, the Muslims claim that “the Quran is the direct, literal word of God unmodified in any way by the Prophet who uttered them at the bidding of God.” In addition, in the book UNVEILING ISLAM by Ergun Mehmet Caner and Eethi Caner has shown that the Qu’ran was modified in the following account on pages 45. “Muhammad felt the need to improve on the words of Allah, since he changed Allah’s wisdom for his own on several occasions. A hadith tells of the nonchalant emendations of Muhammad:’
On a number of occasions he [a scribe] had, with the Prophet’s consent changed the closing words of verses. For example, when the prophet had said ‘God is mighty and wise ‘ Adbollah b. Abi Sarh suggested writing down ‘Knowing and wise’ and the Prophet answered that there was no objection. Having observed a succession of changes of this type, Adbollah renounced Islam on the grounds that revelations, if from God could not be changed at the prompting of a scribe such as himself. After his apostasy he went to Mecca and joined the Qorayshites.’ Other writers reveal that later Muhammad and his people did go war with the Qorayshites and he personally killed Abdollah. Obviously Abdollah knew too much and Muhammad wanted Abdollah’s knowledge to die with him.”
In conclusion, the Qu ‘ran is not only a fiction, it’s also a hoax.
Even though the above essay was posted before, it should now be added that the last statement of the above that “the Qu ‘ran is not only a fiction, it’s also a hoax.” To put this in a Biblical way. As in from the Bible, it may be truly explained that the Qu ‘ran is a deceptive work of “the cunning and craftiness of men in their deceitful scheming.” Ephesians 14:12.. [N.I.V.]
·
Keith O says
Every time I see a picture of one of Allah’s warriors, all I can see are dead eyes and a barely contained rage.
Even the garden variety mudslimes that I see on the street never look happy, never seem content and when I watch their interactions with the normal population there is always a sense of entitlement that makes the almost impossible to deal with,,,, until one of the locals puts the breaks on.
These turds need to be immediately deported back to whatever outer suburbs of hell they came from and refused entry to any other civilised nation.
Goofy says
“He admitted that he was the one who was seen throwing stones in footage from the scene – but denied the crime”.
This sounds illogical, but it is not. He admitted the facts but he cannot admit to a crime as he doesn’t accept Swedish law. For him only Shari’a is legitimate. I would not be surprised if he and his family consider himself a martyr!