New in PJ Media:
The facts at hand are about as revolting as they can possibly be. A married gay couple in metro Atlanta, William Dale Zulock, 32, and Zachary Jacoby Zulock, 35, is accused of using their two adopted boys in child porn films. The case raises numerous questions that will never be answered because no one will dare to raise them.
Atlanta’s WSB-TV reports that Bill and Zack are now “facing child sex crime charges for acts deputies say they committed against their adopted children.” Following a lead regarding the downloading of child pornography, the Walton County Sheriff’s Office raided the Zulocks’ home in Loganville, Ga., and questioned one of the Zulocks, although which one was not disclosed. The on-the-spot Zulock immediately crumbled under questioning and “admitted to collecting child porn.” He also “identified a second suspect in Oxford” who was “making the child porn with at least one child who lived in his home.”
Ultimately, both husbands were arrested, and Walton County’s Division of Family and Child Services intervened “to help protect the two children in the home,” although they’re obviously a bit late to protect them from the major trauma they have already gone through. For “after making sure the children were safe, investigators found evidence that the couple, who were the adoptive fathers of the pair of brothers living there, were recording themselves committing sexually abusive acts against the children.” According to the Walton County Sheriff’s Office, the adoptive fathers of the boys “were engaging in sexually abusive acts and video documenting this abuse.”
Both Zulocks are currently in Walton County Jail. They’re facing charges of “aggravated child molestation, sexual exploitation of a child and enticing a child for indecent purposes.” On top of all that, William Zulock “has an additional charge of child molestation.”
WSB adds that “the boys are now safe,” but that bland assessment doesn’t take into account the lasting effects of what they have suffered. Nor do the available news reports give any hint that this case will lead to any reassessment of how this happened in the first place, and of course it will not do so. That reliable advocate of every Leftist cause du jour, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), crowed in November 2021: “In the past, some states had laws banning LGBTQ people from becoming foster or adoptive parents. The last of these was struck down in 2016.”
Fulton v. the City of Philadelphia, a case about “whether Philadelphia could refuse to contract with a Roman Catholic adoption agency that says its religious beliefs prevent it from working with same-sex foster parents,” went all the way to the Supreme Court last year.
There is more. Read the rest here.
wpm says
If this was a tradition married -couple(tradition man and women) running a porn ring with children they legal adopted it would be all over the media .They would be alot of questions on the screening process ect.. That it is a gay couple the story is not covered in the MSM.In California they just passed a bill that makes having sex with someone up to 10 years age difference less of a crime especially if it same sex then it currently is So if a 22 year old man can have sex with a 13 year old boy will not be on a sexual offenders list when he get a shorter prison sentence(he would not be charged with rape of a minor) for his crime. In the new bill .It does not want to stigmatize offenders that the previous law on the books did might hurt their “employment ” or” housing opportunities ” after getting out of jail that is what the bill says among other things.
mortimer says
We were assured this sort of thing wouldn’t happen.
The frequency of pedophiles in the male population is less than 5%. That is no comfort to children who were abused.
This case is a horrifying breach of trust. The authorities who approved this couple will likely face no consequences.
Marshall Gill says
The frequency of homosexuality is also less than 5%. Your statement means that every single homosexual could statistically be also a pedophile. It isn’t a stretch to imagine that a person with one kind of sexual mental illness is susceptible to another.
bill says
Less than 5%. So why do we find a gay character or couple in almost every TV series and sitcom one watches, or should I say encounters?
James Hoagland says
After descending into moral depravity seems the conduct descends to even lower depths. At least to avoid contact with such creatures!
Marshall Gill says
In spite of their lies, this is what the homosexuals do. The pretense that there are normal, long term, monogamous homosexuals is without evidence. Anyone surprised by this is simply not paying attention.
Rarely says
It is what SOME homosexuals do. It is also what SOME heterosexuals do.
Horrible and despicable. Child sexual abuse seems to be at epidemic levels. Or is it just that the reporting has improved and it has always been so? I suspect that to be the case.
Infidel says
This is one of the biggest reasons that gay marriage should not have been legitimized by SCOTUS nor made the law of the land. After all, embedded in the concept of marriage is children – be it born or adopted. Once gay marriage was legitimized, gays could start adopting kids, and then subjecting them to their own sex-modes, since it was important to them that their kids also be gay
somehistory says
homosexuality is not normal…it is a perversion of the way people are made. to give kids over to people who have already demonstrated that they have a perverted way of seeing *relationships* is beyond comprehension.
Just because a group gets large enough to make a loud stink, calling others bigots and charging :discrimination” is not reason to put children in jeopardy. Yet, this is exactly what has happened.
It has also happened with those who murder the unborn….that is a perversion, also, but because some have gotten loud voices to argue for the *right* to murder children, this has been…and is still being…allowed.
homosexuality is not normal…it is perverted and children should not be put in harm’s way because homosexuals have gained a loud voice. This is just one case….but there are more.
And yes, those not homosexual abuse children in this way, but that is no reason nor is it an excuse for knowingly putting children with people such as this “couple”…
two husbands…how stupid! how twisted! sodom and gomorrah…known for this kind of thing, but the historical record does not call them “husbands.”
john smith says
I am a straight man myself but I have absolutely nothing against homosexuals or lesbians, if that’s the way they are made then so be it. What I am against is a child being brought up in such an environment. Both parents may be loving and kind towards the child, but that isn’t enough it’s the child’s feelings that should come first every time. Children are extremely sensitive from a very early age, and a child with two men as parents, is immediately going to learn that he or she is completely different from other children, in fact they could even feel ashamed of themselves, and for that reason I’m against it.
somehistory says
And you make a sound argument. the trouble today, no one in authority wants to listen to sound arguments and so children are at increasing risks. the authorities are either afraid of the loud voices, or they are of the loud voices. Many are in high government positions, and are bound and determined to keep their “cause” going, no matter who might be injured by it.
john smith says
Such an upbringing could have a long lasting effect on a child for the rest of their life. To be brought up by a gay couple is completely unnatural and flies in the face of anything normal, it could lead to all sorts of psychological problems for that poor kid.
Gays are thinking of themselves when they adopt a baby and no one else. Just imagine how confused that child is going to be, he or she is probably going to love their adoptive parents but at the same time just wishing they belonged to a normal family like everyone else.
Homosexual couples or lesbian couples should never be allowed to adopt, NEVER.
somehistory says
I agree. Everything that happens in a child’s life makes an impression for good or bad depending on what it is. A good father, a good mother, lots of parental love and seeing the parents love each other, all make for good emotional ties. anything abnormal, fighting parents, lack of the right kind of attention, etc. leaves emotional scars.
the child can sense that something is amiss from the get-go. Doctors have discovered that for the first five years of a child’s life, the mom is the most important person; from five on and for sometime,after, the father’s importance increases and this makes for a well-rounded childhood.
a baby with no mother or no father is going to turn out having problems, no matter how much the adoptive “parents” say otherwise. And, you are so right about the selfishness of the adults. It should be the child who is most important, and if that happened, they wouldn’t adopt a child in the first place.
john smith says
Just the thought of it to me is absolutely abhorrent. I can’t think of anything worse than a straight guy having to be brought up by a couple of bum-boys (sorry if I’ve offended anyone as I know you like to call yourselves “gays” these days) I would of hated it. I think maybe I could of hacked it being brought up by a couple of lezies but definitely not the other way around.
somehistory says
I can’t think of anything worse than being in a household with such as either …males with male or female with female. the entire thing just curdles my brain.
Something that is happening here, the cdc is not calling the carriers, spreaders, of monkeypox “homosexual” or their perverted use of “gay” even, but saying male with male, so that they can distance themselves from the whole “gay” thing. don’t want to offend them, you see. They haven’t done any lockdowns of them as yet…but have declared that the monkeypox is a national emergency…as if it’s just like the ‘rona.”
Rarely says
And especially since heterosexual couples are doing such a bang up job.
Might as well give the other 92 genders a chance to show what they can do in this terribly mixed up World. They could hardly do a worse job of it.
somehistory says
well, now, “rarely” you have hit upon the problem. You see it’s normal for a male and a female to get married and have children. that is the **only** normal way.
the *normal* thing is not perfect, so some *normal* couples who have children do a sorry job. but, since they are “innocent until proven” not to know what they are doing, or know and don’t care, or have evil intent, then it is nobody’s business unless they are found to be hurting the children….because it is **normal.** for them to produce the children.
However, the homosexuals cannot have children …because what they do is not normal and won’t lead to having children. Of course, there are some who fake it and get married and have kids with another person of the opposite sex, and then move on to show that they would rather not be *normal* and they may keep the children they had with the other person. Unless they are found to be hurting the child, they are treated the same way they would be if still faking it.
but, alas, the homosexual is not normal, cannot have kids of their own and so must get them in some other way. However, they have already shown that they are not normal, but have perverted ideas. It can clearly be a *right* of those who have kids to object to those with perverted ideas adopting. Because if they have perverted ideas about sex…shown by their choice of ‘partner;…then they have no clear grounds for claiming they have the best interests of any child at heart.
And all those other alphabet people are mentally ill and shouldn’t be adopting kids. If they have them naturally, that’s a different thing, but they should not be adopting.
Freeland_Dave says
Odd. Just yesterday someone in the LBGTQ+ community was telling me that LBGTQ+ did not embrace pediofilia.
Rarely says
I don’t believe it’s a requirement under their charter but, you know there’s always someone with other ideas.
Major Tom says
No surprise here……Could we expect anything less?