There is, of course, domestic violence in all cultures. So to post this is just “Islamophobic,” right? Wrong: there is domestic violence in all cultures, but only in one does it have divine sanction. Islam doesn’t teach that man may kill his wife, but once you’ve allowed him to beat her, accidents will happen.
The Qur’an teaches that men are superior to women and should beat those from whom they “fear disobedience”: “Men have authority over women because Allah has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them.” — Qur’an 4:34
Muhammad’s child bride, Aisha, says in a hadith that Muhammad “struck me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: ‘Did you think that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you?’” — Sahih Muslim 2127
An another hadith states: “Rifa`a divorced his wife whereupon `AbdurRahman bin Az-Zubair Al-Qurazi married her. `Aisha said that the lady (came), wearing a green veil (and complained to her (Aisha) of her husband and showed her a green spot on her skin caused by beating). It was the habit of ladies to support each other, so when Allah’s Messenger came, Aisha said, ‘I have not seen any woman suffering as much as the believing women. Look! Her skin is greener than her clothes!’” — Sahih Bukhari 7.77.5825
“In Front of Their Children: Man (49) Executes Wife († 32) with 30 Knife Strikes,” translated from “Vor den Augen Ihrer Kinder: Mann (49) Richtet Ehefrau (†32) mit 30 Messerstichen Hin,” Tag 24, August 24, 2022:
Kassel – A 49-year-old man has been sentenced to thirteen years in prison by the Kassel Regional Court for manslaughtering his wife.
The court saw it as proven that the man killed the 32-year-old with at least 30 stab wounds after a dispute in front of their five children between the ages of one and eleven.
With the decision, the court fell short of the demands of the public prosecutor’s office and the joint prosecutor, who had pleaded for aggravated manslaughter or murder. The judges did not consider murder criteria to be met. The presiding judge justified the decision by saying that it was an impulse act committed in emotional excitement.
The judge said the couple’s relationship was problematic. Even before the crime, the accused had become aggressive towards his wife. “But mostly because of the kids, she didn’t break up.” Nevertheless, in the course of the proceedings it became apparent that the picture was not as black as the prosecution had painted it.
The public prosecutor accused the accused of having acted out of base motives. According to the information, the Iraqis are said to have lived strictly according to Muslim principles. According to the public prosecutor’s office, however, his wife maintained a modern lifestyle and wanted a separation.
He understood that as a “defamation”. According to the presiding judge, the image of the Muslim living according to strict religious rules was not confirmed.
Possible motive for murder? Wife rejected her husband’s Muslim principles
The character of the man is still special. “The defendant is an impulsive person prone to aggression,” he said. He is credited with the fact that he has no criminal record, has not attempted to escape and has neither covered up nor denied the crime. At the start of the trial, the accused had testified that he could remember the arguments with his wife, but not the act itself.The Iraqi was also sentenced to pay survivor’s benefits of €20,000 each to his five children. The judgment is not final, an appeal is possible.
PMK says
Muslins who want to live by ‘strict religious rules’ should live in dar-al–Islam. Leave the West (and the rest of the modern world) in peace.
somehistory says
Looks like the Germans are going to have to rid their country of knives. It seems that would be easier than getting rid of the mozlums who are murdering their wives in front of their little children….and getting some “judge’ to see what justice means.
the “judge” is as bad as the murderer…13 years for “manslaughtering” and he was “emotional” and “excited.” so, what is the excuse of the idiot ‘presiding judge’?
The murderer should be deep-sixed. His kids will probably never see a penny of the money he owes them.
Gary Fouse says
Another absurd legal decision in Europe. What, did the judges doubt that the victim was dead?
Walter Sieruk says
The message is so very important that it needs to be reiterated.
This message is that this not an isolated incident when a Muslim husband or father viciously harms or murders his wife or daughter because he disobeyed him. The malicious evil had been explained by the scholar of Islam, Brigitte Gabriel, who in her book entitled THEY MUST BE STOPPED in which on page 171 she informs the reader that “Control of behavior and disregard for human life are key elements in Islamic ideology.
Further , on the very next page it also reads “Women in Islam are considered unclean , deemed inferior even to dirt.”